Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.



Published on


Published in: Education
  • Login to see the comments


  2. 2. DEFINITIONS: 1. Municipal. … the term comes from the Latin (org. Latimore's) words: Muni/ Moenio-Capio (a) Capio> to entrap, allure, entice, to hunt for legacies, a fallacy, cheat, deception, harm, lay hold of, catch at, capture and Seize. (b) Moenia/ munus/ Munia> a public office that taxes and charges: a wall city of fortification or castle (of the federal lords). (c) Municipalis> Provincial> Administration/ IVE government under the control of a Magistrate, or military control [Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary (C.N.L.D.)]. 2. Natural born. [>Aboriginal Preamble and Posterity] Sovereign, of the Government of The United States of North America/The Republic of North America: “Original 1787 Constitution” [> Art.2, § 2, Clause 5> Title 8, U.S.C. § 1503(a)} Privileges and Immunities of the Original 1787 Constitution [>Art. 4, § 1], Sovereignty or Lordship, including the Petitioner's Government Protections and Allegiance. 3. HaKhdar. Holder of a Right of the Qualified Elector and Common-Law Citizens of the United States of North America, in the Family of Nations. 4. Allegiance Citizen [>a Prior-entitled Qualified Aboriginal Common Law Free Inhabitant] of the United States, e.g., "Poster-Master". 5. United States. This term has several meanings. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations, it may designate territory over which sovereignty of United States extends, or it may be collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. Black Law's Dictionary 4th Edition, p. 1703. 6. Family of Nations. An aggregate of Nations which PREDATE (historical antecedents) colonial history and record keeping, having an inherited common [law] civilization, and ARE at a similar level of moral and political opinion. The Ancient nations who ordained and established the "Law of Nations", so written, in Art. 1, § 8, Clause 10 of ''this Constitution" and are bound thereby. State v. Dixon, 213 P. 227, 230 66 Mont. 76: Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. U.S., 112 F3d 1569: Lore Silkman, 84 NY. 1025, 1030, 88 App. Div 102, citing Scott v. Stanford, 19 How. (60 U.S.) 404, L.Ed 691. "Family of Nations". The family of nations means just that, a family or relative and no natural person calling themselves a "color", i.e., Black, Brown, Red, Yellow or White, according to the ancient Law of Nations, is legally or contractually considered a Human Being in the United States of North America, et al. 7. Nation. A people, or aggregation of men existing in the form of an organized jural society, usually inhabiting a distinct portion of the earth, speaking the same language, using the same culture, possessing HISTORIC CONTINUITY (> Continuation or Continental); and distinguished from other like groups by the RACIAL ORIGIN (aboriginal people who are not "Native Americans", that is, "Wards of the State") and characteristic, and generally, but not necessarily, 2
  3. 3. living under the same government and Sovereignty". Black’s Law Dictionary, vol. 6, p. 1024. 8. Republican States. Republican Nations Indigenous to the United States of [North] America and the Pre-colonial entry into The Americas; and now identified as the 13 [48, 50] original States whose Representatives constructed and signed "A Declaration" of July 4th, 1776, by the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress Assembled in 1776, who Announced "The Declaration of Independence" for the 12 United Colonies August 2nd, 1776 and ordained and established the General National Constitution(s) of and for the 'original' United States.. 9. Femme Couleur Libre and Las Negras De-‘Terre’. "Femme Couleur Libre" meaning free (Libre) Colored Nation (femme) or people. Black’s Law 6th Edition, p. 618: "Femme Couleur Libre up to the time of the Civil War, this term applied to all persons NOT of the White Race, including “Indians.” Again the word Indian originally did not mean “NATIVE AMERICAN” or “American” the way it is used today, however, it did mean Ethiopians, Negro da Terra (Native of America). See, e.g., Indi, Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary (C.L.D.) by D.P. Simpson, 1960, p. 299. 10. Indian. The term Indian is a latter Latin word coming from Hindi and Sindu, meaning dark hued and transferring from the Older Latin word “Ethiopian”. The term Ethiopian is not of African origin and it transfers back to the Greek word Athiopian meaning dark hued. INDIANS. The aboriginal inhabitants of North America. Frazee v. Spokane County, 29 Wash. 278, 69 P. 782. 11. Free White Person/ Moorish. “... European Jews … intermixed ... Celtic … Iberians … mixed Latin Celtic-Iberians, and Moorish inhabitants of Spain and Portugal, the Mixed Greeks ... Phoenicians, and North African inhabitants of Sicily. IT DOES NOT MEAN CAUCASIAN RACE …” Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. P. 792. Also see, 1 Stat 103, 1 C3. 12. USNA “… the Sovereign Posterity Preamble Government of The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, e.g., “Original United States”. 13. Government De Facto: A Government of fact. A government actually exercising power and control, as opposed to the true and lawful government, a government not established according to the constitution of the nation, or not lawfully entitled to recognition or supremacy, but which has nevertheless supplanted or displaced the government dejure. A government deemed unlawful, or deemed wrongful or unjust, which, nevertheless, receives presently habitual obedience from the bulk of the community. See, e.g., Black’s law Dictionary, Six Edition. 14. Government De Jure: A government of right; the true and lawful government established according to the constitution of the nation, and lawfully entitled to recognition and supremacy and the administration of the nation, but which is actually cut off from power or control. A government deemed lawful, or deemed rightful or just, which, nevertheless has been supplanted or displaced; that is to say, which receives not presently [although it received formerly] habitual obedience from the bulk of the community. See, e.g., Black’s Law Dictionary, Six Edition. 3
  4. 4. 15. Plantation “… A COLONY”… “e state” [> COLONIAL STATES OPPOSED TO REPUBLICAN States]. Plantation. "In English Law. A colony... In American law. A farm; a large cultivated estate". 16. Province …. Proxincia> Government administrated by a Magistrate and / or Military Commander [Origins … Eymological Dictionary by Eric Partridge (O.E.D.) p. 531]. 17. Agency of the United States. “A department, division, or ADMINISTRATION within the FEDERAL government": Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 63. 18. Agency. "Properly speaking, agency relates to commercial or business transaction", i.e., seizures, bankruptcies, etc.: Black's Law Dictionary 4th Ed. p.84, paragraph 2. 19. Federal Governor. "The system of government administrated in a nation formed by the union or confederation of several independent States" [Const. Art. 6, Clause. 1> Lat. Foederis] and “A league or compact between two or more States to become united under one central [General] government. See Federation": Black’s Law Dictionary, Ed. 6, p. 610-11. 20 Federation. “A joining together of … nations in a league or Association … An unincorporated association of persons for a common purpose": Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 614. 21. Association. “Unincorporated association. A confederation of individuals …, which is NOT chartered as a Corporation”. “... a Voluntary confederacy”: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th and 6th Ed's. 22. Public. "In another sense the word does not mean all the people, nor most of the people, nor very many of the people of a place but so many of them as distinguishes them from the few". Black’s Law Dictionary, 4-6 Ed. When today's governmental official declare that they are doing so and so, whether it is increasing taxes, public restriction> licenses or abridging and denying Constitutional rights, in the name of public safety, welfare, etc. they are doing it for the government, i.e., themselves. 23. Nation. A people, or aggregation of men existing in the form of an organized jural society, usually inhabiting a distinct portion of the earth, speaking the same language, using the same culture, possessing HISTORIC CONTINUITY (> Continuation or Continental); and distinguished from other like groups by the RACIAL ORIGIN (aboriginal people who are not "Native Americans", that is, "Wards of the State") and characteristic, and generally, but not necessarily, living under the same government and Sovereignty". Black’s Law Dictionary, vol. 6, p. 1024 24 People. “... In a more restricted sense and as generally used in Constitutional law, the entire body of those citizens of a state or nation who are invested with political power for political purposes, that is, the QUALIFIED voters or Electors...the people as the repository of sovereignty, or as a source of government power, or to popular government, we are in fact 4
  5. 5. speaking of the selected and limited class of citizens to who the constitution accords the elective franchise and the right of participation in the offices of government". See, e.g., Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., p. 1292. 25. "We the people”... of the United States, in Order [(Analogous order): in a logical order> from the top> Aboriginal to the bottom> indigenous]...promote the general welfare, and secure the Blessing of Liberty to (1) ourselves and (2) our Posterity, [> all the blood relatives] do ordain and establish THIS Constitution for the United States of America" 26. Cabal … term means Anglo-Saxon Nazi Khazairan Jews overthrowing “original United States” > USNA. National Constitution. Free National Constitution includes, in part: a. The Constitution of the United States of North America b. The Constitution of the United States. c. The Constitution for the United States of America d. The "Preamble" to and Article one though seven of the Constitution of/for the United States> including Article 6, Sec. I thereof, e. The Articles of Confederation > “The Constitution" f. The Articles of Association g. The Constitution of the Five>Union Nations. h. Posterity. Issue. Beneficiaries of "the people" and the United States Government i. The Divine and National title-Deed or will-trust to the Land-Property belonging to the United States of America, in the Family of Nations Movant in, Jus Personam and in Jus In re, inter alia., for United States of North America, in/of the Family of Nations, officially including the former and official names, (a) “the people of the United States”, (b) The United States in Congress assembled (c) “The Congress of the United States”, (d) “The Congress”, (e) “The United States of America in General Congress Assembled”, (f) “The Congress of the United States assembled”, (g) “The United States Government”, (h) “Prior entitled Association”, (i) “Priori Petenti” Confederation of America, (j) the United States Republican form of State Government of America, i.e., “The Constitutional States of the United States of [North] America.”1 1 JUDICIAL NOTICE: This Court is put on notice that the Petitioner is the “original people” of North America and of We, the People of The United States of North America Government and the Posterity thereof, is merely the Heirs of "We the people" of Old America, that is to say, Elin a Bey mispronounced "Leni Lenape". Petitioner has Complete and Perfect claim to Elin a Bey who are the Posterity Consanguity of the DGR or De'eGRas of Celestial Times and the DRG or The Dragons(s) [>Seraphim or Cherubim] in the Hebrew Old Testament Stories. As the North American Phoenix Dragons Tail, he Know that it is fair and correct to alert all Justices, Judges, Magistrates, Employees, etc., Whether Masons-Shriners or otherwise, who he is and what he is claiming so there is no doubt. By HaKh the Heavens so Rule, Selah. 5
