12681

758 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
758
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
23
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • (Isokangas et al., JDR 2000)
  • A healthy diet is no threat to teeth Constant snacking is a risk to dental health – consumption of sweets, soft drinks, snacks in general, is increasing in the Western World
  • 12681

    1. 1. Mother-child transmission of mutans streptococci
    2. 2. The window of infectivity for mutans streptococci
    3. 3. The earlier the mutans streptococci are colonized, the higher is the risk for caries
    4. 4. Transmission of mutans streptococci <ul><li>The mother (infecting person) has high salivary mutans streptococci counts </li></ul><ul><li>Several daily saliva contacts between the child and the mother must take place </li></ul>
    5. 5. Methods to prevent the acquisition of mutans streptococci <ul><li>Information on mother-child transmission of ms, advice on diet and oral hygiene </li></ul><ul><li>Chemical methods (chlorhexidine) </li></ul><ul><li>Xylitol </li></ul>
    6. 6. Mother-child study Eva Söderling and Pauli Isokangas Institute of Dentistry, Turku Ylivieska Health Centre, Ylivieska
    7. 7. Subjects <ul><li>At baseline 195 mothers with high salivary mutans streptococci counts (60% of all mothers) </li></ul><ul><li>2-year examination: 169 mother-child pairs </li></ul><ul><li>6-year examination: 147 children </li></ul>
    8. 8. Study groups <ul><li>Xylitol group: xylitol chewing gum 4 times a day </li></ul><ul><li>Fluoride (F; control) group: fluoride varnish (2.26%) treatments 2 times a year </li></ul><ul><li>Chlorhexidine (CHX) group: CHX varnish (40%) treatments 2 times a year </li></ul><ul><li>All interventions discontinued when the child was 2 years old </li></ul>
    9. 9. Xylitol chewing gum
    10. 10. Only the mothers used xylitol/were treated with varnish; no additional treatments to children
    11. 11. Results
    12. 12. Mutans streptococci of the mothers: <ul><li>High salivary mutans streptococci counts in all groups throughout the study </li></ul><ul><li>No differences between the study groups </li></ul>7 . 5 7 . 0 6 . 5 6 . 0 5 . 5 5 . 0 4 . 5 4 . 0 P r e g n a n c y 0 . 5 1 2 A g e o f c h i l d ( y e a r s ) F C H X X y l IogCF/ml
    13. 13. Mutans streptococci of the 2-year-old children (Söderling et al., JDR 2000) <ul><li>The child’s risk of having mutans streptococci colonization in the dentition was 5-fold in the F group and 3-fold in the CHX group as compared to the Xylitol group </li></ul>
    14. 14. Caries occurence in children <ul><li>At the age of 5 years the need of restorative treatment was 71-75% lower in the Xylitol group as compared to the F and CHX groups </li></ul><ul><li>The occurence of caries and early mutans streptococci colonization were in agreement </li></ul>
    15. 15. Prevention of Maternal-Infant Transmission of Caries A Randomized Clinical Trial
    16. 16. Investigator Affiliation <ul><li>University of Washington Schools of Dentistry, Medicine and Public Health </li></ul><ul><li>Departments of Dental Public Health Sciences, Pediatrics, Health Services, Pediatric Dentistry </li></ul>
    17. 17. Background <ul><li>Rates of early childhood caries 4.5 fold higher among Alaska Natives </li></ul><ul><li>High rates of caries likely related to: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>high load of oral bacteria that cause caries </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>S. mutans, S. sobrinus </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>early acquisition </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>decreased fluoride exposure </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>large amounts of refined sugar in diet </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>poor oral hygiene </li></ul></ul>
    18. 18. Specific Aim <ul><li>To determine if the infants of pregnant mothers who use CHX mouth rinses for two weeks, followed by xylitol gum use for two years, experience less dental decay compared to infants of mothers who do not use these interventions </li></ul>
    19. 19. Methods: Design <ul><li>Randomized controlled trial </li></ul><ul><li>2 arms: intervention vs. control </li></ul><ul><li>double-blinded </li></ul>
    20. 20. Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
    21. 21. Subjects <ul><li>Enroll: Pregnant mothers at 36-38 weeks of gestation </li></ul><ul><li>Track outcomes: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mothers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Liveborn children who are offspring of enrollees </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Exclude: infants born in Anchorage, infants with congenital anomalies </li></ul>
    22. 22. Intervention: Both Groups <ul><li>Dental hygiene and exam </li></ul><ul><li>Restoration of caries and extractions as necessary </li></ul><ul><li>Dental and dietary counseling/education </li></ul><ul><li>Toothbrushes and toothpaste </li></ul>
    23. 23. Intervention Group Only <ul><li>Chlorhexidine rinses, twice a day for two weeks; starts at enrollment </li></ul><ul><li>Xylitol gum 5.1 grams per day (3x/day) for two years </li></ul>
    24. 24. Outcome Assessment <ul><li>Outcomes of interest </li></ul><ul><ul><li>caries among infants at 1 and 2 years of age </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>all enrolled children </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>deft </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>S. mutans counts for mothers and infants at same time intervals </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>for subset (n=30) only </li></ul></ul></ul>
    25. 25. Data Collection <ul><li>Baseline: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>maternal dental exam </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>maternal gingival culture (subset) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>maternal oral health questionnaire </li></ul></ul><ul><li>T 1 (infant age= one year) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>oral health questionnaire </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>infant dental exam </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>infant and maternal gingival cultures (subset) </li></ul></ul>
    26. 26. Data Collection <ul><li>T 2 (infant age=2 years) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>oral health questionnaire </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>infant dental exam </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>infant and maternal gingival cultures (subset) </li></ul></ul>
    27. 27. Analysis <ul><li>Compare rates of caries between intervention and control groups </li></ul><ul><ul><li>(unit of analysis: child or teeth) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Compare S. mutans counts between groups </li></ul><ul><li>Control for confounding factors, if present </li></ul>
    28. 28. Potential limitations <ul><li>Compliance with intervention </li></ul><ul><li>Blinding </li></ul><ul><li>Misclassification of exposure </li></ul><ul><ul><li>e.g. control mom uses intervention </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>mother doesn’t rear child </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Intensification of exposure </li></ul><ul><ul><li>e.g. whole family uses gum </li></ul></ul>
    29. 29. Sample Size Estimates <ul><li>N=375 births/year </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Exclude 25% born in Anchorage </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assume 10% refusal rate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enroll approximately 125 in each group </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assume 80% follow-up at two years </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Need about 200 at final follow-up </li></ul></ul><ul><li>About 90% power to detect a 50% reduction in the intervention group </li></ul>
    30. 30. Future studies…
    31. 31. Xylitol administration with a slow-release pacifier for AOM and ECC?
    32. 32. Diet and dental caries
    33. 33. Subsidizing toothpaste, introducing xylitol snacks
    34. 34. What is most impressive about xylitol is its safety
    35. 35. Effectively addressing caries will require new and better tools for public health
    36. 36. THANK YOU

    ×