Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

OS16 - 3.2.c Sero-Epidemiological Study of FMD in Livestock in West Libya - A. S. Dayhum

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 14 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to OS16 - 3.2.c Sero-Epidemiological Study of FMD in Livestock in West Libya - A. S. Dayhum (20)

More from EuFMD (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

OS16 - 3.2.c Sero-Epidemiological Study of FMD in Livestock in West Libya - A. S. Dayhum

  1. 1. Open Session of the EuFMD - Cascais –Portugal 26-28 October 2016 Sero-epidemiologic study on Foot-and-Mouth Disease in livestock in West Libya Symaia M. AbdulJawad1, Hiyam M. Zegallai1, Emad M. Bennour2, Ibrahim M. Eldaghay2, Fabrizio Rosso3, Chris J. M. Bartels3 and Abdunaser S. Dayhum2 1 NaGonal Center of Animal Health, P. O. Box 121, Zawia, Libya 2 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli, P. O. Box 13662, Tripoli, Libya. 3 EUFMD1 European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Food and Agriculture OrganisaGon, Rome, Italy
  2. 2. Study objecIves and results •  For two areas in North-west Libya (Zliten and Tripoli) in small and large ruminants – to determine the NSP-Ab sero-prevalence for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) – to idenIfy the putaIve risk factors associated with FMD infecIon. •  Two master degree: –  Serological Survey for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) in Livestock Animals in Zliten Region – Libya by Symaia M. AbdulJawad –  SEROEPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN SHEEP, GOATS AND CATTLE IN TRIPOLI REGION, LIBYA by Hiyam M. Zegallai
  3. 3. ObjecIves and study design •  Study objecIve –  To acquire a beTer understanding of the epidemiology of FMD virus circulaIon in large and small ruminants with regard to Prevalence and putaIve Risk factors –  To support the risk-based strategy for FMD control in Libya •  Study area –  Two areas in West Libya (Zliten (25) and Tripoli (22)) –  Cross-secIonal sero-survey –  Small ruminants and large ruminants
  4. 4. FMD in Libya IntroducIon of •  FMD SAT 2 in 2012 •  FMD O – EA3 unnamed in 2012 •  FMD O – Ind-2001d in 2013 Current poliIcal situaIon makes it hard to receive noIficaIons and samples
  5. 5. Livestock producIon in Libya •  Large ruminants: 156.000 heads of caTle, mainly dairy and around large ciIes •  Small ruminants: 6.360.000 heads with –  30% of owners trading mainly around larger ciIes –  70% tradiIonal livestock owners – grazing their stock Small ruminants – value chain Breeding farms (70%) 10% Slaughterhouses Meat shops Import Animal Market 20% Consumers Fattening farms (30%) 70% Butchers Restaurants People involved: Veterinarians Dealers Veterinarians Traders Workers Workers Raw leather producers Feed suppliers Workers Manure distributors Traders/dealers Wool buyers
  6. 6. •  1800 km coast line •  4400 km border lines (Egypt, Sudan, Chad, iger, Algeria, Tunesia) Animal movement across Libya
  7. 7. CollaboraIon EuFMD 2014 •  Developing a Risk-based Strategy Plan – PCP-FMD Stage 1 –  IdenIficaIon of risk hotspots –  IdenIficaIon of gaps and needs –  Risk prioriIzaIon and risk pathways –  DefiniIon of strategic objecIves and tacIcs
  8. 8. Context of present study •  Work of student as part of Master studies –  Nearby Tripoli –  Animal dense locaIon •  56.000 dairy caTle •  700.000 small ruminants •  Mixed farming pracIces •  Previous work was part of a collaboraIon with IZSLER in 2012-2014 –  InvesIgaIon of FMD outbreaks –  Immune response in vaccinated animals –  Level of FMD virus circulaIon (NSP-Ab)
  9. 9. Study design •  CaTle sampled: –  91 herds (10% of herds) –  Maximum 5 heads sampled –  Total 435 heads of caTle •  Small ruminants –  34 flocks with >= 100 heads (10% of flocks) –  48 samples per flock by age-categories (< 12 months, 12-23 months, >= 24 months) –  Total 1590 heads •  QuesIonnaire with farmers on putaIve risk factors –  Management pracIces –  LocaIon –  Species •  Samples tested for NSP-Ab against FMD –  PrioCHECK® FMDV NS •  StaIsIcal analysis –  Poisson regression analysis for risk factors at herd/flock level
  10. 10. Study results – NSP-Ab seroposiIvity •  Herd level –  25 out of 91 had no NSP-Ab + caTle –  8 out of 91 had all 5 caTle NSP-Ab + •  Individual level –  37% (95% CI: 32 – 41) Figure 1 Histogram of number of FMD positive test results in cattle Figure 2 Histogram of number of FMD positive test results in small ruminants Cattle Small ruminants •  Flock level –  1 out of 34 had no NSP-Ab + SR –  Mean number NSP-Ab + was 7.4 heads –  Median NSP-Ab + was 5 heads •  Individual level –  16% (95% CI: 15 – 18)
  11. 11. AssociaIon between NSP-Ab and animal-related factors CaTle •  Age: CaTle older than 12 months were 2-Imes more likely to test NSP-Ab posiIve compared with caTle younger than 12 months Small ruminants •  Over 12 months of age: OR = 1.8 (1.2-3.5) •  Goats versus sheep: OR = 2.4 (1.8-3.1) •  Imported versus local: OR=1.8 (1.4-2.3)
  12. 12. PutaIve risk factors at unit-level CaTle •  No staIsIcally significant factors from mulI-variable regression •  Univariable tesIng indicated –  ProporIon NSP-Ab increases with increasing herd size –  ProporIon NSP-Ab higher in Tripoli compared with Zliten Small ruminants •  Sales: farms selling more livestock had increased levels of FMD posiIve test results (Odds raIo: 2.0 (95%CI: 1.2-3.4)) •  Manure: farms selling or taking the manure outdoors had higher levels of FMD posiIve test results (Odds raIo: 1.8 (95%CI: 0.9-3.7))
  13. 13. InterpretaIon and discussion •  Age is indicaIng acIve virus circulaIon •  FMD virus circulaIon more in small ruminants –  CaTle are kept indoors (on site) more than small ruminants –  CaTle are more likely to be vaccinated •  Goats tesIng posiIve more onen than sheep •  Selling livestock and manure are putaIve risk factors •  Results will help to inform livestock owners, private vets and extension workers on farm management pracIces to reduce exposure to FMD virus •  Building capacity –  Study design –  Data collecIon –  Data management
  14. 14. Thank you

×