Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Nepal pva workshop report chitwan november 2k5 final


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Nepal pva workshop report chitwan november 2k5 final

  1. 1. Participatory Vulnerability Analysis November 14-19, 2005 The Global Hotel Bharatpur, Chitwan Nepal Emergency & Disaster Management Theme ActionAid Nepal Human Security & Governance Team Kathmandu Prepared By Shyam Sundar Jnavaly AAN CRC Bharatpur Dhruba Raj Gautam DPNet Nepal Kathmandu ActionAid Nepal November 2005 Bharatpur, Chitwan
  2. 2. ACTIONAID Nepal GPO Box 6257 Kathmandu Nepal Tel: 977 (1) 7736477, 4410929, 4419115 Fax: 977 (1) 4419718 E-mail: Copyright © ACTIONAID Nepal 2005 ACTIONAID Nepal reserves all rights of ownership of the original material in this Report, but readers are free to make use of it for non-commercial purposes in the course of development work. ACTIONAID Nepal asks, however, that proper acknowledgement be given whenever the Report is so used, and that a copy of any document prepared with the assistance of original material quoted from this Report be sent to ACTIONAID Nepal, for inclusion in the ACTIONAID Nepal resource centre.
  3. 3. Acronyms CBDP : Community Based Disaster Prevention CBO : Community Based Organization CDO : Chief District Officer DDC : District Development Committee DIO : Divisional Irrigation Office DOI : Department of Irrigation E&DM : Emergency and Disaster Management FGD : Focus Group Discussion GO : Government Organization HMG : His Majesty's Government INGO : International Non Governmental Organization KII : Key Informant Information NGO : Non Governmental Organization NPC : National Planning Commission NRCS : Nepal Red Cross Society UNDP : United Nations Development Program VDC : Village Development Committee Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 1 of 82
  4. 4. Table of Content 1 The Context: Disaster and Vulnerability 1 1.1 Vulnerability in the Context of ActionAid International 2 1.2 Forms of Vulnerability 2 1.3 Linkages between Vulnerability with other Disciplines 2 2 Participatory Vulnerability Analysis 3 2.1 Core principles of PVA 3 2.2 PVA at the different levels 3 2.3 Role of PVA in the context of Action Aiders and its partners 4 3 PVA in the Context of Actionaid Nepal 5 3.1 A Historical Timeline 5 3.2 PVA Workshop in Nepal 5 3.3 Participation 6 3.4 Resources 6 3.5 Sampling/Selection 6 3.6 The Communities 6 3.7 Use of Secondary Data 6 3.8 Data and Data Management Information Dissemination 7 3.9 Participatory Tools and Techniques 7 3.10 Key Outputs from Data Analysis 8 3.11 Ties to Decision Making Process 9 3.12 Analysis from Field PVA presentations 9 3.12 Participant’s Feelings, after having a PVA training 10 Commitments 3.14 Outcome / Impact 10 4 Data to be documented 11 Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 2 of 82
  5. 5. 5 Issues Emerged while Analysing the Vulnerability 11 6 Institutionalizing PVA 12 7 Gaps and Challenges 12 8 Benefits of PVA 12 9 Learning and Sharing 13 10 The Way Forward 15 11 Summing up 15 Workshop Proceedings 17 Annexes 54 Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 3 of 82
  6. 6. Workshop Report on Participatory Vulnerability Analysis (November 14-19, 2005) Hotel Global, Bharatpur, Chitwan 1. The Context: Disaster and Vulnerability Disaster is an unexpected phenomenon. Due to frequent floods and chronic landslides, Nepal is regarded a highly disaster prone area. Both floods and landslides damage the infrastructures, erodes the productive agriculture land and cause to take away thousand of lives and livestock. There are various reasons behind the heavy disasters. Development activities haphazardly implemented without maintaining the norms (road, buildings), deforestation, adaptation of the traditional practices of making khoriya for cultivation, and encroachments of flood plains are some of the immediate reasons. Break of epidemic, migration, starvation, deaths, beggary, suicide, disability and illness are the post disaster syndromes. Disasters are responsible for significant economic loss, erosion in social and financial capitals, psychological dislocation and widespread physical injury and death. Poor, children, elderly and disadvantaged people are more vulnerable to the disaster and post disaster effects because of their poor access to and control over the necessary resources. The vulnerability situation depends on family, community and hazards. Due to the socio- economic condition and inadequate awareness among the people of the community, they are not been able to face these hazards, so their condition is being vulnerable day by day. As the hazard is increasing, vulnerability is also increasing due to the multiple effects of the previous hazards. Further, it is also seen that there is a strong relation between hazards, vulnerability and poverty. The poverty is found to be the major cause of vulnerability. And the poverty is the consequence of hazards. The vulnerability is the cause of poor unity and network of the disaster victims, ineffective mitigation measures during disaster, poor capacity of community to fight against the disaster, inadequate preparedness and mitigation plans on time. In order to cope with vulnerability, advance planning and preparation is needed and capacity of the people should be increased to mobilize internal as well as external resources. Increase leadership quality, provide vocational skills and techniques to seek the alternative income source are equally important. Those communities which have capacity to analysis their vulnerability and its underlying causes can manage disaster more easily. The ways of minimizing the vulnerability are multifarious. It has to be dealt with both from social/institutional and technical perspectives. Building the capacity of local communities is the foremost step to deal with the implication of disaster. For this, community themselves have to assess their capacities to deal with the extent of vulnerability. 1.1 Vulnerability in the Context of ActionAid International Vulnerability is considered to be the main linking factor between emergencies and long term development work. The emergencies strategy of ActionAid has also emphasised on Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 1 of 82
  7. 7. analysing vulnerabilities in long-term work and using this analysis in building local resilience, readiness and long term recovery. 1.2 Forms of Vulnerability There are many forms of vulnerability. They are: poverty and vulnerability, needs and vulnerability, deprivation and vulnerability and disadvantage and vulnerability. Poverty and vulnerability: Poverty and vulnerability are strongly linked and mutually re- enforcing and these are brought about by the same process. All poor are vulnerable and most of the vulnerable are poor. Poverty is not the only factor, which leads to vulnerability; there can be other factors like geographical location, communal conflict, etc. Needs and vulnerability: Vulnerability is not just connoted with needs but is broader than that. Needs are the outer symptoms while vulnerability remains hidden and strikes back. People who cannot meet their basic needs are more vulnerable than others. During a disaster, the well-off recover much more quickly than those who are struggling to meet their basic needs. Deprivation and vulnerability: Any kind of deprivation i.e. deprivation of information, resources, or services generates vulnerability. Disadvantage and vulnerability: It involves the access and control of resources. Disadvantaged status reinforces the vulnerability. All the above can be regarded as conditions of exposure to vulnerability. It affects people/ groups of people everywhere by different magnitude and categories. It also depends on the context, which varies from one place to another. Among many, the major dimensions of vulnerability are physical, social, cultural, gender, generational, economic, and political. Vulnerability can be formulated as follows. Vulnerability = Hazard/Capacities, or Risk x Capacities/Hazard 1.3 Linkages between Vulnerability with Other Disciplines Vulnerability can be considered to have strong linkages between emergencies and long term development work. The emergency strategy of ActionAid International also emphasises the analysis of vulnerabilities to promote long-term development work. PVA is a systematic analytic process which can develop and build local capacities to understand their situations of vulnerabilities. It is also useful in developing local communities' resilience, strengthening their capacities for prevention and mitigation work. PVA promotes their ability to overcome and reduce the impact of vulnerabilities and also promote long term recovery. It is therefore important to view vulnerability analysis as a process with strong linkages into many thematic areas within the work of ActionAid International. These themes focus on enhancing, the rights of women and girls, promoting good governance, food security, education, preventing HIV/AIDS, conflicts and Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 2 of 82
