OS16 - 1.2.a Change in the Management of FMD Disease Control to a Private-Public-Partnership - V. Shütz

1. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Change in the management of the FMD Diseases Control to an Private- Public-Partnership Approach European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EuFMD) Casicais Portugal, 26.10.2016 Verena Schütz

2. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Agenda 2 §  Alternative methods for highly contagious livestock diseases like FMD §  Communication with the society §  Economic aspects for the added value chain of the use of marker vaccines §  Legal restriction of the use of vaccines – marker vaccines in the EU §  Why we need Private-Partnership-Approaches?

4. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Public and ethical grounds 4 §  Acceptance of culling of animals in the public: Culling: Production of meat or to ensure causing avoidable pain, distress and any other form of suffering §  Culling of animals as highly contagious livestock diseases management – public discussion alternative measurements? Communication with the public?

7. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Economical Problem 7 Fundamental decision §  Ethical and morally acceptable to cull animals for the control of FMD §  Faster entry to third countries Market acceptance of meat from vaccinated animals §  Slaughtering of animals §  Meat processing §  Market restrictions §  Final duration 1

8. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Slaughtering of vaccinated animals 8 Council Directive: §  Article 54, 2003/85/EC, fresh meat produced from vaccinated animals ….. bear the mark provided for in §  Directive 2002/99 EC, Annex II – diagonal cross or §  has to be stored and transported separately ... in sealed containers and has to be treated e.g. heated (Annex III Directive 2002/99/EC) No differentiation between vaccine and DIVA (marker vaccine)

9. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Open Issues 9 §  Election of the slaughtering place §  Impact of the slaughtering place (separation of product lines, access to third countries,….) §  Processing products (treatment heat) §  Only national / local (?) market access No study to asses the economical impact for processing units available

10. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Economical problem – losses for farmers (e.g. pig meat production, CSF) 10 Baseline Farm location zone Depop Vacc_ns Revenues or compensation 153.62 113.83 121.15 Costs Piglet 55.00 55.00 55.00 Feed 53.05 26.53 71.57 Animal losses 2.76 2.11 3.22 Production costs 4.35 2.18 5.87 Interest pig & feed 2.24 0.86 3.51 Interest assets 0.10 0.13 0.13 Housing 15.01 20.25 20.25 Manure 1.92 1.20 2.42 Labour 4.64 6.25 6.25 Total costs 139.08 114.52 168.23 Net farm income 14.54 -0.69 -47.08 Income farmer 19.18 5.57 -40.83 During outbreak 12,936.23 2,783.69 -20,414.99 After outbreak 16,720.88 16,761.05 16,761.05 Annual net farm income 29,657.11 19,544.74 -3,653.94 Difference with baseline -10,112.37 -33,311.05 Quelle: Hope et al. 2014 - 23.198,68 65 % - 12 % Assumption: 1 €/ kg slaughtering weight! 100 %

11. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Crisis management of highly contagious livestock diseases 11 §  Administration are the responsible decision maker in the case of FMD outbreak §  Adaptation/consideration of the added value chain in the crisis management – common cross border approach for the crisis management §  Data Management §  Structures (communication and data) §  Trust §  Function of private crisis managements are not know of administration – gap

12. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Crisis management of highly contagious livestock diseases 12 §  Private crisis management of FMD §  Focused on the instructions of administration §  Crisis plan and training of workers in the focus of biosecurity §  Reflection to reduce the finical risks of marker vaccines

13. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Alternatives Aid Fund Insurance New Commercial à  Risk assessment and development of an insurance police à  Reinsurance à  Cots of the police Statutory basis Existing Founded by the economy à  Creation of a legal right à  Creation of administrati on and clearing center Epizootic Fund à  Validation of legal matters à  Adaptation of the legal matters à  Purpose of hedging à  Determination of the damage event à  Cooperation with insurance recommendable à  e.g. BAFIN New insurance Pecuniary Reparation

14. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Conclusion §  In the decision making process for the use of marker vaccines as a crisis management instrument should be included epidemiological and economic models §  Crisis exercises, cross border and between public and private instructions are necessary §  Revise structures to enable continuous collaboration cross border and public-private approach Public-Private Approaches are necessary

15. © 2016 Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Vieh und FleischDr. Verena Schütz Deutscher Raiffeisenverband e.V. Pariser Platz 3 10117 Berlin Telefon +49-30-856214- Telefax +49-30-856214- E-Mail: www.raiffeisen.de Vieh und Fleisch 15 Dr. Verena Schütz 467 522 schuetz@drv.raiffeisen.de

OS16 - 1.2.a Change in the Management of FMD Disease Control to a Private-Public-Partnership - V. Shütz

You are reading a preview.

Check these out next

OS16 - 1.2.a Change in the Management of FMD Disease Control to a Private-Public-Partnership - V. Shütz

More Related Content

Similar to OS16 - 1.2.a Change in the Management of FMD Disease Control to a Private-Public-Partnership - V. Shütz (20)

More from EuFMD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)