Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

OS16 - 4.P2.c Efficacy of a FMD Inactivated Vaccine (Aftovaxpur DOE), Administered at a 1ml Dose to Sheep - C. Hamers

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 30 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to OS16 - 4.P2.c Efficacy of a FMD Inactivated Vaccine (Aftovaxpur DOE), Administered at a 1ml Dose to Sheep - C. Hamers (20)

Advertisement

More from EuFMD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

OS16 - 4.P2.c Efficacy of a FMD Inactivated Vaccine (Aftovaxpur DOE), Administered at a 1ml Dose to Sheep - C. Hamers

  1. 1. Efficacy of a Foot-and-Mouth Disease inactivated vaccine (AFTOVAXPUR DOE), administered at a 1 mL dose to sheep Claude Hamers
  2. 2. Efficacy of a Foot-and-Mouth Disease inactivated vaccine (AFTOVAXPUR DOE), administered at a 1 mL dose to sheep Claude Hamers
  3. 3. • In field practice, FMD vaccines are frequently administered to sheep at half the dose recommended for cattle • Main reasons for this practice: i) a lower susceptibility of sheep to FMD infection ii) the relative vaccine cost as compared to the value of a sheep • Study to compare vaccination of sheep with an AFTOVAXPUR DOE vaccine ᴑ 1 mL (half dose) ᴑ 2 mL (full dose) Introduction = registered claim
  4. 4. • Animals : 30 ewes, 1 year olds, Texel breed, randomly allocated to 3 groups in high containment throughout the study • Vaccine : AFTOVAXPUR DOE trivalent, formulated at low antigen content O Manisa, A22 Iraq, SAT2 Sau Study design
  5. 5. G1 (1 mL vaccinated) G2 (controls) G3 (2 mL vaccinated) Study design
  6. 6. G1 (1 mL vaccinated) G2 (controls) G3 (2 mL vaccinated) Study design
  7. 7. G1 (1 mL vaccinated) G3 (2 mL vaccinated) Study design
  8. 8. G1 (1 mL vaccinated) G3 (2 mL vaccinated) Study design
  9. 9. Study design Immunisation serum sample  Comparisons of G1 and G3 on serological responses 7 days
  10. 10. Study design Immunisation serum sample 7 days
  11. 11. Study design Immunisation challenge serum sample clinic + temp. FMD lesions blood for virology FMDv O Manisa
  12. 12. Results : serology
  13. 13. Results : serology VNT to FMD A22 Iraq D28 VNT in G1 statistically non inferior to D28 VNT in G3
  14. 14. Results : serology VNT to FMD SAT2 D28 VNT in G1 statistically non inferior to D28 VNT in G3
  15. 15. Results : serology VNT to FMD O Manisa D28 VNT in G1 statistically inferior to D28 VNT in G3 G1 & G2
  16. 16. Results : O1 Manisa challenge Intercurrent Footrot infection during the immunization phase
  17. 17. Results : O1 Manisa challenge Rectal temperatures
  18. 18. Results : O1 Manisa challenge General Clinical Signs Controls (G2) • every animal presented polypnea and lameness between D29 and D31 • frequently accompanied or preceded by a reduced feed intake Vaccinates (G1) • none of the vaccinates ever presented any general clinical sign
  19. 19. non specific feet lesions (footrot suspected) G1 (1 mL Vaccinated) G2 (Controls) G3 (2 mL Vaccinated) Group No feet lesions Typical FMD feet lesions 5 32 Number of sheep with (10 sheep per group) 0 110 6 40 Results : O1 Manisa challenge Feet lesions G3 was not challenged !
  20. 20. Results : O1 Manisa challenge Viraemia G1 G2 Box-and-Whisker Plot 0 1 2 3 4 5 LogAUCviraemia Group
  21. 21. Results : O1 Manisa challenge G1 (1 mL vaccinated) G2 (controls)
  22. 22. Results : O1 Manisa challenge G1 (1 mL vaccinated) G2 (controls)
  23. 23. The study results demonstrated : • Serological equivalence with a 2 mL dose (A22 Iraq, SAT2 Sau) • Clinical and virological protections against a virulent challenge (O Manisa) . Conclusions
  24. 24. WBR : A. Dekker, M. Bleijenberg Merial B.V. : B. Van Schaijk, J. Coco-Martin Merial S.A.S.: L. Mouton, M. Besset, M. Curet, S. Goutebroze And Technical Staff from the WBR Animal Facilities and MERIAL R&D Lelystad Laboratories . Acknowledgements
  25. 25. Thank you
  26. 26. Thank you
  27. 27. Thank you
  28. 28. Thank you
  29. 29. Thank you
  30. 30. Thank you

×