  8. 8. emergencies, and engaging in policy influencing and advocacy work in favour of the poor and disadvantaged. 2. Participatory Vulnerability Analysis Understanding the degree of capacity of the community for reducing their vulnerability is a fundamental principle of the PVA. Participatory Vulnerability Analysis (PVA) is a systematic process that empowers communities to understand their own situation of vulnerabilities and take active measures. At the core of PVA lies the local knowledge and capacities of the people to articulate, identify and develop plans for their situations of vulnerabilities. It involves communities and other stakeholders in an in-depth examination of their vulnerability, and at the same time empowers or motivates them to take appropriate actions. The overall aim of PVA is to link disaster preparedness and response to long-term development. PVA is a qualitative way of analyzing vulnerability, which involves participation of vulnerable people themselves. The analysis helps us to understand vulnerability, its root causes and most vulnerable groups, and agree on actions by, with and to people to reduce their vulnerability. By analysis, we mean the process of breaking down something into component parts, which can then be addressed systematically. PVA has its own principles, which are outlined below. 2.1 Core Principles of PVA The core principles of PVA are: • PVA acts as an active agency that poor people can and involve in finding the solutions to the problems they face. • It is not an end in itself; it should result in action and change for the better. • The sources of vulnerability and solutions to vulnerability are located or controlled outside the community, so it needs a multi-level process. • It is based on ActionAid’s rights based approach. 2.2 PVA at the Different Levels Community level: At the community level analysis, local facilitators will help the community to analyse their vulnerabilities in the meetings and discussion sessions. The participatory and Reflect approaches will be used to incorporate community’s perception of their vulnerabilities. But at the same time, local facilitators will feed in some issues extracted from the other levels of analysis. District/Project level: At the district/project level analysis, community representatives will involve other stakeholders and will translate the issues into the local level advocacy and lobbying. The regional/ country and international level of analysis will extract the ideas & issues from the community and district level analysis to feed into the policy and advocacy work. Studies on specific issues identified by the analysis will be conducted and learning will be promoted by workshops, reports and exchange visits. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 3 of 82
  9. 9. Regional/Country Level: At this stage, studies on selected issues will be made and major issues and outcome of the studies will be disseminated through national level advocacy and lobbying. In doing so, exchange visits and monitoring as well as national level workshops are beneficial. International Level: At this stage, coordination and documentation activities will be implemented in the full swing. Other activities like technical support from outside like in policy and advocacy work. International workshops and interactions are also useful to exchange the knowledge and experiences. 2.3 Role of PVA in the Context of Action Aiders and its Partners PVA has its place in the promotion and attainment of the above. For instance, working in poverty reduction will require PVA. • The attainment of livelihoods and reduction of vulnerability to food insecurity, poor health, management and maintenance of community natural resources to reduce environmental degradation. • Gender issues, including various forms of marginalization, social exclusion and deprivation of the rights of poor and vulnerable groups within the communities,-Dalits issues, the untouchables, including people considered as 'squatters' and street children. • Utilization in searching of opportunities for change in status quo of the poor and marginalized including the promotion of long-term development and focus on rights based approaches to development. PVA – can examine root causes of poverty, marginalization and exclusion the issues related to power dynamics and power relationship. PVA encourages enhanced awareness and sensitivity to poor and marginalized that are often not present during meetings. These categories of people need to be heard. Often they may not be visible or may remain silent and unheard because of the cultural and social norms. Enhanced awareness of structural injustices and exclusion can enable us to utilize PVA to unearth and examine in each context – the existing power and marginalisation processes. Thus, PVA can serve as a process that reveals vulnerable and excluded groups in the communities we serve and indicates ways in which these people are exposed to hazards, risks and even disasters. PVA utilizes various participatory techniques to probe and ask questions, engage communities in a reflective process to provide answers to the following questions: Who controls power? Who is excluded and made vulnerable by this power? Who has access to livelihood resources and who does not? What are the root causes of people's vulnerabilities? PVA reveals those who are socially excluded. Social exclusion can be defined in terms of caste system, gender disparities, ethnicity, status and various forms of disabilities. The work on vulnerability was viewed in the light of "Fighting Poverty Together” and framed within the context of AAI Global Strategy entitled "Rights to End Poverty", (R2EP) to be implemented during 2005-2010. It is evident R2EP places the poor and marginalized, particularly women and girls, at the core of AAN programming. It also calls for their active Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 4 of 82
  10. 10. agency including AAN partnership with CSOs to form networks and alliances to advocate for pro-poor polices and ensure that duty bearers meet their obligations. Emphasis is on RBA to promote equity and social justice. 3. PVA in the Context of Actionaid Nepal 3.1 A Historical Timeline In the first time, PVA Dorset Report was received in 2002. Subsequently, in the following year, in 2003, PVA Guide draft was received. A year later Actionaid shared this draft PVA guidebook to its partner NGOs. This concept was applied in the first time by Friends Services Council in 5 VDCs and 1 Municipality of Rupandehi District in June-September 2004 (Please refer annex for proceedings of the training cum workshop). In June 2005, Actionaid Nepal staff participated in PVA workshop India to sharpen the knowledge about the PVA and its associated issues. Then, PVA guide (Final copy) was received/circulated. Finally, PVA Training cum workshop was organized in Chitwan, Nepal in November 2005 to further sharpen the knowledge and understanding among AAN and its partners about PVA. Apart from these activities, community issues were identified organizing mass meetings at most hazardous /vulnerable locations in Rupandehi, Chitwan and Makwanpur Districts of Nepal under Safety Net Campaign. The outcome issues were presented at district level involving all district line agencies to address the specific issues by the specific departments of local governments. e. g. flood, wild animal, health, education, etc. The district level issues were shared at national level involving related I/NGOs, National Planning Commission, Government Departments and Ministers. In this way, the issues of vulnerability were taken in to discussion to find the root causes of vulnerability and its associated issues. 3.2 PVA Workshop in Nepal The PVA training cum workshop was conducted in Chitwan District / Central Terai from 14-19 November 2005. The overall objectives and aims were two fold: first to familiarize the PVA process to the AAN Staff, Partner NGOs, local stakeholders and the community and; second, to enable the community to develop understanding of their situation of vulnerability and to empower them to take forward the issue to claim the compensation and mobilize them to engage in rights based advocacy for development and improvement of safety nets. The objectives of the workshop were to: • generate a common consensus on plan for a research programme on vulnerability analysis • share what we know and don’t know about vulnerability • learn and think about vulnerability and how this can be analysed effectively • develop a network of people working on vulnerability & emergencies within ActionAid in the different parts of world Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 5 of 82
  11. 11. 3.3 Participation in the Workshop In the workshop, varieties of people from different disciplines were involved. • ActionAid Nepal staff and Partners (14) (includes Theme leaders for Education, Food security, Dalit, Governance, Peace and Conflict, Urban Poverty, Education, Impact Assessment, Program Officers, Coordinators) • Representatives of other NGO/CBOs and Networks (9) • Local Government representative (1) • Community Volunteer/Activists (6) • Disaster Victim/Vulnerable community members (12) 3.4 Human Resources The following were the resources of AA Nepal to carry out the PVA Workshop. • AA International Resource Person • PVA Guide Book • In-house Pool of Experts on Participatory Tools and Techniques • Committed Human Resources • Appropriate logistic management, and • Media 3.5 Selection of Samples These communities were selected as per the following criteria • Proximity to the workshop venue (low security threats) • New DI area of AAN, so needs planning… • AAN’s engagement with Food Security and NRM issue in the area • Felt need of Disaster preparedness works • Community issue linked with PVA process 3.6 The Communities Selected As a part of the workshop, the participants of the training visited two communities of Nepal, viz: Meghauli and Divyanagar /Jagatpur of Chitwan, Nepal. Meghauli and Divyanagar/Jagatpur VDCs of Chitwan District face heavy flood and landslides every year, and lose land, livelihood, life and property. The area also falls under the buffer zone of the Royal Chitwan National (Wildlife) Park, thus wild animals damage the standing crops as well as kills people every year. Communities are not able to claim compensations for damaged crops and life due to complex compensation policy of the government. They are not able to argue with Army that guard at the National Park. Though there is provision of investing the 50% income of the Park for the betterment of surrounding community, no proper development activities were running due to poor local governance. 3.7 Use of Secondary Data The secondary information that was used was drawn from the following sources. • The existing secondary data from the Partner NGO and networks / DDC and VDC profile. • Document Mapping of previous project works. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 6 of 82
  12. 12. 3.8 Data and Data Management Information Dissemination Primary data were generated from PVA and secondary data were used for probing. For this, analysis of vulnerability situation was made through • Prevalence/extent of vulnerability • Coping ability and approaches of different people • Analysis of present threats/vulnerabilities After consultation and feed back from the participants and community, report was finalized and disseminated. Nepali language was used for the report and it was also made available for the community and CBOs for future reference. 3.9 Participatory Tools and Techniques The following participatory tools and techniques were used for the purpose of primary data collection. • Transact Walk • Focused Group Discussion • Time Line • Seasonal Calendar • Social/Resource/Vulnerability Mapping • Mobility Mapping • Venn diagram • Well-being Ranking A process of making vulnerability map • REFLECT - • Problem Tree • Conflict Analysis – Power Analysis – Force field Analysis • Gender Analysis – Time Chart • Stepping Stone - Counselling • Livelihood Analysis/Cob-Web • SWOT Analysis A map showing clusters 3.10 Key Outputs from Data Analysis Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 7 of 82
