Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

6.G6.b Evaluating the Survival of FMD Virus in The Environment - E. Brown

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 13 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

More from EuFMD (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

6.G6.b Evaluating the Survival of FMD Virus in The Environment - E. Brown

  1. 1. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Open Session of the EuFMD - Cascais –Portugal 26-28 October 2016 Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright Ins2tute
  2. 2. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Study outline: q 4x ca>le transmission experiments to study environmental contamina&on and virus survival q Environmental sampling to es&mate the decrease in environment infec&ousness over &me q Development of environmental sampling methods for surveillance
  3. 3. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #1 & 2: Experimental plan
  4. 4. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #1 & 2: Sampling plan Samples collected: q  2 Wall swabs (50x50 area) q  5 Faecal samples q  5 Floor swabs (10x10 area) q  1 Food trough swab Temperature: 19°C Rela&ve humidity: 60%
  5. 5. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #1 & 2: Results- Room housing direct contact donors 0 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Log10 PFU/ml Day of study Trough Wall Floor Faeces Study 1 Study 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Log10 PFU/ml Day of study Floor Wall Trough Faeces N.B. Day 1 is Day 9 of the transmission studies
  6. 6. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #1 & 2: Results- Room housing inoculated donors 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Log10 PFU/ml Day of study Floor Wall Trough Faeces Study 2 N.B. Day 1 is Day 5 of the transmission study
  7. 7. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #3 & 4: Experimental plan / Sampling plan AlteraRons to the sampling plan: q  5 Wall Swabs (10x10cm) q  2 Food trough swabs
  8. 8. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #3 & 4: Results: room housing inoculated donors 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 1 2 3 4 5 log10 PFU/ml Day of study Trough Wall Floor Faeces Study 3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1 2 3 4 5 log10 PFU/ml Day of study Trough Wall Floor Faeces Study 4 N.B. Day 1 is Day 6 of the transmission studies
  9. 9. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #3 & 4: Results: room housing direct contact donors (Pre-clinical) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 log10 PFU/ml Day of study Trough Wall Floor Faeces Study 3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 log10 PFU/ml Day of study Trough Wall Floor Faeces Study 4 N.B. Day 1 is Day 8 of the transmission studies
  10. 10. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Transmission studies #3 & 4: Results: room housing direct contact donors (Clinical) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 log10 PFU/ml Day of study Trough Wall Floor Faeces 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 log10 PFU/ml Day of study Trough Wall Floor Faeces Study 3 Study 4 N.B. Day 1 is Day 10 of the transmission study N.B. Day 1 is Day 11 of the transmission study
  11. 11. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Half lives
  12. 12. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Conclusions q Live virus can be detected up to 7 days aVer room has been evacuated. q  On average live virus was detected highest and longest in faeces. q On average the lowest virus was detected on the walls and shortest on the food trough. q There was not a large difference between virus Rtre and survival Rme between the rooms contaminated by clinical emission compared to pre-clinical emissions. q The results of this study will be combined with those of the risk of transmission from exposure to contaminated environment. This will give a beYer understanding of the effect of disinfecRon and waiRng Rme before re-populaRon on the control of FMD outbreaks.
  13. 13. European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease OS16 Acknowledgment s The Pirbright Ins&tute: Dr Claire ColenuY Dr Simon Gubbins Mr Noel Nelson Wageningen Bioveterinary Research (WBR) (formally CVI): Dr Jose Gonzales Dr Phaedra Eblé Dr Aldo Dekker A special thanks to all the animal staff at both insRtutes

×