Barriers and Motivators for Using OER in Schools


Published on

Authors: Ulf-Daniel Ehlers, Thomas Richter
For this study we investigated German teachers to see how they use, reuse, produce and manage OER.
The research explored what motivators and barriers effect their use of OER, what others can learn from their Open Educational Practices, and what we can do to raise the dissemination level of OER in schools.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Barriers and Motivators for Using OER in Schools

  1. 1. From the field Barriers and Motivators for Using OER in SchoolsAuthors For this study we investigated German teachers to see how they use, reuse, produce and manage OER. The research explored what motivators and barriers effect their useThomas Richter, of OER, what others can learn from their Open Educational Practices, and what we canResearcher, ManagingDirector of the KDU e. V., do to raise the dissemination level of OER in schools. The survey revealed some unex-Project-Coordinator pected results, notably the fact that participating German teachers do not to feel theyInformation Systems for need special OER-licenses, since they consider everything available in the Internet asProduction and Operations being public – even their own products. Regarding barriers, insecurity on the correct-Management, Faculty of ness of information was one of the biggest issues and also, a concern regarding the lackEconomics and Business of expertise and guidance during the adaption processes.Administration, University ofDuisburg 1. IntroductionUlf-Daniel Ehlers, Open Educational Resources, as it is used here are educational resources, publicly accessibleUniversity of Duisburg- through the Internet, that freely can be used within non-profit but also within profit orientedEssen, Director of the educational scenarios (Hewlett, 2005). Great amounts of Open Educational Resources (OER)European Foundation forQuality in E-Learning are available for download in the Internet. The UNESCO recognizes OER as having the tential to help level out the educational challenges of ‘developing countries’ but also bear a risk of “educational neo-colonialism”, because most of them originate in western countries and bear western style education values (Daniel 2010). Large repositories of OER have beenTags built, such as those from Merlot, MIT or Connexions. Still, new resources often are produced instead of reusing and adapting existing OER. A basic condi-tion for a successful dissemina-open educational practices, tion of OER is building trust into those learning resources being fully capable to support high-barriers, motivators, teacher quality education. Research, particularly in the European framework shows, that OER still aresurvey not used in the level, as they could be. (OLCOS, 2006) The EU project OPAL, emphasizing the shift from focusing on resources to focusing on prac- tices focus, advances the view that the key to a higher dissemination-level of OER is not the accessi-bility itself, but much more understanding and overcoming the gaps preventing the use of OER. Trust in OER as first-rate choice and not second-rate quality has been identified as one key factor for better acceptance of OER in educational organizations. Therefore, the project focuses on the various stake-holders in educational scenarios, supporting potential users by making available a portfolio of good Open Educational Practices, which are defined as the use, reuse, management and production of OER with the intention to improve quality and innovation in educational scenarios (Conole et al, 2010). For this paper, we have conducted an explorative study covering schoolteachers in Germany, with the aim, to also understand their specific situation. We wanted to reveal their motiva- tors for their exposure to OER but also and particularly their barriers, which are to be over- come. First of all, we briefly will explain the German school system. We invited teachers from different school forms to par-ticipate in group-discussions, focusing issues on their usage, ing earn eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eueL ers 23 u ers.e gpap .elea rnin n.º 23 • March 2011Pap www 1
  2. 2. From the fieldmanagement and production of OER. The results of the group the job, by working in a company. There, they learn the specificdiscussions will be presented after a discussion of the setting practical knowledge the company can teach. Complementary,and limitations of the study. Afterwards we will deduce conclu- the apprentices visit a professional school where the theoreticalsions on how teachers can be supported in their Open Educa- background to the profession is taught.tional Practices. 3. The Explorative Study – Setting and2. The German Educational System LimitationsThe German education system foresees 10 years of compulsory In our explorative study, we have determined the views and ex-education, with a primary level of 4 years and a secondary level periences of teachers from four school types to get a deeperof 6. For secondary education a selective three-type school sys- understanding of their successes and failures (problems) re-tem exists: ‘Hauptschule’, ‘Realschule’ and Gymnasium. garding their use of OER. For each investigated school form, we asked related teachers to participate in informally orga-nizedWith the ‘Berufsschule’, an additional school type is available. group discussions as experts. We investigated the school formsIn the traditional German professional education, teenagers can ‘Grundschule’ (3 teachers), ‘Hauptschule’ (5 teachers), ‘Gymna-undergo an apprenticeship in a self-chosen profession, which sium’ (4 teachers) and ’Berufsschule’ (4 teachers).usually take three years. The specialized education is organizedin the so-called dual system: The apprentices first of all learn on 