  13. 13. After the analysis of primary data collection, the causes of vulnerability, their cause and effects and prioritization were found. From the analysis of the data available from two communities, the causes of vulnerability were identified as follows. • Narayani and Rapti River • Wild Animals • Army (Guards of National Park) • Multiple Affects of Hazards and Poor governance From the detail field work, the major causes of physical vulnerability were found as: • Presence of the settlement area, buildings, arable lands physical infrastructures and necessary services in disaster prone areas. • Lack of alternative livelihood resources. • Inadequate access and control over the production of resources. • Dependence on elites and well-off people. • Inadequate foodstuffs. • Inadequate necessary education, skills and capacity. • Inadequate basic services such as education, health-related services, drinking water, sanitation, roads, electricity, and communication facilities. • Diseases and epidemics. Similarly, the major causes of socio-economic vulnerability were recorded as: • Weak family lineage structure. • Inadequate leadership qualities. • Unpractical decision-making process. • Unequal access to legal and treatments services. • Inadequate access to political services. • Weak community based institutions. • Orthodox thinking towards change and modernizations. • Dependent with others, belief on fate and lack of unity and coordination. • Inadequate enough knowledge about threats and risk. • Inadequate enough resources for rehabilitation. • Weak social harmony and cooperation. • Gender and caste discrimination. • No access to information. • No preparedness plans and strategies. • Erosion of agriculture land by flood • Standing crop submerged for several days • Collapse of thatched house and loss of lives of livestock and family members Prioritisation of vulnerability was shared as follows: • Poverty and poorness • No sustainable means of resources to cope with livelihoods • No unity and network of the disaster victims • Not effective mitigation measures during disaster Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 8 of 82
  14. 14. • Poor capacity of community to fight against the disaster • Lack of proper preparedness and mitigation plans on time • No action to cope with vulnerability • No sufficient advance planning and preparation • Poor capacity of the people to mobilise internal resources • Inability to manage the external resources to cope with the problems • Extraction of stone, sand from the river. They are also causes for the disaster inviting the vulnerability situation. • Unavailability of the information about warning system and advance forecasting • Absence of secure place to rehabilitate people and cattle. • Absence of leadership quality; need to provide vocational skills and techniques to seek the alternative income source. • Non existence of management plan for temporary shelter in advance. It was also found that, following actions were adopted by the communities to reduce the vulnerabilities: • Formation of a Pressure Groups at community/cluster level • Delegation to Stakeholders to familiarize the situation of various forms of disasters • Establishment of Flood Early Warning System on the basis of their local knowledge • Organization of Interaction with Authorities for external resource mobilization • Capacity building trainings to the communities to cope with disaster and vulnerability. 3.11 Ties to Decision Making Process Key steps carried out to tie PVA with the initiatives of other agencies. • Adopt the outcome findings of PVA workshop for Annual Plan and Budget of DDC/VDC, AAN, NGOs • Incorporate the findings / outcome of PVA workshop in District Disaster Management Strategy of Chitwan District • Incorporate the issues that are generated from PVA in AAN long term development program 3.12 Analysis from Field PVA Presentations From the presentation of both groups and issues and concerned raised by the participants in the plenary session, it was inferred that: • The vulnerability situation depends on family, community and hazards. Due to the socio-economic condition and lack of awareness among the people of the community, they are not been able to withstand these hazards, so there condition is being vulnerable day by day. As the hazard is increasing, vulnerability is also increasing due to the multiple effects of the previous hazards. • Hazards related to vulnerability also depend on the availability of food. The vulnerability is found more prevailing in the period of food scarcity than during the period of availability of food. It is also seen that there is a strong relation between hazards, vulnerability and poverty. The poverty is found to be the major cause of vulnerability. And the poverty is the consequences of hazards. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 9 of 82
  15. 15. • Those people who are vulnerable are not able to manage the resources by their own after it occurs, i.e. they cannot face the disaster. Those whose livelihood is fluctuated by the disaster cannot manage the disaster by their own efforts. Similarly, those people do not fall under vulnerable category who can easily face the disaster or who are able to rehabilitate by their own resources after disaster. 3.13 Participant’s Feelings, after having a PVA training • Participants recognised that they did not know much about the idea of vulnerability and its associated issues before coming to the workshop. Now they not only knew different aspects of it but also developed a common understanding to perceive it. • Work on PVA is important because of its scope for linking emergencies with long term development work; its deep link with poverty and inter-relatedness with rights issues. • PVA draws its mandate from Fighting Poverty Together by contributing for the core themes of participation, rights and advocacy. For this, PVA should be participatory, qualitative, empowering and capable of analysing responsibilities and capacities. • No single definition of vulnerability captures all its dimensions, complexities and applications. Similarly, no single model or generalisation can be applied to all the places and contexts. Vulnerability analysis also includes stakeholders, capacities, rights and responsibilities analysis. • It is better if analysis is based on the community’s own agenda at the community level with some input from the facilitators. In this way, community’s time will be spent to pursue their own motives rather than to feed the organisation. • Every analysis should be followed by action but there can be some cases where no service delivery action is required. 3.14 Commitments from Various Stakeholders Followings are the commitments from various stakeholders to carry out the PVA process in the future. • Community ready to form Action Groups • Local NGO/CBOs come forward to raise the issue to District level • AAN and (DI) Partner NGO ready to provide resources for capacity building and advocacy • DDC agrees to mediate the talk/interaction with stakeholders/Line agencies 3.15 Outcome / Impact The outcome and impact generated from the workshop were as follows. • Commitment by the DDC representatives to take the issue further in their annual plan. • Local NGO/CBOs agree to facilitate the Advocacy process. • Development of PVA Network in the Region • Commitment to use PVA while selecting DA DI for AAN • Use of PVA for community level annual plan budget formulation • Use of PVA for PRRP – Monitoring, Impact and Evaluation Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 10 of 82
  16. 16. 4. Data Documentation The following are the key steps to be considered before making the PVA exercise in the field. • Who are the most vulnerable and were they involved in the analysis? • What are they vulnerable to? • What are the changes in vulnerabilities over time? • What are the underlying causes of vulnerabilities? • Unsafe conditions (e.g. flow of information, coping mechanisms, level of assets etc). • Differential levels of vulnerability (geographical location, access and control over resources, power, gender, economic etc). • Underlying factors and trends (e.g. trade policies, land rights etc). • What are the characteristics of the categories of vulnerable poor: improving, coping and declining? • What assets do they have access to and control? • Why are they vulnerable now? • Why will they be vulnerable in future? • What strategies do they use to reduce vulnerability and cope? • How are assets used and what assets are used? • What strategies do they use during crisis? • What are their long-term livelihood strategies? • What aspects of vulnerabilities can be used as indicators in programme reviews and impact assessments? 5. Issues Emerged while Analysing the Vulnerability The participants identified the following issues related to vulnerability, while working with two communities. • Should the vulnerability analysis be one time or continuous process integrated within existing work. In case, it is a one time activity, what should be the ideal timing of the analysis? • Adequate capacity/skills of analysis/facilitation of the local facilitators to conduct good analysis, which provide different options. • Balance between external and local knowledge/information. What and how much information will be injected during analysis and what will be extracted? • How to develop true participation and ownership of the vulnerability in the analysis. • Analysis should adequately incorporate community’s perception of vulnerabilities. • Should the analysis be necessarily followed by action in order to bring change? What should be the balance between analysis and action? • Application of vulnerability analysis in conflict situation. • How vulnerability analysis can capture the complex and dynamic situation of communities. • Involvement of other actors/stakeholders i.e. government, other civil society organisations, etc. in the vulnerability analysis. • Linking the outcome of analysis to long-term development work (not only to emergencies work). Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 11 of 82