  6. 6. INTRODUCTION HEAR HE HEAR ALL, the Sovereign-Posterity General Government of The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America [in Congress assembled] an Association-Confederation and member of The Family of Nations, The Grand Council, The Supreme Council and The Dragon Court, who pronounced to the world the Authentic “A Declaration” of July 4th , 1776, authored and endorsed the “Original 1787 Constitution/Contract”, and holds the Certificate of Authenticity of the following: Secret 1781 1st American Company, Secret 1783 Trilateral Tripartite Agreement (The United States of North America, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States & Great Britain), Secret Puerto Rican Agreement, Secret 1664 Titulo Torrens of North America, Secret 1772 Treaty of Versailles, 1773 Secret Treaty of Paris, Federal Pacem Terris Covenant & Concordant, Five Books, Sixteen Copies, Black Book of Exchequer, Blue Book; and holds the Secret 1919 Treaty of Versailles, Secret 1950 Bilateral Minefield Agreement, Secret 1950 Trilateral Tripartite Agreement and Secret 1963 Green Hilton Agreement (which were never renewed by Sovereign Ancient Royal Families). 2. The Petitioner's Sovereign Preamble Bank of North America (PBNA), holds both Federal United States and United States of America Corporation's global debts, and control the 8216, 8217, 8254 and 8278 Global Master Accounts, which the entire (Artificial Intelligence) global monetary system is underwritten and financed; therefore, USNA has the sole lawful control and authority of the Ancient Black Asiatic Royal Families' Sovereign Royal Portfolio (> 13,413,500 MT of Gold), which is financially backing both U.S./U.S.A. and the BIG FOUR Nations, all of which can be verified by the Inter-Bank Screens with proper security clearances and codes (>Classified, Top Secret & Clocked For Secrecy). 3. Accordingly, The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, appearing Amicus Curia and brings forth this Writ of Quo Warranto, Writ of 6
  7. 7. Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition Against the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District Court For The Western District of Washington, Federal State of Washington, Federal City of Seattle, Federal County of King and Washington State Bar Association (>quasi-government corporate agency), each of them, acting under “Color – of – Authority”; “Color – of – Law” and “Color – of – Office”,committed clear Treason, Genocide, Slavery, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, Offences Against Law of Nations, Domestic Terrorism, Economic Terrorism, Fraud, Discrimination, Racketeering Influence Corruption Organized Crime, Breech of Trust and Breach of Contract, against the Ancient “natural born” Black Aborigines > Nahua-Negris Da Terra of North America, by and through, impersonation and mirroring the dejure sovereign posterity government of The United States of North America/The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations (hereinafter referred to as “USNA”); and through a sophisticated foreign judicial star chamber's statutory scheme in manufacturing diversity of citizenship, for the sole purpose, to overthrow the government of The United States of North America and to deprive the original people > “We the people” of North America of their nationality, birthrights, inheritance, trust accounts, land, property, rights, privileges, immunities and rights to self-govern. 4. The mirroring of governments started with the Authentic “A Declaration” of July 4th, , 1776, vs. August 2nd , 1776, 12 United Colonies Declaration of Independence (plagiarized from the Authentic “A Declaration”) and mirroring the “Original 1787 Constitution” and dejure Nation-States's Constitutions vs. Federal Colony State Constitutions {> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)]. 5. However, the Respondents are not of the “People” (Nation) of the United States, in the Family of Nations, nor of the “People” Republican Form of Government. The term "people" means a "Nation in its collective and political capacity". Nation. "A organized jural society...speaking the same language...and distinguished from other like groups by their racial origins and characteristics… The nation is the moral body, independent of political revolution, because it is 7
  8. 8. constituted by INBORN qualities, which render it INDISSOLUBLE (in/unalienable) a.k.a. Indivisible. 6. Further, the Respondent's Courts are for profit corporations and not sovereign government judicial tribunals. These courts commit fraud by charging a pro se the filing fee without disclosing that it is a burial fee to dump the case especially if the merits of the complaint was filed by Black Aboriginals of North America regarding usurping exercise of jurisdiction in extra-constitutional geographic area and Citizenship. Every year, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts publishes the Annual Report of the Director. It contains those courts’ official statistics on their caseload and their management of it by the judges and staff. A return on investment analysis report points to whether a rational human being, a homo economicus, should file in the court or gamble in Las Vegas. 7. In the FY15, 52,698 cases were filed in the 12 regional federal courts of appeals. Of them only 65% (34,244) were disposed of on the merits rather than on procedural grounds. Only 7.2% (3,794) of all appeals were disposed of in opinions of quality high enough for the judges to dare sign and publish them. The rest 92.8% was so intrinsically defective that they wanted to negate even the implication that they knew anything about it. You have 1 chance in 14 of getting a written opinion that means anything so that none of the three circuit judges on the appellate panel would be embarrassed by giving the public access to it with her name as the author or as one who joined in it. 8. The courts of appeals knew that before you filed your appeal you had spent $10,000s in legal fees or the equivalent in the effort and time that you invested in writing your brief and the pain and suffering that you had to endure to figure out whatever it was that you had to do to represent yourself. The courts offered appellate services, that implicitly were to be rendered honestly, if you pay their $505 filing fee. Your payment of the fee was your acceptance. A contract was formed, even if it was one of adhesion, much like the Federal 14th Amendment Adhesion citizenship through acceptance of governmental services. 9. But they failed to perform. What they delivered to dispose of your appeal and that of the rest 8
  9. 9. 93% of appellants was “unsigned, unpublished, without comment, by consolidation opinions”, which were so defective or wrongful that they overwhelmingly deprived them of any precedential value. By so doing, the courts made it all go to waste. They defrauded the 'original people' of the filing fee. They frustrated their reasonable expectation for disposition of appeal in a written and reasoned opinion that recognized that “Justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done”. And they did all of it knowingly and intentionally, for a settled principle of torts provides that “a person is deemed to intend the reasonable consequences of his or her acts”. They intended a fraud and a breach of contract. 10. Obtaining justice from the judges of the Federal Judiciary, the model for their state counterparts, is not only illusory, with worse odds than gambling and near certain waste; it is wrongdoing so coordinated as to be a scheme. Judges know that they are unaccountable and that in the end they will wield their power to dispose of their caseload so as to advance their interests, without regard for due process, equal protection of the law, reasonable expectations, and their end of the bargain of a contract in fact. On their way to final disposition, they engage risklessly in wrongdoing so widespread, routine, and grave that wrongdoing has become their institutionalized modus operandi. Throughout it all, they fail to abide by their own injunction to “avoid even the appearance of impropriety. 11. A pro se brief reaches the judge tainted by the presumption of irrelevancy, inadmissibility, and incompetence. She will give it the perfunctory attention that the official weighting of the case enables her to give it. The weighting works as a self-fulfilling expectation: Because the pro se case is weighted as merely a third of a case, the judge will presume it to be worthless and do a quick job of disposing of it, a chore most likely relegated to her law clerk. So it is highly probable that the judge will not even read the brief. Of the 18,969 appeals terminated in FY15 on procedural grounds, 73% (13,814) were terminated by the staff. It follows that as a pro se, they do not stand a chance of getting a 9
  10. 10. due process fair hearing or reading. Its DoA. 12. But you are treated “equal” to a represented party in that you had to pay the same $505 filing fee in the district court. The court failed to disclose on the Case Information Sheet before demanding and receiving from you that fee that by you checking the “pro se” box, the court would unduly process your case into a coffin and send it to the potter’s field for those who had committed pro se status. Instead, it put up the pretense that if you paid the fee, a judge would be assigned to your case who would fairly and impartially handle it on the merits according to law. Since the district courts knew that they would handle a pro se case, not as equal, but rather as inferior, to a represented case, those courts commit fraud on the original people of North America, in general, and the district court where you filed your case defrauded you, in particular violation of their own RICO statute. 13. Most importantly, the people, the Ancient people> “original people”> We the people Government of The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, never endorsed, the Federal United States Constitution nor the 50 Colony Federal State Constitutions, thereof. These Colonial Federal States, Federal Cities and Federal Counties [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)] overlap the “Original 1787 Constitutional” Republic Nation-states [>Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(1), Article IV § IV of the “Original 1787 Constitution] and remain bankrupt since 2005, and operating as an “outlaw nation” within the NGO, United Nations. 14. This criminal treasonous scheme to overthrow the de jure Sovereign Posterity Government of The United States of North America/The Republic of North America (> "Femme Couleur Libre”), in the Family of Nations, can be found in a classified report written to the late U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy by the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding Five Star Trust, a registered Isle of Man, West Indies Trust, which operates as a front for the U.S. Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency, also known for their 820+ Quadrillion global off-ledger bank accounts earned from the so-called war on drugs to implement their “New World Order”. However, one must overthrow an 'existing 10
