Design of Customised Medical Implants by Layered Manufacturing

1,738 views

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,738
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
59
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Design of Customised Medical Implants by Layered Manufacturing

  1. 1. Design of Customised Medical Implants by Layered Manufacturing. S F Khan, K W Dalgarno School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK Abstract The utilisation of Layered Manufacturing (LM) and CAD for medical applications had been reviewed in this paper. It highlights a number of researches describing the implementation of LM and CAD processes in medical applications and also described the design process for customised medical implants by layered manufacturing. The paper then examines the feasibility of designing of new implants in mandibular bone based on bio ceramics and new fixation methods. It describes the requirements for these bone implants and the processing steps required to develop the implants. This paper then concludes by outlining future work. 1. Introduction Layered Manufacturing is a technique of fabricating parts by additive method. A 3D model generated in a CAD system is sliced into 2D profile by the software in the LM machine. The sliced-layers of the model are then added one layer at a time onto the build platform by the LM machine until a 3D part is produced. Main LM technologies used are stereolithography (SLA), laser sintering such as Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) and Selective Laser Melting (SLM); Fused Deposition Model (FDM); 3D ink jet printing (3DP) techniques such as Sanders ModelMaker™, Z-Corp Ink Jet System™, 3DS Multi-Jet Modeling™, and 3DObject PolyJet™; and electron beam melting (EBM). LM is largely being used to produce prototypes and functional parts in the engineering and manufacturing industries. Since it inception in 1986, numerous engineering and manufacturing applications utilizing LM have been documented and researched. In LM technologies, various applications in fields which are not traditionally associated with engineering and manufacturing have opened up such as in architectural and medical modeling, artistic creation [10, 36, 48] and historical restoration work [4]. The main applications are in the evaluation, visualization, validation, form fitting and functional testing in the early stage of product development process as well as tooling aids (refer to Fig 1) [39]. Only about 12% are in the Rapid Manufacturing application with growth expected in its application for customised parts. This will be particularly relevant to fields such as the medical and healthcare industry. The principle pulling point of utilizing LM for fabrication and manufacturing parts in this field is that LM systems can produce parts of almost any geometrical complexity with relatively minimal tooling cost and time as well a significant reduction in requirements of technical expertise. The removal of tooling will reduce the cost at early stages of the product development process and avoid the lead times imposed by
  2. 2. tooling. Minor or substantial changes to part geometry during the course of design will not incur the times and costs of producing new tooling [11, 26]. Fig. 1 LM Applications [39]. 2. LM technologies in Medical Applications Numerous researches have documented the use of LM in medical applications. In general LM technologies for medical applications can be categorized as follows:- • visualisation and surgical planning • customized orthoses and protheses implant/replacement • scaffoldings and tissue engineering • drug delivery and micron-scale medical devices 2.1 Visualisation and surgical planning LM systems can be used to produce physical models of parts of the human anatomy and biological structures to assist in surgery planning or testing as well as for communication. 3DP system can be used to produce coloured medical models (Fig.2) to enhance learning for students in the classroom as well as for researchers. It can be used to better illustrate the anatomy, allow viewing of internal structures and much better understanding of some problems or procedures [11, 26]. The possibility to mark different structures in different colors in a 3D physical model not only well suited for teaching purpose but can be very useful for surgery planning. The medical models generated using LM systems plays a vital role in providing tactile interaction for the surgeon with patient anatomy prior to the operation. This facilitates the surgeon in planning and performing complex pre-operative surgical procedures and simulations( Fig. 3). When using medical models, the surgeon will have a chance to study the bony structures of the patient before the surgery, to increase surgical precision, to decrease time of procedures and risk during surgery as well as costs and also to predict possible problem that may arise during operation [11]. As compared to conventional MRI assessment, medical models allow a more acceptable judgement over the feasibility of diagnosis and procedural planning [1].