  17. 17. • How policies, which are mostly designed outside the communities, affect vulnerabilities of people (market forces, trends in trade etc). • How vulnerability analysis can feed into the policy and advocacy. • How to treat vulnerability as a product of development? Mostly developmental initiatives are meant to decrease vulnerabilities but sometime they increase people’s vulnerabilities. • Should the capacity analysis be the part of vulnerability analysis as the poor people have many capacities? • How to develop linkages to different levels i.e. community, district, regional/national, international, while doing causal analysis. • Vulnerability analysis should include endowments and entitlements of the communities along with the causes and underlying forces, which make people vulnerable. • Should the analysis be necessarily followed by action in order to bring change? What should be the balance between analysis and action? • How to develop true participation and ownership of the most vulnerable in the analysis. • How changes or progression of vulnerability can be monitored and recorded over time? • Is it possible to predict about future vulnerabilities based on experience and action? If so, what can be the indicators to make it predictive? • Can vulnerability be used as an indicator in program reviews and impact assessments? • How PVA can be linked to Fighting Poverty Together: Global strategy of AA. 6. Institutionalizing the PVA • The need for AA Nepal and partners to chart the way forward by strengthening networks for PVA, AAN needs to undertake PVA at District and community levels to feed into National and International levels- i.e. Using PVA analysis (community, district, country & international). • Share and learn experiences – many of the trained participants in Nepal have committed themselves to use PVA in future programme activities. 7. Gaps and Challenges The following are the gaps and challenges recorded from the PVA exercise. • PVA Timing – must suit for community • Owning PVA – PVA not only Emergency’s Tools • External facilitators need to be catalyst and local facilitators need to carry out the process as an activist to mobilize community for addressing the root causes of vulnerability & other findings • Establishing linkages between emergencies and long term development work • Generating expectations as problem increase • Requirement of high level of commitments of Time and Resources – needs continued follow-ups 8. Benefits of PVA On the basis of analysis of the PVA process, following benefits are identified: Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 12 of 82
  18. 18. • PVA is central to not only emergencies work but also to policy, advocacy and long term development issues. It involves the exploration of root causes of natural and man made disasters as well as chronic states of vulnerabilities. It can definitely be linked in rights based approach and advocacy. • It influences policies related to communities’ vulnerability issues and location, income, livelihood, services, gender, generation and other dimensions. • The importance of vulnerability analysis should be highlighted at different levels of policy work and advocacy work / the outcomes of analysis should feed into our on- going work on these areas. 9. Learning and Sharing The following issues were identified for learning and sharing purpose: For community participation • How to use PVA process to ensure community participation. • Linkage of PVA to emergencies, reduction of vulnerabilities and long-term development efforts • Linkage of PVA to RBA works to aware rights, and to build the capacity to enhance networking and advocacy work of NGOs/CBOs • Emergence of PVA in rights and advocacy at all levels-local, national and international • Working with the community in free time of community. • Work as a facilitator • Hurry in finishing the work rather than problem identification • Unable to explore all issues of community • It was realised to have matured people while visiting the community • It is better to convey message 2 days earlier for more participation of people • It was realised from the field work that PVA is also feasible apart from the disaster. The linkage of RBA with PVA is beneficial with each aspects of human life. In this context, the overall realization was as follows: • Use appropriate tools in local context for PVA • Facilitating organization should build the rapport with the communities before PVA exercise • PVA should be interlinked with scientific research to ensure reliability and validity of the work • PVA is a continuous process • PVA enhances indigenous knowledge and its dissemination • Root cause analysis and analysis of power dynamics is possible through PVA • PVA awares communities on human rights persecutors • PVA establishes macro-micro linkages For PVA method/process • Every analysis should be followed by action to bring change. • Reflective, engaging and participatory approaches should be used to empower communities. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 13 of 82
  19. 19. • PVA should be a continuous process integrated with existing work of Actionaid International. • Efforts to be made to predict future vulnerabilities by combining experience and action (for mitigation and prevention work, develop early warning systems/ mechanisms and responses in place). • Analysis of vulnerability at one level can be linked to other levels to promote long-term development work. • Capacity of local facilitators should also be developed for improved facilitation and analysis of PVA initiatives, particularly familiarity and use various tool of social analysis, e.g. PRA, gender analysis, conflict analysis, Reflect, Stepping Stones, Power analysis and Assets mapping tools to undertake PVA. • PVA uses participatory tools and we should examine ways to use other systems – Scientific methods should use in social analysis to enrich analysis on vulnerability mapping. On the basis of collection of data, and analysis of information, it is learnt that: • Most vulnerable to be involved in the analysis, it means involvement of stakeholders at all levels in the analysis. • Proper timing- recognizing that poor and vulnerable groups are constantly engaged in ‘bread and butter’ survival activities- for understanding farming calendar and ensuring proper timing • Developing a sense of ownership of analysis in the community. • PVA process should gradually empower the community (active engagement of the poor and disadvantaged). • PVA should incorporate communities’ perception about vulnerabilities. • There should be a balance of local and outsider's information/knowledge while doing PVA (do not force our own agenda on the people). In additions to above aspects, the other lessens learned from PVA are recorded as: • PVA help to increase Community Participation: Most vulnerable to be involved in the analysis, it means involvement of stakeholders at all levels in the analysis- community, district, and national / international levels - engage in campaigns to influence policy makers and duty bearers, advocate for pro-poor policies that work in favour of people to reduce their vulnerabilities. • PVA in the appropriate time: It was learnt that PVA should carry out at the appropriate time of the community. It is because poor and vulnerable groups are constantly engaged in "bread and butter" survival activities. The understanding of local communities, farming calendar and ensuring proper timing of PVA to get maximum participation meaningfully. • Developing a sense of ownership: This is particularly important for people who are often excluded and absence in decision making processes. The need for heighten awareness of socially excluded groups such as the Dalits and others is important. They need to be included in the discourse during PVA. • Interface of local and outsider's information/knowledge: There would be a balance of local and outsider's information/knowledge while doing PVA (it is not wise to force outsiders agenda on the people). Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 14 of 82
  20. 20. • Empowerment of Local People: The PVA process lead to active agency and empowerment of the community (active engagement of the poor and marginalized) in developing deep understanding of their situation of vulnerability and what the root causes of their conditions are. PVA tries to incorporate communities’ perception and feelings about vulnerabilities, underlying cause and suitable coping strategies. 10. The Way Forward On the basis of analysis, the following are some of the way forwards: • We will create Matrix for Collating CP experiences and enhance mechanisms to share information on best practices. • Examine and outline of challenges and key achievement (including impact) on PVA (or value added of PVA) • Make concrete suggestions on areas for improvement on the PVA methodology- using experiences on what has worked/not worked- provide suggestions on technical gaps and agreement on how these will be filled etc. • Input into the trainers guide based on the skills gap. • Participatory/Reflect approaches will be used at the community level analysis and the capacity of facilitators will be build before conducting analysis. • Efforts will be made to integrate PVA into the existing policies/programmes. • The need for AA Nepal and partners to chart the way forward by strengthening existing networks for PVA. • Undertake PVA at District levels to feed into National and International levels- i.e. Using PVA analysis (community, district, country and international). • Create opportunities for partners and those who have been exposed to participatory vulnerability capacity analysis to use PVA, also, engage in share and learning experiences. • Create advocacy networks and mobilize resources to follow-up on community action points which has been developed from PVA in the field work. • Share reports and case studies with all other AAI CPs Nepal’s implementation of PVA. 11. Summing up In zest, following things could be concluded on the whole PVA process: • The PVA process is designed to help the community analyse their own situation. • During a PVA, data collection, analysis and action emanating from the analysis are all conducted with the community. Moreover, there is no further analysis done by external facilitators alone where communities are not involved. • The PVA process uses a variety of other sources such as secondary information and interviews with other institutions. Information obtained from these sources has to be included in the discussions with the community during a PVA. • Good facilitation techniques are required to ensure a successful PVA. The tools for data collection, analysis and planning create a framework for the facilitators and the community to discuss. • In some cases the topics are personal and individuals may feel uncomfortable sharing such deep-seated issues in public. In such cases it is important to discuss with particular groups separately through focus group discussion. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 15 of 82
