Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Communication of Debate Aspects to Different Audiences - Da

  1. Communication of Debate Aspects to Different Audiences Brian Plüss Knowledge Media Institute The Open University, UK brian.pluss@open.ac.uk edv-project.netSchloss Dagstuhl, 17 December 2015
  2. Context and Motivation edv-project.net The Election Debate Visualisation project • Aim: to improve democratic citizenship by making political media events more accessible and engaging, and by giving viewers tools to make sense of complex political argumentation and debate. • Political communication, computational linguistics, collective intelligence and design brought together to provide enhanced, interactive online debate replays.
  3. Context and Motivation edv-project.net
  4. Context and Motivation edv-project.net
  5. Context and Motivation edv-project.net
  6. Embedded visualisations edv-project.net
  7. edv-project.net Embedded visualisations
  8. Interactive Visualisations edv-project.net
  9. edv-project.net Dialogue Rule Compliance and Fair Play + Manual Annotation of Dialogue Act Functions and Content Features Rules of Engagement (76 in 2010; 28 in 2015)
  10. edv-project.net Dialogue Rule Compliance and Fair Play • Instances of violations of the rules Static: performance of forbidden dialogue acts Dynamic: failure to discharge discourse obligations • Aggregated normalised scores per speaker + Manual Annotation of Dialogue Act Functions and Content Features Rules of Engagement (76 in 2010; 28 in 2015)
  11. edv-project.net Dialogue Rule Compliance and Fair Play • Instances of violations of the rules Static: performance of forbidden dialogue acts Dynamic: failure to discharge discourse obligations • Aggregated normalised scores per speaker Fair Play Summary + Manual Annotation of Dialogue Act Functions and Content Features Rules of Engagement (76 in 2010; 28 in 2015)
  12. edv-project.net Dialogue Rule Compliance and Fair Play + Manual Annotation of Dialogue Act Functions and Content Features Rules of Engagement (76 in 2010; 28 in 2015) • Instances of violations of the rules Static: performance of forbidden dialogue acts Dynamic: failure to discharge discourse obligations • Aggregated normalised scores per speaker
  13. edv-project.net Instant Audience Feedback
  14. edv-project.net Instant Audience Feedback
  15. edv-project.net Instant Audience Feedback
  16. edv-project.net Instant Audience Feedback
  17. edv-project.net Instant Audience Feedback
  18. edv-project.net “Argument” Mapping
  19. edv-project.net “Argument” Mapping
  20. edv-project.net “Argument” Mapping
  21. edv-project.net “Argument” Mapping
  22. edv-project.net “Argument” Mapping
  23. edv-project.net Widget Dashboard
  24. Thank you! Brian Plüss Knowledge Media Institute The Open University, UK brian.pluss@open.ac.uk edv-project.net
Advertisement