  3. 3. Fig. 2 Left: CAD image - Right: Medical model Fig. 3 Biomodel use in pre- [47]. surgery planning [46]. 2.2 Customized orthoses and protheses implant/replacement Since every patient is unique, LM systems are used in fabrication of personalised implants for reconstructive and plastic surgery. Due to the inherent strength of LM technologies to fabricate complex geometry, it is very easy to manufacture custom implants. The model can be used as the custom implant itself or of the implant. Winder et al. [37] and D’Urso et al. [7] successfully used implants model fabricated using LM systems as a master model for reconstructive surgery of a skull defect. They claim there is a reduction on operating time and excellent outcome at ‘reasonable’ cost. The capability of LM to customise implants to quickly fit into a patient's unique size is a great advantage. Hip sockets, knee joints and spinal implants could greatly benefit from this. He et al. [15] claims that the composite hemi-knee joint prosthesis (Fig. 4) reconstructed using LM are accurate to within a maximum tolerance of 0.206 mm. It fitted well and matched with the surrounding tissues, in particular to the lower tibial knee joint. Chang et al [4], Eggbeer et al [9] , Kruth et al [21] and Bibb et al [2] had demonstrated the use of LM technologies in dental applications to be viable as it can improved the speed, quality and efficiency. a b c Fig. 4 SL pattern of a hemi-knee joint (a) as a master for the titanium joint (b) which implanted in the femur bone (c) [15]. 2.3 Scaffoldings and tissue engineering With it ease of fabricating internal structure, LM technologies are ideal for generating implants with special geometrical characteristics, such as scaffolds for the restoration of tissues [18] as shown in Fig. 5. Scaffolds are porous supporting structures used as transplantation of tissue cells for the rapid and guided growth of new tissue in damaged or defective bones of the patient. 3D scaffold fabrication techniques for tissue engineering has been used for the last 30 years with less favourable success due
  4. 4. to the lack of mechanical strength, no assurance of interconnection channels and uncontrolled pore size [18, 40]. Hence in order to for tissue reconstruction, scaffolds must have interconnected macro and micro-channels with high porosity and adequate pore size to facilitate cell seeding and diffusion of both cells and nutrients throughout the whole structure. These characteristics are required in producing scaffold for tissue engineering. LM has been studied by numerous researchers as a fabrication choice in constructing 3D scaffolds to guide the development tissue culture both in vivo and in vitro [13, 17, 33]. Armillota et al. [1], Hollister [17], Hutmacher et al [18], and Yang et al [40] have demonstrated and rationalised the use of LM technologies in scaffold design for tissue engineering to be viable, cost effective and practical. Yang et al [24] state the advantages of using this technique in designing and a b c Fig. 5 LM femur with scaffold (a) [27], (b) [17] and mandibular scaffold implant (c) [45] fabricating scaffolds. Fig. 6 illustrates a scaffold tissue engineering proposed for reconstruction of a mandibular implant. LM systems like SLS, FDM, and 3DP have proved to be suitable for fabricating controlled porous structures for use in tissue engineering. LM technologies have contributed significantly to the field of scaffoldings and tissue engineering through the use of biomaterials [20]. a b Fig. 6 Layered manufactured scaffold tissue engineering (a) used in reconstruction of mandibular implant (b). [42] 2.4 Medical devices and Drug delivery systems Another application of LM techniques is in fabricating medical devices and drug delivery systems. Skull defect and dental implant are restoration process that requires
  5. 5. detailed planning and high accuracy in implant placement. Hence surgical guidance aids are required. Sarment et al. [27] and Di Giacomo et al. [6] investigated the use of SL surgical guides (Fig. 7) to accurately place dental implants and concluded that there is a significant improvement in implant placement. Ruppin et al [29] claim that LM fabricated surgical guides are comparable to optical tracking system and in agreement other researches on accuracy in computer aided surgery for implant. Bibb et al [2] studied the use of LM to fabricated removable partial dental (RPD) framework for retaining artificial replacement teeth in the oral cavity. The patterns produced were deemed by a qualified and experienced dental technician to be a satisfactory fit and comparable with those produced by expert pattern technicians. In the study, the stiffer patterns produced by SL were easy to handle, were accurate, and produced satisfactory results. And Tay et al. [35] claim that an actual prosthetic socket fabricated using an FDM system (Fig. 8) provides an acceptable degree of comfort, and clinical trial confirmed the viability of fabricate prosthetic socket using FDM technology. Besides medical devices, LM methods are also use to produce drug- delivery system like oral tablet. Rowe et al [28], Leong et al [22] and Low et al [24]demonstrated the possibility of building oral tablet that controlled specific and precise drug delivery by using SL. a b c Fig. 7 SLA surgical guide (a) and the constructed surgical guide in CAD (b) [ [29] fabricated guide (c) [43]. a b Fig. 8 Below-the-knee Selective laser sintering prosthetic (a) [44] and FDM total knee replacement (b) [41]
