Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

OS16 - 1.4.c Which Vaccines are Most Important? A Decision Support Tool for Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine Bank Manager - M. McLaws

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 18 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to OS16 - 1.4.c Which Vaccines are Most Important? A Decision Support Tool for Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine Bank Manager - M. McLaws (20)

More from EuFMD (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

OS16 - 1.4.c Which Vaccines are Most Important? A Decision Support Tool for Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine Bank Manager - M. McLaws

  1. 1. WHICH VACCINES ARE MOST IMPORTANT? PRAGMATIST: A DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VACCINE BANK MANAGERS Melissa McLaws1, Don King2, Katie Hickey1, Anna Ludi2, Keith Sumption1 European Commission for the Control of Foot and Mouth Disease (EuFMD) 1 WRLFMD The Pirbright Institute2
  2. 2. Key Messages • PRAGMATIST is a tool to assist vaccine bank managers select /maintain the most appropriate antigens – Transparent, evidence based – Vaccine matching results • Other applications: – Highlight data gaps and important antigens that do not have a good vaccine available – Framework for surveillance to engage international FMD lab/epi networks • Next Steps – Ongoing efforts to improve data quality – User feedback
  3. 3. Context • Viruses in any region are a potential threat to all other regions, no matter how far away, and consequently should be considered for inclusion in antigen banks. (Lombard & Füssel, 2007) FMD serotypes • FMD virus: 7 serotypes, multiple strains within serotypes. • No cross-protection between serotypes – variable between strains within serotypes • Multiple vaccine strains available
  4. 4. Context • Viruses in any region are a potential threat to all other regions, no matter how far away, and consequently should be considered for inclusion in antigen banks. (Lombard & Füssel, 2007) Which strains are most important to maintain in my vaccine bank? • FMD virus: 7 serotypes, multiple strains within serotypes. • No cross-protection between serotypes – variable between strains within serotypes • Multiple vaccine strains available
  5. 5. Which strains to maintain in the vaccine bank? • Significant financial investment • The World Reference Laboratory produces annual recommendations – Antigens divided into high, medium and low priority – EU perspective: not “global” in nature – Criteria are not clearly defined
  6. 6. PRAGMATIST: PRioritisation of AntiGen MAnagemenT with International Surveillance Tool • EuFMD and WRL collaboration • Assist risk managers make decisions about the FMD vaccines that they purchase/maintain, based on current risks to countries covered by the bank
  7. 7. PRAGMATIST: Antigen Priority tool • Excel spreadsheet • 2 distinct considerations: 1. “Antigen risk score”: which strains pose greatest threat of incursion (left side) and 2. “Coverage score”: effectiveness of available vaccines to protect against each virus strain (right side) cv cv
  8. 8. Antigen risk score • For a given free country/region the strains that pose the greatest threat of incursion will depend on: 1. From what FMD endemic area(s) is the virus most likely to enter the country? (most likely “source areas”) 2. Which virus strains are currently circulating in the source areas?
  9. 9. Where is the virus most likely to come from? (Source area score) • Virus likely to enter due to illegal/informal activity – Legal activities made safe by border and trade restrictions • Main routes of incursion: 1. Infected live animals 2. FMDV-contaminated animal product 3. (Fomite, wildlife) • Importance of the source area will depend on the user: –ie will be different if she is in Australia vs N. America vs. Europe – Expert opinion/User input Consider proximity, connectedness, incentive, prevalence
  10. 10. Where is the virus most likely to come from? (Source area score) • Expert elicitation at European NRL meeting (May 2016) Source Area Multiplier Divide 100 points according to the risk posed by the source area W. Eurasia 41 E. Asia 11 N. Africa 25 India & S. Asia 9 East Africa 4 West/Central Af 4 Southern Africa 3 S. America 3 100
