Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

PLAY Minecraft!

Ad

PLAY Minecraft!
Assessing secondary engineering education using game
challenges within a participatory learning environmen...

Ad

Warning
This paper is not about playing Minecraft!
Sorry :(
We studied
how children talk about Minecraft!
This is good stu...

Ad

Project overview
Goals
• Apply participatory learning to STEM
• Assess learning using Next Generation Science Standards
• ...

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 25 Ad
1 of 25 Ad

PLAY Minecraft!

Download to read offline

Applying participatory learning to STEM
E. Shaw, M. La, R. Phillips, and E. Reilly, “PLAY Minecraft! Assessing Secondary Engineering Education using Game Challenges within a Participatory Learning Environment,” in Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014, Session W447.

Applying participatory learning to STEM
E. Shaw, M. La, R. Phillips, and E. Reilly, “PLAY Minecraft! Assessing Secondary Engineering Education using Game Challenges within a Participatory Learning Environment,” in Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014, Session W447.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Similar to PLAY Minecraft! (20)

More from Erin Brockette Reilly (20)

Advertisement

PLAY Minecraft!

  1. 1. PLAY Minecraft! Assessing secondary engineering education using game challenges within a participatory learning environment (Research to Practice) Strand: Addressing the NGSS: Supporting K-12 Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy and Engineering-Science Connections Erin Shaw, Computer Scientist, University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute Minh La & Richard Phillips, Undergraduates, USC Computer Science Erin Reilly, Director Innovation Lab, USC Annenberg School of Communications & Journalism Thank you to Aninoy Mahapatra, Sam Shuster and Dr. Anthony Maddox
  2. 2. Warning This paper is not about playing Minecraft! Sorry :( We studied how children talk about Minecraft! This is good stuff, too :)
  3. 3. Project overview Goals • Apply participatory learning to STEM • Assess learning using Next Generation Science Standards • Explore computational methods for assessing learning Key ideas • Social media/multimedia based science learning • Discourse/context based instructional assessment
  4. 4. Project overview What • USC Undergraduate Research Associates Program (URAP) • Ten weeks during summer of 2013 Who • Two undergraduates (2B junior and sophomore) • Graduate student advised on NLP/ML tools • Programmer advised on platform and database • “Committee” consisted of faculty and staff from schools of engineering, communication and education
  5. 5. Outline 1. Learning theory – Participatory learning 2. Platform – PLAYground 3. Subject – Minecraft 4. Standards – NGSS Science & Engineering Practices 5. Methods – Topic modeling 6. Data – Focus session 7. Processing – Data mining 8. Analysis – Results display
  6. 6. 1. Learning theory – Participatory learning Participatory cultures (Jenkins) • Have low barriers to engagement • Support artistic expression, sharing creations, mentorship • Foster New Media Literacies (NML) - e.g., performance, appropriation, distributed cognition • Focus on social skills developed through NMLs Four C’s of participatory learning • Creativity, Connection, Collaboration, Circulation
  7. 7. 2. Platform - PLAYground PLAY! (Participatory Learning and You!) • Project consists of technology and pedagogy PLAYground • Multimedia authoring environment - Users create “Challenges” • Designed around 4 Cs of PL • Piloted by high school teachers • Never used for STEM subjects
  8. 8. PLAYground canvas
  9. 9. 3. Subject – Minecraft What is Minecraft? • Popular, free-to-play computer game • Has dynamic virtual worlds built of LEGO-like blocks • Players can combine blocks to “craft” items and to build fantastical structures Minecraft is a virtual engineering environment
  10. 10. Minecraft creations
  11. 11. Minecraft wiki site
  12. 12. 4. Standards – NGSS SEPs NGSS emphasize 3 dimensions • Science & Engineering Practices (SEPs) - Behaviors that scientists engage in as they investigate and build models and theories about the natural world - And that engineers use as they design and build models and systems • Crosscutting Concepts - Provide an organizational schema for interrelating knowledge from various science fields • Disciplinary Core Ideas - Focus curriculum, instruction and assessments on the most important aspects of science
  13. 13. NGSS dimensions
  14. 14. 5. Methods – Topic modeling Build corpora for subject and standards • Minecraft – Scrape wiki • SEPs – Copy all SEP text from NGSS document • Both - Clean text (NLTK) Process • Pre-determine categories • Fit topic model (MALLET) - Resulted in each SEP and Minecraft category being associated with a topic distribution (each topic consists of weighted vector of words) -
  15. 15. Final topic categories SEP categories - Analyzing and interpreting data - Asking questions and defining problems - Constructing explanations and designing solutions - Developing and using models - Engaging in argument from evidence - Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information - Planning and carrying out investigations - Using mathematics and computational thinking Minecraft categories - Blocks, Items, Enchanting, Mobs, Trading, Redstone Circuits, and Modifications.
  16. 16. 6. Data – Focus session Small user study conducted • Five boys - grade 4(2), grade 8(2) and grade 11(1) • Two hours - 30 minutes discussing seed challenges (undergraduate created) - 60 minutes creating own challenges - 30 minutes discussing peer challenges • Simple questionnaire
  17. 17. Seed challenge discussion
  18. 18. Student “challenges”
  19. 19. 7. Processing – Data mining Export database tables Organize user interactions • Collect, link and order data • Attach context, prompts, questions, etc. Output to table for validation
  20. 20. 8. Analysis – Results display Analyze user discourse • Performed topic similarity matching of SEP and Minecraft topics using topic distributions from pre-processed categories
  21. 21. Engineering standards application G4 G8a G11 G8b G14 G15 G8b mathematically gifted G4 in only one category G11 in seven categories
  22. 22. Minecraft topics application G4 G8a G11 G8b G14 G15
  23. 23. Standards application per student G11 in seven categories
  24. 24. Discussion Results • Application of SEPs increases as grade level increases • Mathematically gifted student identified through SEP assess • Good subject category identification Methods • Validate, acquire more text, data, further experimentation • New research to improve results using wordnet Future • Propose to apply techniques to middle school sciences
  25. 25. THE END Thank you for listening. Questions? For more information please contact me at shaw@isi.edu

×