Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

OS16 - 2.P1.b FMD Disease Risk Assessment and Progress on Risk-Based Control Program - A. Bulut

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 17 Ad

OS16 - 2.P1.b FMD Disease Risk Assessment and Progress on Risk-Based Control Program - A. Bulut

Download to read offline

OS16 - Open Session 2016
Cascais, Portugal
26 - 28 /10/2016

EuFMD Sessions\Open Session\Archive-2018\Open 2016 Cascais- Portugal\PPT presentations\

OS16 - Open Session 2016
Cascais, Portugal
26 - 28 /10/2016

EuFMD Sessions\Open Session\Archive-2018\Open 2016 Cascais- Portugal\PPT presentations\

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (19)

Similar to OS16 - 2.P1.b FMD Disease Risk Assessment and Progress on Risk-Based Control Program - A. Bulut (20)

Advertisement

More from EuFMD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

OS16 - 2.P1.b FMD Disease Risk Assessment and Progress on Risk-Based Control Program - A. Bulut

  1. 1. Open Session of the EuFMD - Cascais –Portugal 26-28 October 2016 FMD DISEASE RISK ASSESMENT AND PROGRESS ON RISK BASED CONTROL PROGRAM Dr. Nihat PAKDIL1, A.Naci BULUT2 Deputy Under Secretary Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestocks (MoFAL) Diagnosis Department Şap Institute, Ankara, Turkey
  2. 2. CONCLUSION • Main risk identified in Turkey is virus incursion, once it happens – Allow virus circulation in naive population and evolution of novel strains, due to some risk and gaps identified in Turkey. It is resulted maintenance of endemic setting. • To response the situation, it has been developed a «Risk Based Control Program» • By regional progressive disease control approach, control measures have been implemented • Main goal of the program is to achieve OIE status of FMD free with vaccination by 2025 – Based on risk assessment and socio-economical evaluation, and CBA eradication program has been initiated through West to East Anatolia by three regional level; West, Central and East/SE Anatolia – As a first step, Risk based Control program has been updated for West Anatolia and initiated control measures including stamping out and activities in order to eliminate/reduce identified risk and gaps – Progress of the program will be strictly monitored by specified monitoring system using all available indicators – The program has some challenges including regional implication. Turkey can capable to overcome using its own sources and effort, such as vaccine production with enough capacity/potency and capacity on developed diagnosis and molecular epidemiological tools ect. – However, to overcome challenges by regional interaction, it needs  Functional early detection system in the region  Implementing effective all-duty regional control program  Overall needs a strong political commitment on regional disease eradication
  3. 3. CIRCULATING STRAINS • FMD is endemic in Anatolia region in Turkey • Current Circulating virus strains: – Serotype O (O PanAsiaII/Qom), – A (Asia/GVII)* and – (Asia1 has been not recorded since July 2015) • Latest sirculated one was Asia-1(Asia1/SINDH08) • Thrace region has been free of FMD with vaccination since May 2010. 3
  4. 4. OS16 4 Number of FMD outbreaks occurred by years (2016 –till 8thOct) JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Mean of last ten years 80 73.4 69.1 76.5 111.4 102.7 73.3 56 41.3 31.5 26.5 33.6 2013 29 31 129 177 257 172 120 50 29 27 46 30 2014 42 49 39 47 28 18 13 10 6 11 4 9 2015 4 17 22 10 8 7 5 4 7 12 126 375 2016 76 21 24 123 136 47 43 28 35 7 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 NumberofOutbreaks Number of Outbreak by years A/ASIA/GVII (2015) O/PANASIAII/QOM15 (2016)
