BPC10 BuckleyMigration-share


Published on

11 Strategic Considerations for SharePoint Migration, presentation given by Christian Buckley at the SharePoint Best Practices Conference in August 2010, Reston VA

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • I was going to include a picture of Brad Pitt, but then I thought – ok, maybe not that cool.
  • “While Microsoft can provide options for automating migration, these options work best with implementations which have no customizations and a simple structure.” Stephen Cummins, echoTechnologyThe challenge is to do this quickly, so that you minimize user impact and environment downtime.
  • SharePoint 2010 replaces the SSP concept with service applications, each creating several databases. These services include Search Service application User profiles Service application Excel Service application App Registry (for backwards compatibility)(Joel Oleson, SharePoint 2010: Best Practices to Upgrade and Migrate, pg. 69)Visual Upgrade includes three options: Display the previous UIPreview the new UI Use the new UI
  • Microsoft’s easy-to-follow guides. Point and click.There are a number of risks with In Place upgrade: 1) your system will be down, and if the migration does not go well – it could be down for a while 2) disk space will be impacted. You really don’t know how much space is needed 3) no rollback. Doh!With either migration method, you do have a Visual Upgrade, which basically replaces your gradual upgrade in 2007. This allows you to migrate, and through Central Administration, preview your 2007 sites in the 2010 template before committing yourself to it. So you can keep what works, and slowly make the changes over time.
  • Planning is the key. Let’s discuss the activities leading up to migration, which will drive your method for migration.
  • My background is technical project management. My company comes from a service background, and our team has participated in hundreds of migrations. From this experience, we’ve created a list of strategic considerations that will help ensure that your migrations are successful.I’d like to walk through them in detail, and I want your thoughts and feedback.And up front, aside from this presentation being available post-conference, I’d like to provide you with a free download of our 11 Strategic Considerations Checklist.
  • Before I go through this list, I would like to point out that many of these items have circular dependencies. They need to be done in parallel. They’re not meant to be run in order necessarily, but to help guide your planning activities and make your plan more robust and thorough.
  • Refer to ondemand event by Dux Raymond Sy about SharePoint project planning
  • Refer to ondemand event by Dux Raymond Sy about SharePoint project planning
  • There is some consideration of in-place versus database attach, or some hybrid approach.
  • A strong value proposition of SharePoint is the ability to better organize your content, improve discoverability, and clarify authorship and accessibility by mapping to SharePoint’s permissions. However, one of the primary reasons for delaying a file share migration is the need to go through and “clean up” content so that it can better fit into the SharePoint paradigm.  As with any spring cleaning, migrating your file shares presents an opportunity for users and administrators to clean up document versions, reorganize folder structures, clarify content ownership, and update relevant metadata. But is it easier to clean up this content inside or outside of SharePoint?
  • Why a tortoise? This big guy is from the Galapagos Islands. I was thinking about Darwin’s classification of animals on the islands. Well – specifically, I was thinking about the movie Master and Commander with Russell Crowe and how they stopped on the islands and then had discussions about Darwin, classifications and taxonomy… but that’s neither here nor there.
  • More of a centrally managed portal, where innovation is more managed as a process?A decentralized model where innovation is driven from the bottom up by the end users?
  • ×