Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Science Journalism: RELATE briefing


Published on

RELATE: Research Labs for Training Journalists. 80 journalism students are sent on one-week study tours to EU-funded research labs, where they shadow and interview researchers. Subjects cover everything from climate change modelling to cultural heritage, aeronautics, photonics, and vaccine research for TB and cancer.

Published in: News & Politics, Education
  • Be the first to comment

Science Journalism: RELATE briefing

  1. 1. Study tour briefing Howard Hudson, Editor European Journalism Centre
  2. 2. A learning curve for everyone <ul><li>I am new to science journalism in 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>But I have a passion for media development </li></ul><ul><li>RELATE aims to help you develop your skills in science writing </li></ul><ul><li>...While helping researchers deal with the media (share information, interview skills, etc.) </li></ul>Image: Ruby Blossom Flickr)
  3. 3. Why are we here? <ul><li>People can't keep up with the pace of technological change... </li></ul><ul><li>The general public is either afraid or apathetic about hi-tech research because they don't understand it. </li></ul><ul><li>Bombarded by Hollywood films and sensationalist articles, people don't know what to believe. </li></ul><ul><li>Journalists are key to explaining science – literally to mediate </li></ul>
  4. 4. Reporters: Cheerleaders or watchdogs? <ul><li>“ Science and journalism are not alien cultures... They are built on the same foundation...that conclusions require evidence; that the evidence should be open to everyone; and that everything is subject to question... And whether it's directed towards an experiment or a breaking news story, each can appreciate the other's critical eye.” </li></ul><ul><li>Nature Magazine , 30 June 2009 </li></ul>Image: US Geological Survey (Flickr)
  5. 5. So what can we do? <ul><li>Interview and shadow researchers while they work: discover science from the inside </li></ul><ul><li>Present the facts as clearly as possible: help make sense of science </li></ul><ul><li>Involve the reader by focusing on the individual stories: things they can relate to... </li></ul><ul><li>The sick people who benefit: e.g. over 7.4 million people die each year from cancer worldwide </li></ul><ul><li>Or by showing the 'human side' of the scientists </li></ul>
  6. 6. What are we NOT here to do? <ul><li>Act as public relations officers for science: we're not here to write press releases. </li></ul><ul><li>Why? For our own CREDIBILITY </li></ul><ul><li>Because people dismiss one-sided stories and editors won't buy one-sided accounts. </li></ul>
  7. 7. But also remember... <ul><li>We are not here as undercover journalists </li></ul><ul><li>Or to write sensationalist articles </li></ul><ul><li>Please note which briefings are off-the-record </li></ul><ul><li>Respect the lab rules and journalism ethics </li></ul><ul><li>Learn best practice and worst practice... </li></ul>
  8. 8. See
  9. 9. Ultimately, we're here to... <ul><li>Write engaging, balanced and accurate accounts </li></ul><ul><li>Capture the cutting-edge in our writing </li></ul><ul><li>Explore all sides of the issue: the likely benefits as well as the social impacts </li></ul><ul><li>Explore the personal angle: Who benefits? How do the researchers work? What drives them? </li></ul><ul><li>Get people talking and debating, through intellectual curiosity or individual empathy </li></ul>
  10. 10. Thank you for listening! <ul><li>Howard Hudson, EJC Editor: </li></ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul>