Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Everett Transit/ Motor Vehicle Division Experiences by Tony Cademarti


Published on

Tony Cademarti, Fleet Program Manager at Everett Transit, gave this presentation at Forth's networking event on February 19, 2020.

Published in: Automotive
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Everett Transit/ Motor Vehicle Division Experiences by Tony Cademarti

  1. 1. Everett Transit / Motor Vehicle Division Experiences Tony Cademarti Fleet Program Manager City of Everett, Motor Vehicle Division/Everett Transit
  2. 2. Choices That Were Made • Funding: FTA partnership grant with Proterra for 40 ft. electric buses • Depot Charging over On-Route Charging: • High cost and land ownership issues with on-route charging • University of Texas Austin study for extended range buses with depot charging
  3. 3. Why Choices Were Made • Need to replace a number of buses (six 1996-vintage Orion buses, six 2001-vintage Orion buses and three 2002-vintage Orion buses) in short order • Only grants available at the time were for electric buses (had experience with diesel-electric hybrid buses already) • Later, public declaration of transition to fully electric fleet of 36 electric buses by 2030 (50% electric by 2023- 18 buses)
  4. 4. How Implemented Solutions • Buses- Order process for buses with Proterra (at the time, Configurator) • Infrastructure- Work with local electric utility (SNOPUD), Bid process for installation of conduit, wiring, and chargers, lay groundwork for future expansion of charging infrastructure (extra conduit) • Chargers- switched from ChargePoint CPE250s to Proterra PCS and Dispenser system due to slowdown in production of CPE250s. • Training- Drivers (Train the Trainer-style) and Mechanics training by Proterra fly-away trainers • Fall Protection System- Miller SkyOrb
  5. 5. Lessons Learned • Not just another bus purchase- complete “system” • Shop design, i.e. in-ground lift design modification to work with independent suspension (possibly Proterra-only) • Need for “shop charger”- extra expense and infrastructure needs • New PPE required (arc-flash gear, EH-rated shoes/boots, etc.) • Unique parts/labor requirements, i.e. large-one piece windshield replacement • • Get ready to possibly hear “no” from manufacturer on desired configuration • Irregularities between units (quality issues) • Driver buy-in necessary (training, mindset, etc.)
  6. 6. Lessons Learned • Electromagnetic radiation concern by drivers (perception, not a real concern, as proven by testing) • Interference with AM radio reception during acceleration • Composite body and 20-ply tires- harsher ride (other buses in fleet have 16-ply tires and metal frames) • Charger unreliability (at first) • Need a dedicated Project Manager for initial purchase requirements- don’t split duties of infrastructure and bus procurement (Tony’s opinion) • Not an island- lessons learned from other agencies • Pierce Transit: • King County Metro: projects/innovation-technology/zero-emission-fleet.aspx