  11. 11. Relative prevalence of viral strains circulating within the source areas • Many virus pools have 3+ serotypes circulating at once, (& multiple strains within serotypes) • Relative prevalence of serotypes/strains is dynamic: – population immunity (natural or vaccination) – ecology of the viruses (eg new strains outcompete older strains) • Data: Submissions to WRL and expert opinion
  12. 12. 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = � 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 1 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑛𝑛 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 ∗ 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠Calculating the Antigen risk score Caution: Data preliminary, For example only! Circulating Strain Antigen score source area score→ 41 11 25 9 4 4 3 3 O/ME-SA/PanAsia-2 30 1230 0 0 5 45 0 0 0 1275 O/ME-SA/PanAsia 10 410 10 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 O/SEA/Mya-98 0 32 352 0 0 0 0 0 0 352 O/ME-SA/Ind2001 5 205 3 33 24 600 90 810 0 0 0 0 1648 O/EA-3 0 0 54 1350 0 28 112 20 80 84 0 1434 O/EURO-SA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 99.9 99.9 O/CATHAY 0 8 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 A/ASIA/Sea-97 0 36 396 0 0 0 0 0 0 396 A/ASIA/Iran-05 30 1230 0 15 375 0 0 0 0 0 1605 A/ASIA/G-VII 10 410 0 5 45 0 0 0 455 A/AFRICA 0 0 2 50 0 28 112 27 108 84 0 134 A/EURO-SA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 99.9 99.9 Asia-1 0 11 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 Asia-1 Sindh-08 13 533 0 0 0 0 0 533 SAT1 0 0 0 0 8 32 26 104 40 24 0 24 SAT 2 2 82 0 5 125 0 28 112 25 100 40 84 0 291 SAT3 0 0 0 0 8 32 2 8 20 24 0 24 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 99.9 99.9 Cumulative Score 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.9 300 Score adjusted for route importance 4100 1100 2500 900 400 400 300 599 N. Africa India & S. Asia S. America W. Eurasia E. Asia East Africa West/ Central Africa Southern Africa
  13. 13. PRAGMATIST: Antigen Priority tool • Excel spreadsheet • 2 distinct considerations: 1. “Antigen risk score”: which strains pose greatest threat of incursion (left side) and 2. “Coverage score”: effectiveness of available vaccines to protect against each virus strain (right side) cv cv
  14. 14. Coverage score Coverage score Vaccine Antigen coverage no information 0 no matching isolates 0.2 1-20% isolates match 0.4 21-40% isolates match 0.6 41-60% isolates match 0.8 61-80% isolates match 1 81-100% isolates match • For each combination of vaccine and field virus strain • Percentage of isolates of that particular strain that match the vaccine in question
  15. 15. Caution: Data preliminary, For example only! A22Iraq A24Cruzeiro A-Arg/2001 A-Eritrea A-Iran96 A-Iran-05 A-Malaysai97 A-SAU95 A-SAU/23/86 A-TUR/2006 Merial MSD Merial MSD Merial Merial MSD Merial Merial MSD Merial MSD MSD 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 SEROTYPE A A/ASIA/Sea-97 A/ASIA/Iran-05 A/ASIA/G-VII A/AFRICA A/EURO-SA
  16. 16. Putting it all together: vaccine score High scores for vaccines that cover well against : –Strains circulating in many areas and/or –Strains in most important ‘risky’ areas and/or –Several different strains 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = � 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 1 𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑛𝑛 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 ∗ 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 A22Iraq A24Cruzeiro A-Arg/2001 A-Eritrea A-Iran96 A-Iran-05 A-Malaysai97 A-SAU95 A-SAU/23/86 A-TUR/2006 MerialMSD MerialMSD Merial Merial MSD Merial MerialMSD Merial MSD MSD 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 960 0 0 375 0 533 400 0 0 1254 SEROTYPE A A/ASIA/Sea-97 A/ASIA/Iran-05 A/ASIA/G-VII A/AFRICA A/EURO-SA
  17. 17. Key Messages • PRAGMATIST is a tool to assist vaccine bank managers select /maintain the most appropriate antigens – Transparent, evidence based – Vaccine matching results • Other applications: – Highlight data gaps and important antigens that do not have a good vaccine available – Framework for surveillance to engage international FMD lab/epi networks • Next Steps – Ongoing efforts to improve data quality – User feedback
  18. 18. Thank you for listening!

×