Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

OS16 - 4.P1.f EU Authorisation of Novel Vaccines - M. Ilott

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 18 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to OS16 - 4.P1.f EU Authorisation of Novel Vaccines - M. Ilott (20)

Advertisement

More from EuFMD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

OS16 - 4.P1.f EU Authorisation of Novel Vaccines - M. Ilott

  1. 1. An agency of the European Union Marketing Authorisation requirements for a live recombinant (GMO) veterinary vaccine for Foot-and-Mouth disease in the European Union Immunological Veterinary Medicinal Products (IVMPs) EuFMD Meeting Cascais, Portugal 27 October 2016 Presented by Martin Ilott on 27 October 2016 Department of Veterinary Medicines at the European Medicines Agency (EMA), London, UK
  2. 2. EMA in the EU • >500m people • ~27% of global pharmaceutical sales* • 28 MS • 24 official languages • ~50 medicines regulatory authorities • 1 EMA The European Medicines Agency1
  3. 3. 2 The European Medicines Agency Who are we? • established in 1995 • 7 Committees • 975 positive opinions for human medicines since 1995 • ~840 staff from 28 EU Member States • 24 official languages Over 200 veterinary products Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products One member for each of the 28 Member States plus one alternate 5 co-opted experts Chair: David Murphy
  4. 4. 3
  5. 5. 4 Live Recombinant (GMO) vet vaccines authorised by the EMA Product Name Authorisation Date Purevax Rabies 18/02/2011 Porte West Nile 5/08/2011 Nobivac Myxo-RHD 07/09/2011 Poulvac E. coli 15/06/2012 Oncept IL-2 03/05/2013 Bovela 22/12/2014 Suvaxyn CSF Marker 10/02/2015 Innovax-ILT 03/07/2015 Vectormune ND 08/09/2015 Product Name Authorisation Date Suvaxyn Aujeszky 783 + O/W 07/08/1998 Purevax FeLV 13/04/2000 Vaxxitek HVT+IBD 9/08/2002 ProteqFlu 6/03/2003 ProteqFlu-Te 6/03/2003 Equilis StrepE 07/05/2004 Purevax RCP FeLV 23/02/2005 Purevax RCPCh FeLV 23/02/2005 Hiprabovis IBR Marker Live 27/01/2011
  6. 6. Regulatory requirements defined by intended claims on the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) 5 “Does what it says On the Tin” • Indications for use? • Prevention/reduction of infection, clinical signs or lesions • Improved production (daily growth and feed conversion) or reproductive performance • Prevent or reduce transmission • Influence of maternally (naturally) derived antibody MDA • Target species? • Cattle, sheep, pigs, goats, buffalo etc. • Route of administration? • Intramuscular or subcutaneous or oral • Use during pregnancy?
  7. 7. Regulatory requirements defined by intended claims on the SPC 6 “Does what it says On the Tin” • Fixed formulation or flexible combinations of strains formulated to match the epidemiological situation at the time of need? • Monovalent or multi-valent product? • Dose volume and vaccination schedule? • Minimum age for vaccination • Primary & Booster dose recommendations? • Immunological properties? • DIVA claim • Interactions with other medicinal products? • Combined or Associated use
  8. 8. EU Regulations and Directives for authorisation of a live recombinant veterinary vaccine • EU Regulation:(EC) No 726/2004 Establishing the European Medicines Agency • Recombinant DNA technology (compulsory) • Vaccines for Community prophylactic measures i.e. FMD, BTV, AI (optional) • EU Directive (2001/82/EC) including Technical Annex (2009/9) • Legal, Procedural & Technical requirements relating to veterinary medicinal products • EU GMO Directives (2001/18/EC): deliberate release of GMOs into the environment • EU Regulation:(EC) No 470/2009 & No 37/2010 • Establishment of residue limits of active substances for food producing animals 7
  9. 9. • European Pharmacopoeia • FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE (RUMINANTS) VACCINE (INACTIVATED) 01/2015:0063 • VACCINES FOR VETERINARY USE (04/2013: 0062), • EVALUATION OF SAFETY & EFFICACY OF VETERINARY VACCINES (5.2.6 & 5.2.7) • CVMP Guidelines • Data requirements for multi-strain dossiers for inactivated vaccines against foot-and- mouth disease (FMD) EMA/CVMP/IWP/105506/2007 • Requirements for the production & control of IVMPs EMA/CVMP/IWP/206555/2010 • Live recombinant vector vaccines for veterinary use EMEA/CVMP/004/04 • CVMP Position papers • Requirements for vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease EMA/CVMP/775/02 8 Technical requirements for a recombinant FMD vaccine
  10. 10. 9 • Organism: any biological entity capable of replication or transferring genetic material • GMO: an organism, with the exception of human beings, in which the genetic material has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination • 2001/18/EC: deliberate release of a GMO into the environment requires notification to the GMO Competent Authority in the MS e.g. field trial with a GMO vaccine • Notification requirements (Annex IIIA & IV) • Environmental risk assessment (ERA) (Annex II) • Under 2001/82 notification to the designated GMO CAs is waived • 726/2004 (Rec 36) & Dir 2001/82/EC Part 3.E Assessment for GMOs • Data should be in accordance with 2001/18/EC (Art 2 & Annexes) • See NTA Vol 6C (currently refers to II.H rather than 3.E) Genetically modified organism (GMO) 2001/18/EC
