Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

OS16 - 6.G5.c Antigen-Detection ELISA Performance VS Virus Evolution - V. Mioulet

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 4 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

More from EuFMD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

OS16 - 6.G5.c Antigen-Detection ELISA Performance VS Virus Evolution - V. Mioulet

  1. 1. www.pirbright.ac.ukThe Pirbright Institute receives strategic funding from BBSRC. Antigen-detection ELISA performance versus virus evolution V.Mioulet, A.Morris, B.Wood, B.Thapa, A.Gray, L.Henry, N.J.Knowles, J.Wadsworth, D.P.King
  2. 2. WHY? v Serotyping done using pAg-ELISA v In the last few years this test failed to serotype a number of samples v Is there a pattern? v Samples logged and sets identified O A C SAT 1 SAT 2 SAT 3 ASIA 1 SVDV Ctrls
  3. 3. EXAMPLE: O/CATHAY % No issues in serotyping using polyclonal Ag-ELISA Low to borderline OD values on standard Ag-ELISA / Confirmation may have been required using the integrin-mAb ELISA Additional ELISA required for determination of serotype
  4. 4. v Best practice to not rely on a single test for serotyping v Tests in use should be subjected to ongoing validation against circulating field strains v Highlights the importance of ongoing work to develop and validate new assays and reagents to detect current circulating strains of FMDV CONCLUSIONS

×