5. Historically the BBC has created a series of
microsites – each coherent in their own right but
not across the breadth of BBC content
Radio 4 Big Bang http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/bigbang/
11. I can’t follow my nose, I can’t browse by meaning,
from one page to the next following a semantic
thread
Snickers http://www.flickr.com/photos/homer4k/386980596/
13. Linked Data has helped us build a coherent,
scalable, sane service. One that we hope is a bit
more human literate.
Linked Data cloud diagram http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/pub/lod-datasets_2009-03-05_colored.png
14. Use URIs to identify things not only documents
How it works: The Web http://flickr.com/photos/danbri/2415237566/
15. Use HTTP URIs - globally unique names that
anyone can dereference
Colon Slash Slash http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeffsmallwood/299208539/
16. Provide useful information [in RDF] when someone
looks up a URI
Information Desk http://www.flickr.com/photos/metropol2/149294506/
17. Include links to other URIs to let people discover
related information
Links http://www.flickr.com/photos/ravages/2831688538/
18. One implication of this is that I think there’s only
URIs and metadata... nothing else
Self-portraiture + metadata http://www.flickr.com/photos/saltatempo/323462998/
19. URIs are used as identifiers for real world things
...like Polar Bears and Jeremy Clarkson
45. Linked Data allows loosely coupled, distributed
teams to share data, share models and build on
each others work
46. Thank you
Programmes ontology
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/programmes
Understanding the big BBC graph
http://blogs.talis.com/n2/archives/569
Music ontology
http://musicontology.com
Editor's Notes
Although I’m in speaking in the semantic web strand of this conference I’m not going to talk about RDF/XML.
That’s not because I don’t think it’s important, I do, but rather because RDF is often conflated with RDF/XML and I would rather consider the model for a bit - what it means and how we’ve used it. So I guess what I really mean is that what I’m going to be talking about is RDF the model not RDF the data format. If however that is something you are interested in that perhaps grab me after my talk because we are publishing lots and lots of RDF/XML.
The BBC is the largest broadcasting corporation in the world.
Its mission is to enrich people's lives with programmes that inform, educate and entertain. It is a public service broadcaster, established by a Royal Charter and funded by the licence fee that is paid by UK households.
The BBC uses the income from the licence fee to provide services, including...
8 national TV channels + regional variations and programming
National TV and radio for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland plus 40 local radio stations
and that’s before you get to the World Service which broadcasts to the world in 32 languages.
We’ve had a web presence since 1994
What all this means is that the BBC produces an incredible range, diversity and volume of content .
This volume of content is a challenge in it’s own right let alone before you consider the size of the existing archive
This size presents a number of challenges - how to organise, how to build
For starters traditional 'left hand nav' style navigation doesn't work. From a UX POV, nor from a coordination and governance POV.
As a result the BBC has historically created a series of microsite. Each coherent in their own right but not across the breadth of BBC content.
Consider for example I can navigate around a Radio 4 site about the opening of the LHC... but...
I can’t find everything to BBC knows about CERN... but equally I can’t find everything
I can’t find everything to BBC knows about CERN... but equally I can’t find everything
I can’t find everything to BBC knows about CERN... but equally I can’t find everything
I can’t find everything to BBC knows about CERN... but equally I can’t find everything
I can’t find everything to BBC knows about CERN... but equally I can’t find everything
Paul Weller, or any other artist, nor can I find everything
But things are changing..
Starting with the data and how people think about it rather than starting with the web page down. And when I say data I really mean starting with understanding what things people care about and giving each of those things a URI and returning appropriate representations...
Of course what I’m talking about is Linked Data... even if we didn’t quite realise that when we started.
But the idea that we should care about our URIs, care about having one per concept, care about having machine representations for those resources instead of a separate API has helped us build a coherent, scalable, sane service.
Linking Open Data is a grassroots project to use web technologies to expose data on the web. It is for many people synonymous with the semantic web, or worse web 3.0, a term I personally can’t stand (esp when you consider that TimBLs original memo described a web of things).
It does, as far as I’m concerned, represent a very large subset of the semantic web project.
But what is it?
Well it can be described with 4 simple rules.
The web was designed to be a web of things, not just a web of documents.
Those documents make assertions about things in the real world but that doesn’t mean the identifiers can only be used to identify web documents.
Minting URIs for things rather than pages helps make the web more human literate because it means we are identifying those things that people care about.
The beauty of the web is its ubiquitous nature - the fact it is decentralised and able to function on any platform. This is because of TimBL’s key invention the HTTP URI.
URI’s are globally unique, open to all and decentralised.
Don’t go using DOI or any other identifier - on the web all you need is an HTTP URI.
And obviously you need to provide some information at that URI. When people dereference it you need to give them some data - ideally as RDF as well as HTML.
Providing the data as RDF means that machines can process that information for people to use. Making it more useful.
And of course you also need to provide links to other resources so people can continue their journey.
And that means contextual links to other resources elsewhere on the web, not just your site.
And that’s it. Pretty simple.
And I would argue that, other than the RDF bit, these principles should be followed for any website - they just make sense.
Including that I look like this
Was born here
That my name is this
(diff slide - my driving license is another identifier which also makes assertions about me)
Including that I look like this
Was born here
That my name is this
(diff slide - my driving license is another identifier which also makes assertions about me)
Including that I look like this
Was born here
That my name is this
(diff slide - my driving license is another identifier which also makes assertions about me)
Including that I look like this
Was born here
That my name is this
(diff slide - my driving license is another identifier which also makes assertions about me)
Tigers look like this
Sound like this
Do these things
This has happened to them
They live here
Do have this sort of way of life (adaptations)
Tigers look like this
Sound like this
Do these things
This has happened to them
They live here
Do have this sort of way of life (adaptations)
Tigers look like this
Sound like this
Do these things
This has happened to them
They live here
Do have this sort of way of life (adaptations)
Tigers look like this
Sound like this
Do these things
This has happened to them
They live here
Do have this sort of way of life (adaptations)
People care about our programme brands - they search for them, love watching them and expect the BBC to provide footage/ clips of them.
And we have separate pages for every artist the BBC plays on the new music site.
And you can do the same thing for sounds, news stories, links, wikipedia etc
If you build things correctly then like lego we can stick things together to build more stuff
Information about a thing is important and it is interesting, but it’s interest is somewhat limited. What’s really interesting is the join the link between things.
What programmes or clips do we have about a given species?
Clips live at /programmes but are transcluded onto other pages
Which tracks were plaid on a particular show - linking through to the artist pages.
Again the information about the artist ‘lives’ at /music but it’s pulled into the programme domain because
Which in turn tell you about which programmes and radio stations play that artist - with links through to the programme or station.
What probably isn’t completely obvious is that we have modeled and structured the site around those things.
So we have classes of object and relationships between them, and resources within each class. For example - a Lion is a Species and species have defined relationships to habitats, location, conservation status and adaptation.
What this means is that when we create a new species it appears on it’s habitat, adaptation page etc.