  6. 6. 3. Implementation of LM and CAD in medical applications The development of medical images into 3D models as a tool to help practitioners visualize 2D images has contributed to the development of a new methodology in fabricating medical parts. Medical imaging provides important data of various body structures for diagnostic reasons. These data can be used to obtain geometrical information of the body structures for three-dimensional modeling. CT and MRI images of various structures from conventional hospital scanners provided the input data for commercially available software packages. The image data are visualised, segmented and three dimensionally reconstructed. Solid models can then be generated for use in CAD systems. The generated models incorporating tissues of interest can be imported into a CAE environment for further CAD modelling and finite element analysis. That environment also serves as a platform for conversion to a readable format by rapid prototyping systems. LM systems are then used to produce the physical medical models. The integration of Medical Imaging, CAD, FEA and LM has been presented as a realistic method for modeling and designing various body structures in medical applications. Hieu et al [38], Gopakumar [14] and Lohfeld et al [23] in the study of designing cranial and maxillofacial implant claim that there is a reduction time in implementing the integrated approach of Medical Imaging, CAD, FEA and LM for fabricating personalised medical implants. The common theme in Hieu et al [16], Gopakumar [14] and Lohfeld et al [23] methodology of this approach is illustrated in Fig. 9. from CT, Capture Software Process Patient Medical Modeler Images Export data in suitable format Data Scan Scan MRI data IGES, SSL, STL, DXF, 3DS analysis. design and Modeler for parametric based NURBS Solid or CAD/CAE Commercial and FEA in CAD Modeling Export data in RP format STL (Binary or ASCII) LM of Medical Implant SLA, SLS, SLM, FDM,3DP.EBM Direct Method Indirect Method Fig. 9 LM and CAD methodology adapted to design and manufacture of implants However Starly et al [33] highlight a more comprehensive approach that generate CAD models from scan images. Integrated slice software in LM is used as an
  7. 7. interface between the STL file generated from CAD modeled implants and the LM machine. It allows the user to specify the attributes for the LM to build the physical model. 4. Implants design for mandibular bone based on bioceramics and new fixation methods Bone is a living tissue; considered as a composite material, it comprises of trabecular (cancellous) bone and cortical (compact) bone. It has the capability of healing and remodelling. It will respond with adaptation in its structure to loading stress or injury such as fracture. However, bone is unlikely to remodel itself in major losses cause by trauma, cancer, congenital abnormalities or bone deficiency. Most of these types of major bone repairs are treated by grafting which uses the patient’s own bone (autografts) or donor bone (allografts). The need of further surgery, risk of transmitted disease and limited material from donor site pose some limitations to the current practices [25, 34, 32]. Synthetic substitutes using metal, ceramic, polymer and composites are currently been use to overcome these limitations. Bioceramics are most frequently used in scaffold manufacturing and hard tissue implants within bones, joints and teeth. Bioceramics have the basic chemical composition akin to natural bone. Goodridge et al [13] and Dyson et al [8] have demonstrated the feasibility of using bioceramics for use as bone substitute. The design of the implant must take in to consideration biocompatibility, mechanical properties, cost effective manufacturability and process [19] as well as an accurate fit that requires minimal or no healthy bone removal. Furthermore, the bone variations in material and mechanical properties are dependence on location and function [12, 31]. Hence a promising method of manufacturing implants is through LM. This paper proposes a LM and CAD methodology to design customised implants of mandibular bone. The process flow is as shown in Fig 10.
  8. 8. Capture patient data Process Scan data Export data in suitable format Create Library of 3D cellular microstructure Modeling in CAD and FEA Selection of microstructure Boolean Operation Dense Implant Implant with Microstructure Export data in RP format Verify data RP file before uploading into LM system LM of Medical Implant Post process Customised Bioceramics Implants Fig. 10 LM and CAD methodology for implants design in mandibular bone based on bioceramics and new fixation Normally most of the fixation methods for mandibular reconstruction and fracture system consist of drill bits, plate bending forceps, plate holding forceps, plate cutters, cannulae, taps, countersinks, plate bending pliers, plate cutters, drill guides and screwdrivers to facilitate the placement of screws and modification of plates. The implant for reconstruction is secured in place by plate and screw. However, this paper proposed a design that integrates the fixation method into the implant. This is derived from the advantages of LM. A lower jaw bone model in STL format was imported to the CAD to design an implant. The lower jaw is non-defective and was obtained from a secondary source. A simulated defective section was created on the jaw by cutting a section of it in the CAD software (Fig. 11).