  11. 11. government' to implement a New World Order Government, Treason. ISSUE PRESENTED 15. First and Foremost, Petitioner's Sovereign Posterity Government never endorsed the 1791 British Colony's Federal United States Constitution, nor the Colony's Federal States [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)] Constitutions, thereof. Further, the 1791-Present Colony Federal United States and Federal States never endorsed the “Original 1787 Constitution/Contract”. Most importantly, the British colonies were never granted Independence nor Sovereignty, therefore, never freed from Great Britain. 16. However, since these British subjects were never freed nor granted Independence and Sovereignty, they remain “natural-born subjects” employed by the foreign colonial corporation and known as "United States Citizens" or "individual franchises" known as "citizens of the United States" provide governmental services. i.e., foreign copyright statutory citizenry.2 Simply put, the colonial 2 For Courts who adjudicate pursuant to Title 26 shall recognize IMF, which means Individual Master File, all taxpayers have one. However, to read one you have to be able to break their codes: using files 6209, which is about 467 pages. On your IMF you will find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying. You will probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is reserved. You then look up the BMF 300- 399, which is the Business Master File in 6209. You would have seen prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business and involved in commerce and you are being held liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA - Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won't find many people using this form however, just the 1040 form. The 8288 forms can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you check the OMB's paper - Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545- 0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests- statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a. These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing changed, the “administrative government” just made it plainer, the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. Also see, Jay’s Treaty of 1774 between England and United States and Paris Treaty of 1774. Further, it is my understanding that Queen Elizabeth of England amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.1. 1997 No. 1778 The Social Security Order 1997-made 22nd day of July, 1997, coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court of Buckingham Palace 11
  12. 12. Brutish/British Moors (disguised as African-Americans) and their colonial Caucasian/White and African Nativity serfs, collectively, are not equal rank nor status of the posterity Ancient people, “We the people” > “original people” > natural born > Aboriginal Las Negras De-‘Terre’ of North America, they are aliens, moreover, each of them, have engaged in a private war against the Aboriginals of North America. Accordingly, an Alien has not right of Revolution Against the Petitioner: Kjar v. Doak, C.C.A. Ill 61 F.2d at 569. 17. The Respondents, each of them, usurping judicial jurisdictional power and authority, by and through, impersonation and mirroring of Petitioner's sovereign de jure government in the Family of Nations. The Respondents' setup offshore foreign corporations in the same name as or resembling Petitioner's sovereign de jure governments, to wit: UNITED STATES, INC., United States, Inc., The United States, Inc., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States of America, Inc., The United States of America, Inc., STATE OF WASHINGTON, INC., Washington States, Inc., COUNTY OF KING, INC., King County, Inc., CITY OF SEATTLE, INC., Seattle City, Inc.. These colonial foreign owned corporations mirroring de jure governments are subsidiary of the Municipal “District of Columbia” (>Cayman Island Corporation), parent company of the City of London, located in London. The Respondent's foreign colonial corporate Constitutions are mirroring the de jure Nation-States [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(1)]. 18. Further, Blacks are not monolithic, however, since the 1868 enactment of the British Colonial 13th /14th Amendment “Federal Constitution” following the 1856 Federal Corporate U.S. Supreme Court's Dred Scott vs. Sanford decision, the Respondents, each of them, re-categorized and converted the Black Aborigines of North America's sovereign “natural born” National/[C]itizenship “IN” The United States of North America/The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, to foreign “natural-born subjects” and Federal 13th /14th Amendment persons/[c]itizens of the United States the 22 day of July, 1997. 12
  13. 13. and United States of America Corporations (> formally The Virginia Colony Company & 1781 1st American Company), therefore stripping the 'original people' from the “Original 1787 Constitution/Contract” and “Original United States” thereafter listed them as natural resources (>chattel property/ Slaves) for foreign debts (Citizen = servant of government, National = those the government serves). 19. The Petitioner's “natural born” (>Aboriginal) National [C]itizenship lawfully included “Jus Soli” and “Jus Sanguinis, i.e., (a) the law of the place of ones birth rights or Preamble Citizens of The United States [of North America], and (b) the right of blood or the Posterity of We, the people of the United States Respectively. The Petitioner is not (a) natural-born citizens nor (b) natural-born subject, however, the Preamble-natural born Citizens of the United States [of North America (General Republican form of Government) in the Family of Nations] are Liegeman only to Petitioner's Government and not bound or subject to the jurisdiction of the (a) British Colonial Federal Corporation United States, in the United Nations [>Title 28, U.S.C.S. § 3002(15)(A)(B)(C)] (b) Federal State of Washington [> Title 5, U.S.C.S., § 1501(2)], (c) Administrative-State Government in the United States of America nor the (d) 13th /14th Amendment citizenship thereof. 20. The “original people” of The United States of North America did not knowingly, intentionally, willfully give up his/her “natural born” > Ancient Aboriginal Nahua-Negris da Terra rank and status, and Preamble Sovereign-Posterity National/Citizenship thereof, to be “natural born subjects” and Federal 13th /14th Amendment Corporation franchise persons/[c]itizens of the United States, “United States [c]itizens” and United States of America persons/ [c]itizens, moreover, the original people are “Strangers” to any other citizenship that attempts to (de)mismcre our Hakhdar Place of birth, i.e., 13th, 14th, 16th, et seq.. Further, the Preamble Posterity Black Aboriginals of North America are not colonial serfs > “natural-born subjects”, “African-Americans” nor Black/British Moorish subjects nor are they the same rank and status of Petitioner's “National” citizenry. 13
  14. 14. 21. Additionally, under Franklin D. Roosevelt’s tenure, as CEO of the United States of America, Inc. he setup millions of foreign situs trusts named after each colonial British “natural-born subjects” thereafter claimed them all as "foreign vessels in commerce" and sureties backing the debts of the already bankrupt United States of America, Inc. ----- which was just another foreign-owned governmental services corporation operated by the "Federal Reserve System". Unfortunately, the Nahua-Negris Da Terra of North America > “original people” > We the people” of the “Original United States” (>USNA) were also inserted into the Cestui Que Vie Trust, making them “foreign subjects” operated via the Puerto Rican Agreement. This foreign 'transmitting utilities' Federal “14th Amendment” “PERSON” is a Cestui Que Trust via changing his/her birth name from “Prince Rogers Nelson” to “PRINCE ROGERS NELSON” & “PRINCE R. NELSON”. This blatant Fraud, had its roots stretched back to the Civil War and other acts of fraud that occurred then, and the tentacles of it have stretched forward to today. Ironically, the cabal Federal State of Washington, Federal City of Seattle and Federal County of King Respondents, hijacked and illegally used the Black Aboriginals of North America's gold assets and collateral accounts, for themselves, under the economic disparities banner of “White Privilege”. 22. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District Court, Federal State of Washington Courts (> State, County & City), are foreign for profit corporations, enforcing 'public policy' legislated and enacted by 13th / 14th Amendment [c]itizens > “natural-born subjects” of the colonial Federal United States. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District Court and the Federal State of Washington Courts are in violation of Offences Against Law of Nations, Treason, Slavery, Genocide, Breech of Trust, Breech of Contract, by and through, manufacturing diversity of citizenship, converting the Black Aboriginals > “original people” > “We the people” of North America > Ancient “natural born” > Nahua-Negris Da Terra > Aztec Preamble Sovereign-Posterity National/ [C]itizens of the Preamble Sovereign-Posterity Government of The United States of North 14
  15. 15. America/The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, to become persons/citizens of the bankrupt British colonial Federal Corporational United States and Conterminous/Coterie Federal State of Washington [>Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)], i.e., Corporational Partisan-Political Campaign Municipal Coterie States; and the Federal Corporation> United States [Title 28, U.S.C.S. § 3002(15)], a.k.a. “Providence Plantation”, thereof. 23. Petitioner as “Creditor” so written in Article VI § I, of the “Original 1787 Constitution” have “original jurisdiction”, therefore, the right to demand its property, debt and taxes from the Respondents, pursuant Title 31, U.S.C.S. §§ 3544, 3545, et seq. Further, the “Law of Property Act of 1922,” which convert “Federal” Land into “Copyhold” and “Lease,” is illegal, unlawful and null void as Petitioner's government never approved nor endorsed such agreement. USNA/The Republic of North America, Family of Nations, is not under the Federal Government [> Title 4, U.S.C.S. § 107(a)] and has "exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal -area" [> Title 4, U.S.C.S., § 108]. RELIEF SOUGHT 24. The fact of the matter that I have called the debts owed on the Education, Food Stamps, Medicare and Social Security Bonds (Artificial Intelligence) due 2017, which you have no means of paying such debts, is beside the point. The Respondents are guilty of manufacturing citizenship, fraud, Treason, Slavery, Genocide, Domestic Terrorism, Economic Terrorism, Breech of Trust and Breech of Contract in blatant violation of Offences Against Law of Nations, therefore, an order directing Respondents' to cease and desist, from further impersonating and mirroring of Petitioner's de jure governments, is appropriate. If not, we shall zero balance your accounts, causing an International and Domestic financial crisis in accord with Article VI § I, similar to what was done that your so-called Federal Government shut down (0 the SPR accounts). 25. Petitioner as “Creditor” so written in Article VI § I, of the “Original 1787 Constitution” 15
