Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

Successfully reported this slideshow.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- How to run Student's t-test on SPSS by Azmi Mohd Tamil 16135 views
- Pearson Chi-Square by Azmi Mohd Tamil 1710 views
- How to draw Scatter plot on SPSS by Azmi Mohd Tamil 15453 views
- How to run ANOVA on SPSS by Azmi Mohd Tamil 14810 views
- How to run Pearson's Chi-square for... by Azmi Mohd Tamil 15383 views
- Running Pearson's Correlation on SPSS by Azmi Mohd Tamil 14980 views

1,936 views

Published on

Short notes on how to answer t-test question for the coming exam

Published in:
Health & Medicine

No Downloads

Total views

1,936

On SlideShare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

41

Shares

0

Downloads

0

Comments

0

Likes

14

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. Dr Azmi Mohd Tamil Normally distributed data Comparison between 2 groups Student’s T-Test 1 drtamil@gmail.com 2015
- 2. Concept drtamil@gmail.com 20152 Basically we are comparing the mean of the outcome (as measured in continuous data) among the treated against the mean of the outcome among the control. If the treatment is effective, we would expect those treated to have a significantly higher (“causative”) or lower (“protective”) mean of the outcome compared to those in the control group. n Mean HDL S.D. Fish Oil + 30 1.4767 0.45549 Control - 30 1.2593 0.44488
- 3. Research Question Will those treated with fish oil supplement have a higher level of HDL compared to control group? If it is true that fish oil is good for you, then we expect a significantly higher level of HDL among those treated with fish oil group (1.48+0.46) compared to the control group (1.26+0.44). Student’s t-test will test whether the HDL mean among treated group (1.48) is significantly higher than the HDL mean of control group (1.26). 3 drtamil@gmail.com 2015 n Mean HDL S.D. Fish Oil + 30 1.4767 0.45549 Control - 30 1.2593 0.44488
- 4. Null hypothesis Null hypothesis assumes that there is no association between fish oil usage and HDL level. As though taking fish oil has no effect on the HDL level. If taking fish oil has no effect on HDL, then there should be no difference of mean of HDL level between treatment and control groups. The statistical test conducted is to decide whether or not to reject the null hypothesis. So if the mean HDL level of treatment group is significantly different than the mean HDL of control group, null hypothesis is rejected. 4 drtamil@gmail.com 2015
- 5. Significance We expect better HDL level among the treated group, compared to the control group. The better the improvement, the larger is the mean difference between the two groups. The larger the difference, the more significant is the p value. The bigger the mean difference, the bigger is the t value, therefore the smaller is the p value, therefore more likely to be significant. The smaller the variance, the smaller is the p value.
- 6. Significance The larger the difference, the more significant is the p value. But here the difference is only 0.2174, which is even smaller than the standard deviation (0.45549 & 0.44488) The small mean difference, and the large standard deviation/variance will lead to a smaller t value, therefore larger p value, therefore more likely to be insignificant. n Mean HDL S.D. Fish Oil + 30 1.4767 0.45549 Control - 30 1.2593 0.44488
- 7. Example: t = (1.4767 – 1.2593)_____ (0.455492/30 + 0.444882/30)0.5 t = 0.2174/0.1162=1.870 df = (30-1)+(30-1) = 58 Critical value for df = 60 for p=0.05 is 2.00, Critical value for df = 40 for p=0.05 is 2.02, The calculated t is smaller than the critical value, therefore the null hypothesis is NOT REJECTED. Conclusion: Although the treated group HDL level is slightly higher (1.48+0.46) compared to the control group (1.26+0.44), the difference is not statistically significant (p>0.05) Hint: Memorise critical value of 1.96 for df=infinity.7 drtamil@gmail.com 2015
- 8. Refer to Table A3. We don’t have df=58, so we use df=40 instead. Calculated t = 1.870 < 2.02 If t=2.02, p=0.05 Therefore if t=1.870, p>0.05.
- 9. As analysed by SPSS drtamil@gmail.com 20159
- 10. Summary drtamil@gmail.com 201510 Hypothesis – those treated with fish oil supplement have a higher level of HDL compared to control group. Null hypothesis No difference of mean of HDL level between treatment and control groups, or; There is no association between fish oil treatment and HDL level. Suitable statistical test – Student’s t-test (compare mean between 2 groups, n=60-assume normally distributed data).
- 11. Summary drtamil@gmail.com 201511 Calculation; t = (1.4767 – 1.2593)_____ (0.455492/30 + 0.444882/30)0.5 = 0.2174/0.1162=1.870 df = (30-1)+(30-1) = 58 p > 0.05 Null hypothesis NOT REJECTED because p > 0.05 Conclusion: Although the treated group HDL level is slightly higher (1.48+0.46) compared to the control group (1.26+0.44), the difference is not statistically significant (p>0.05); or There is no association between fish oil usage and HDL level.

No public clipboards found for this slide

Be the first to comment