Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

COBWEB - infrastructure and platform for Environmental Crowd Sensing and Big Data

570 views

Published on

Presentation given by Chris Higgins at EnviroInfo & ICT4S 2015 workshop, in Copenhagen

Published in: Internet
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

COBWEB - infrastructure and platform for Environmental Crowd Sensing and Big Data

  1. 1. COBWEB EnviroInfo & ICT4S 2015, Workshop - Infrastructures and Platforms for Environmental Crowd Sensing and Big Data, Copenhagen, 9th Sept, 2015 Chris Higgins chris.higgins@ed.ac.uk Sta
  2. 2. Introduction to COBWEB • Research Project: Funded under the European Commission’s Framework Programme 7 • Started Nov 2012 for 4 years (Month 35 of 48) • First demonstrator completed and tested during the 2015 field season • Why? – GPS enabled, internet connected mobile devices now ubiquitous – Lots of potential, eg, can citizen sourced environmental data be useful for decision making?
  3. 3. Citizen Observatory Web • Generic crowdsourcing infrastructure – A toolkit which can be downloaded and used in multiple scenarios • Data which supports policy • Address data quality issues • Open standards
  4. 4. Project Partners
  5. 5. UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves Sites of excellence to foster harmonious integration of people and nature for sustainable development through participation, knowledge sharing, poverty reduction and human well-being improvements, cultural values and society's ability to cope with change, thus contributing to the Millennium Development Goals
  6. 6. COBWEB Biosphere Reserves Biosffer Dyfi Biosphere Mount Olympus Gorge of Samaria Wadden See & Hallig islands
  7. 7. Dyfi Biosphere Reserve #1 www.biosfferdyfi.org.uk
  8. 8. Dyfi Biosphere Reserve #2 Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right (2013) ©CountrysideCouncilforWales.Allrightsreserved.
  9. 9. Co-design
  10. 10. Co-design – Snowdonia National Park • Japanese Knotweed - Fallopia japonica • Giant Knotweed – Fallopia sachalinensis • Hybrid knotweed – Fallopia x bohemica
  11. 11. Co-design – RSPB • Domenlas Saltmarsh – Survey vegetation – Use quadrats – Soil salinity levels – Weather conditions – Look at reversion process • Covert Coch Peatbog – Survey vegetation – Use quadrats – Soil moisture – Grazing history Janetbaxter.co.uk
  12. 12. Co-Design - Penparcau Community Forum
  13. 13. Co-Design - Penparcau Community Forum • Temperature • Humidity • Wind speed • Wind direction • Pressure • Precipitation In situ sensors
  14. 14. Usability Testing
  15. 15. Not just apps… A number of demonstrator mobile phone applications – Exactly what, deliberately left open and subject to discussion with community 3 pilot case study areas: 1. Validating earth observation products 2. Biological monitoring 3. Flooding
  16. 16. COBWEB Framework
  17. 17. Key components at different TRL’s • Conflation • QA workflow editor • QA WPS/services • Sensor networks • GeoNetwork/Portal • Middleware • Authoring tool/Survey designer • Apps • User management and privacy • Access control • Authentication
  18. 18. The app itself Key features • Capture information – Images – Audio – Text – Location • High quality background maps • Saved maps for use “offline” • Custom data collection forms • Manual location correction
  19. 19. View COBWEB Portal
  20. 20. Join COBWEB Portal
  21. 21. Customise your own app for your survey
  22. 22. Customise your own app for your survey
  23. 23. Customise your own app for your survey
  24. 24. Citizen captures data on their phone
  25. 25. Approach to QA • Quality Assurance: complex problem and often use case specific: – Internal quality (metrics) – External quality (fit for purpose) • A generic system that can be easily customised to fit new use cases, based on standards • Understanding data quality is likely to require a combination of approaches and tests, the system is designed to enable this • As quality requirements are use case specific, the quality control tests are configurable to utilise a wide variety of datasets and parameters
  26. 26. Classifying quality: Seven pillars Pillar Example Test Notes Pillar 1 – Location Based services Assessment of spatial accuracy – estimate from a mobile device and number of satellites Tests often carried out on the mobile device Pillar 2 – Cleaning Removal of junk data via an attribute text check Very lightweight, can flag or remove malicious entries Pillar 3 – Automatic validation Analysis whether an image is blurry Higher level testing, often used to assess ranges Pillar 4 – Comparison with authoritative data Use of a set of boundary polygons to check whether an observation is in or out Wide variety of tests that involve comparison with what it known Pillar 5 – Model based validation Running a flood model Can be complex, and may also include question based modeling Pillar 6 – Big/Linked data Querying Twitter via a hashtag for similar phenomena Tapping into large databases such as sensor records and social media Pillar 7 – Semantic harmonisation Rationalisation of entries via an ontology Attempts to recognise multiple entries of the same observation
  27. 27. Web Processing Service • OGC Standard • Web facing • Public • Holds spatial and non-spatial processes • Processes are suited to chaining • BPEL is the traditional method of chaining – However, removed from WPS 2.0
  28. 28. BPMN Workflow Engine • JBOSS JBPM – A Java based BPM workflow engine • Orchestrates processes in a given order with defined inputs • Chains results from one process to the next • Can be executed remotely via REST • Graphical interface utilises BPMN2.0 – a recently ratified OMG standard • Unlike BPEL this interface is standardised
  29. 29. Current questions • What is the Post Quality database. How to manage different schemas and different data sources? • RDF to handle the fuzzy view of crowdsourced data? • How is client side QA being managed? • GeoPackage + watching service? • Client side vs server side • Security • Can we protect certain datasets/processes and make them available to those who have the correct credentials? • Many others!!
  30. 30. For more information on QA – see: • Relevant sessions at the OGC Technical Committee in Nottingham next week • Architecture Implementation Pilot – 8 deep dive videos: http://www.ogcnetwork.net/node/1969
  31. 31. Service Provider (SP) Identity Provider (IdP)Discovery Service (DS) “GEOSS user” Single- Sign-On Trust Gateway (TG) to OpenID Google OpenId COBWEB/GEOSS AIP-6 Federation NASA Ames Secure Dimensions CUAHSI* Catapult University of Edinburgh Kst. GDI.DE *: Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science EarthServer (FP7) project MEEO
  32. 32. Remainder of project…emphasis shifting • Rolling out software • Getting greater buy-in • Sustainability • More focus on research agenda • Greater focus on Greece, Germany • Additional Biosphere Reserves
  33. 33. Thank you • Website: http://cobwebproject.eu/ • Mailing list: http://eepurl.com/Ita05 or use the QR code • Follow us: @cobwebfp7 • And look out for members of the COBWEB team at events. chris.higgins@ed.ac.uk

×