  16. 16. have “original jurisdiction”, therefore, the right to demand its property, debt and taxes from the Respondents, pursuant Title 31, U.S.C.S. §§ 3544, 3545, et seq. Further, the “Law of Property Act of 1922,” which convert “Federal” Land into “Copyhold” and “Lease,” is illegal, unlawful and null void as Petitioner's government never approved nor endorsed such agreement. USNA/The Republic of North America, Family of Nations, is not under the Federal Government [> Title 4, U.S.C.S. § 107(a)] and have "exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal -area" [> Title 4, U.S.C.S., § 108]. Most importantly, we never endorsed the Federal Constitution, therefore, 14th Amendment § IV, don’t apply to the Testator Grantors, Beneficiary and owners of the assets. LEGAL STANDARD 26. This Court weighs five factors in determining whether to grant a writ of mandamus under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651: (1) The party seeking the writ has no other adequate means, such as a direct appeal, to attain the relief he or she desires. (2) The petitioner will be damaged or prejudiced in a way not correctable on appeal. (3) The district court’s order is clearly erroneous as a matter of law. (4) The district court’s order is an oft-repeated error, or manifests a persistent disregard of the federal rules. (5) The district court’s order raises new and important problems, or issues of law of first impression. Douglas v. U.S. Dist. Court, 495 F.3d 1062, 1065-66 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Not every element of the mandamus standard must be satisfied in order to warrant a writ. Valenzuela–Gonzalez v. U.S. Dist. Court, 915 F.2d 1276, 1279 (9th Cir. 1990) (“all five factors need not be satisfied at once”). “Exercise 16
  17. 17. of [the Court’s] supervisory mandamus authority is particularly appropriate when an important question of law would repeatedly evade review because of the collateral nature of the issue.” In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 688 F.2d 1297, 1304 (9th Cir. 1982). HISTORICAL FACTS 27. The fact of the matter that both White American and Black History are distorted, and the Colonial United States Colonies were never granted Independence nor Sovereignty, is beside the point. The Preamble and Constitutional Sovereign-Posterity General Government of The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, is far more ancient than the Historic arrival of the European explorers, or Proprietors and their White-Caucasian "Famulus" or Plantation Colonial Serfs. The word aMaRuKa (hăMooRica) is the origin of the modern term America that has absolutely nothing to do with the made up person historically called Amerigo Vespucci [nor did Christobal Colon>Christopher Columbus discover America or actually exist]. The term aMeR- ica is far older than the 15th Century. 28. The phrase "We the people" [of the United States of North America is far older than the Preamble Clause]; and is not referring to the American Citizens. In pre-historic America a people of the Aboriginal Ancestry called Lenape or the people and Lenni Lenape which translates to Grandfather, the Old Ones, Original People and We, the people. 29. The Lenape are now called Delaware Indians, but they never called themselves this. All other so called Native Americans referred to the Lenappy [The Nappy Head Ones] as the very ancient ones with Magic [Nanticoke]. William Penn by his own account written in his own hand said: "The Natives shall consider in their person... with my sense of Original. For their Person, they are generally tall, straight, well built, singular Proportioned; they tread strong and clever, and mostly walk with lofty chin: of complexion, BLACK, but by design, as the Gypsies in England...”. William Penn's 1683 account of the Delaware- Indians. 17
  18. 18. 30. Jack D. Forbes in his book entitled Africans and Native Americans, p. 69 states, "in 1524 the people of the Carolina coast were said to be of dark color not much unlike the Ethiopians". The Charlotte Observer dated Sunday August 15, 1993, stated that North Carolina in 1690 reported the presence of Blacks and that they are the ancestors of a people erroneously called Melungeons. 31. Mr. Forbes also states on p. 64 that "When Africans are referred to in the Jesuit letters they are always called NEGRO DA GUINE> blacks of Guinea to distinguish them from NEGRO DA TERRA> "blacks of the land of America". And on pages 67 & 71 he states “... French noir [black] and negre [black or dark person]... French More [Moor} as equivalent to Negro from Guinea".“... Thus Negro is used for Indian, and not for someone from Africa...In any case it is clear that many Iberians and Italians, whether in Europe or America, were comfortable using NEGRO, NEGRI, etc. for American." 32. The Negro da Terra are classified in Black's Law Dictionary 4th and 6th Edition as "Femme Couleur Libre" meaning free (Libre) Colored Nation (femme) or people. Black’s Law 6th Edition, p. 618: "Femme Couleur Libre up to the time of the Civil War, this term applied to all persons NOT of the White Race, including “Indians.” Again the word Indian originally did not mean “NATIVE AMERICAN” or “American” the way it is used today, however, it did mean Ethiopians, Negro da Terra (Native of America). See, e.g., Indi, Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary (C.L.D.) by D.P. Simpson, 1960, p. 299. The term “Native-American” refers to the Second Group of Americans. The first group esoterically the Nahua-Negris Indians known as the Aborigine Americans. The third group is the term Indigenous Americans. 33. The term Indian is a latter Latin word coming from Hindi or Sindu, meaning dark hued and transferring from the Older Latin word “Ethiopian”. The term Ethiopian is not of African origin and it transfers back to the Greek word Athiopian meaning Moorish and Mauros>dark hued), 1 Stat. 18
  19. 19. 103, 1 C3. Needless to say, words like Native American, American and many more are "Words of Art" (see, e.g., Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., p. 1779) or idiomatic [> “an accepted phrase or expression having a meaning different from the literal"]. The Old Moorish Latin, originally called Latimer/Latimor or Latiner (see Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. P. 1027), consisted of three/3 sorts of Law Latin. The third or esoteric sort was and is only known to a select few called "Sages" which consist of idioms> words of art and also called "Lawyers Latin or Law Latin": “Law Latin” The corrupt form of the Latin language employed in the old English law books and legal proceedings". See, e.g., Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed., p. 1030. 34. The Monocan Empire (>Lenni Lenape) of the United States was a Union of three Confederacies: (I) AlgonKuian, (2) Iroquoian and (3) Siouan Linguistic groups with 13 zones, [the basis for the 13 original States] 16 National States and numerous Tribal-City Units> Small towns. The Monocan Empire domain was North into Canada, South to the Gulf of Mexico, East to the Atlantic Ocean and West to the Ohio Valley; and law and order was maintained by their supreme Law of the Land, i.e., The Constitution of the Five [Five symbolized complete unity and not individual states] Nations a.k.a. the Great Law of Peace [>Islam]; and Originally called GayanashaGowa.3 3 Although this explains why the History of Los Angeles County Superior Court was founded off of the Islamic “Moorish Al-Quadi Judicial System”, the Petitioner shall direct the court's attention to Time Magazine #ISBN 0- 8129-0847-3 who produced a copy of the oldest known map of North America. The article stated that this ancient Libyan- Arabic script … ca., the first century B.C. and in the center of the Continent, i.e., Nevada is the word MR [>MooR] and being the origin of the word America. Barry Fell, Emeritus Professor at Harvard University and author of Saga America (Time Book), states that "America" probably has nothing to do with Amerigo Vespucci [also see Isis Unveiled for more info on this subject]. "Dr. Fell indicates several Pre-Colombian cultures in the (United States) west, finding rich evidence of an early Arabic presence, including many instances of decorative signatures of the PROPHET MOHAMMAD...He suggest important correspondence between Pueblo [>City] Indian culture and North African cultures. He infers a major Carthaginian (Canaanites>MooRTu=Moors) trade with North and South America". In an article entitled "Secret Societies in the Ancient Americas" it states: “Ancient Masonic Lodges have been discovered among the American Indians … what he called an ancient Indian Masonic Lodge at an Anasazi Indian archeological site … eighty percent identical to the Masonic Lodges in America now. In the ancient lodge … there were fifty rock and clay tablets, which he dates 1000 and 1200 A.D., written in 19
  20. 20. 35. The MonoKhan/MoRoKhan Confeoderati was primarily, principally and predominately Mauros complexioned and Copper/Coffee hues. The legendary founders of the Great Law of Peace were DeKanawidah (an Angel of the Lord) and Hiawatha (the man who wrestled with the Angel of the Lord> Jacob). The pine or White Pine was the National Symbol of the United People and this same Pine symbol' transferred to the Official Flag of the United States of America centralized in the United States in Congress Assembled: and historically called the Continental Congress Flag of 1775. what appears to be Arabic... Even the name America may be the product of ancient American secret Society. In an 1895 edition of a magazine called Lucifer, published the occult promoting Theosophical Society, … the word America … He said that the Supreme God of the Mayan culture of Central America, Known as Quetzalcoatl elsewhere, was known in Peru as Amaru, Amaru's territory was Known as Amaruca...". The Olmecean Civilization of Central America is considered by most Scholars to be the oldest high culture in America. The word Mexico comes from the word Olmec and the coded Moorish word Amexem [this word is a verb: "place of the mixing": and not a noun> name]. Most scholars deduce this word from "Olli" or "rubber people", however, it would be better translated Oli> Ali=Exalted Ones and the people who bounce back> The Phoenix=Phoenicians> Canaanites> MRTW=MooTu> The Moors > Blacks. The term Ol-Mec when esoterically understood means Al-Mac> son of or belonging to Alh (Allah) or el-MeK> those from Mecca> The MeKKans. One of the Oldest meanings of Mecca [a/k/a BaKKa (Ba>soul&Ka>spirit)] is veteran or belonging to Egypt or TMR> T’ Moors. The original Meccan (Olmeccans) was of the Family Imran. In the Quran by A. Yusuf Ali, Sura/Chpt. 3, Iyat/Verse 32-33-it states: "Allah did choose Adam, Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of IMRAN above (exalted>Ali=Oli>Olli) all people, - Offspring, one of the other: And God heareth and knoweth all things". Who was and is Imran, the last of the chosen family of God? Imran is a word of art term that can be fully comprehended when one applies the ancient Moorish Arabic three/3 radical roots. In A Concordance of the Quran (C.O.Q.) by Hanna E. Kassis, p. 266 & 267 the idiom term I-MRaN becomes MR> MooR. The Ayn> is silent and the letter 'N' is a terminal plural that becomes the modern 'S', therefore, I> ayn> silent and MRN=MRS> Moors > Blacks > Negro Da Terra > Nativity/Native of aMaRuKa (hăMooRica > America. Also the letter *’N’> Nun meaning water, sea and ocean adding to the meaning of the word Imran, i.e., Moors> Merman or Moorman=Navigators, helmsmen and governors. Remember the first governors or presidents of the United States where Moors > Blacks > Negro Da Terra > Nativity/Native of aMaRuKa (hăMooRica > America, with the titles of Bey. In "The Ancient History of the Distinguished Surname Bey", by The Historical Research Society in Orlando FL, state’s that "These (Beys) pioneers became the nucleus of the first settlements from Maine to the Cumberland Gap. They provided much of the STOCK that produced the early Presidents and Governors of the United States of North America. In Canada they settled Nova Scotia, the St. Lawrence and Ottawa Valley. 20
