Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

OS16 - 4.P2.d No Heterologous Protection with FMD SAT2 SAU Vaccine Against SAT2 BOT Challenge - A. Dekker

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 10 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

More from EuFMD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

OS16 - 4.P2.d No Heterologous Protection with FMD SAT2 SAU Vaccine Against SAT2 BOT Challenge - A. Dekker

  1. 1. No heterologous protection with SAT2 SAU Against SAT2 BOT challenge A. Dekker, L. Mouton, M. Blanchet, M. Bleijenberg, J. Coco-Martin, P. Hudelet, S. Goutebroze
  2. 2. Background  Type A reasonable to good heterologous protection ● Even when r-values are low ● Even with reasonable genetic distance  Very limited information on SAT2 vaccine  Can high quality SAT2 vaccine also provide cross- protection against heterologous challenge 2
  3. 3. 2 PD50 8 PD50 Type A good protection even with low r- value or high genetic distance (VP1 in red) 3 r1 = 0.09 r1 = 0.04 r1 = 0.1 r1 = 0.23 r1 = 0.12r1 = 0.1 0 0.21 0.18 0.52 0 0.26 0.60 0 0.54 0 14 PD50 >32 PD50 >32 PD50 >32 PD50 14 PD50 19 PD50 11 PD50 4 PD506 PD503 PD50 11 PD50
  4. 4. Kimura genetic distance VP1  Type A: genetic distance 0.18 to 0.54 ● Reasonable to good protection  Type SAT2: genetic distance SAT2 SAU and BOT 0.40 ● No information yet ● No r1-values available yet 4
  5. 5. Materials and methods  Vaccines ● SAT2 SAU emergency vaccine  Challenge virus ● SAT2 SAU cattle challenge virus (3 times) ● SAT2 BOT cattle challenge virus (1 time)  European Pharmacopoeia potency test ● 3 – 4 groups of vaccinated cattle (5 cattle/group) ● Full, 1/4 , 1/16, (1/64) dose ● 2 controls 5
  6. 6. Challenge results (SAT2 SAU vaccine) 3 homologous potency test (94 PD50/dose) 1 heterologous potency test (0.8 PD50/dose) 6
  7. 7. Statistical analysis  Linear regression ● Strong relation between Ab response and vaccine dose ● 10 times more vaccine  4 times higher antibody titre  Generalised linear regression ● Binomial with logistic link function ● Challenge strain best predictor of protection ● Antibody response very strong predictor of protection 7
  8. 8. Relation Ab response and protection 8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 SAT2 SAU titre at challenge (log) protection SAT2 SAU challenge SAT2 BOT challenge
  9. 9. Conclusion  SAT2 SAU vaccine is a very good vaccine bank strain ● 94 PD50/dose against homologous challenge  Antibody response very strong predictor of protection ● For heterologous SAT2 BOT challenge 1 log higher Ab titre needed  r-values of SAT2 SAU and SAT2 BOT should be determined  Vaccine banks should include more than 1 SAT2 strain ● More data on circulating strains is necessary 9
  10. 10. Thank you for your attention Good vaccines can induce heterologous protection, but it can fail (FMD vaccine banks should test their vaccines!) 10

Editor's Notes

  • A22 0.0000 0.2070 0.1804 0.5234 0.0000
    A24 Cruzei 0.2070 0.0000 0.2593 0.5970 0.2070
    A/IRN/96 0.1804 0.2593 0.0000 0.5429 0.1804
    A/IRN/99 0.5234 0.5970 0.5429 0.0000 0.5234

×