  5. 5. OS16 Map Distribution of FMD Outbreaks Occurred in 2016 (till October) n: 540 SerotypeO: 261 SerotypeA: 270 PCR(+): 9
  6. 6. OS16 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 TREND DISEASE -EPIDEMIC CURVES_LAST DECADES AIRN05 SIS-10 BAB-12 NEP-84 (GVII) PA II ANT-10 FAR-09 QOM16(KAR-16) SINDH-08 A O Asia 1 By Fuat Ozyörük
  7. 7. OS16 7 Map Distribution for Outbreaks due to A/ AsiaGVII Nov● /Dec● 2015 Map Distribution for Outbreaks in between January-October2015
  8. 8. Early Response to new A outbreak wave: Vaccination vs no of Outbreak 8 0.000 0.000 1.323 2.223 3.534 4.834 6.136 7.446 8.759 10.075 11.379 12.670 14.098 15.417 15.420 6 22 61 81 102 120 115 81 22 32 15 14 15 10 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 9-15 Nov 16-22 Nov 23-29 Nov 30 Nov- 6 Dec 7-13 Dec 14-20 Dec 21-27 Dec 28 Dec-3 Jan16 4-10 Jan 11-17 Jan 18-24 Jan 25-31 Jan 01-07 Feb 08-11 Feb 12-21 Feb Num.OfOutbreaks Timeline Amount ofVaccine(x000 dose) No Outbreaks
  9. 9. OS16 O/Kutahya/328/2016.288 O/Kutahya/1149/2016.635 O/Van/410/2016.308 O/Balikesir/929/2016.462 O/Ankara/LALA/2016.327 O/Sakarya/473/2016.327 O/Igdir/178/2016.135 O/Bingol/447/2016.327 O/Igdir/113/2016.058 O/Bingol/889/2016.442 O/Adiyaman/263/2016.250 O/Kars/96/2016.038 O/Bitlis/919/2016.462 O/Agri/316/2016.269 O/Agri/628/2016.385 O/Amasya/532/2016.346 O/Ankara/943/2016.481 O/Bingol/811/2016.423 O/Malatya/517/2016.346 O/Elazig/591/2016.365 O/Van/987/2016.500 O/Mardin/471/2016.327 O/Agri/907/2016.462 O/Malatya/792/2016.423 O/K.Maras/1071/2016.538 O/Elazig/272/2016.231 O/Nigde/1148/2016.635 O/Hakkari/989/2016.500 O/Adiyaman/720/2016.404 O/Ardahan/313/2016.269 O/Ankara/541/2016.346 O/Adiyaman/534/2016.346 O/Diyarbakir/279/2016.250 O/Malatya/513/2016.346 O/Kayseri/271/2016.250 O/Igdir/1005/2016.500 O/Gaziantep/431/2016.327 O/Gaziantep/441/2016.327 O/Diyarbakir/276/2016.250 O/Mus/522/2014.346 O/Kilis/302/2016.269 O/Malatya/528/2016.346 O/Diyarbakir/250/2016.231 O/Gaziantep/518/2016.346 O/Denizli/660/2016.385 O/Artvin/1107/2016.577 O/Adana/300/2016.269 O/Van/521/2016.346 O/Samsun/241/2016.212 O/Eskisehir/296/2016.269 O/Kars/1160/2016.635 O/K.Maras/235/2016.212 O/Kastamonu/305/2016.269 O/Agri/322/2016.269 O/Kars/809/2016.423 O/Burdur/530/2016.346 O/Kilis/406/2016.308 O/Mugla/1129/2016.615 O/Yozgat/1114/2016.577 O/Balikesir/262/2016.250 O/Izmir/930/2016.462 O/Ankara/327/2016.288 O/Nevsehir/1131/2016.615 O/Balikesir/772/2011.250 O/ISR/Snir/2011 O/Gaziantep/153/2010.212 O/IRN/7/2009 OTNKr5707/2007 O/Kirklareli/387/2007.154 O/Sanliurfa/264/2009.904 OAPC13402/2002 O/Agri/71/2010.096 O/Ardahan/57/2015.231 O/BAR/2/97 O/SAU/3/2013.615 O/Bingol/332/2005.462 O/VIT/32/2011.327 O/AFG/210/2004.096 O/PAK/3/2005.096 99 80 96 57 64 65 30 55 27 74 26 37 88 14 74 37 54 86 61 15 18 30 77 69 49 99 22 35 15 25 67 4 30 45 28 27 65 6 44 2 2 2 23 5 5 14 27 6 0 3 0 13 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.01 A/Samsun/1100/2016.577 A/Corum/1137/2016.615 A/Amasya/307/2015.923 A/Kirikkale/336/2015.923 A/Kars/455/2016.327 A/Ardahan/1055/2016.538 A/Mus/1008/2016.500 A/Malatya/347/2016.288 A/Gaziantep/480/2016.327 A/Kayseri/239/2016.192 A/Isparta/246/2016.212 A/Eskisehir/333/2015.923 A/Ardahan/312/2016.269 A/Ankara/306/2016.269 A/Kutahya/317/2016.269 A/Manisa/912/2016.462 A/Kocaeli/234/2016.192 A/Van/198/2015.808 A/Ardahan/123/2016.058 A/Van/203/2015.827 A/Kayseri/274/2015.923 A/Duzce/219/2015.865 A/Kutahya/331/2015.923 A/Kirsehir/279/2015.904 A/Bursa/271/2015.923 A/Yozgat/304/2015.923 A/Van/175/2015.712 A/Isparta/65/2016.038 A/Agri/679/2015.981 A/Ankara/300/2015.923 A/Corum/292/2015.923 A/Corum/243/2015.904 A/Eskisehir/276/2015.923 A/Kars/267/2015.904 