  21. 21. 36. Every, so-called, civilized nation has a Patron Saint. The name of the North America Patron Saint is St. Tammany whose birthday is celebrated on May 1st [Epiphany Moors] and he was a Lenape-Delaware Chief. The word Tammany is rooted in the words "Tami"> ancient group and "Tame" originally meaning those who tame, that is to say, civilization bringers. Tammany also means affable, friendly or easy to approach. 37. The European Denizen proprietors of the United Colonies of America found themselves comfortable and at ease in Tamrnany's presence while attempting to negotiate an agreement that would allow them to become an annexed part of the Aborigina1- Indigenous Native United States of North America's Government, in the Family of Nations. See, e.g., Tammany, Dictionary of the American Indian (D.A.I.) by John Stoutenberg, Jr., 1960, p. 404. 38. The leaders of United peoples of America was the MoRhocKs [pronounced Mohocks]; and now falsely written as Mohawks. The Lenape Monocan Empire strayed away from the Great Law of Peace, warred amongst themselves, at the behest of their British Denizens, reinstituted Slavery and adopted Christianity. By 1677 the Monocan people were forced into a treaty as "Liege Subjects" with Lord Charles II, which, by 1729-1774 the Monocan "corrupt" Empire was all but finished. See, e.g., Authentic Virginia Colonial Records- 1677 Treaty, Between Virginia And The Indians. 39. However, on the 4th day of July, 1776, the Resurrected Monocan Empire Pronounced to the World the Authentic “A Declaration” By the Representatives of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, In General Congress Assembled [not to be confused with the Denizen British Proprietors "Declaration of Independence". For further information on free Maures people in pre-Columbian America, see “Strangers In Their Mist”, S. & R. McLeRoy and “The Melungeons, Brent & Robyn Kennedy”. BRITISH COLONIES WERE NEVER GRANTED INDEPENDENCE AND SOVEREIGNTY 21
  22. 22. THE BIG LIE 40. The USA, a corporation of the English Crown, is bankrupt, and has been since at least 1788. The Articles of Confederation states in Article 12: “All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed as considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.” The Colony's 1791 Federal United States so-called “Founding Fathers,” as constitutors, acknowledged and reorganized the debt in the “Original 1787 Constitution”, Article VI, hence “constitution.” Bankruptcy occurred on January 1, 1788 based on 21 loans that the United States of America received from the King of England dating from February 28, 1778 through July 5, 1782, the repayment of which had been ratified by Congress on January 22, 1783. The United States Bank, created in 1791, was a private bank, with 18,000 of 25,000 shares owned by England. 41. No de jure, constitutional Congress has existed since March 27, 1861 when seven (7) Southern States walked out of Congress leaving Congress without a quorum for adjourning and therefore ending sine die. That which is called “Congress” today assembles and acts under the authority of the President acting in capacity of being Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, under emergency war-powers rule, i.e. “law of necessity,” i.e. no law (see 12 Stat 319, which has never been repealed and exists in Title 50 USC §§ 212, 213, 215, Appendix 16, 26 CFR Chapter 1 § 303.1-6(a), and 31 CFR Chapter 5 § 500.701 Penalties). 42. Since the above-referenced date, March 27, 1861, the original people of North America have been under Fascist rule via presidential executive order under the aforementioned Emergency War Powers, 12 USC 95 a, b., which the original people and their governments, is now “legally” established as an “enemy” via the Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, amending Trading With Enemy 22
  23. 23. Act of October 6, 1917, H.R. 4960, Public Law No. 91. 4. December 6th, 1865, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed as ratified (even though it never properly was, see below). The 14th Amendment, (which is private Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust Law, known as the Saint Peters Trust), constitutes a constructive, cestui que trust, a public charitable trust, “PCT,” that was expressly designed to bring every corporate franchise artificial person called a “citizen of the United States” into an inseparable merging with the government until the two are united (with the power inhering in the government, not the people). A cestui que trust is fundamentally different from a regular trust, which is express in nature and consists of a contractual indenture involving three (3) parties: Grantor (Creator or Trustor), Trustee, and Beneficiaries. In an express trust, legal ownership is transferred by written contract between Grantor and Trustee in which the Grantor surrenders ownership of property to the legal person, the Trust, to be managed by the Trustee on behalf of those who are to benefit from the arrangement, the Beneficiaries. A cestui que trust, on the other hand, differs from an express trust in several crucial ways: a. It is not formed by express contract, i.e. overt agreement expressed in writing, but by legal construction, i.e. fiat. b. A cestui que trust has no Grantor, but, being a constructive trust created by operation of law, i.e. by make-believe, has only co-trustees and co-beneficiaries. The co-trustees are the parties with the duties for managing property for the “public good,” i.e. for the benefit of those designated as co-beneficiaries. 43. The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, chartered a Federal company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the so-called 14th Amendment, which the record indicates was never ratified (see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 23
  24. 24. 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484; Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US, Inc. in Section 4. 44. In conformity with the above-referenced creation of United States (1871) and the 14th Amendment, the Legislature of each State created a limited-liability corporation, chartered in a private, military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF…” e.g. “STATE OF CALIFORNIA,” as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the creation of a new constitution, e.g. Constitution of the State of California (1879), concerning which, re California: a. A general partnership agreement, hereinafter “General Partnership,” exists between the California Republic (1849), and STATE OF CALIFORNIA (1879), with STATE OF CALIFORNIA acting as governmental controller. b. STATE OF CALIFORNIA now acts as an agent/instrumentality of United States, collecting whole life insurance premiums, known as “taxes,” for the International Monetary Fund, based, inter alia, upon the Limited Liability Act of 1851 and the bankruptcy of United States of 1933, (see House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933; Public Law 73-10; Perry v. U.S. (1935), 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 L Ed 912; 31 USC 5112, 5119). 45. Inasmuch as all law is contract, the contract involved in a constructive trust is an implied contract. An implied contract can be ratified by two (2) means: a. Acquiescence by silence, i.e. the “government” asserts its intentions concerning your life, rights, and property and you assent, don’t rebut, and compliantly go along with what they claim. In 1871 the Government changed the nature of its contract with the people from law as defined by the original Constitution of 1787 that recognizes law (common law), admiralty (on the sea only), and equity (functioning by voluntary contract between all participating parties), and began relating to people as if they were “citizens of the Unites States” within/under the private, commercial, international, military 24
  25. 25. jurisdiction of the new de facto corporation, i.e. US Inc. They offered people a “new deal,” and almost everyone bought it (based on naïve and foolish trust and assuming that everything was OK). 46. The We the people, e.g. 'original people' of North America were thereby denied access to its original sovereign government's law and placed on the ship of state of US Inc. where the captain’s word is law and no one has any rights. As Jefferson phrased the matter, “As government grows, liberty recedes.” b. You expressly accept “benefits” offered by the government, and thereby finalize the contract by deed. This is similar to finalizing a contract with a restaurant by sitting down at a table, reading a menu, and then ordering and consuming a meal. By your deeds you affirm to the restaurant that you will pay for the meal in accordance with the price stated on the menu. No written contract is signed, but a contract is formed nevertheless. 47. By the above two (2) means people give implied assent that they are bound by an alleged contract with US Inc. in accordance with the terms and conditions that inhere in being treated as a “citizen of the United States” under the 14th Amendment, and are therefore placed into permanent legal status as a Debtor and Surety for U.S. Inc.. In such a position, the original We, the People of North America leave the ground of sovereignty and all capacity for asserting their birthrights, nationality, inheritance rights, and rights of self-governess in favor of being presumed as having exercised their sovereignty and free-will autonomy for the purpose of going along with the government’s assertion that they sacrifice everything for the “public good,” (i.e. the PCT). By so doing the original people lose their standing in law, (i.e. they “die a civil death in the law.”) They are placed in the legal position of mortmain (i.e. as if deceased) and are shorn of capacity for asserting their rights, since the presumption is that they have already exercised those rights for the purpose of being placed in the position they are in, i.e. property of the foreign government with a lien against them and everything including life labor could ever create, and their posterity, children. The private being (the real 25
  26. 26. individual) is sacrificed for the good of the public (the imaginary collective). 48. When people die such a civil death in the law they are like ghosts, and thereby incapable of managing their own affairs and enjoying their birth rights. Like the estate of a decedent, they are then managed by the executors/administrators of the estate, in probate. Such is the condition of every “citizen of the United States” today in law, managed by the government agencies acting as executors/administrators of their estates in bankruptcy, legal incapacity, and civil death as assets of the bankrupt US. The US is property of the private Real Parties of Interest, the Creditors in bankruptcy. 49. The 14th Amendment was allegedly established for the purpose of creating a citizenship for the liberated White Negroes, and other disenfranchised people, who otherwise had no citizenship because they could not comply with the requirements for state citizenship. What actually happened was that the White Negroes were taken off of the Southern slave plantations and placed into the slave plantation of the foreign US Inc., a far worse lot. The foreign government then gradually absorbed everyone else — including the original sovereign people, e.g. We, the people, of the land — into the same condition. 50. 1871-1913. Officers of the actual government held office in dual capacity, (i.e. in both USA and US Inc. status). 51. 1912. Bonds issued by US Inc. came due but US Inc. did not have the resources for paying their creditors (the seven families that founded the Federal Reserve Bank), so US Inc.’s owner (the actual government) was required to pay the balance. The national government was also without sufficient funds to meet US Inc.’s obligations, so the foreign creditors settled for all of the assets of both US Inc. and the national government instead of foreclosure on and liquidation of the entire country. By so doing, they expropriated the nation — both USA and US Inc. Sic transit America. 52. 1912. US Inc. forms an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank (It is important to note that both of these entities are foreign private corporations which removes the general allegations of 26