  21. 21. • To draw the attention of illiterate people, use of pictorial tools and techniques is very much important. • To ensure a successful PVA, adequate preparation in advance is required. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 16 of 82
  22. 22. Workshop Proceedings 1. Background Participatory vulnerability analysis (PVA) is a systematic process that involves communities and other stakeholders examining their vulnerability in detail and being empowered or motivated to take appropriate actions. It helps to understand the impact of disasters on people’s lives, livelihoods or environment. Moreover, the rationale of PVA is: The basic essence of PVA is how communities can be involved in examining their own vulnerability as well as taking appropriate actions both in short and long term. Hence, it opens the way and room for people from all sections of society to identify the causes of vulnerability, prioritise the causes and prepare an action plan on the basis of it. PVA makes use of participatory tools to ensure active community involvement. As a result, it helps to generate reliable primary information in the participation of all people including illiterate people. To diagnose varieties of vulnerability as well as their underlying forces and factors, PVA plays a vital role. It is also able to generate information on specific vulnerable groups, hazards and locations. It focuses on the participatory process with an objective of participation and empowerment of vulnerable people by specifying their rights and responsibilities. It informs communities and stakeholders for better emergency preparedness, mitigation and response as well as execution of better development work on the basis of pre and agreed plans and programmes, thus it is useful in integrating development and emergencies work. 2. Objectives The objectives of the workshop were to: Understand the basic principles of PVA Aware the applicability of PVA in the context of disaster and beyond Learn and think about vulnerability and how this can be analysed effectively, and Aware on the usage of it for the preparation of action plan to fight against vulnerability situation Proceedings Day I (November 14, 2005) 3. Welcome/Introduction The brief remark was delivered by Shyam Sundar Jnavaly, Resource Centre Coordinator of Central Resource Centre at Action Aid Nepal Bharatpur. In his remarks, he highlighted the vulnerability and its associated issues and how communities were struggling to fight against the vulnerability. He said that vulnerability is considered to be the main linking factor between emergencies and long term development work. The emergencies strategy of ActionAid has also emphasised on analysing vulnerabilities in long-term work and Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 17 of 82
  23. 23. using this analysis in building local resilience, readiness and long term recovery. In Nepal, the concept of PVA was started in 2001 and it was developed as a powerful tool in 2005 to analyse the issues of vulnerability. Before proceeding further, he shared the schedule of day one to the participants. The participants were given authority to amend the schedule so that they also feel ownership and internalize what they were willing to learn from this workshop. The detail schedule of the workshop is given in annex-1. 4. Introduction to each other Introduction “to know each other” session was facilitated by Shyam Sunder Jnavaly. He asked all the participants to say “their names among with participating organization and areas of interest in the field of disaster management”. At the end of the exercise, all participants knew each others in terms of name, the participating organization and their areas of interest/experience in the field of disaster management. There were 32 participants in the workshop. The list of names and participating organisations is given in annex-2. Workshop Participants 5. Ground Rules In order to systematise the workshop and make it more effective and meaningful, the workshop participants agreed to set “Ground Rules”. This session was facilitated by Mr Deepak Poudel and Mr Dhruba Raj Gautam. Those ground rules were: Session should be started from 9 AM and end at 17 PM. To develop concentration in each session and discussion, participants need to “Switch up the mobile”. Participants need to stay for a full time in each session. Participants need to develop a culture of ‘active listening’, ‘mutual respect’ and ‘listen to and learn from each other’. The following participants were allocated the following roles and responsibilities to systematise the sessions of each day. Key Activities Responsible person/(s) Energiser : Mr. Rajesh Hamal Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 18 of 82
  24. 24. Overall Management : Mr. Deepak Lamichhane Reporter : Mr. Dhruba Raj Gautam, Ms Madhavi Pradhan Power Group analysis : Mr. Manish Pradhan, Mr. Bimal Gadal, Ms Subhala Subba, Ms Amrita Sharma Logistics : Mr Krishna Chandra Acharya 6. Welcome/Introduction This session was lead by Ms Agnes Campbell. In her remarks, she highlighted the following issues: All the workshop participants are both “learners” and “teachers”. So, she expected to have good discussion and interaction throughout the workshop in each session/issue. PVA has been beneficial to analysis the risks, hazards and vulnerability situation. Cross fertilization of learning will provide the culture sharing and learning from each other. Participants need to discuss on the proposed PVA guidebook, identify the gaps, if any paving for its further improvement. In this session, Mr Shyam Sunder Jnavaly also highlighted the following issues associated with the workshop. Participants need to perceive PVA as ‘non-structured’, there is large scope to discuss on it and to make suggestion for further improvement. Field based learning will sharpen the knowledge of participants to look and understand the issues of vulnerability. PVA exercise will provide an opportunity to collect field based information, and synthesis information to make an action plan. Then expectations were collected from the participants. Those expectations were as follows: Understanding of the use of PVA beyond the vulnerability (i.e. to cover social, political and economic issues related to people’s poverty). Linkage of PVA for impact assessment and monitoring process. Identification of the gaps (the types of issues to be explored for the vulnerability analysis). Sharing of knowledge and experience Development of capacity to support/complement for district level plan. Identification of the ways of collecting reliable primary information. Expectation to hear about PVA from international experience. Ability to distinguish the fundamental difference between PRA, RRA, PLA and PVA. Ways of identifying/assessing level and extent of vulnerability. Exploration of the ways for “why people are vulnerable”. Increase in the knowledge of “analysing the vulnerability”. Learning of the linkage of PVA tools to other tools. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 19 of 82
  25. 25. 7. Develop common understanding of the terminology used in disaster This session was led by Shyam Sunder Jnavaly. Before initiating the work, participants requested for the clarification of Hazards, Risks, Threats, Disaster exposure and vulnerability. He tried to clarify the meaning and differences in meaning of these terminologies by giving examples of drawing (mentioning the stone at the top of the hills and how the settlements at the downstream are affected from that). Agnes Campbell also added her experience by giving the examples to show the basic difference among these terminologies. An intensive discussion was held among the participants. After clarification, the participants were requested to divide into two groups and make the list of terminology used in disaster management and their simple meaning in local language. The participants were asked to come in the common consensus. After the discussion, each group leader was asked to present the group work. After the presentation, synthesis was made to develop the common understanding about these terminologies. And these agreed meaning of each terminology was typed and circulated to the participants. This session helped to develop the common understanding about the participants on disaster related terms and their simple meanings. Work to develop simple meanings of key terminologies 8. Facilitation Skills It was realized that the role of participatory tools and techniques for PVA was crucial. It was also agreed that the role of good facilitation skills for using PRA tools was important. This session was led by Ms Madhabi Pradhan and Ms Amrita Sharma. In the beginning, they shared the importance and role of effective facilitation skills for using participatory tools and techniques. They divided workshop participants into two groups by giving two different colours of flowers. The same flower choosers were requested to be one group and vice versa. The task for each group was divided in the following way. Task for Group A: Basic principles and tools to be used for facilitation skills. Task for Group B: Skills needed for effective facilitation. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 20 of 82