  11. 11. Consultation with environmental Competent Authorities (CAs) for Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) 10 Application for veterinary vaccine GMO CA GMO CA GMO CA EMA - Confidentiality agreements - sends “ERA extract” of (Co-)Rap ERA sections Part IIIE to GMO CAs - Forward overview of comments to rapporteurs CVMP (Co-)Rap ERA assessment
  12. 12. 11 • The objective of an ERA is, on a case by case basis, to identify and evaluate potential adverse effects of the GMO, either direct or indirect, immediate or delayed, on human and the environment (including animal health) • The ERA should be conducted with a view to evaluating if there is a need for risk management, and if so, the most appropriate methods to be used. • ERA and environmental risk management particulars should be kept under continuous review after the granting of an MA • When submitting a variation to the terms of the MA, the marketing authorisation holder should consider any possible impact on the ERA. • Guidance on how to approach an ERA Commission Decision 2002/623/EC Objectives of the Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA)
  13. 13. Safety study requirements for a live recombinant FMD vaccine Safety for each target species, by each recommended route of administration using the maximum titre from production. To GLP standards. • Laboratory safety of a single dose & 10x overdose • Each category including minimum age: 8 animals per group, 14 day study • Observe local & systemic effects and macroscopic & microscopic lesions at the injection site • Laboratory safety of a repeat dose: • If primary schedule is greater than one dose and/or booster dose required • Laboratory safety of reproductive performance: • 8 animals in each trimester (24 for each species and route) plus examination of progeny • Field Studies • if justified, results from laboratory studies do not need to be supplemented with field studies • EMA authorised multi-strain FMD vaccine included no EU field studies12
  14. 14. • Specific laboratory safety studies for live vaccines & especially relevant for the ERA • Spread of the vaccine strain • Master Seed and the recommended route most likely to lead to spread • Spread of the vaccine strain from vaccinated to unvaccinated target animals • Spread to non-target animals • Dissemination in the vaccinated animal • Faeces, urine, milk, eggs, oral, nasal and other secretions for the virus • Dissemination of the vaccine strain in the body, especially predilection sites • Reversion to virulence • Master seed & the recommended route most likely to lead to reversion. • Serial passage in 4 groups of 2 animals. Final passage in 8 animals • Repeat passage in 10 animals if recovery unsuccessful13 Safety of a live recombinant FMD vaccine (cont.)
  15. 15. Efficacy of a live recombinant FMD vaccine • Efficacy for each target species, by each recommended route of administration using the proposed schedule of administration for each component. • Studies using minimum titre in minimum age animals. Challenge strain? • Onset of immunity • Immunogenicity test in cattle in accordance with Ph.Eur 0063 challenged at 21 days? • PD50 challenge test with 17 cattle using graded doses • Percentage of protection against generalised foot infection using 18 animals with single dose • Established or justified models for sheep, pigs, goats etc.? OIE manual • Duration of immunity • Challenge or serum neutralising antibodies is correlation with protection established • Efficacy of a booster dose • MDA studies may be relevant with a vaccination to live policy14
  16. 16. EMA routes for advice on developing novel veterinary vaccines Overview of authorisation systems in the European Union15 • Innovation Task Force (ITF) • Fostering development of veterinary medicines • ITF is a multidisciplinary group that includes scientific, regulatory and legal experts • To apply for a briefing meeting, complete the request form and return it to vet.applications@ema.europa.eu • Scientific Advice Procedure Article 56(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 • Scientific advice on the appropriate tests and studies in the development of a veterinary medicine. • “Guidance for companies requesting scientific advice” EMEA/CVMP/172329/2004-Rev. 4 • Scientific Advice Working Party of experts providing advice to CVMP http://www.ema.europa.eu • If you seek further information on any of the included topics and/or want to apply for a scientific advice pre-submission meeting please contact: VetScientificAdvice@ema.europa.eu
  17. 17. Thank you for your attention martin.ilott@ema.europa.eu European Medicines Agency 30 Churchill Place • Canary Wharf • London E14 5EU • United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact Further information Follow us on @EMA_News