Figure 1: The German Educational System ing earn eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • eL ers 23 u ers.e gpap .elea rnin n.º 23 • March 2011 Pap www 2
  3. 3. From the fieldAt least one teacher of each group taught an IT related sub- copied books (mostly single pages) in their educational practice,ject and / or was responsible for the IT infrastructure of his / and so, most considered sparing the citation being a peccadillo.her school. The other teachers taught various combinations of The High school group was of a different opinion, particularlysubjects (In Germany, one teacher usually at least teaches two because learning the correct way of citation explicitly is a matterdifferent subjects), such as, history, religion, lan-guages, nature of their educational content.sciences, and economics. After all teachers briefly had been informed about the correctThe discussions took place within a private atmosphere in res- legal situation of intellectual property rights in Germany, fortaurants / cafes. The time frame for the group discussions was this discussions, we commonly decided to ‘enhance’ the defini-not predefined. Actually, the discussions lasted between 1,5 tion of OER from those resources that are explicitly (by license)and 3,5 hours (depending on the available time and the interest declared as ‘open’ to all available and usable Internet-based,of the participants). learning resources.The results of the explorative study are neither representa- Open Educational Practices – OEP (definition)tive for the investigated school forms, the schools themselves, According to the definition of Conole et al (2010), for the discus-the region, or for the country. However, some interesting hints sions, as Open Educational Practices, we defined ‘all the ‘prac-particu-larly on existing problems in the exposure to OER have tices’ around the creation, use and management of OER’.been revealed. What is your educational scenario like? Which technology do4. Discussion Topics and Outcomes you use within your classes? Beside general issues regarding OER and in analogy to the Class sizes of 25 to 30 learners are common and therefore, the upper definition of Open Educational Practices (Conole et al, common teaching form is a frontal teaching scenario. Interactive 2010), the discussion covered the topics ‘administration’, ‘pro- education, in which learners directly participate in a dialogue duction’, and ‘usage’ of OER. The topic ‘administration’ finally with the teachers often is related to printed / copied materials, played an inferior role, because least of the teachers had been which as a discussion base previously have been distributed to responsible for such a question. Instead, the specific support / the learners. Particularly in the high school, additionally group encouragement through each school’s administration became work and presenta-tion of the results also are used as learning a topic of discussion. methods. In the frontal teaching situations, teachers mainly use the black-4.1 General Questions / Definitions board or if available, an over-head projector: Classes rarely areWhat in your Mind are Open Educational Resources (OER)? equipped with a local beamer, so that the direct use of digital learn-ing material comes along with having to reserve the need-The term OER itself broadly was unknown to the teachers. Just ed technology and must be understood as exception. Therefore,the IT responsible teachers in each of the groups ‘Professional teachers usually have to transform the found digital materialSchool’ and ‘high school’ knew about the term. However, the into analogous overhead-projector-slides or distribute printedGerman term ‘freie Bildungsressourcen’ (free educational re- papers to the learners.sources) was known. As the teachers explained, it de-scribes asimilar concept, but the focus related to ‘open’ applied more to Within computer classes, digital learning materials are broad-accessibility than to the more legal concept in OER. Free edu- casted to the learners’ desktops. Besides one interactive highcational resources, in the view of the teachers, are learning re- school project, where computer classes of two high schools alsosources that can be found in the Internet and (from a practical syn-chronously cooperate with each other by using messengerperspective of fitting) used for educational proc-esses. Most of and forum discussions, the communication between teachersthe teachers already performed Internet-research for inspiring and learners is performed purely analogously. An Internet-or reusable educational material. There in fact was awareness based Learning platform (Moodle-based) only is available in thethat proper citation might be needed for lawful acting. Never- investigated ‘Gymnasium’. The ‘Berufsschule’ and also the ‘Gr-the-less, before the Internet, teachers were used to distribute undschule’ have not yet implemented a Moodle-based learning ing earn eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • eL ers 23 u ers.e gpap .elea rnin n.º 23 • March 2011 Pap www 3
