Commercial & Open Source SoftwareErick WatsonUS Business & Marketing OrganizationMicrosoft Corporation
Separate Competition from the DiscussionDevelopment     Business       Licensing            Open  Models         Models   ...
Software Production    Academia                   Community                      Commercial                               ...
Commercial and Non-Commercial Software                                                           Non-                    C...
OSS and Commercial Use        IBM                    Customer                  Red Hat       Apple                    Bene...
Competitive LandscapeIBM Linux ($ + heads + OSDL + LSB = Control) Apache – Board of Directors, contribution, inclusion, ...
Competitive Landscape cont ...SUN   Desktop is focus - $ & heads in desktop and OpenOffice   OSS putting extreme pressur...
Who/What To Watch MySQL – innovative business model, disruptive for Oracle  & MS JBOSS – disruptive for IBM, BEA & MS M...
www.microsoft.com/sharedsourcehttp://infoweb/sharedsourcehttp://linuxsource@microsoft.com© 2004 Microsoft Corporation. All...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Commercial & Open Source Software

365 views

Published on

Commercial & Open Sou

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Commercial & Open Source Software

  1. 1. Commercial & Open Source SoftwareErick WatsonUS Business & Marketing OrganizationMicrosoft Corporation
  2. 2. Separate Competition from the DiscussionDevelopment Business Licensing Open Models Models Models Standards Role of IP, Economics, Public Policy… Product Competition, Consumer Choice VS.
  3. 3. Software Production Academia Community Commercial (traditional) Governments Hobbyists Competition Freeware Industry Open Source (Non-Software) Functionality IT Development Public Domain Software Shareware Vendors Intellectual Property There is no “correct” way to produce software Interaction of multiple models has produced best results Development model has little impact on production use
  4. 4. Commercial and Non-Commercial Software Non- Commercial Commercial Open Commercial Software Free Commercial Public OSS Tech Transfer >60K software companies producing >180K products Millions of apps custom developed by orgs for in-house use Tech transfer of R&D has been critical to software industry
  5. 5. OSS and Commercial Use IBM Customer Red Hat Apple Benefit CollabNet SUN VA Systems SAP Ximian Software SuSE * Oracle Business Sendmail Microsoft Model MySQL RealNetworks Sleepycat OSS is positive influence for most major software companies Increased product and services competition benefits customers OSS vendors are directly commercializing their solutions Customer demand for value is still primary driver * Recently acquired by Novell
  6. 6. Competitive LandscapeIBM Linux ($ + heads + OSDL + LSB = Control) Apache – Board of Directors, contribution, inclusion, leverage Eclipse – SUN compete, Java community strategic play, Websphere support ISVs – second “big bet” Hardware & Services – revitalize PPC, SUN compete, strengthen services contractsRed Hat “Winner” of Linux market consolidation Heavy commercialization – negative for community, positive for customers Not invested in OSDL or LSB – putting R&D into distro testing and ISV integrationNovell OSS-O-Matic – acquired SuSE & Ximian Big question mark is execution and corporate culture integration Microsoft is their key target – not SUN
  7. 7. Competitive Landscape cont ...SUN Desktop is focus - $ & heads in desktop and OpenOffice OSS putting extreme pressure on any commercial Java strategy Linux is a SUN server business threatIntel Drive x86 success…and repeat – OSDL (carrier grade Linux focus) Tools to support ISV communityHP OSS project office - >200 projects in process Hardware – largest Linux hardware distributor, printers Legacy – migration path for HPUX communitySAP SAPDB – drive commodity into database market OSS investment minimal - $ + heads into My SQL and Eclipse onlyOracle Linux – commodity pressure in OS space drives down TCO for their solution Appearance of community involvement rather than heavy investment
  8. 8. Who/What To Watch MySQL – innovative business model, disruptive for Oracle & MS JBOSS – disruptive for IBM, BEA & MS MONO - .NET on Linux SAMBA – NT4 implications Eclipse – OSS IDE, commodity pressure in tools space OSDL – Linus lives there, core Linux direction Black Duck (and similar) – not OSS, but implication for litigious environment
  9. 9. www.microsoft.com/sharedsourcehttp://infoweb/sharedsourcehttp://linuxsource@microsoft.com© 2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.This presentation is for informational purposes only. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, in this summary.

×