Editor's Notes

  • Good morning I would like to thank EUFMD to give a EU regulatory talk on Marketing Authorisation requirments in the EU
    Regulatory talk at a scientific meeting
    To gain an EU Marketing Authorisation to commericlaise a veteirnary vaccines
    Vaccines are important tools for protecting animal health and welfare. Aside from
    significant financial investment, the development of a vaccine for a new virus or a
    new serotype of an existing virus is technically complex taking 5 to 7 years with
    authorisation taking 1.5 to 3 years.
  • Setting the scene …

    EMA serves a market of over 500 million people living in the European Union;
    EMA protects public and animal health in 28 Member States (+ EEA countries) by ensuring that all medicines available on the EU market are safe, effective and of high quality;

    The medicines EMA recommends for marketing authorisation account for 27% of global pharmaceutical sales.
    Formed in 1995

  • EMA is a scientific body;
    It is a decentralised agency of the European Union established in 1995 to evaluate medicines for use in people and animals in the EU;
    EMA brings together the best scientific expertise on medicines from across the whole of the EU;
    EMA works with seven scientific committees who evaluate medicines along their life cycle from early stages of development, through marketing authorisation to the safety monitoring once they are on the market; the committees are supported by 28 working parties;
    All of this is underpinned by a network of over 4000 scientific experts who are made available to EMA by the national competent authorities (more about the network in the next slide). At EMA’s London headquarters, there are around 890 staff members; EMA staff help to support, coordinate and facilitate the work of the committees;
    Since 1995, EMA has recommended over 1000 medicines for marketing authorisation in the EU;
    EMA is a guardian of public health in the EU.
  • Wanted to start the talk reflecting on some of the issues surrounding MAs in the EU
    IFAH the bodt that rperesents the veteirneary pharmaceuticla industry states that it takes 5-7 years to develop a vacicne for the Eu market an dcan take betwene 1-5 to 3 years to complete the reguatory steps for authorisation. Therfore it pays to undertand the requiremtns and seek scientfic advice on areas of uncertianlty. It is also important to
  • 20 recombinant vacicnes for food producing and companion animals
    3 authorisied in 2015
    A CSF-BVDV recombinat for pigsLive Recombinant E2 gene deleted Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus
    containing Classical Swine Fever E2 (CP7_E2alf) 104.8* to 106.5 TCID**50
    Innovax ILT for Mareks disease and ILT in poultry For active immunisation of one-day-old chicks to reduce mortality, clinical signs and lesions due to infection with avian infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) virus and Marek’s disease (MD) virusCell-associated live recombinant turkey herpesvirus (strain HVT/ILT-138), expressing theglycoproteins gD and gI of infectious laryngotracheitis virus:
    Cell-associated live recombinant turkey herpes virus (rHVT/ND) expressing the fusion protein of Newcastle diseases virus D-26 lentogenic strain
    And also a postive opinion for the first DNA vaccine
    But is the vaccinated Fish a GMO
  • When developing a product it is important to defined what is the intended marketing strategy for the product as this will define the number and extend of the safety and efficacy studies to
    SPC which are a description of a medicinal product’s properties and the conditions attached to its use.
    I don’t intend to touch on quality or manufacturing issues for this presentation but fro a EU regulatory perspective its critical that the batches you use in your studies are representative of the production process

  • Adenoviruses (members of the family Adenoviridae) are medium-sized (90–100 nm), nonenveloped (without an outer lipid bilayer) viruses with an icosahedral nucleocapsid containing a double stranded DNA genome. Their name derives from their initial isolation from human adenoids in 1953. They have a broad range of vertebrate hosts; in humans, more than 50 distinct adenoviral serotypes have been found to cause a wide range of illnesses, from mild respiratory infections in young children (known as the common cold) to life-threatening multi-organ disease in people with a weakened immune system.
    Some adenoviruses under specialized conditions can transform cells using their early gene products. E1A (binds Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein) has been found to immortalize primary cells in vitro allowing E1B (binds p53 tumor suppressor) to assist and stably transform the cells. Nevertheless, they are reliant upon each other to successfully transform the host cell and form tumors
  • The European Pharmacopoeia is a single reference work for the quality control of medicines in the signatory states of the Convention on its elaborationEuropean Union Directives 2001/82/EC, 2001/83/EC, and 2003/63/EC, as amended, on medicines for human and veterinary use. These maintain the mandatory character of European Pharmacopoeia monographs when requesting marketing authorisation (MA).
  • Terefore it is important to note that for an FMD vaccine that wasn’t subject to any field trials the EMA would be lead agency defining whether it was a GMO and
  • *flora and fauna, soil fertility, soil degradation of organic material, the feed/ food chain, biological diversity, animal health and resistance problems in relation to antibiotics.
    Hazard identification, assessment of the likelihood, assessment of exposure, assessment of the level of risk, selection of control measures
  • Once released, the GMO, depending on its nature and on the nature of the receiving environment,
    may, in any combination:
    • Spread.
    • Undergo genetic or phenotypic change.
    • Compete with existing species.
    • Infect tissue.
    • Remain latent.
    • Reproduce.
    • Transfer genetic material to other micro-organisms.
    • Transfer genetic material to human beings, or animal or plant species.
    • Degrade.
  • Consider the receptors for the recipient vector and donor and justify the approach
    Spread - how?
  • Note: This slide is OPTIONAL. It uses the 'Closing slide' layout. Delete if not needed.

×