  4. 4. From the fieldplatform, but it is in progress. The teachers from the Gymnasium computers and the Internet, use search engines such as Googlereported that even though it is available, most teachers in their for an advanced research (in both languages, German and Eng-school yet do not use the LMS or e-Learning for their classes. lish). For those teachers being proficient enough to use the In-Some teachers use the Moodle-platform for af-ter preparation ternet, the accessibility of learning resources was not consid-and group (home-)works, but rarely for communication issues. ered being a larger challenge. The decision, if a resource is trustable in the meaning of cor-4.2 Usage and Adaptation of OER rectness, particularly regarding to the contents and the politi-Have you already used publicly available learning materials cal background, has been considered being much more chal-from the Internet within your own courses? In which way is ma- lenging. All groups stated that there often are doubts on theterial from the Internet useful for your preparation of classes? sincerity / validity of the researched documents. Par-ticularlyWhat kind of materials do you preferably use? in cases of recent incidents, the user-generated content always could be fake information. The teachers quoted, often not us-In the discussion groups, all but one teacher said already having ing the found material because they are afraid giving wrongused educational materials from the Internet to enrich (explicit- informa-tion or hidden political incorrect statements further toly stated) their classes. Particularly, when recent incidents (such the learners. The teachers missed a seal of qual-ity that showsas 9/11, Iraq war, or the financial crisis) are to be explained or them, that they do not need to worry. They clearly describeddiscussed in the school, Internet materials are considered be- a dilemma situation: On the one hand, there is a need for re-ing much more useful as e.g., print media: In unity, all teach- cent information, but on the other hand, it cannot be confirmeders considered not only the variety of information to a certain within such short time frames. Anyways, not seeing a suitabletopic as being much wider, but they also stated that research compromise themselves, they explicitly wish someone mightand access of related material became much easier. As a main find a solution.benefit of Internet-based learning re-sources all teachers con-sidered the topicality of information. Particularly because of the From a more technological perspective, it often is unclear, if theInternet-users’ participation in quickly producing and spreading found educational material is secure to download because ofindividual information via YouTube (User Generated Content), it ‘digital vermin’ that could harm the school’s is possible to provide the learners with a broad variety of Also as extremely tough the teachers assessed the adaptationperspectives (or a tailor made one) considering a single topic. process itself: Not only lacks of opportunities to technically real-All teachers stated to mainly research for pictures and movies as ize an adaptation process (because of the documents’ formats)examples to present to the learners. Just in case that a new top- often lead to a rewriting process, but also a lack of experience,ic (such as a recent political inci-dent) is to be included into the what exactly should be changed in which scenario. Particularly,almost ‘traditional’ lessons, also text-based documents (e.g., to when learning resources originally have been produced for an-re-search for political backgrounds) from the Internet are used. other cultural con-text, they often include, e.g., politically dif-How (concretely) do you search for, decide the use of, and adapt ficult statements or do not fit to the own didactical approach.OER? What have been your suc-cesses? Where did you experi- Revealing such adaptation needs is a far too complicated taskence problems? and so, the teachers always feel like sailing close to the wind. This is a main reason why they often reduce their use of OER toA minority of the teachers quoted exclusively focusing their simple pic-tures and smallest learning objects.research well known and recommended German repositories.Particularly the older teachers never visited computer classes, In all schools but the high school, the teachers complained thatthemselves and still feel unconfident using computers and the contents often are just avail-able in English language. Particular-Internet. The majority of the teachers reported, first of all, look- ly for the younger classes, contents must be translated to Ger-ing in such German and recommended repositories for suitable man. In some single cases, the language gap also led the (older)contents by using keywords in German language. The adaptable teachers to their limits of capability.results in German language were considered often being very As more annoying than the language gap itself, the teacherspoor. If the search in those repositories is not successful, the considered pictures with informa-tional contents, such as dia-younger teachers who seemed being more proficient in using ing earn eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • eL ers 23 u ers.e gpap .elea rnin n.º 23 • March 2011 Pap www 4
