Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Watkins School Modernization Community (November 17, 2015)

XXX

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Watkins School Modernization Community (November 17, 2015)

  1. 1. District   of   Columbia   Public   Schools     |     1200   First   Street,   NE   |   Washington,   DC   20002   |   T   202.442.4800   |   F   202.442.5517   |   www.k12.dc.us       Watkins                                                       Community  MeeJng     November  17,  2015    
  2. 2. Contents DCPS  |  OCOO   2   §  Project  Review   §  ConstrucJon  Phasing   §  Next  Steps   §  Discussion  
  3. 3. Project Overview DCPS  |  OCOO   3   §  Start  Date:    June  2016   §  End  Date:    August  2017     §  Watkins  Elementary  will  receive  a  complete  modernizaJon  to  serve   students  in  grades  1  through  5.     §  All  of  the  classrooms  will  be  “right-­‐sized”  and  upgraded  to  meet   21st  Century  EducaJonal  standards.     §  Windows  were  replaced  during  Summer  2016  
  4. 4. Single-Loaded Corridor With Commons DCPS  |  OCOO   4  
  5. 5. Modernized Classrooms DCPS  |  OCOO   5  
  6. 6. New Gym and Cafeteria Spaces DCPS  |  OCOO   6  
  7. 7. ConstrucJon  Phasing  
  8. 8. Construction  Phasing   §  DCPS  and  DGS  are  moving  away  from  the  “Summer  Blitz”  approach  to  construcJon.       §  The  Watkins  project  involves  a  significant  amount  of  demoliJon  and  new  construcJon,  which  will  take   much  longer  than  a  summer.   §  This  has  educaJonal  and  operaJonal  implicaJons.     §  This  forced  DCPS  and  DGS  to  evaluate  “swing  opJons”  for  SY16-­‐17  .   §  Both  on-­‐site  and  off-­‐site  opJons  have  been  evaluated.   DCPS:OCOO  
  9. 9. Evaluating Swing Options DCPS  |  OCOO   9   §  Evaluated  pros  and  cons  of  swinging  on-­‐site  and  swinging  off-­‐ site   §  Criteria:   1.  Impact  on  educaJonal  environment  and  school  operaJons   2.  Impact  on  student  and  teacher  quality  of  life   3.  Impact  on  school  community  and  logisJcs   4.  Proximity  of  off-­‐site  swing  opJons   5.  Costs  and  impact  on  overall  project  budget.  
  10. 10. Scenario 1: Swing Onsite DCPS  |  OCOO   10   •  Would  require  a  significant  #  of   trailers  on  the  DPR  field.   –  Field  and  other  ameniJes  would  be  off-­‐ line  for  the  year.     •  Students  would  be  next  to  an   acJve  construcJon  site,  but  would   remain  in  the  “Watkins   Community”.     •  No  parking  for  staff  or  visitors.     •  Higher  Cost:    $5+  million   –  Trailer  construcJon   –  Aeer-­‐hours  work   –  Field  resurfacing    
  11. 11. Scenario 2: Swing to Eliot-Hine MS DCPS  |  OCOO   11   •  Eliot-­‐Hine  MS  is  under-­‐uJlized  and   can  accommodate  both  programs   –  Serves  grades  6-­‐8   •  Building  is  located  at  1800   ConsJtuJon  Ave  ~1mi  away  from   Watkins  and  ~1.1mi  away  from   Peabody.   –  C40  Bus  line  could  be  re-­‐routed.   •  Students  would  be  away  from   construcJon  site,  but  no  longer  in  the   “Watkins  Community”.   •  LogisJcal  challenge   •  EnJre  student  populaJon  would  be   together.  
  12. 12. Scenario 2: Swing to Eliot-Hine MS DCPS  |  OCOO   12   •  Eliot-­‐Hine  would  receive  pre-­‐occupancy  improvements,  which  would  include:   –  PainJng  (welcoming  for  elementary  students)   –  IT  Upgrades  to  ensure  wireless  connecJvity   –  Necessary  modificaJons  to  meet  the  needs  to  elementary  students   –  Play-­‐space  for  elementary  students.   –  LighJng  improvements     –  Other  cosmeJc  improvements  to  be  determined.   •  Student  populaJons  would  be  separate,  including  a  separate  entrance,  gym,   cafeteria.   •  EnJre  student  populaJon  would  be  together.   •  Lower  Cost:  ~  $2.5M   –  Pre  &  Post  Occupancy  Improvements.  
  13. 13. Scenario 3: Split Program at Van Ness & Eliot-Hine DCPS  |  OCOO   13   •  Grade  1    would  be  at  the  newly  modernized   Van  Ness  (will  be  complete  in  Summer  2016).   •  Grades  2-­‐5  would  be  at  Eliot-­‐Hine.   •  This  opJon  creates  addiJonal  logisJcal   challenges  for  families  and  school  leadership.   –  TransportaJon  rouJng  would  need  careful  planning.       •  Other  opJons  explored:   –  Trailers  at  Peabody  for  1st  Grade  (too  small  for  4   trailers  and  have  play  space  and  parking)   –  5th  grade  at  Stuart-­‐Hobson  (creates  logisJcal   challenge)   –  Trailers  at  Payne  field  (too  small  and  would  restrict   their  play-­‐space)   •  Lower  Cost:  ~  $2.5  million   –  Pre  &  Post  Occupancy  Improvements  
  14. 14. Next Steps DCPS  |  OCOO   14   §  DCPS  will  evaluate  the  feedback  from  the  community  on  the   scenarios.   §  DCPS  will  make  a  final  decision  by  Winter  Break   §  Further  evaluaJon  of  program  layout  in  swing  scenario.   §  If  off-­‐site,  work  with  both  school  leaderships  to  ensure  programmaJc  needs  are  met.     Careful  planning  and  design  around  keeping  student  populaJons  separate.   §  CoordinaJon  &  Planning   §  TransportaJon  (C40  Bus  Line).   §  Aeer-­‐school  programming     §  DeterminaJon  of  any  pre-­‐occupancy  improvements.   §  Project  Website:    Before  Thanksgiving    
  15. 15. Contact Information DCPS  |  OCOO   15       Patrick  Davis   DCPS  Facility  Planning  and  Design   Patrick.Davis@dc.gov     Please  submit  comments  to  Patrick.Davis@dc.gov  by  December  4th.    

×