A/Mus/719/2015.981 A/Ardahan/565/2015.962 A/Ardahan/43/2016.019 A/Ardahan/569/2015.962 A/Nigde/245/2015.904 A/Kars/229/2015.885 A/Nigde/231/2015.904 A/Kars/226/2015.885 A/Yalova/217/2015.865 A/Usak/327/2015.923 A/Izmir/365/2016.288 A/Agri/252/2015.904 A/Amasya/209/2015.865 A/Elazig/248/2015.904 A/Karabuk/323/2015.923 A/Igdir/48/2016.019 A/Izmir/214/2016.173 A/Cankiri/312/2015.923 A/Yozgat/305/2015.923 A/Kirsehir/310/2015.923 A/Cankiri/277/2015.923 A/Bursa/214/2015.865 A/Bitlis/205/2015.827 A/Balikesir/335/2015.923 A/Mus/657/2015.981 A/Afyon/699/2015.981 A/Erzurum/820/2016.423 A/Antalya/242/2016.212 A/Konya/294/2015.923 A/Sivas/381/2016.308 A/Agri/704/2015.981 A/SAU/1/2015.692 A/BAN GA Sa197 2013/2014.000 A/ALB/1/1996 A/IND/40/2000.000 A/NEP/21/84 A22/Mahmatli/1964.981 A/Nevsehir/402/2006.173 A/IRN/1/2005.269 A/Kocaeli/180/2015.788 A/Sivas/208/2015.546 A/Nigde/200/2015.827 A/Ankara/195/2015.827 A/Karabuk/223/2015.885 A/Malatya/242/2015.904 99 99 66 99 30 43 99 95 95 82 99 77 99 87 58 54 27 46 48 20 51 42 36 66 6024 64 47 8 49 44 17 11 10 10 15 11 5 5 21 0 11 15 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 Filogenetic Analysis2016 : O serotype Filogenetic Analysis2016 : A serotype
  10. 10. OS16 Challenges for Disease Control REGIONAL  Virus Incursion into the country  profitable animal price amounts of causes illegal movements across the borders  Insufficient early detection of upcoming strains  Lack of all-duty regional control program NATIONAL  Booster vaccination of young animals in Central and East Anatolia  Single vaccination of calves having maternally-derived antibodies might be unfavorable for herd immunity. • Dense cattle population providing raw material (>1 year) for fattening farms in the other region: causes irregular animal movement • High elevation, hard and long winter conditions in East Anatolia • Common grazing and highland (yayla) for summer grazing • Farmer awareness; Biosecurity, outbreak management
  11. 11. OS16 CONTROL PROGRAM • A Risk Based Control Program has been developed and applied since 2014 GOAL OF THE STRATEGY • To contribute to the development of the livestock sector by achieving OIE status of FMD free with vaccination by 2025 • By regional progressive disease control approach, the strategy is consist of 30 component objectives ACTIVITIES AND TACTICS • To reduce/eliminate risk and gaps for each identified risk and gaps: • Initiated implementing of control activities
  12. 12. MAP FOR REGIONAL PROGRESSIVE CONTROL PROGRAM 2019:PCP4; 2021 OIE FreeStatus 2021:PCP4; 2023OIE FreeStatus 2023:PCP4; 2024 OIE FreeStatus Buffer Zone: 2025 FreeStatus
  13. 13. RISK BASED CONTROL PROGRAM FOR WEST ANATOLIA GOAL: Reach PCP Stage4 in 2019; and OIE FMD Free Status with vaccination in 2021 MAIN COMPONENTS OF CONTROL PROGRAM: Continuing risk based vaccination  Including booster vaccination for primo vaccinators Risk based surveillance program Monitoring movement: Check point Regulation of animal movement form the other regions compliance with OIE Terrestrial Code: Quar./NSP testing ect. Effective outbreak management/Biosecurity Stamping out for DC Enhance awareness for stakeholders Increasing technical capacity Effective monitoring and improvement of infrastructure West Anatolia Central Anatolia East Anatolia Check points
