Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

IR14 Pre-Conference Workshop Lightning Talk: Social Media Methods & Ethics

Presented at the University of Denver, 23 October 2013.

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

IR14 Pre-Conference Workshop Lightning Talk: Social Media Methods & Ethics

  1. 1. Methodological Challenges IR14 Pre-Conference Workshop Denver,CO @dpwoodford Wednesday, 23 October 13
  2. 2. PLATFORMS • Twitter: Open API, Limited on Volume, Real-Time unless paying for API; good data on user profiles. • Facebook: Multiple levels of access; public pages easily accessible, historical data easy to obtain (unless deleted), but less precise (e.g. likes not timestamped unless page owner). • Weibo? Vkontake? LinkedIn? • Cost:Benefit analysis for developing infrastructure, Wednesday, 23 October 13
  3. 3. TWITTER • Streaming API is limited to ~1% of total tweets per second & Firehose access is expensive. • Large data sets are not easily malleable, or visually analyzed (e.g. with Tableau): – Our database of Twitter users is ~3.7TB, and growing. – A weeks worth of selected TV data (current US shows) in JSON format is 750MB, and 600MB in TSV (selected fields). And millions of rows. • Analyzing large data sets is slow, if it’s even possible => “Usable Data” Wednesday, 23 October 13
  4. 4. WHAT DOES 1% LOOK LIKE DURING SCANDAL? Wednesday, 23 October 13
  5. 5. RANDOM SAMPLING VS FULL SAMPLE ANALYSIS Source:  Tony  Hirst  (Open  University  UK) Wednesday, 23 October 13
  6. 6. FULL SAMPLE, REPEATED CAPTURE Source:  Bruns  /  Woodford  [Mapping  Online  Publics] Wednesday, 23 October 13
  7. 7. ANALYSIS TOOLS: DATA ANALYTICS • Historically @ CCI / Mapping Online Publics: .csv files, Gawk Scripts, Excel. • Ideally: Custom Tools, R, Large Sample analysis. • Reality: We’ve compromised on Tableau. A great option for easy data analysis, and reasonably large samples: – But still, large flat files => memory leaks (e.g. Accession charts for Barack Obama). – Currently investigating database solutions, with mySQL as a stop-gap. Wednesday, 23 October 13
  8. 8. ANALYSIS TOOLS: CONTENT ANALYSIS Source:  Woodford  /  Prowd  [Fan  Cultures  and  Hatred  in  Big  Brother  15:  Race  Rows,  EliMsm  &  SporMng  Tribalism  -­‐-­‐  Forthcoming] • Lots of advanced tools, but sometimes they overcomplicate things; simple visuals are good for communicating to your audience.. Wednesday, 23 October 13
  9. 9. ANALYSIS TOOLS: WORDLE SOMETIMES WORKS Source:  Woodford  /  Prowd  [Fan  Cultures  and  Hatred  in  Big  Brother  15:  Race  Rows,  EliMsm  &  SporMng  Tribalism  -­‐-­‐  Forthcoming] Wednesday, 23 October 13
  10. 10. ANALYSIS TOOLS: WORDLE SOMETIMES WORKS Source:  Woodford  /  Prowd  [Fan  Cultures  and  Hatred  in  Big  Brother  15:  Race  Rows,  EliMsm  &  SporMng  Tribalism  -­‐-­‐  Forthcoming] Wednesday, 23 October 13
  11. 11. WHO’S THE AUDIENCE? • Who you want to connect with is important in choosing methods and presentations. • My commentary / analysis on Big Brother 15 (US) across my blog, MOP and SocialMedia@QUT was read many more times than ANY academic article I’ve ever written. • And was picked up by industry.. • Who should we be writing for? Wednesday, 23 October 13
  12. 12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • ARC Centre for Excellence in Creative Industries and Innovation (CCI) - & http:// • Social Media Research Group -- http:// • Queensland University of Technology Wednesday, 23 October 13