Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

GERD: Telling Fact from Fiction

1,895 views

Published on

GERD (Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease) is one of the commonest medical conditions found in the community today. GERD patients often suffer from frequent symptoms and require long term medication. However, how much of what we know about GERD is truly fact based on medical evidence? We challenge traditional paradigms to GERD

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • I'm interested because I've worked for over 4 years in a Tertiary Gastroenterology Unit (Karachi-Pakistan) where diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopies were done (Avg. 7-8 procedures) daily.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Excellent presentation. Thanks for sharing. Can you please email me this presentation at abidabbassheikh@gmail.com.
    Dr. Abid Abbas Sheikh
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

GERD: Telling Fact from Fiction

  1. 1. GERD: Telling Fact from Fiction Dr Jarrod Lee Gastroenterologist & Advanced Endoscopist Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital
  2. 2. Fact or Fiction? • Non Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD) is a mild form of GERD. It can progress to Erosive Esophagitis • In Asia, NERD is far more common than Erosive Esophagitis. Hence, endoscopy is not useful for diagnosis • In GERD, if PPIs don’t work, nothing more can be done except surgery
  3. 3. NERD is a mild form of GERD. It can progress to Erosive Esophagitis
  4. 4. Traditional Paradigm NERD Erosive Esophagitis Barrett’s Esophagus • Focus on Erosive Esophagitis – Most well designed GERD studies focus on mucosa healing and symptom improvement in Erosive Esophagitis • Progression along spectrum over time • NERD is a mild form of GERD
  5. 5. What is the Evidence? NERD Erosive Esophagitis Barrett’s Esophagus
  6. 6. Studies in NERD • Most community based patients have NERD • Very few progress to Erosive Esophagitis – 10-15% over 5-20 years – Only mild Erosive Esophagitis (Grade A) • No Barrett’s Esophagus or Esophageal Cancer • Lower symptom response to PPIs – Increased number of treatment failures – Relapse back to NERD after treatment
  7. 7. NERD Natural History
  8. 8. Changing Paradigm
  9. 9. Non-erosive Reflux Disease (NERD) is much more common in Asia. Hence, endoscopy is not useful for diagnosis.
  10. 10. Epidemiology: East vs West • GERD Incidence: – West: 10-20% – Asia: 5% – Singapore: 10% • NERD percentage – West: 50-70% – Asia: 60-90%
  11. 11. Diagnosing GERD • No gold standard!! • Presumptive diagnosis can be made with typical symptoms: – Heartburn, acid regurgitation – Frequency: at least weekly • If presumptive diagnosis made, can proceed to an empirical trial of PPI
  12. 12. Empirical PPI • Both a diagnostic and therapeutic test • Sensitivity: 70-80% • Poor specificity: 25-65% – May be positive in other acid disorders – Specificity with placebo 40% !! • 4-8 weeks of PPI will: – Heal erosive esophagitis in 85-95% – Control symptoms in 75-85%
  13. 13. How to do it? • • • • What drug? Any PPI What dose? Standard dose How long? Minimum 1 week What to look for? > 50% symptom improvement • When to review? 2-4 weeks – No improvement: increase dose, BD dosing – Improvement: complete 4-8 weeks
  14. 14. Role of Endoscopy • Evaluate alarm symptoms: – Dysphagia, weight loss, persistent vomiting, bleeding/ anemia • • • • Exclude other differentials Evaluate other symptoms, e.g. dyspepsia Evaluate treatment failures Screen for Barrett’s Esophagus if at risk: – Males > 50 yrs + chronic GERD + risk factors
  15. 15. Endoscopy in Uncomplicated GERD • • • • Problem with patients on treatment Good specificity 95% Poor sensitivity <30% In Asia: sensitivity 10%