  5. 5. From the fieldgrams when offered in non-changeable formats (bitmap, PDF, Different to the others, the teachers of the ’Berufsschule’ expe-JPEG). Such pictures can only be used one-on-one or as patterns rience serious problems to find adequate learning resources in(templates). Therefore, the time saving ad-vantage of the Inter- the Internet. The provided support is considered being poor ornet-resources is lost, particularly since such pictures anyways even not available at all as well through the chambers of craftsrarely completely cover the exact needs and therefore have to as also through the chambers of industry and commerce. Ad-be adapted. Such experiences often lead to frustration, and the ditionally, in some professions, the chambers of crafts have re-reaction in a lot of single cases is rather copying ‘boring’ print- gionally typical re-quirements on certain processes and from books than looking for and using OER. Besides in the IT-related professions, the teachers of the group ‘Berufsschule’ rarely use open educational resources, e-Learn-4.3 Management of OER, Policies ing or even computers. Since the chambers started providing e-Learning material for Master students (The German MasterDo your school administrations or the federal government sup- Crafts-man) particularly the situation of lacking contents isport the use of OER? Are there related policies within your insti- slightly changing now. However, the necessary equipment alsotutions? is missing.All teachers of all schools agreed that any kind of support orencouraging sides the school administra-tions or federal gov- 4.4 Production of OER, User Generatedernments are very weak. In fact, they complained, that more Contentand more actions ex-plicitly or indirectly are required sides the As already stated in section 4.3, some teachers produce con-teachers, but they have to take the full responsibility and no tents by themselves and, as far as they are able doing so, sharehelp or incentives are provided in return. it with others. Such self-produced contents are e.g., publishedRelated to the contents, be it open or restricted educational re- in the reposito-ries of ‘Lehrer Online’. Often, in a lack of knowl-sources, broader assistance has neither been provided by the edge, the Creative Common License (or others) is not attachedschools’ administrations, nor by the government. A major argu- because the teachers purpose to upload their resources any-ment sides the government not to make recommendations was ways is sharing contents and supporting their colleagues. Learn-the autonomy of the schools and teachers that had to be pre- er generated content rarely is made available for the public. Ifserved. As long as content decisions just extended (and didn’t such contents are being uploaded to a server, it mostly happenschange) the curricula, teachers have been encouraged to be just inside the school infrastructures, e.g., for further use withincreative. In the curricula, in a lot of cases, certain schoolbooks internal school projects. Also, some teachers and older learnersand novels are ‘recommended’ for the classes, so that anyways, have own web-sites where they upload their learning resourcesconcrete contents often are pre-selected (in printed form). As and / or essays, but this is the, the government later on offered an Internet-portal called‘Lehrer-Online’ (Teachers-Online). ‘Lehrer Online’ provided rec- 5 Summary of the Results andommendations and articles for teachers, a fo-rum and later on, Recommendationsalso small repositories for suitable educational resources that Almost all invited teachers from used the Internet as a sourcefreely could be used. Teachers, themselves, produced most of to gather available educational re-sources. Although there is nothe resources in this repository (User Generated Content). Af- explicit demand or quota for using OER at schools, the lack ofter having used (and acknowledged) those in their own classes, funds drives teachers to use free learning resources.they (can) share their contents with other teachers. The quality,therefore, is considered being suitable but the dissemination The available Learning Management Systems in the investigatedof the re-sources are limited to registered users. The variety of schools are based on the open platform ‘Moodle’. Benefits ofavailable resources still is low, even when fol-lowing the hints digital learning resources, related to print media, particularlyto further, external but recommended German repositories. As are seen in the fast availability of information on recent inci-additional service, the portal ‘Lehrer Online’ offers online and dences.offline (physical) seminars and workshops where the teacher’sneeds and possible solutions to problems are discussed. ing earn eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • eL ers 23 u ers.e gpap .elea rnin n.º 23 • March 2011 Pap www 5