  27. 27. treason or fraud from this relationship). Through this agreement, US Inc. must function in debt, even though they have neither funds nor resources for financing their operation. 53. 1912. The first corporate only Senators are seated in the next election year by popular vote of the US Inc. registered voters. The original-jurisdiction national Senators of the States did not assume office that year and at least one third of the nation’s Senators seats were lawfully and voluntarily vacant. 54. February 3rd, 1913. US Inc. passes its 16th Amendment and Congress orders the Secretary of State to enter it as ratified even though the States had not ratified it according to Law. The Secretary complied. It should be noted that this would not have been lawful if it were a national Constitution amendment, however it was perfectly legal within the colorable, de facto foreign corporation. It should also be noted that where the national Constitution already had a 16th Amendment and where the Supreme Court says that the new 16th Amendment did not do anything, this corporate Amendment must simply be a space filler entered such that US Inc.’s Constitution (1871) would have the same number of Amendments as that of the national Constitution (1787). 55. April 8th, 1913. US Inc. passes its 17th Amendment and Congress orders it to be entered as ratified in the exact same manner as they did with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment. This Amendment changes where US Inc.’s Senators are elected. This Amendment is not even lawfully possible as a national Constitution Amendment for several reasons, not the least of which is that the Amendment would have required that Congress first pass an Amendment that stated that they had the power to say where Senators are elected before they could even deliberate on such a subject matter, after which they would then have to have competent ratifications performed on such Amendments in accord with Constitutional limits, not as was done with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment. 56. December 23, 1913. The Congress, (late at night with only a small cadre of supporters present), passed the Federal Reserve Act, surrendering the creation and management of the nation’s 27
  28. 28. currency into the hands of a cartel of private — and mostly foreign — bankers. Currency is the single most essential and critical commodity in the world, embodying more law and principles of commerce than any other. Since all interactions are “commerce,” and the medium of doing business in commerce is currency, money is in a very significant sense the measure of all things. 57. By abandoning control and management of the money supply, the nation surrendered all capacity for claiming sovereignty. The government lost its independent treasury (one of the requirements in law for national sovereignty). The United States Government became a mere fiefdom, or administrative arm, of the foreign bankers, who now owned the store. 58. Massage of the Federal Reserve Act was a major milestone on the “road to serfdom” that this entire progression outlines. The conspiratorial nature of matters is exemplified in comments by one of the major actors in the triumph of the Federal Reserve, Edward Mandell House, who had this to say in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson: “[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social 28
  29. 29. Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” 59. 1917. Corporate-only Senators begin participating in all matters with those Senators who still had original jurisdiction government capacity, as a result of which all activities of the government were performed in corporate capacity only. 60. 1917. President Wilson was re-elected by the Electoral College, but only US Inc.’s Senate performed the Senate confirmation necessary for seating the national President. There was no national government Senate confirmation; no national seats were seated and all remained vacant. 61. Note: the national President is also the Military’s Commander in Chief, and under the nation’s status of being ruled by the private, commercial, martial-law rule of the Bankers and English Crown, the business needs of the nation have remained under US Inc. control since 1871, (i.e. ever since US Inc. was incorporated and made operational over such matters). 62. 1917-1944. All national government seats are and remain vacant, and US Inc. continues maintaining the business needs of the government under martial-law rule. 63. June 5, 1933. US Inc. declares bankruptcy under House Joint Resolution, “HJR,” 192. 22. 1935. The Social Security Act is passed. 64. On application, the new Social Security Administration (hereinafter “SSA”) creates a private Trust with a trust name that sounds like the name of the applicant except the Trust’s name is spelled with all capital letters. SSA makes the applicant a co-trustee of the namesake Trust, designates the SSA General Trust Fund as the Beneficiary of the namesake trust, and assigns the Trust a Social Security General Trust Fund Account number regarding the applicant for accounting and identification purposes. 29
  30. 30. 65. 1938. In Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64-92, the U.S. Supreme Court sets the presumption regarding the status and capacity of an individual as that of General Capacity/General Partnership relationship with the namesake Trust, as if the two (2) entities — individual and namesake Trust — were one-in-the-same person. 66. 1944. In the Bretton Woods Agreement, US Inc. is quit-claimed into the newly formed International Monetary Fund (hereinafter “IMF”) in exchange for the power allowing US Inc.’s President the right of naming (seating and controlling) the governors and general managers of the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter- American Bank also formed in that agreement (codified at United States Code Title 22 § 286). It must be noted that this Act created an unlawful conflict of interest between US Inc. (with its new foreign owner) and its purpose of carrying out the business needs of the national government. This is the cause of our use of the term “original-jurisdiction” government. With the new foreign owner of US Inc. a conflict of interest is created between the general national government and US Inc., even though the contracted purpose of US Inc. has not changed on its face. 67. Since 1953 – 1975 at least, MKULTRA (Mind Control, etc.), CIA, and Military are unlawfully engaging in human experimentation with and without the knowledge of the subjects. Military airborne toxins are sprayed on large cities without warning for the purpose of studying distribution and effect patterns, and other more sinister purposes (see numerous cites on the Internet re “chem-trails”). Cite: Joint Hearing before the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 95th Congress, 1st Session, August 3, 1977. 68. 1962. At the National Governor’s Conference in Lexington, Kentucky; US Inc. informs the governors (under the guise of “public necessity”) that they must all form, or reform existing, private corporations under US Inc. (in their State’s interest), so that the people will not discover what the State governments are doing with the original people’s assets (dabbling in foreign notes, i.e. Federal Reserve 30
  31. 31. Notes (FRNs), bonds, and evidences of debt), which activity is forbidden from State governments by their own State Constitutions, which information would likely cause a people’s revolt ending in the State official’s being, at worst, killed and at least replaced. The proposed incorporation deadline was 1968. 69. 1970. By this time, each State revised its Constitution and Statutes and formed private corporate entities [> Title 5, U.S.C.S., § 1501(2)] of the name “STATE OF (X)” (where “(X)” is representative of the common State name), and then vacated the original people of North America, We the people, original jurisdiction sovereign nation government seats [> Title 5, U.S.C., § 1501(1)] in favor of foreign ownership and control under the mandate of US Inc. 70. It appears that this was all done so a General Partnership could be presumed as existing between “The State” (of the national Union of States) and “STATE OF (X)”, a private corporation. Said STATE OF (X), as General Partner, then assumes the role of governmental operator/controller. This scenario is further proven by the fact that these corporate entities cannot handle gold and silver coin of the United States of America in commercial transactions without violating the Par Value Modifications Act and the Foreign Currency Exchange Act. 71. September 5, 1996, U.S. Patent & Trademark Office application number 709471 is filed, consisting of a plan for marking the alleged “human property” of US Inc., (i.e. every “citizen of the United States”) reminiscent of the Christian Biblical reference in the nature of the Mark of the Beast. This plan is a violation of foundational law. 72. April 19th, 1994. Federal agents attack, burn, and raze the compound, killing approximately 100 of the members of the sect, without any lawful cause for the action. 73. 50 USC 1520 et seq. demonstrates that there exists an agenda for using the original people of North America (Sovereign and otherwise) as biological test subjects. This is a fundamental breach of an alleged Constitutional contract and violation of Offenses Against Law of Nations. 31
  32. 32. 74. President Clinton pushes for a mandatory Health Care Bill for the purpose of placing the physical bodies of all the original people of North America, We the people, under control of US Inc., with international identification attached, for the purpose of tagging the populace, as per the Biblical prophecy of the Mark of the Beast. The computer that would handle the tracking is even identified with the acronym: B.E.A.S.T. 75. What the above progression depicts is the systematic growth of the power, scope, and pervasive control of Government exercised against the original people of North America, We the people, by foreign, criminal, and hostile powers. 76. This same dreary gestalt constitutes the nature of man’s history on this planet as far back as the eye can see. Civilizations rise, fall, and disappear, replaced by new ones that — based upon being founded on, and functioning in accordance with, wrong principles — are foredoomed for extinction, as were all of their predecessors and as all future civilizations will be until mankind finally learns and ceases “beating a dead horse” by structuring law, commerce, religion, and social organization in general on principles that are existentially impossible. 77. The above progression has proceeded in North America by implementing such strategy as: 1. Relentlessly instilling in the Aboriginal people of North America, We the people, the foundational idea that governments in general are absolutely essential in the society of man and that the Government in North America is the people’s friend and servant, (i.e. a “government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”) These premises are untrue — self-serving cons by those who want the foreign power. 2. Creating governmentally owned corporate franchises, such as a “citizen of the United States” and one’s all-capital-letter name, with which the Aboriginal people of North America, We the people, are deceived into identifying. 3. Regarding every citizen of the United States as contractually being: a. A foreign corporate citizen, i.e. a corporate franchise; b. A co-trustee (with duties) and co-beneficiary (with privileges) of the 14th Amendment Public 32
