Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Chemistryand web2 ma walker 2 5 10

  • Be the first to comment

Chemistryand web2 ma walker 2 5 10

  1. 1. Chemistry and Web 2.0<br />Martin A. Walker<br />Dept. of Chemistry, SUNY Potsdam<br />Member of the Wikipedia Chemistry Project<br />
  2. 2. Overview<br />Chemistry information in 2010<br />The “lay of the land”<br />Chemistry Web 1.0<br />Chemistry Web 2.0<br />Wikipedia<br />ChemSpider<br />Project Prospect<br />Educational resources<br />Open Access and Open Notebook Science<br />Concerns<br />The future?<br />Discussion<br />
  3. 3. CHEMISTRY: The Lay of the Land<br />
  4. 4. The lay of the land<br />Chemistry has long had superb information resources<br />Beilstein, Chemical Abstracts, etc<br />Picture by JOE M500<br />from Flickr, CC licence<br />
  5. 5. The lay of the land<br />Chemistry has long had superb information resources<br />Beilstein, Chemical Abstracts, etc<br />Traditional ties with the chemical and pharmaceutical industries have fostered a “for-profit” environment e.g., for publication<br />A chemistry book is typically $200, and many journals cost >$1 per page<br />Picture by JOE M500<br />from Flickr, CC licence<br />
  6. 6. The lay of the land<br />Chemistry has long had superb information resources<br />Beilstein, Chemical Abstracts, etc<br />Traditional ties with the chemical and pharmaceutical industries have fostered a “for-profit” environment e.g., for publication<br />A chemistry book is typically $200, and many journals cost >$1 per page<br />As a result, chemistry has been slower to adapt to “Web 2.0”<br />Picture by JOE M500<br />from Flickr, CC license<br />
  7. 7. Chemistry on the Web (Version 1.0)<br />
  8. 8. Web 1.0<br />The Web has already transformed <br />chemical information<br />Picture by azure elixir, on Flickr. CC license.<br />
  9. 9. Chemistry Web 1.0<br />We can read articles without leaving our desks<br />
  10. 10. Chemistry Web 1.0<br />We can search, find and read patents:<br />
  11. 11. Chemistry Web 1.0<br />Google Scholar can also help us find recent articles by Lavoisier…<br />
  12. 12. One of the oldest sites is still one of the best<br />
  13. 13. Organic Chemistry Portal<br />
  14. 14. Web 1.0<br />
  15. 15. Chemistry on the web(Version 2.0)<br />
  16. 16. Chemistry Web 2.0<br />Picture by Mighty Mighty Big Mac, Flickr , CC License<br />
  17. 17. Chemistry Web 2.0<br />Scientists already depend on their own social networks to learn, share ideas<br />The Web offers us the chance to share the sum of human knowledge – including the deep knowledge of specialists such as scientists.<br />Mashups can allow seamless sharing of data between sites<br />Picture courtesy of<br />Jim Hendrickson, Brandeis<br />
  18. 18. Some Chemistry Web 2.0 initiatives<br />Wikipedia chemistry and other wikis<br />ChemSpider<br />NMRShiftDB<br />RSC Project Prospect<br />Blue Obelisk, Jmol and the open source movement<br />Educational initiatives<br />
  19. 19.
  20. 20. Wikipedia Chemicals Project<br />~60 members (~20 active)<br />Collaborated on writing quality articles and standards for:<br />developing data boxes for articles<br />chemical naming, structure drawing<br />article assessment<br />Data validation<br />New collaboration with CAS<br />Wim Van Dorst, a Dutch member of WP:Chem since March 2005.<br />
  21. 21. Wikipedia Chemicals Project<br />
  22. 22. Traffic can be very high….<br />
  23. 23. Even for specialized topics<br />
  24. 24. And people too!<br />
  25. 25.
  26. 26. References for sodium sulfate<br />
  27. 27. Content validation<br />In 2008 a data validation drive was initiated for basic chemical identifiers<br />Led to a collaboration with CAS, to ensure Wikipedia CAS registry nos. are correct<br />Now around 3500 substances have been validated against CAS Common Chemistry, as having correct name, structure & CAS RN<br />Validated content indicated with a check mark<br />
  28. 28. CommonChemistry<br /><ul><li> Launched in April 2009
  29. 29. Came about as a result of a collaboration between CAS & Wikipedia