  6. 6. From the fieldThe teachers mainly used pictures and movies from the Internet Fazitillustrating or spicing up their lectures. Pictures with informative Using expert group discussions as a method for an explorativecharacter (containing text elements) should not be stored in an study provided fruitful results. Particu-larly, because the expertsun-changeable format: From the perspective of the teachers, as themselves profited from the discussion outcomes in form ofsoon as they are to be adapted such are almost worthless. learning about the other expert’s experiences, they showedRegarding the adaptation processes, support is needed: Adapt- themselves very learning resources from foreign contexts to the own one For the study, it can be concluded that the OER movement issimply is too complicated for the teachers. This includes as well welcome and needed by school-teachers in Germany. Teachersthe decision process on adaptation needs as also the following already use and produce OER and would like to raise their levelchanging and validation processes. of contribution, but feel a strong need for assistance regardingRegarding licensing, a clear lack of information and / or sensibil- the technological realization and for a cer-tain culture of prac-ity has been revealed: The teachers were not fully aware of the tice in order to legitimate their efforts.difference between open and available resources. They rarely As reported by the teachers, the usage of OER often collapsesuse the CCL (or any other license) themselves, but consider because of missing change-ability of available documents, a lacktheir own provided resources already are open by publishing of trust regarding the correctness of included information andthem in the Internet. Therefore, they do not take the legal situ- missing support regarding adaptation processes. In contrast,ation too serious. the pure availability of learning re-sources, for most teachersA broader support by the German government and school ad- has not been considered being a problem: Besides the profes-ministrations urgently is needed not only for using OER, but sional school, all other groups considered the amount of avail-also for using digital media in general. Particularly the neces- able learning resources being rather over-whelming (becausesary equip-ment is missing. The teachers basically are willed to often unstructured or undefined) than too small.contribute their self-produced learning resources to the com- The teachers showed a lack of understanding regarding the legalmunity, but need a suitable supportive platform, which is simple background of use even for beginners and automatically attaches the neces-sary license type.It often is unclear if material, found in the Internet is trustable Referencesand if it maybe includes hidden threads that could bring the Conole, G., Ehlers, U.D., Mundin, P., Santos, A.I., Connelly,teachers into troubles. Also the suitability of certain resources T., Richter, T., Koskinen, T., Kairamo, A. K., Nozes, J., &for learners of different ages often is unclear. The teachers see Carneiro, R. (2010). Quality and Innovation in Open Education-problems in the use of OER without an ensured re-liability / al Practice. In: Proceedings of the EDEN 2010 Annual Conference,quality of open contents. This issue would have to be solved as Valencia.soon as possible. Daniel, John (2010). Commonwealth of Learning: WelcomeAlthough e-Learning and IT now is used since more than a & Introductory Remarks. Retrieved September 12, 2010, fromdecade within German classes, the teachers in the discussion still feel like pioneers when using ICT for classes that es/2010-04-28.aspxare not di-rectly related to information technology. Particularly Hewlett Foundation (2005). Open Educational Resources Initia-when situations are tough, they often feel aban-doned. A cer- tive Overview. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrievedtain (commonly accepted) culture of practice could enormously September 12, 2010, from the teachers to reach the necessary level of confidence. HewlettFoundationOER.pdfSuch a culture of practice is considered being needed in order tobe successful in the use of ICT and particularly OER. OLCOS, Open eLearning Content Observatory Services (2006). Project Handout. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ing earn eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • eL ers 23 u ers.e gpap .elea rnin n.º 23 • March 2011 Pap www 6
  7. 7. From the fieldEdition and productionName of the publication: eLearning Papers CopyrightsISSN: 1887-1542 The texts published in this journal, unless otherwise indicated, are subjectPublisher: to a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivativeWorksEdited by: P.A.U. Education, S.L. 3.0 Unported licence. They may be copied, distributed and broadcast pro-Postal address: c/Muntaner 262, 3r, 08021 Barcelona (Spain) vided that the author and the e-journal that publishes them, eLearningPhone: +34 933 670 400 Papers, are cited. Commercial use and derivative works are not permitted.Email: The full licence can be consulted on es/by-nc-nd/3.0/ ing earn eLearning Papers • ISSN: 1887-1542 • www.elearningpapers.eueL ers 23 u ers.e gpap .elea rnin n.º 23 • March 2011Pap www 7