  14. 14. OS16 • Vaccination Vaccination implemented based on risk analysis: • Preventive campaign vaccination :In Anatolia; twice a year for LR;_In Thrace: : Twice a year for LR/once for SR • Early Spring: population assured immun before releasing grazing time • Late Summer: population assured immun before Kurban festival • Ring Vaccination to response outbreak in Surveillance zone of outbreak • Targeting vaccination for identified “Hotspot» • Small ruminant veccination where risk identified • Booster vaccination in West of country Şap Institute produces FMD vaccine sufficient capacity covered national population with >6PD50 potency vaccine used • Diagnosis and Genetic and Antigenic Characterization of Isolates • Epidemiological investigation • Active and passive surveillance • Outbreak investigation and case study • Sero-surveillance; NSP Prevalence estimation in Anatolia/Risk based surveillance Program for early detection in Thrace • Routine control measures in case of disease outbreak (biosecurity, restriction, quarantine, sampling) • Control of animal movements and markets • Training field vets and awareness activities for stakeholders • Stamping out in West of Anatolia CURRENT FMD CONTROL POLICY CONDUCTED IN TURKEY
  15. 15. OS16 MONITORING CONTROL PROGRAM_INDICATORS • Reconstructed TURVET (Registration and Information System) with more functional and features : • Animal Registration System • LR/SR registered into the system with ear-tag; initiated replacement of electronic ear-tag • Animal movement managed and monitored by the system • Regular movement report by province • Veterinary Information System (VIS) • Outbreak Management • Entering outbreak data all notifiable disease • Vaccination data • Sample Management System • Establishment Epidemiology and Monitoring Unit • Central level at GDFC; at 9 Regional Vet Institute including Şap Institute and Provincial level • Regular Diagnosis Activities • Clinical diagnosis (Incidence, attack and mortality rate) data; VIS • Serotyping data: Şap Institute and VIS at GDFC • Genotyping data: Şap Institute • Antigenic Characterization (r Value) data: Şap Institute • Clinical surveillance • Sero-surveillance Activities • NSP Suro-surveillance: Assessment disease dynamics and identifying risk factors • Post vaccination sero-surveillance: Vaccination performance and antibody level
  16. 16. CONCLUSION • Main risk identified in Turkey is virus incursion, once it happens – Allow virus circulation in naive population and evolution of novel strains, due to some risk and gaps identified in Turkey. It is resulted maintenance of endemic setting. • To response the situation, it has been developed a «Risk Based Control Program» • By regional progressive disease control approach, control measures have been implemented • Main goal of the program is to achieve OIE status of FMD free with vaccination by 2025 – Based on risk assessment and socio-economical evaluation, and CBA eradication program has been initiated through West to East Anatolia by three regional level; West, Central and East/SE Anatolia – As a first step, Risk based Control program has been updated for West Anatolia and initiated control measures including stamping out and activities in order to eliminate/reduce identified risk and gaps – Progress of the program will be strictly monitored by specified monitoring system using all available indicators – The program has some challenges including regional implication. Turkey can capable to overcome using its own sources and effort, such as vaccine production with enough capacity/potency and capacity on developed diagnosis and molecular epidemiological tools ect. – However, to overcome challenges by regional interaction, it needs  Functional early detection system in the region  Implementing effective all-duty regional control program  Overall needs a strong political commitment on regional disease eradication
  17. 17. OS16 Thank you very much for your attention! Acknowledges • Fuat Ozyörük; Unal Parlak • The Şap Institute • General Directorate for Food and Control (GDFC)

×