  30. 30. Offered as a free service for CAS RNs for members of the public.</li></li></ul><li>Pfizerpedia<br />Thanks to Antony Williams<br />
  31. 31. Wikis for IUPAC<br />One IUPAC workgroup recently used a wiki to reach consensus on Mass Spectrometry terms.<br />
  32. 32. ChemSpider<br />Started by Antony Williams, March 2007. Acquired by the Royal Society of Chemistry in May 2009.<br />Now the world’s largest open chemical database (over 20 million substances).<br />Open access, all content is free.<br />Brings together data from many different sources, with links out to those sources. Search for structural information, physical properties, etc..<br />Data uploads and curation by volunteers.<br />
  33. 33. ChemSpider<br />
  34. 34. ChemSpider<br />
  35. 35. ChemSpider<br />
  36. 36.
  37. 37. ChemSpider<br />The goal of ChemSpider is to build a “community of chemists”<br />Not trying to be “Facebook for chemists”, instead it offers useful chemical information, FREE.<br />Chemists can share their own data<br />
  38. 38. New this week – ChemSpider Synthetic Pages!<br />
  39. 39. NMRShiftDB<br />
  40. 40. Blue Obelisk group<br />An informal international group of chemists committed to open science and open source software for chemistry, e.g. Jmol for visualizing molecules in 3D<br />Picture courtesy of Wikipedia/NicoV, GFDL license<br />
  41. 41. Project Prospect<br />
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44. Blogs<br />
  45. 45. Nature Island in Second Life<br />“I think that being able to walk around a molecule can add valuable new insight<br /> to thinking about and doing chemistry.” Jean-Claude Bradley, April 5, 2007.<br />
  46. 46. Ionicviper.org<br />
  47. 47. WikiEducator<br />
  48. 48. Open Access<br />
  49. 49. Open Access<br />Web 2.0 methods depend on sharing data, to produce a network of information. The data need to be freely available and accessible.<br />For information to be found (e.g., by Google), it needs to be open.<br />“3Bs” (Budapest, Bethesda, Berlin) – agreements that define OA.<br />Groups that keep data behind a subscription firewall may lose market share.<br />
  50. 50. Open Access<br />
  51. 51. Open Access<br />
  52. 52. Open Science <br />
  53. 53. Open Notebook Science<br />
  54. 54. SOME Concerns<br />
  55. 55. Is it reliable?<br />Traditional peer review vs community controls<br />Current review system is flawed<br />Community controls are highly variable<br />Look for validation<br />Confirmation may be just a click away!<br />On Wikipedia, high traffic => more reliable <br />
  56. 56. Peer review: How will publications be evaluated in the Web 2.0 world?<br />Traditional<br />Critical review by subject experts within months<br />Reviews may be cursory, or worse – “Did you even read the paper???!”<br />Review process is not very transparent<br />Hard to update<br />Valued in tenure & promotion<br />Web 2.0<br />Review often by non-experts, and the main point may be overlooked or misunderstood<br />Review may be fast – or may not occur at all?!<br />Potential for “many eyeballs”<br />Transparent, updateable<br />Not considered at all in tenure and promotion<br />Both approaches can lead to very bad – and very good - reviews<br />
  57. 57. Judge the quality of the output, not the perceived quality of the process<br />
  58. 58. The future?<br />
  59. 59. The Future?<br />“Grey” questions can be answered<br />Data shared openly – a web of all information<br />Chemistry “social networks”?<br />Free, fully open sites will thrive; closed sites may end up “closed” forever….?<br />Open sites that can get ordinary chemists to share their data will reallythrive!<br />Simple semantic searches<br />Lab results open & uploaded in real time?<br />
  60. 60. The future?<br />
  61. 61. What do you think?<br />How does this apply to my field?<br />Is open access a dead end? Who will pay for everything?<br />How will the tenure process work under the new paradigm? <br />I don’t want my rivals to steal my data and get the credit!<br />What about peer review?<br />

×