  33. 33. Charitable cestui que Trust; c. Pledged as an asset in the bankruptcy of US Inc., and therefore a co-surety for the debts of US Inc.; d. An enemy of the Creditors; e. Chattel property of the foreign Bankers and foreign Power Elite; f. A slave with no capacity for asserting any rights, no standing in law, and no capacity for contracting. 4. Functioning on the presumption that the individual being, with autonomy and free will, knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily contracted into the situation of being united — like heads and tails of a coin — with a corporate entity created and owned by the foreign Governments. 78. As per the established maxim of law, “As a thing is bound, so it is unbound,” the way out of the problem is within and through the problem. This is accomplished by understanding what the problem is, (i.e. its structure and character, just as solving the problem of a plugged drain is accomplished by realizing that the problem is the plugged drain, whereby the solution consists of unplugging the drain.) “Know the truth and the truth shall make you free.” 79. The United States Library of Congress now has between 2,000,000 and 3,000,000 books on colonial corporate partisan-political copyright law lobbied by foreign entities. Any law library is a daunting place, possessing row after row of shelves with foreign copyrighted books full of fine print. Making knowledge of such “law” even more unattainable is not only that what passes for law today perpetually changes, altered by every new Court Case/Opinion, by non 'natural born' [>Aboriginals of North America] Legislators and Judges, by and through, Legislative foreign colonial corporate partisan- political enactment, and all of the ever-changing Policies, Rules, and Regulations of Administrative Agencies, but an immense amount of the world’s law today (as actually implemented) is unwritten and inaccessible. 33
  34. 34. 80. This is not only because non 'natural born' Judges operate in General Equity in which the ultimate Arbiter of a matter is the “conscience of the court” (i.e. how the judge feels about something that day), but because almost all of the world’s law is the private Law Merchant of the foreign Creditors in bankruptcy of the world’s Nations, essentially all of which are insolvent and in receivership to the foreign Bankers. [3] This private Law Merchant is of ancient origin, and is implemented today by men whose identities are unknown to the mass of mankind. 81. In the face of this undependability of law we may ask some fundamental and ingenuous questions: 1. Is there such a thing as genuine law that is timeless, stable, and dependable? 2. If so, can such universal law be effectively invoked and utilized in practice today? How can I use it to ensure my natural law sovereign birth rights to life and happiness to the original people of North America? 3. If genuine law exists, why is it not taught and uniformly utilized instead of the chaotic and colorable charade that dominates the legal field against the sovereign Aboriginal people of North America, today? 4. Can we integrate said universal law with the ephemeral, desultory “law” that now enslaves the overwhelming majority of the Aboriginal people of North America? STATEMENT OF FACTS 82. It's quite evident by the following Treaties and Agreements that the British colonies were never granted Sovereignty nor Independence in North America and the Brutish/British Moors including their colonial Caucasian/White serfs remain “natural-born subjects” of the United States of Great Britain's Federal Corporation's known as United States, Incorporated > “United States [c]itizens” and United States of America, Incorporated, franchise “[c]itizens of the United States”, and fifty (50) 34
  35. 35. Federal States [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)] thereof, to wit: Secret 1781 1st American Company, Secret 1783 Trilateral Tripartite Agreement (The United States of North America, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States & Britain), Secret Puerto Rican Agreement, Secret 1664 Titulo Torrens of North America, Secret 1772-Present Treaty of Versailles, 1773 Secret Treaty of Paris, Federal Pacem Terris Covenant & Concordant, Five Books, Sixteen Copies, Black Book of Exchequer, Blue Book; and holds the Secret 1919 Treaty of Versailles, Secret 1950 Bilateral Minefield Agreement, Secret 1950 Trilateral Tripartite Agreement and Secret 1963 Green Hilton Agreement. 83. The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America became involved with the British Colonial Confederal/Federal Corporation in 1791 via the above-mentioned Treaties and Agreements which made the Federal United States a subordinate and Annexed Business Trust of the General Government of The United States of North America, this colonial Federal Corporation government of and in the United States is and was completely distinct from any and all Municipal (Lat. Muni-capio) Incorporation, and the post 1933 Administrative government of the United States. 84. The subordinate and Annexed colonial United States 1791 Federal Corporation government went bankrupt several times including the year of 1933-Present. However, the colonial Federal “Agency of the United States” White/Caucasian colonial serfs raised the Administrative Commercial Bankruptcy Flag of the 1791 British Colonial Federal United States between 1929-1935 adding gold fringes to its flag while attempting to declare “White Independence” in North America, which they too remain bankrupt, since 2005. 85. There are three types of [C]itizens within North America: (a). Title 8, U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a)(22)(A) "a citizen [> a Preamble natural born and Resident] of the United States" [of North America in the family of nations] is the principalized pre- entitled national of the United States. The word "citizen" used previously is NOT a corporation but a citizen within the meaning of the original 1787 Constitution, i.e., Article. 1-7 and a citizen of the 35
  36. 36. Republican States entitled to privileges and/or immunities [> see, e.g., 8 U.S.C.S., Section 1503(a)] of the 14th Amendment prohibiting any States from abridging privileges and/or immunities of Citizens of the United States. Also, neither the Federal nor State Governments are Citizens. All Preamble and Articles 1-7 individual human beings who are natural-born Citizens are LIGIUS> LIGA and Allegiance in Alliance or by TREATY> The Preamble and United States Constitution, with the United States of America Government, in the Family of Nations. (b). Title 8, U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a)(22)(B) "a PERSON [> both natural and artificial, or native and alien] who, though not a citizen [Preamble, Articles 1-7, entitled, natural born, Allegiance, etc.] of the United States OWES [> to bound or bind> compulsory constraints, also contractual] permanent [> not subject to change] allegiance to the United States", in the family of nations [> FON or fon]. (c). Title 8, U.S.C.S., Section 1401(a) "The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at BIRTH: [> born=delivered over to] (1) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The word "Slave" in Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. p. 1559, reads as follows: "A person who is wholly subject to [> permanently owes] the will [one wishes or a revocable contract] of another.” 86. There are three types of Nationals within North America: (a) Preamble "Posterity", (b) "free persons" [Art. 1, Sec. 2, Clause 3], (c) “natural born”, (d) Naturalized Resident Citizens [Articles 1, Sec. 8, Clause 4 & 2, Sec. 1, Clause 5], (e) Republican State Citizens [Art. 4, Sec. 4 & Sec. 2, Clause 1 with added "privileges and immunities" so written in Amendment 14, Sec. I, sentence two]. This National Citizen can also be found in 8 U.S.C.S., Section 1101 (a)(22)(A). (b) The Denizen or (a) "free Person", including those bound to SERVICE for a TERM of YEARS (> word of art) [Art. 1, Section 2, Clause 3 and (b) Naturalized [Nationalized] Resident Citizens of the United States [Art. I, Section 8, Clause 4 & Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5]. Also this denizen national is attached to the Preamble National Citizenship according to 8 U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a), (22)(B) via “Allegiance”, and amalgamated within “A Declaration of 1776” as "The Declaration of Independence", especially the last paragraph of both the authentic “A Declaration” and the historic “Declaration of Independence”. (c) “Three fifths. …Persons [Art. 1, Section 2, Clause 3]. Esoterically a person who is three fifths- human, simply represents an individual who lacks [Ar. Lak> Angel] complete control of the Spiritual or Mental inner senses outwardly described as the physical senses of seeing and 36
  37. 37. hearing. The other three are the sense of smell, taste and touch. Hue or complexion has nothing to do with a person being Truly classified as being three fifths a person, however, anyone who designates themselves as Black, Brown, Red, Yellow or White, or allows others the authority to do so is a "Colored person or person of color"> three fifths human. 87. More importantly, the “original” 1787 Constitution4 prohibited “African Nativity” citizenship, in pertinent part: 88. “Original 1787” Constitution Article XIII § 12 states: "The traffic in Slaves WITH AFRICA is hereby forever prohibited on pain of death and the forfeiture of all rights and property of persons engaged therein: and the descendants of Africans shall not be Citizens" (of the Federal Corporation United States).5 89. A type of freedom for Africans is also found in § B of the same Article. "Involuntary Servitude (of Africans) except for crime, shall not be permanently established within the District … Persons held to Service or Labor for life, shall not be denied" the Sojourn. 90. However, the “U.S.” Supreme Court rendered a decision in the matter of Dred Scott vs. Sandford on the 12th day of May, 1856, thereafter, on the 28th day of July, 1868, the 1791 Federal 4 See, e.g., Alden vs. Maine, 527 US 706: “Sovereign Immunity drives not from the Eleventh Amendment but from the structure of the “original Constitution”; McCreary County vs. ACLU, 545 US at page 872: “and it is no less baffling to leave out the “original Constitution” of 1787 while quoting the 1215 Magna Carta”; Kansa vs. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163, 165 L.Ed 2d 429, note 1: “The original Constitution contained few guarantees of individual rights against the states, and in a clash of governmental authority there was a small risk that the state courts would erroneously side with the new Federal Government”. 5 Scientifically speaking the modem day fields of Archeology and Anthropology has, without a doubt shown that there are only two types of human beings and that both types came from the vogue popular term, erroneous as it may be, African Ancestry. What they are not telling the public is that “African Descent” does not mean “African Nativity”; and that Africa today was named after a Canaanite Moorish Roman citizen named Scipo Africanus. Further, Contrary to most judicial perverted opinions, Blacks are not monolithic, and African-Americans (> African Nativity), British colonial Moors who enslaved the European Caucasian colonial White serfs, are not the same rank nor status of the “original people” (>Blacks) of North America, e.g., Petitioner. 37