  16. 16. Symptoms bother me! I’m worried and concerned Heartburn disturbs my sleep I cannot bend over or exercise My whole life is affected I cannot eat or drink what I like
  17. 17. ‘Next Generation’ Endoscopy
  18. 18. Advanced Imaging Narrow band imaging 20
  19. 19. NBI in GERD Improves visualization of squamocolumnar junction
  20. 20. GERD patients have: • Increased number, dilatation, tortuosity of intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCLs) • Micro-erosions • Increased vascularity • Absence of round pit pattern
  21. 21. • Endoscopy normal • Advanced imaging shows tiny mucosal break and increased vascularity
  22. 22. How accurate is it? GERD Patients Endoscopy Finding Micro-erosions Increased vascularity at junction Conventional Endoscopy Advanced Imaging 0% 0% 52.8% 91.7%
  23. 23. Advanced Imaging: NERD vs Controls Advanced Imaging Micro erosions Increase vascularity Round pit pattern NERD 52.8% 91.7% 5.6% Controls 23.3% 36.7% 70% P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Using a composite of: increased vascularity & absence of round pit pattern • Sensitivity 86.1% • Specificity 83.3%
  24. 24. In GERD, if PPIs don’t work, nothing more can be done except surgery
  25. 25. PPI Failures in GERD 27
  26. 26. PPI Therapy in GERD • NOT a definite solution – Symptoms will recur once PPI stop – Reduces acidity but not frequency or volume of reflux • Efficacy in Erosive Esophagitis – Mucosal healing: 85-95% – Symptomatic response: 75-85%
  27. 27. Reasons for Failing PPI • Compliance • Concomitant functional disorder, e.g. IBS, FD • Wrong diagnosis • NERD – Hypersensitive Esophagus (non-acid reflux) – Functional Heartburn
  28. 28. Proportion of patients who fail once daily PPI
  29. 29. Optimizing PPI Therapy Sub-optimal PPI therapy is the largest cause of ‘refractory’ GERD • < 80% of patients take PPI according to prescription • 25-50% of patients have moderate to poor compliance PPI instructions by primary care physicians Chey WD et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2005 31
  30. 30. Partial Responsers • What next? – Switch to BD dosing or different PPI – Provides symptom improvement in 20% • No clear advantage with either strategy • If still not responding, consider refer to gastroenterologist
  31. 31. What will the Gastroenterologist do?
  32. 32. Ambulatory pH Monitoring • Documents acid reflux: frequency + intensity • Correlates with symptoms
  33. 33. Bravo pH Capsule
  34. 34. Reflux Esophagitis Increased acid exposure. All acid regurgitation (29 episodes) occurred at times of acid reflux.
  35. 35. ? GERD Significant acid exposure. Only 2 out of 4 episodes of mild acid regurgitation occurred at times of acid reflux.
  36. 36. pH Monitoring in NERD patients Proportion of abnormal pH monitoring
  37. 37. Combined pH-Impedance Testing • Documents ALL reflux; improves GERD diagnosis in up to 90% • Correlates symptoms with reflux event • Can differentiate NERD subtypes
  38. 38. What is Impedance? • Impedance is the electrical resistance measured with an alternating current • Catheter with metal rings: a small electrical current is used to measure the impedance between 2 rings Ring R1 R2 Patient safe low electrical current
  39. 39. Impedance Values Ohm*cm (at 1 kHz) Gastric contents 30-100 Bile 90 Saline solution 100 Saliva 110 Skeletal muscle Milk/ yoghurt 250-700 300 Drinking water/ cola 1,100 Esophageal wall 2,000 Epidermis Air 2,000 – 100,000 10,000,000
  40. 40. 43
  41. 41. 45
  42. 42. Conclusion • GERD is a disorder with different phenotypes • Diagnosis – PPI test is good – Gastroscopy for alarm symptoms, treatment failures – Consider advanced imaging for better yield: 10% vs 85% • Treatment failures – Optimize PPI therapy – Determine GERD or NERD phenotype 47
  43. 43. Thank You 48

×