  9. 9. Fig. 11. A section cut out for implant. Several joints are proposed as shown in Fig 12. Type (a), (b), and (c) joints rely on rapid bonding to secure the implant while type (d) uses conventional screws. a b c d Fig. 12 Different types of joint under consideration. The design of the implants will need to incorporate interconnected controlled channels in order to promote bone growth. Bignon et al [3], Woesz et al [38] and Chu et al [5] indicated that there are significant correlation between micro- and macro-porosity as well as controlled channels with bone response and mechanical properties. 5. Conclusion and Future work The LM and CAD approach for medical applications had proved to be viable and promises potential benefits as demonstrated by the numerous researches conducted. Precise customised bioceramic implants can reduce the removal of healthy bone, eliminate the need for bone grafting, and promote effective planning of implantation.
  10. 10. The future work to be undertaken should be related to finding suitable bioceramics’ material and mechanical properties that adhere to the requirements of successful bone growth. In addition, further work will be conducted to propose new fixation methods and assembly. This will involved FEA to determine the strength of the propose fixation joint as well as of the implant itself. References 1. Armillotta, A., Bonhoeffer P., Dubini G., Ferragina S., Migliavacca F., Sala G., and Schievano S. (2007) Use of rapid prototyping models in the planning of percutaneous pulmonary valved stent implantation Proc. IMechE Vol. 221 Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine 2. Bibb R, Eggbeer D, Williams R (2006) Rapid manufacture of removable partial denture frameworks. Rapid Prototyp J 12(2):95–99 3. Bignon, A., Chouteau J., Chevalier J., Fantozzi G., Carret J.P., Chavassieux P., Boivin G., Melin M., Hartmann D., (2003) Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response Jour of materials Science: Materials in Medicine 14 pp 1089-1097 4. Chang CC, Lee MY, Wang SH (2006) Digital denture manufacturing- An integrated technologies of abrasive computer tomography, CNC machining and rapid prototyping. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:41–49 5.Chu T-M, Orton D.G., Hollister S.J.,Feinberg S.E., Halloran J.W., (2002) Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architecture Biomaterials 22 pp 1283-1293 6. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL (2005) Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 76(4):503–507 7. D’Urso PS, Earwaker WJ, Barker TM, Redmond MJ, Thompson RG, Effeney DJ, Tomlinson FH (2000) Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. Br J Plast Surg 53(3):200–204 8. Dyson JA., Genever PG., Dalgarno KW., Wood DJ., (2007). Development of Custom-Built Bone Scaffolds Using Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Apatite- Wollastonite Glass-Ceramics Tissue Engineering. 13(12): 2891-2901. 9. Eggbeer D, Bibb R, Williams R (2005) The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks. Proc Inst Mech Eng 219(3):195–202 10. Giannatsis J, Dedoussis V, Karalekas D (2002) Architectural scale modeling using stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J (3):200–207 11. Giannatsis J., Dedoussis V., 2007.Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review Int J Adv Manuf Technology 12. Goldstein, S.A., (1987) The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function J Biomechanics Vol 20, No 11 12. pp 1055-1061 13. Goodridge RD., Wood D.J., Ohtsuki C, Dalgarno KW. (2007) Biological evaluation of an apatite–mullite glass-ceramic produced via selective laser sintering Acta Biomaterialia, Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 221-231 14. Gopakumar S. (2004) RP in medicine: a case study in cranial reconstructive surgery. Rapid Prototyping Journal Volume 10 · Number 3 · 2004 · pp. 207–211
  11. 11. 15. He J, Li D, Lu B (2006) Custom fabrication of a composite hemiknee joint based on rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyp J 12 (4):198–205 16. Hieu L.C., E. Bohez, J. Vander Sloten, H.N. Phien, E.Vatcharaporn, P.H. Binh, P.V. An and P. Oris (2003) Case Study: Design for medical rapid prototyping of cranioplasty implants Rapid Prototyping Journal Volume 9 · Number 3 · 2003 · pp. 175–186 17. Hollister S., (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering Nature Materials 4, 518 - 524 18. Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV (2004) Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotech 22(7):354–362 19. Katti, K.S. (2004) Biometerials in total joint replacement colloids nd Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 39(3) pp133-142 20. Kim BS, Mooney DJ (1998) Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotech 16(5):224–230 21. Kruth J-P, Vandenbroucke B, Van Vaerenbergh J, Naert I (2005) Digital manufacturing of biocompatible metal frameworks for complex dental prostheses by means of SLS/SLM. In Virtual Prototyping and RapidManufacturing - Advanced research in virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Taylor & Francis, London, pp 139–146 22. Leong KF, Chua CK, Gui WS, Verani (2006) Building porous biopolymeric microstructures for controlled drug delivery devices using selective laser sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:483–489 23. Lohfeld, S.,McHugh, P., Serban, D., Boyle, D., O’Donnnell G., Peckitt, N., (2007) Engineering Assited Surgery: A route for digital design and manufacturing of customised maxillofacial implants Journal of Materials Processing Technology 183 333-338 24. Low KH, Leong KF, Chua CK, Du ZH, Cheah CM (2001) Characterization of SLS parts for drug delivery devices. Rapid Prototyp J 7(5):262–268 25. Mankin H.J., Gebhardt M.C., Jennings L.C., Springfield D.S., Tomford W.W., (1996) Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (324) 86– 97. 26. Milovanović J., Trajanović M., (2007) Medical Applications Of Rapid Prototyping FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Mechanical Engineering Vol. 5, No 1, pp. 79 - 85 27. Naing M.W., Chua C.K. Leong K.F., and Wang Y. 2005 Fabrication of customised scaffolds using computer-aided design and rapid prototyping techniques Rapid Prototyping Journal Vol. 11 Number 4 (2005) pp249-259 28. Rowe CW, Katstra WE, Palazzolo RD, Giritlioglu B, Teung P, Cima MJ (2000) Multimechanism oral dosage forms fabricated by three dimensional printing. J Control Release 66:11–17 29. Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spu¨ ntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. (2008) Evaluation of accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Impl Res., 19, 709–716 30. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N (2003) Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18(4):571–577 31. Schwartz-Dabney, C.L., Dechow, P.C., (2003) Variations in Cortical Material properties throughout the human dentate mandible American Journal of physical anthropology 120:252-277
  12. 12. 32. Simonds R.J., Holmberg S.D., Hurwitz R.L., Coleman T.R., Bottenfield S., Conley L.J., Kohlenberg S.H., Castro K.G., Dahan B.A., Schable C.A., Rayfield M.A., Rogers M.F., (1992) Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from a seronegative organ and tissue donor New England Journal of Medicine 326 (11) 726– 732. 33. Starly B., Fang Z., Sun W., Shokoufandeh A. and Regli W. (2005) Three- Dimensional Reconstruction for Medical-CAD Modeling Computer-Aided Design & Applications, Vol. 2, Nos. 1-4, pp 431-438 34. Strong D.M., Friedlaender G.E., Tomford W.W., Springfield D.S., Shives T.C., Burchardt H., Enneking W.F., Mankin H.J., (1996) Immunologic responses in human recipients of osseous and osteochondral allografts : Fundamental and clinical immunology of the skeletal system Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (326) 107–114. 35. Tay, Francis E.H., Manna, M.A. and Liu, L.X. (2002) A Case Study: A CASD/CASM method for prosthetic socket fabrication using the FDM technology Rapid Prototyping Volume 8 · Number 4 · pp. 258–262 q MCB UP Limited · ISSN 1355-2546 36. Wai H.W. (2001) RP in art and conceptual design. Rapid Prototyp J 7(4):217–219 37. Winder J, Cooke RS, Gray J, Fannin T, Fegan T (1999) Medical rapid prototyping and 3D CT in the manufacture of custom made cranial titanium plates. J Med Eng Technol 23(1):26–28 38. Woesz A., Rumpler M., Stampfl J., Varga F., Fratzl-Zelman N., Roschger P., Klaushofer K., Fratzl P., (2005) Towards bone replacement materials from calcium phosphates via rapid prototyping and ceramics gelcasting Jour of Materials Science and Engineering C 25 pp181-186 39. Wohlers, T. (2007). Wohlers Report 2007: State of the Industry Annual Worldwide Progress Report Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins,USA, ISBN 0-9754429-3-7 40. Yang S., Leong KF., Du ZH, Chua CK. (2001 and 2002) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering Tissue Engineering. 7: 679-689 and 8(1): 1-11 41. http://www.biomechanika.cz/index.php?pg=laborator-rapid-prototyping&lang=en (access 15Jan2009) 42. http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/technology/reconstruction/ (access on 23Jan2009) 43. http://www.dentalaegis.com/Publications/Inside_Dentistry/article.aspx? id=54667(access on 3Feb2009) 44.http://www.laserfocusworld.com/display_article/227426/12/none/none/Feat/Rapid- prototyping-evolves-into-custom-manufacturing (access on 18 Jan 2009) 45.http://www.materialise.com/materialise/view/en/1917057- Materialise+and+LayerWise+join+forces.html (access on 8Jan2009) 46. http://www.metaltechgroup.it/UserFiles/Image/26.jpg (access 12Jan2009) 47. http://www.rp4baghdad.org/_img/project_1.jpg (access 12Feb2009) 48. http://www.timecompress.com/magazine/archives.cfm (retrieved on 13 Jan 2008)

×