Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

CampusOnline and quality in online teaching - OOFHEC 2019

104 views

Published on

OOFHEC presentation by Jaana Kullaslahti, HAMK and Katri Huovinen, DIAK, 17/10/2019.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

CampusOnline and quality in online teaching - OOFHEC 2019

  1. 1. CampusOnline and quality in online teaching 17.10.2019 Jaana Kullaslahti & Katri Huovinen
  2. 2. Universities of Applied Sciences in Finland 12. South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Mikkeli 13. Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu 14. Karelia University of Applied Sciences, Joensuu 15. Police University College, Tampere 16. Lapland University of Applied Sciences, Rovaniemi 17. Saimaa University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta 18. Satakunta University of Applied Sciences, Pori 19. Savonia University of Applied Sciences, Kuopio 20. Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Seinäjoki 21. Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Tampere 22. Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku 23. Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Vaasa 24. Novia University of Applied Sciences, Vaasa 25. Åland University of Applied Sciences, Maarianhamina 1. Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki 2. Diaconia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki 3. HAAGA-HELIA University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki 4. HUMAK University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki 5. Häme University of Applied Sciences, Hämeenlinna 6. JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä 7. Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Kajaani 8. Centria University of Applied Sciences, Kokkola 9. Lahti University of Applied Sciences, Lahti 10. Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Vantaa/Helsinki 11. Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki
  3. 3. CampusOnline.fi Coaching program for teachers Coaching: • Self- and peer-evaluation • Webinars (5) • Face-to-face meeting • LinkedIn • Online meetings (3) • CampusOnline open badge
  4. 4. CampusOnline expert is able to plan and implement an online course consistent with the quality criteria of the online implementations (eAMK). The online course has been a part of the CampusOnline.fi portal offering of Finnish universities of applied sciences, and students from different universities of applied sciences have participated in the course. • plan an online course in accordance with the eAMK quality criteria • make the online course available in the CampusOnline study portal • implement the online course by applying the quality criteria • collect feedback, subject the implementation to a peer review, and evaluate your implementation and the necessary development measures 19.2.2020
  5. 5. How can we ensure that CampusOnline -implementations achieve our standards of quality criteria? • Student feedback • Quality criteria known and introduced • Coaching teachers – mentoring, support, workshops • Self- and peer-evaluation – working together • Cross-institutional peer-evaluation • Resources for development • Long-term development together
  6. 6. Teacher, why do you offer your course on the CampusOnline.fi? Student, why did you choose a course on the CampusOnline.fi? I think this is a good way for teacher to share her/his knowledge across the country. Not everyone has to offer everything, and in the small country, it makes sense to pool resources where it is possible. CampusOnline was like a gift from heaven.
  7. 7. Student feedback autumn 2018 and spring 2019 19.2.2020
  8. 8. 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Technical support was available during the course. The materials used on the course were readily available. The implementation plan clearly described the objectives and content of the course. The structure of the course and the different stages of progress were presented clearly. The responsible persons, channels and schedules related to student guidance could be easily found on the online platform. The course timetable was clearly announced on the online platform. Information about the basic equipment required for completing the course, as well as any other necessary applications, could be found in the course description. The course entry level requirements could be found from the course description. Basic information of the online course (spring 2019) completely disagree disagree undecided agree completely agree
  9. 9. 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % The working methods were well in line with the number of course participants. The course made it possible to utilise a range of technological solutions, e.g. sound, video, image and various kinds of texts. The course assignments had working-life relevance. The course assignments were easy to understand. The online tools provided support in the studies and in achieving the intended learning outcomes. The course working methods provided me with support in achieving my intended learning outcomes. The course content provided me with support in achieving my intended learning outcomes. Content, assignments and tools (spring 2019) completely disagree disagree undecided agree completely agree
  10. 10. 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % The teacher and the student had an opportunity to interact online. The course made it possible to learn from others and share experiences online. The guidance and feedback received during the course was provided on a timely basis and made available throughout the course. The course made it possible to receive feedback from the other students in the course. Assessment was carried on a continuous basis throughout the course. The course assessment criteria were provided on the online platform. A varied range of methods was utilised in the assessment. Self-evaluation was carried out during the course using the tools provided by the online platform. Assessment, guidance and interaction (spring 2019) completely disagree disagree undecided agree completely agree
  11. 11. Student, would you recommend CampusOnline studies for a friend? Teacher, would you recommend CampusOnline teaching for a colleague? ”For me it has been interesting to work with different educational fields (5) and different institutions (students from 9 different UAS). Because the students have chosen the course themselves, they are motivated to study and it has been the best in this.” CampusOnline teacher “All UAS offer just a few courses for their specializations. We might not have enough courses to complete the specialization at our own school or would like to have skills in our repertoir which are not offered by our institution. Also, online courses can be done by anyone anytime (you can do it besides work, other classes or raising children). Campus online is a very good idea and helps us students a lot, even if the course quality is a bit low here and there...” CampusOnline student 99 % 1 % Autumn 2018 yes no 98 % 2 % Spring 2019 yes no 84 % 6 % 10 % Autumn 2018 yes no with reservation 70 % 7 % 23 % Spring 2019 yes no I don't know
  12. 12. Together we are more! https://www.eamk.fi/en

×