  26. 26. Then two groups worked in their respective theme and prepared the presentation. But before the presentation, Mr. Bimal Gadal sang a song that covered the issues of caste discrimination and right based approach. The presentation of Group A was as follows Group A Principles and tools Do’s Have enough knowledge and command over subject matter Have knowledge about the basic norms, values and culture of ‘working committee’ Create ‘real’ and ‘easy’ environment Respect to all, obey the community agreed rules Be participatory Be of gentle nature Don’t Be a irrational evaluator Be of a showy nature Be reactive to hurt the people Towards the end of the presentation of Group A, Agnes Campbell shared her feeling as: Do not create ‘confrontation environment’ Be tactful and diplomatic Recognize the basic principle of ‘social justice’, equity and right. Similarly, the presentation of Group B was as follows: The group identified the following skills as beneficial for the facilitators: Language and communication o Use of local language o Clarity in speech o Choice of good words/sensitive Have good knowledge on subject matter Ensure equal participation before initiating the task Use ‘overhead’ and ‘back through’ approach to deal with community’s issues Select appropriate training materials Deliver clear ‘introduction and objective’ Have positive attitude towards community Follow adult learning techniques Ensure eye contact and use of body language Show jolly nature and use appropriate energiser Understand the importance of group dynamics Have quick decision making power and sum up the outcomes time to time Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 21 of 82
  27. 27. Manage ‘over smart participants’ Have conflict resolution techniques Have good listening and observation skills Have skills of appropriate use of PRA and other tools to generate primary information Participants are in the process of observation in the field Once the presentations of both groups were finished, the facilitators acknowledged the task carried out by both groups and shared their views by presenting the following tips: Do Be nice Respect people Be confident about the community ‘they can do it’ Handover the stick Be sensitive Watch, listen and learn Relax Have fun, joke and enjoy Make adequate pre-planning Be simple Take/implement action Don’t Rush Lecture Criticize Interrupt Dominate Wear fancy dress 9. Use of PRA and other participatory tools in PVA This session was led by Mr Bala Ram Luitel. In his presentation, he tried to share the meaning of PRA, its major tools; and he shared key tools and their application in the context of collecting primary information from the field Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 22 of 82
  28. 28. From the discussion, it was agreed that before initiating PRA tools, following steps should be kept in mind: Conduct desktop study (review of secondary information) Identify the most vulnerability areas Share the objective clearly Build rapport with community Mr Shyam Sunder Jnavaly highlighted the applicability of PRA tools in the context of PVA. He also argued that one can develop alternative tools and technique for PVA too. It was found that most of the participants were familiar with the PRA tools and techniques, but the main concern was “how to link PRA tools and techniques in the context of PVA and their inter-relationship. In doing so, Ms Agnes Campbell shared her experienced by giving simple example of each tool which is discussed hereunder (Please refer annex-3 for PRA tools and techniques and their application in the context of PVA). 9.1 Timeline Agnes shared that time line is used to get the systematic development of the area and to locate how the area was suffered from various phenomenons such as starvation, drought, landslide, flood, hailstorm, epidemics earthquakes, deforestation etc. She gave very clear example of ‘Conflict” and Peace Process in Sierra Leone through timeline exercise. She shared the historical timeline, shared its linkage with drought, migration, prostitution, and HIV/AIDS, and tried to focus how it added the path for further vulnerability. Mr Shyam Sundar Jnavaly shared that ‘vulnerability has multiple shifting’. 9.2 Seasonal Calendar Agnes shared that seasons are an integral part of people's lives and they exert an important impact upon the livelihood of the local people. It reflects the perceptions of the local people regarding seasonal variations in the various aspects. It helps to identify heavy workload periods, periods of loan, diseases, food deficiency and wage availability as well as flood, fire and wildlife damaged time. Day II (November 15, 2005) 10. Recap and remarks of power group analysis Mr Dhruba Raj Gautam highlighted the major sessions and issues raised by the participants in the day one before starting the second day events. After recap, power group analysed their feeling about the class room dynamics of day one as follows: Power of language: All participants were interested to speak in Nepali. Seat arrangement: Most of the participants in the front of the room seem active. So it was suggested for reshuffling of seat in each day. Mobility of the participants inside/outside the hall was high. So it was suggested to obey ground rules. Some participants came late, so they were sometimes confused on what was going on (less attentive towards late comers). Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 23 of 82
  29. 29. Realize the “people’s power”. The facilitator’s feelings and perceptions were paid due recognition. 11. Use of PRA and other participatory tools in PVA (continue………) 11.1 Problem Tree For the basic ideas to know about the applicability of problem tree to know cause and effects relationship, Ms Agnes took an example from LUMANTI’ NGO. With the help of participants, she drew the following problems (causes) faced by the people living in slums and squatters and their effects as the following: Open sewerage Thatched house without window Open rivers Garbage No social infrastructure: school/hospital Resources in weak condition Untitled land Their effects Poverty Social discrimination She also tried to give example of ‘causes and effects’ of migration. Causes of migration: poverty, conflicts, droughts, disaster victims Effects of migration: poor housing, sanitation, unsafe drinking water, denied right Specific group has specific issue. So was beneficial. She also added that with the help of FGD, one can further explore the following issues. Why they are coming in that area (when and how) Social attachment among the people etc 11.2 Transect walk Ms Agnes shared that transect mapping helps to provide cross-sectional representation of the different agro-ecological zones and their comparison against certain parameters including topography, land type, land use, ownership, access, vegetation, crops, problems, opportunities and solutions. It helps to know the most vulnerable areas and coping strategies made by local people. 11.3 Focus group discussion This tool helps to get specific information from same category of well-being groups. Therefore, it is dealt as the centre of the all participatory tools. In the FGD, specific topics are discussed where all participants are encouraged to present their views and opinions. It also help to triangulate the information and data collected from other tools Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 24 of 82
  30. 30. and techniques. With the help of FGD, it is better to find out the group dynamics, social network and solidarity. In the discussion it was agreed that the extent/magnitude of disaster and vulnerability may differ for different people like adult, children and women. So, special checklist should be produced to explore the issues. 11.4 Social/Resources/Vulnerability Mapping Mapping helps in developing an understanding of available social and natural resource as well as the most vulnerability areas within the certain cluster. It is prepared by local people as the main objective of this exercise is to involve them in the process so that their knowledge, skills and ideas are recognised. Local people are considered to have an in-depth knowledge of the surroundings where they have survived for a long time. Vulnerability mappings prepared by community people 11.5 Mobility mapping This tool gives the general picture of the mobility of people for various sectors such as education, health, employment, marriage, treatment, seeking help in the case of disaster and emergency, etc. in the chronological order. It helps to triangulate the information of well-being ranking. 11.6 Venn diagram Venn diagram helps to demonstrate relationships (direct and meaningful or indirect) among the various institutions or community with other organizations in case of coping disaster and vulnerability. It helps project stakeholders to reflect on the nature of coordination between the local community and other organizations. Venn diagram prepared by local people Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 25 of 82
  31. 31. 11.7 Well-being ranking This tool is used for ranking and grouping households on the basis of income, wealth and others perceivable well-being criteria as expressed by the people. It helps to understand the people's conceptions on wealth, well-being and their views on socio-economic condition related to livelihood and vulnerability. Venn diagram transcribed from ground in to paper Well-being is culture specific and is difficult to measure. So, the facilitator should have basic knowledge about the people and their culture to which he/she is working with. 11. 8 REFLECT This session was led by Mr. Ram Dayal Yadav. He shared that REFLECT as an abbreviation of Regenerated Fereian Literacy (through) Empowerment Community Techniques. It is considered as: Education without book Jivenmukhi siksha (Life oriented education) It helps in advocacy through raising the issues It can also be useful in programs other than literacy program It is a powerful tool to empower the community It supports to raise the issues, assess them and guides for efforts to be made for mitigating the problem It is informal learning approach and conducted as per the wish of the community It is unstructured and issues are finalized by the participants This is useful for disaster management too (what, why, when, ways, effects, results, resources). In the discussion, the experiences of Prerana (Sindhuli) and HURADEC (Dolakha) about REFLECT model for the empowerment of community were shared. Birth registration campaign in Sarlahi through REFLECT model was also discussed. At the end of his presentation, he summarised that REFLECT can Enable the community Explore where the resources are, how to explore them and Aware, empowerment, action and social transformation 11.9 Conflict Analysis Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 26 of 82
