Presentation by Ferenc Tátrai PhD – EDEN European Distance and e-Learning Network, at the MicroHE Expert Panel Workshop, 10 June 2020
More info: https://www.eden-online.org/microhe-expert-panel-workshop/
Current trends in HE
• Delivery methods: part of the degree
courses are provided in digital or
blended form. This got a strong „push” in
time of COVID-19.
• In response to labour market: need for
shorter, industry-specific courses
• Modularization: smaller, well defined
„chunks” are delivered as SLP-s
(electronic short learning programmes,
• Credentialisation and recognition: need
to award the SLP-s and other open
learning achievements with micro-
credentials. Emergence of the concept of
What are micro-credentials?
• An educational credential is a documented statement that
acknowledges a person’s learning outcomes.
• A micro-credential is a sub-unit of a credential that could
accumulate into a larger credential or degree or be part of a
portfolio. Examples are: Verified Certificates, Digital Badges,
• a Short Learning Programme (SLPs) or short degree
programme is a group of courses (units, modules or other
learning building blocks) with a common subject focussing on
specific needs of the society which are typically part of a larger
degree. A short learning programme usually has 5 to 30 ECTS.
• For both the higher education institute and the employers: should allow to explore
the micro-credential’s requirements and evidence of learning: should have certain
technical value and should have the necessary meta data.
• For HE institutions: To let an SLP be part of a degree programme, it has to be
accredited and measured in (ECTS) credit values, and necessarily has to have the
same assessment and identity verification as any other part of the respective
(accredited) degree programme.
• Recognition by the same HE institution providing the micro-credentialed course is
straightforward, by other HE institutions might be based either on mutual
agreement or at a system level (not yet developed)
Current debate on micro-credentials : How and under what conditions
are they recognised by HE institutions and in the labor market?
To reach a high quality score, the credential statement has to be
Distinct: represent a specific, identifiable and measurable experience,
skill or fact and be attributable to a single, identifiable person
Authentic: contain enough information to verify when, where and by
whom it was issued, trace and reproduce the conditions under which it
was issued, be able to be issued for a limited period and be revocable
Accessible: be issued in a widely-spoken language or in an easy to read
graphical format and in a standardised form,
Exchangeable: be modular, allowing for the credential to be subdivided
into smaller credentials or stacked into larger credentials, be
convertible into other types of credentials
Portable: be owned by the learner
To reflect to the above needs, we started the MicroHE project.
We use microcredentials related to Microqualifications (EQF)
• Focus on HE
• 5 ECTS+
• Create structure, category, metadata system,
Aims of the workshop
Validation of the
• Briefing Paper
• The Credit Supplement (= OEPass Learning Passport)
• The results of European Expert Workshop (held during the Masterclass
event in Bled)
• Forming expert opinion and answering to a set of collected questions
Contributions of the MicroHE project to the development of the concept
A Briefing Paper summarized the results of the Survey on the use of micro-
credentials asking about 100 HE teachers, students, decision makers and
employers about their opinion on micro-credentials.
1) Institutions lack understanding of Micro-credentials
2) Adoption is prevented by the lack of a Common Recognition Mechanism
even within a country and by inadequate resource allocation for SLP
3) SLP enabled profitability coincides with SLP adoption
4) Flexibility, personalization and recognition are critical when using SLPs to
respond to the demands of the labour market
The Credit Supplement (the Learning Passport) creats a digital
standard format for documenting education credentials in ECTS
units in terms of:
• Awarding body
• Credential awarded
• Holder of credential
• Evidence of achievement
The next presentation by Dénes Zarka will describe it in more detail.
Creation of a credit supplement: use of the Learning Passport
developed by the OEPass project
To be fully aligned with teh European Higher Education Area
• Consider adding a new section on micro-credentials to the European
Standards and Guidelines - half a page on micro-credentials on the
basis of the standards.
• Need to add a supplement to the micro-credential to indicate
• the learning outcomes,
• the level,
• the number of credits,
• the quality assurance, and
• the teaching and learning approaches.
This common standard would facilitate micro-credential adoption.
Maria Sticchi Damiani, Lead Author of the ECTS Users Guide
Quote from the Masterclass event in Bled
Questions addressed I.: concerning the MicroHE documents introduced:
•What are your suggestions regarding the Briefing paper?
•What are your suggestions regarding the MicroHE credit supplement /
OEPass learning passport?
•What are your suggestions regarding the results of the European
•What are your your suggestions regarding the MicroHE meta-data
•What are your suggestions regarding Credentify.eu?
Questions addressed II.: pland, feedback, expectations
•Did your institution have concrete plans to offer micro-credentials? In
which way? In which subjects?
•Did your institution have concrete plans to recognize micro-
credentials? In which way? In which subjects?
•Which was the feedback on the information presented and discussed
in the national workshop?
•What you expect from a User’s guide of MicroCredentials in HE (that
we did not yet present or think of)?
•Could you point us to other related initiatives in the field?
Relation of micro-credentials and SLP-s
• The successful completion of the SLP (e.g. MOOCS) might or might
not be awarded with a micro credential. If awarded, it is called
• Relation of micro-credentials and digital badges: Many micro-
credentials offer a visual digital representation, often referred to as
a badge. Sharing platforms include Mozilla Backpack, LinkedIn or
Facebook (Purdue University 2018)
• Common and transparent definition
• Link to the European Qualification Framework (EQF): defined levels,
learning outcomes (please see following section for further
• Quality assurance standards for providers and courses
• ECTS: defined learning outcomes and workload
• Recognition: for further studies and/or employment purposes
• Digital tools: issuing credentials, offering access to micro-
credentials, storage of credentials, sharing of credentials, guidance
• Business model(s) and of engagement of practitioners
Potential building blocks of a European Approach to micro-credentials
(Background paper for the first meeting of the Consultation Group of the EU
Commission, 26 May 2020) :
• Standards on Digital Credentials are being developed, see the European
Digital Credential Infrastructure of the European Commission (European
• Action three of the Digital Education Action plan proposes the integration of
digitally-signed qualifications in Europass. The new Europass will include:
• An e-Portfolio: an online tool for users to describe their skills, find
interesting job and learning opportunities, etc.
• Information on working and studying in different EU countries
• Digital credentials: free tools and software for institutions to issue digital,
tamper-proof qualifications and other learning credentials
• The EU Decision 2018/ 646 Article 4(6) specifies that „Europass shall
support authentication services for any digital documents or
representations of information on skills and qualifications“
The Micro-credentials on the agenda at EU level
➢ The concept of (digital) micro-
credentials emerged to recognise
➢ MC-s should allow to explore the
requirements and evidence of
➢ In HE the micro-credential is a sub-
unit of a credential
➢ It has to be accredited and
measured in (ECTS) credit values
➢ Flexibility, personalization and
recognition are crucial for the
On the agenda at European level
➢European Digital Credential
Infrastructure being developed
➢Action 3 of the Digital Education Action
plan proposes the integration of
digitally-signed qualifications in
➢Article 4(6) of EU Decision 2018/ 646:
Europass shall support authentication
services for any digital documents or
representations of information on skills