  38. 38. Colonial Corporate United States enacted their 14th Amendment to its Constitution. Ironically, naturalization was extended repeatedly by Treaty and acts of Congress to Indians and Negroes long before Dred Scott and the enactment of the Federal 14th Amendment Constitution. See, e.g., Treaty of Choctaws, Article 14, 20th September, 1830; Treaty with the Cherokees, 12th Article, Vol V, U.S. Laws, 647; Treaties of 1803 for Louisiana, 1819 for Florida, 1847 for California. Therefore, with the combination of the aforementioned Treaties and Acts of Congress and the “Original 1787” Constitution Art. 1, Section. 9, Clause 1, (esoterically terminating White Negro Slavery by 1807-08), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals now must address which “United States” the aforementioned Black citizens of before the 1856 Dred Scott decision and the 1868 enactment of the Federal United States 14th Amendment Constitution? The answer to that question can easily be found in Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 4 Cranch at 212: “original United States”. Also see, Harcourt v. Gaillard, 6 L.Ed 216, 12 Wheat at 523: “There was no territory within the (original) United States, USNA. 91. The Federal Colony 14th Amendment Citizen: (a) Section I. " All persons [natural and artificial] born [> the "act of being delivered" via a birth certificate application: delivery "the transfer from one person to another of the res or a right or interest therein, which means more than physical transfer of possession". Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.], or naturalized [> an adoption of an alien or foreigner via an Oath of Allegiance and not the Pledge of Allegiance: a naturalized citizen is a Title 8, U.S.C.S., § 1401 subjugated citizen as a 14th Amendment born citizen] in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, [> Lat. serv, serf or slave] are citizens of the United States and of the State [> State of Consciousness, Status or rank in society or Municipal> Muni-capio political party and Democracy State] wherein they reside. (b) No State [not even the Administrative Municipal States] shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities or the citizens of the “original” United States [> these citizens of the United States are the Preamble, natural born and Allegiance Citizens of (1) the A.O.C., Article 4, Section 1, (2) Preamble Posterity, (3) “Original 1787 Constitution”, Art. 4, Section 2, Clause 1, (4) the free inhabitants/Freeman of the Republican Form of Government guaranteed to all constitutional States in the Confederation and (5) 8 U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a)(22)], nor shall any State deprive any person [> natural or artificial: note the word citizen is not used] of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law [> within one of the many jurisdictions or different types of Citizenships of 38
  39. 39. the United States, i.e., Preamble vs. Subject to] nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction [> there are different jurisdictions for different types of citizens in the US] the equal protection [according to ones citizenship] of the law". 92. In order to better comprehend the word of art phrase & > idiom "subject to the jurisdiction" we shall go to the United States Code Service (U.S.C.S.) Lawyers Edition, Interpretive Note and Decisions, (1) 13th and (2) 14th and (3) 42 U.S.C.S., § 1981:6 (1) Prohibition against Slavery... “...and involuntary servitude...”: “... and obvious purpose of the Thirteenth Amendment is to forbid all shades and conditions of AFRICAN SLAVERY [> African slavery is NOT, and has never been, until recently, NEGRO SLAVERY]: while NEGRO SLAVERY [> those who were supplanted completely about 6000 years ago: see Genesis 2:4-20> part of the Neanderthal people: this is NOT ADAM-Kadmon but it is a man of the dust of the ground] alone (only) was in the mind of Congress which proposed the 13th Amendment, it (the 13th Amendment) forbids any other [i.e. other than Negro Slavery: Property via seizure or contracts] kind of slavery, now (1865- Present) or hereafter". 6 The following quotes are taken from Title 42 U.S.C.S., § 1981 and it is describing (a) what rights white Negro Slaves have had since the Civil War to the present and (b) the rights of the amalgamated free inhabitants who unintentionally and unknowingly Volunteered themselves and their offspring's to inherit the subjugated White-Negro citizenship defined in Amendments 13-27. This will be quoted in three different manners for a clearer understanding. The first shall be quoted without the prepositional phrase. The second to distinctly indicate the power of contracts and thirdly the entire quote, to wit: (1) " All persons … of the United States shall have the same rights, in every State and Territory to make and enforce CONTRACTS [> Voluntary contractual slavery of the 14th Amendment regardless of your color], is (now and was) enjoyed by white citizens...". (2) All persons [>artificial persons, corporations, aliens etc.] within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the SAME rights, in every State and Territory to make and enforce (common law) contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceeding for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to (>enslaved) like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of EVERY KIND, and to no other". As if there needs to be any other types of subjugation. (3) “All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same is enjoyed by White citizens, and shall be SUBJECT TO like punishment, pains, penalties [> the word wite/white, in law, means punishment, pain, penalties, etc.: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. p. 1776], taxes [> burdens], licenses, and EXACTIONS [> "The wrongful act of an officer or other person in compelling payment of a fee or reward for his services, under the color [(> pretense)] of his official authority, when none is due". 39
  40. 40. 93. The question must be asked before the Ninth Circuit Court is why/how come Congress did not forbid "Negro Slavery" in the 13th Amendment, nor Voluntary slavery-servitude. The answer is found, in part, in U.S.C.S., L. Ed., #2 Citizenship, 4 Generally: "While the main purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to establish [c.f. the Preamble that also establishes the Posterity, who are the natural born and Allegiance Citizens of the United States] citizenship of NEGRO, phrase subject to its [another or someone else's] jurisdiction …”. 94. The Ninth Circuit Court should be able to plainly comprehend that the idiom Negro, as codified by Congress, simply meant between 1865-66, as indicated within the 13th and 14th Amendments, a voluntary slave, who is subject to the jurisdiction of another/United States by way of being (a) Conquered, (b) Seizure or (c) Contracts. Therefore, the word of art "Negro" means subject to another's-jurisdiction and Slave means subject to another's will and both describing the conditions of not being free> "white person" opposed to "free white person"-color> Femme Couleur Libre. Femme Couleur Libre means, when properly translated, FREE COLORED PEOPLE/NATION. Femme Couleur Libre. “Up to the time of Civil war, term applied to all persons not of the White race, including Indians.” See, e.g., Black’s Law 6th Edition, p. 618, Indi, Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary (C.L.D.) by D.P. Simpson, 1960, p. 299. 95. Further, the Civil War Office of the President established between 1861 - 1865 constructed Military Districts throughout the United States and a Corporate Military District in the "Seat of Government of the United States", i.e., The District of Columbia. The transfer of "Blakkr>White Black "Persons" as property was partially accomplished with the Emancipation Promulgare" > Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1861 and completed with Amendments 13th and 14th, and the Repatriation of those Individuals, or persons who Expatriated. The 14 Amendment Civil Rights citizenship is "subject to the jurisdiction of others" or the Administrative-Federal 40
  41. 41. Corporation that presently occupy specific quarters in the Seat of Government in the United States located within the District of Columbia and contracted, in part, on the presidential Civil War Office of the President's Executive Orders of January, 1863. 96. The introduction of the 1868 Administrative Military District and with all persons born or naturalized in the [Federal Corporation] United States, and subject to the [Agency of the] United States jurisdiction are Artificial Permanent Resident Alien citizens belonging to the District of Columbia United States and in the keep of its Administrative Foreign Domestic Corporation government and of the 50 Municipal Partisan Political Federal States [5 USCS, § 1501 (2)] wherein they reside, that is to say, an artificially constructed or Corporate person citizenship, or "Permanent Resident Alien" citizenship [that is Totally Foreign or "Stranger" to the Preamble People-Posterity, Constitution [>Art. 1-7] and ''the Sovereign Power of the United States of North America, in the Family of Nations. All 14th Amendment and 8 U.S.C.S., § 1401 & 1452] are "Americans*." or "White Negroes" subject to presidential executive orders and Congressional control, including "Native Americans" a.k.a. the 2nd Americans when they are wards of the State. 97. Therefore, the Civil War did not, nor has any other war, free(d) the slaves no matter what color they were or are, and it was never intended to do so. 98. In Star Wars, Episode I, AnaKim Skywalker a.k.a. Darth Vader represent the Slave(s) who eventually destroy virtually, i.e., all of the former masters [> those of the Republic] and who in return is destroyed and saved by his seed, Luke, Skywalker, who was mixed with the bloodline of the Republic. This negative Karma lead to the Civil war [clone Wars episode II, or artificially created people fighting for freedom] to set Caucasian White persons free but instead of freeing the Slaves it enslaved the amalgamated free people by the ratification of the 13th and 14th Amendments, and the Emancipation Proclamation. 41
  42. 42. 99. The Slave holding Corporate States were defeated and the property> Negro white persons was seized and transferred over to the Federal Corporation United States for Management. These Caucasian Negroes did not have a citizenship and the Masonically guided United States Representatives did not allow them to be Congressionally Naturalized in accordance with the United States Constitution, Art. 1, Section 8, Clause 4 of the “Original 1787 Constitution”, not to be confused with the British Colonial Federal 14th Amendment Constitution Naturalization of 1868, that is, 81 years later. 100. Emancipation the term comes from the Latin word amancipatio and literally means, "to transfer or make over property" (See, e.g., Cassell's New Latin Dictionary, 1960, p. 212). 101. The word Property also means Rights and Slaves do not have rights, however, Preamble “original people” > natural born Citizens who are NOT delivered over to by way of the Federal 14th Amendment adhesion contracts do possess, all Preamble Rights afforded by the “Original 1787 Constitution”. 102. The British Colonial Federal 13th and 14th Amendments, and the Emancipation Proclamation are major sources in the illusion of freedom to the American public and together they established the transference of the White Negro> Property, via seizure, from the federal corporate states [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2) > British Colony States > STATE OF WASHINGTON, CITY OF SEATTLE & COUNTY OF KING] to the Federal Corporation [> Title 28, U.S.C.S. § 3002], such mirroring of governments, created a delusional avenue of freedom and liberty for the Mulatto and Maurus indigenous to America [> both being the native- “natural-born” citizens of the United States]. This 1791 British Colonial Federal United States 13th / 14th Amendment citizenship is no more than “voluntary slavery” through Adhesion contracts (e.g., recipient of federal governmental services and federal local political elections), via the British Colonial Federal Corporation United 42