  32. 32. This session was facilitated by Mr Anil Pant. In his presentation, he shared the major steps for conflict analysis which are as follows (Please refer annex-4 for detail). Conflict analysis from Development perspectives There is no need to read out the development theory. The conflict dynamics can be analysed from the assessment of experience. Why CA? o Difficult to work at community level o Find dos and don’ts of community o Improve the security situation o Support community’s campaign at local level Clarity in objective is important What is analysis? Causes of analysis o Social – gender, discrimination o Political – recognition, inclusive democracy o Physical – geography, unequal distribution of the resources Tier of analysis International, regional, national and local People-based, decentralisation, right-based Local level analysis is not only sufficient. Causes of conflict Dynamics analysis (key issue, responsible actors, interest, reaction, route) Scenario-mapping (to find the trend of history) Analysis of triggers Key issues Peoples’ capacity Humanitarian crises Key stakeholders Others work (on, in and around) He also highlighted that tracking is also important for conflict analysis, as Track (in peace process) can be 1. Formal (Maoist + Government) 2. Informal 3. Through development After the presentation of Mr Pant, Ms Agnes inquired that how conflict analysis model fits into the conflict of gender and youth vs. elderly group. Then Mr. Rajesh Hamal added some points on how to link conflict analysis to PVA tools. In his presentation, he suggested to explore the following issues before conflict analysis process is begun: Who – actor (parties of conflict) o Caste system (dalit, non-dalit) o Gender (Patriarchy) Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 27 of 82
  33. 33. Power o Who are vulnerable? o Why they are vulnerable? What are the issues/interests (interest of needs)? What the effects on the potential consequences to create conflict/worsen vulnerabilities? Violence-migrated and displaced people How to mitigate? – action plan 11.10 Gender This session was facilitated by Mr Bimal Gadal. In his presentation, he highlighted the following issues while analysing the gender. Resources Opportunities (access, control) Roles, and Needs From gender perspectives, children and women are more vulnerable. It was discussed that FGD for separate women is also needed to explore the issues of women. It is because males always dominate even through they are in minority in the group. The promoting factors for gender discrimination are dress, social structure, and social sympathy towards family members. In Sarlahi, it was found that women were more victimised during river flood. So, women should be provided space and allowed to talk and enforce affirmative action. It was also shared that while analysing the gender, power relation and its associated issues should be kept in the centre of the discussion. At the end of the discussion Ms Agnes added that women are overloaded from productive and reproductive work. So, PVA should be interlinked with gender perspectives. 11.11 Stepping Stones Ms Sumita Mathema took this session. In her brief presentation, she expressed that it is a tool that focuses on issues like “Who am I”, and “Look Ourselves”. This tool is mostly used in HIV/AIDS program. There are three key principles of stepping stones. Maximise 3 ‘C’ (Communication, Coordination and Cooperation) Opening up (Be familiar with each other) Change the attitude and behaviours for social change and social transformation During the discussion, Mr. Shyam Sundar Jnavaly shared that vulnerability analysis could be possible from variety of tools and techniques. Stepping stone tool could be beneficial to analyse the vulnerability. He said that disaster invites other associated problems. For examples, from UNDP study in Chitwan to Sarlahi districts, it was found that girls trafficking and prostitution was severe where disaster frequently occurred. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 28 of 82
  34. 34. 11.12 Social Inclusion, Right Based Approach and Power analysis This session was facilitated by Mr Maneesh Pradhan (Please see annex-5 for detail). In his presentation he shared that right means accountability, justice, self-reliance, social recognition and claim over right. He shared the types of rights as social, economical, political, cultural and civil. He said that for rights, Accountability of duty bearers and participation of right holders for equality/non- discrimination is needed. Changes in policies, institutions, attitudes, participation and power relation is required. He shows how RBA cycle evolves and continues. The cycle is comprise steps: Situation- Position-Strategy-Action-Outcome. He shared that Children, Women, Janajali, HIV/AIDS victims, Landless, Ex-Kamaiya and Disables are mostly excluded from the mainstreaming development. So emphasis should be given to include these groups. For power analysis, he focused in his presentation the need to identify key power centres, and opportunities and challenges of each of all actors. 11.13 Sustainable Livelihood analysis This session was facilitated by Mr Shyam Sundar Jnavaly. He shared that Sustainable Livelihood Framework is helpful to reduce the vulnerability. It also helps to motivate people on the necessity of collective action to increase their participation and solidarity. He discussed the five capitals and their characteristics as follows. Social/ Political Capital Increase in solidarity Development of the sense of identity, honour and belongings Interaction through shared interest, increase in people's ability to work together Building of relationship of trust and cooperation Social network for innovation and development of sharing of knowledge Ways of survivals in the time of extreme vulnerability i.e., Parma, neighbourhood supports, etc. Enforcement of group decision to solve problems Formulation of the norms and values Sharing of the power relations among the people Human Capital Increase in local capacity in terms of knowledge, skills and exposure. Change in the orthodox thinking among the people. Initiation for preparedness plans and programs. Skilled labour force. Financial Capital Decrease in cost of construction of houses and infrastructures. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 29 of 82
  35. 35. Increase in the mobilisation of internal resources and management. Physical Capital Continuation of public services. Construction of simple infrastructures. Maintenance of shared infrastructures. Access to road. Natural Capital Preservation of the water resources. Reclamation of the land resources for better production. Access to better-serviced land. Management of common resources. At the end of the discussion, he clarified the importance of this tool by drawing the spider diagram. He also shared that spider diagram provided clear picture about the aspects to widen and make a plan to tackle it. 12. Synthesis of Participatory Tools and their relevancy in the PVA context From the discussion of variety of participatory tools and techniques, usage of different tools and their rationale is presented below in a summarized form: Tools To whom Rationale Access Dalit, landless, nearly landless Access to and control over the resources mapping (only having Ghaderi), homeless of various group of people (used to stay in masters house), women headed HH, disable (differently able people), flood and landslide victims, elderly people, other as specified by local people Time line Elderly people, local elites, Historical perspectives of vulnerability, Aguwa (traditional leaders) marginalisation, Trend analysis Dalit, landless, nearly landless Causes and reasons of vulnerability, (only having Ghaderi), homeless trend and its associated factors (used to stay in masters house), women headed HH, disable (differently able people), flood and landslide victims, elderly people, other as specified by local people KIIs School teachers, VDC officials, To draw personal feelings, opinion, Politicians/social elites, Local ideas, present status, problem, coping money lenders, Aguwa mechanism, ways forward (traditional leaders), Local traders, representative of Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 30 of 82
  36. 36. development programs, widow, suffer from chronic disease and epidemic FGDs Dalit, landless, nearly landless Opinions on group basis, group specific (only having Ghaderi), homeless problem, coping mechanism, ways (used to stay in masters house), forward women headed HH, disable (differently able people), flood and landslide victims, elderly people, other as specified by local people Venn diagram/ Dalit, landless, nearly landless Institutional relationship, access of Stakeholders (only having Ghaderi), homeless vulnerable people in both institutions analysis (used to stay in masters house), and services women headed HH Transect School teachers, VDC officials, Verify the most disaster affected areas, walking Politicians/social elites, Local coping strategies and needed action to money lenders, Aguwa mitigate disaster effects in long run (traditional leaders), Local traders, representative of development programs, widow, suffer from chronic disease and epidemic Case studies Case studies related disaster To explore in-depth analysis of a victims, trafficking, social- selected, critical phenomenon, activity cultural phenomenon, disable and or situation suffer from chronic disease and epidemic, access and control over natural resources, access in service providers and development programs Livelihood Dalit, landless, nearly landless Stability, crisis and coping mechanism, Analysis (only having Ghaderi), homeless relative income, expenditure, credit and (used to stay in masters house), debt) women headed HH, disable (differently able people), flood and landslide victims, other as specified by local people It was agreed that PVA can be used in the following aspects: Baseline information Conflict analysis Emergencies Gender analysis Power analysis, power dynamics, empowerment of the communities Building local capacity building Access power to demand right (advocacy) Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 31 of 82
  37. 37. 13. Roll out of PVA Guidebook This session was facilitated by Ms Agnes and Mr Shyam. In their presentation, they highlighted that: PVA is a systematic process It helps in the examination of vulnerability It can be linked with disaster preparedness and response to long-term development From the field work, baseline data can be generated, issue of vulnerability can be explored and causes and effects of each vulnerability issue can be identified. Mr Shyam also emphasised that PVA can encouraged different political parties to address their commitment in working for the reduction of peoples’ vulnerability. Political parties may use this tool during election campaign. Then, both Mr. Shyam and Ms. Agnes shared the major aspects of ToR as follows. Fix baseline (mobilise the action plan) Map out the sources and root causes of vulnerability o Jagatpur o Meghauli Develop action plan to implement it jointly with partners, Advocate to influence and for monitoring and impact assessment. Tips for field work o More issues to be explored from PRA and other relevant tools o All tools discussed may not be used o PVA is itself a structured process Day III (November 16, 2005) 14. Sharing of Baseline data of Meghauli Village Area 77.18 sq. km River Narayani, Rapti Small river Betari, Laikhari Population 14372, male-7543, female – 6829 HHs 2618, population density 186.21 Ethnic composition Caste Percentage Brahmin 30 Chhetri 8 Newar 3 Gurung 3 Tharu 28 Kumal 10 Magar 1 Other 5 Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 32 of 82
  38. 38. Population of Kumal Ward % 1 50 2 90 3 23 Religion Hindu 90%, Buddha 3% Other 7% Language Nepali : 70%, Tharu : 30% Education Literacy (Overall) 70% Female 60% Male 80% Social infrastructures Infrastructures Number Higher Secondary School 1 High School 2 Lower Secondary School 1 Primary School 5 Sub-Health Post 1 Number of HHs in Study Site Bote: 3 HHs Kumal: 43 HHs Total: 46 HHs The sources of livelihood of the people of study site included agriculture labour, sharecropping, rental farming and fishing. 15. Sharing of Baseline data of Jagatpur (Ghailaghari) Village Boundary East/South : Rapti River/Royal Chitwan National Park West : Sukranager North : Patiyani/Parbatipur Total Population : 800 Total HHs : 160 Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 33 of 82
  39. 39. Ethnic Composition Janagati : 95% Dalit : 1% Other : 4% Name of Stakeholders working for disaster Anugraha Church : Pillar and roofing support to 26 HHs NRCS : Housing support for 40 HHs BZDC : Pillar and roofing materials RCNP : Partial support for housing NRUSEC initiatives till now Distribution of relief Construction of housing, management of toilet and safe drinking water Formation of disaster relief committee Monitoring of the measurement of flood Management and use of Siren Participants in the process of simulation process Construction of public building for shelter (especially for displaced victims) Construction of weir/intake Distribution of utensils and torch light Participants are in the process of allocating the job within the team After sharing of social-economic information of the two proposed village, Mr. Shyam shared the logistic planning for field work as follows: Required materials to be prepared by each group Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 34 of 82
  40. 40. Vehicle arrangement (separate vehicle for each group) Group division on the basis of interest Defined roles and responsibilities within team members Lunch at the field Practice of key informant interview After logistics planning, Ms. Agnes shared the key activities to be carried out from field visit and tips from Guidebook, which were as follows: An assessment of available resources within the village Key activity Tips Process Recording Page 27 (of PVA Guidebook) FGD (women, youth, mixed) Page 28 Analytical steps (PRA and other tools) Finalize community analysis Representation from community & presentation needed Feedback to community By representative Reporting group Page 26,27,24 (of PVA Guidebook) Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 35 of 82
  41. 41. Then all the participants divided in to two groups on the basis of interest. The each group was given the separate task assuming the real field situation as practice. Data in the process of summing up The task for group A was to imagine an Urban community with Problem of Slums and Squatters hit by Flood disaster of 1993 The task of group B was to imagine a Rural community with Problem of Flood and Wildlife Scope of Work for both groups Transect Walk Map of the vulnerability sites (physical infrastructures, hazards, risks to environment, root causes of vulnerability) An observation of soil erosion at river bank Focus Group Discussion Resource available Who controls the resources How to access them during flood and Wildlife invasion Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 36 of 82
  42. 42. Venn diagram CBO, NGO, and INGO working in the area Types of capacity they have, resources they have and their relationship Collaboration/cooperation SWOT Analysis Analysis of finding Hazards, resources – (how the resources are used) Community actions ( of the past) Local, district and national efforts Indicators/outcome of M&E to follow-up Situation Analysis Who are the most vulnerable Types of exposure that they have experienced Prevalence and extent of vulnerability-hazard, risk, exposure (pp6 of PVA Guidebook) Risk Hazard Mapping Use analytical framework 16. Presentation by Group B (Ideal situation of Gitanager village) Timeline Year Major phenomenon (BS) 036 Migration, displaced people from landslide 037 Establishment of National park 052 Big flood, wildlife destroyed 16 houses 054 Huge flood, 30 houses collapsed, 5 dead, destruction of physical assets 058 Destruction of physical assets from flood 059 Diarrhoea epidemic (5 children were dead, starvation, increased the workload of women). Seasonal Calendar Months Description J F M A M J Jul A Sep Oct Nov Dec Flood Temporary Migration Wildlife Problem Epidemic Problem Tree Causes: Heavy flood devastated the physical properties Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 37 of 82
  43. 43. Inadequate support Lack of rehabilitation Negligence of government Damage of hum pipe Lack of alternative livelihood Effects: Increased poverty Conflicts/disputes HIV/AIDS explosion Flood threatening Vibrant youth force migrated Epidemics Powerlessness Well-being Ranking Well-being HHs Indicators Well-off 5 CGI roof, Job, vendor shop, livestock, involved in CBOs/NGOs, have facility of drinking water and toilet. Medium 5 Thatched roof, skilled labour, have only latrine, some livestock Poor 2 Thatched poor house, unskilled labour, depend upon the public tap for drinking water Ultra-poor 6 Landless, dalit, have no source of income, seasonal migration to India, wage labour FGD with Women Most of the families are displaced from flood People migrated to cities and India seasonally to earn livelihood Only women, children and aged people are in the village Most of the children left their school because of the family problem The middlemen are active in girls trafficking Women are compelled to involve in prostitution so suffer from HIV/AIDS Women headed household unable to get neighbours’ support People are deprived from pure drinking water and toilet facilities Theft, dacoit and domestic violence is increasing decision making process is dominated by male Most of the youth are suffering from bad habits Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 38 of 82
  44. 44. SWOT Analysis Strength Strong family structure Have facility of school/Health Post Social organizations are formed Weakness Lack of awareness, employment, land and sanitation Participants in the process of synthesis of data Opportunities Strong political parties Number of development organizations working in the area Threats Eviction, trafficking, and domestic violence A process of action plan formulation Action Plan for (Jan-July ’05) Proposed Activities Months Responsibilities Collect baseline data January Community + NGO Capacity building of CBDP February Community + NGO Provide legal support to claim rights March Community + NGO Implement IGG/skill development training April Community + NGO River training April-June Actionaid Nepal Awareness for right based approach June-July Community + NGO Community plantation June-July DDC + Community 17. Presentation of Group A Analysis of problem from Problem Tree Causes Deforestation Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 39 of 82
  45. 45. Negligence of government Lack of proper plan Lack of awareness Weak organizational efforts Poverty/dominance of ultra-poor Unequal distribution of resources Negligence of National Park No proper enforcement of rules/regulation of Park Group presentation Effects: Destruction of physical asset and human life Human life usually threatened by Wildlife Crop damaged by wildlife Destruction/collapse of physical infrastructure (Bridge, HP, School) Erosion of productive land Explosion of epidemic Children deprived from education Inadequate facilities of drinking water Seasonal Calendar Months Description J F M A M J Jul A Sep Oct Nov Dec Flood Epidemic Eviction Food deficiency Timeline Year Major phenomenon (BS) 052 Settlement started, government tried to displace people but failed, occurrence of big flood 053 Flood damaged 2 houses, 2 people died, NRCS supported the relief materials 055 Got assurance from political leaders to support flood victims, 5 set of gabion wires obtained 058 Explosion of diarrhoea and epidemic, 5 children died, 3 women trafficked by middlemen 060 7 houses destroyed by flood, death of 1 pregnant woman, flood swept livestock, and 2 people died of HIV/AIDS 062 Community organization formed to tackle with disaster and to claim rights. Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 40 of 82
  46. 46. Venn Diagram Schoo RCNP LSC Lalupate NRUSEC Hirapur HP Group Community Club BZMC Hirapur DD Group Workshop Report on “Participatory Vulnerability Analysis” Page 41 of 82