Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality

D
denny4573
••
Growing U.S. Income Inequality,[object Object],A Lecture Presented for the Osher Program,[object Object],San Diego State University,[object Object],April 18, 2011,[object Object],Denny Braun, Ph.D.,[object Object],Professor Emeritus of Sociology,[object Object],Minnesota State University,[object Object],1,[object Object]
2,[object Object]
Major Findings in my Book:,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The middle class is shrinking,[object Object]
The middle class is shrinking
Poverty has been increasing,[object Object]
The middle class is shrinking
Poverty has been increasing
U.S. Multinational Corporations cause more inequality both in the U.S. and in the World,[object Object]
The middle class is shrinking
Poverty has been increasing
U.S. Multinational Corporations cause more inequality both in the U.S. and in the World
Huge inequalities exist between U.S. locales,[object Object]
The middle class is shrinking
Poverty has been increasing
U.S. Multinational Corporations cause more inequality both in the U.S. and in the World
Huge inequalities exist between U.S. locales
The growth of relative income inequality is not only continuous but has become explosive ,[object Object]
A basic truth about absolute income differencesis that the U.S. is NOT the richest country!,[object Object],Source: Inter-national Monetary Fund,[object Object],9,[object Object]
10,[object Object]
The Best and Worst States on Median Household Income,[object Object],Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Surveys, 2008 and 2009,[object Object],11,[object Object]
12,[object Object]
13,[object Object]
Percent Change in Median Household Income ,[object Object],Within Last Two Decades (2009 Dollars),[object Object],14,[object Object]
Who are the poor?,[object Object],[object Object]
Where do they live?
Have their numbers increased over time?
How about the rate of poverty? Is that unchanged?,[object Object]
Source: U.S. Census, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage (Sep., 2010),[object Object]
Source: U.S. Census, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage (Sep., 2010),[object Object]
19,[object Object]
Facts About U.S. Poverty,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Within the past decade, the poverty rate has increased 27% for all persons, and 30% for all families. ,[object Object]
Within the past decade, the poverty rate has increased 27% for all persons, and 30% for all families.
Thus, the poor grew by 12 million in the past decade, totally obliterating the 4 million reduction in poor persons that occurred in the 1990s.,[object Object],[object Object]
Many, many Americans have such low incomes that they are on the brink of poverty at all times. In the four year period (2004-2007), just before the onset of The Great Recession, nearly one in three Americans fell into poverty for 2 or more months. The 2008-2011 figures will surely be even grimmer!,[object Object],[object Object]
These two innocent, vulnerable groups comprise 44% of poor people, approaching the 20 million mark.,[object Object]
These two innocent, vulnerable groups comprise 44% of poor people, approaching the 20 million mark.
Unfortunately, the United States does not do a very good job protecting our poor through social services and other governmental programs.,[object Object],[object Object]
After taxes and transfers, however, our poverty rate only declines to 17.1%. Of the 20 advanced countries, we are last in reduction.,[object Object]
After taxes and transfers, however, our poverty rate only declines to 17.1%. Of the 20 advanced countries, we are last in reduction.
For example, Sweden goes down to 5.3%, Germany to 11%, U.K. to 8.3%, and Japan to 14.9%. (Source: Org. for Economic Cooperation & Development - OECD),[object Object]
The Best and the Worst in 2009 on Poverty Rates ,[object Object],Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009,[object Object]
33,[object Object]
Poverty translates into Hunger,[object Object],[object Object],Source: USDA, Economic Research Report No. (ERR-108), Nov. 2010,[object Object]
Poverty translates into Hunger,[object Object],[object Object]
These households were stalked by hunger and at times did not have enough money to buy enough food at various times during the year.Source: USDA, Economic Research Report No. (ERR-108), Nov. 2010,[object Object]
Poverty translates into Hunger,[object Object],[object Object]
These households were stalked by hunger and at times did not have enough money to buy enough food at various times during the year.
Nearly 7 million households (with one million children) had such severe financial problems that they were forced to miss meals on a regular basis.Source: USDA, Economic Research Report No. (ERR-108), Nov. 2010,[object Object]
Poverty translates into Hunger (Cont.),[object Object],[object Object],Source: USDA, Economic Research Report No. (ERR-108), Nov. 2010,[object Object]
Poverty translates into Hunger (Cont.),[object Object],[object Object]
The number of households experiencing hunger has tripled in the 3 years between 2006 and 2009.Source: USDA, Economic Research Report No. (ERR-108), Nov. 2010,[object Object]
39,[object Object]
How is the American Middle Class Doing? In one word—”Badly”!,[object Object]
How is the American Middle Class Doing? In one word—”Badly”!,[object Object],Since peaking in 1999 (at $38,720), median earnings for male workers is 6% lower eleven years later ($36,331 in 2009).,[object Object]
How is the American Middle Class Doing? In one word—”Badly”!,[object Object],Since peaking in 1999 (at $38,720), median earnings for male workers is 6% lower eleven years later ($36,331 in 2009),[object Object],Female workers have done slightly better, going from $23,738 to $26,030 in the same period—a 9.7% increase.,[object Object]
How is the American Middle Class Doing? In one word—”Badly”!,[object Object],Since peaking in 1999 (at $38,720), median earnings for male workers is 6% lower eleven years later ($36,331 in 2009),[object Object],Female workers have done slightly better, going from $23,738 to $26,030 in the same period—a 9.7% increase,[object Object],Thus, in a two-earner, husband/wife family, earnings have been stagnant for 10 years.,[object Object]
How is the American Middle Class Doing? In one word—”Badly”!,[object Object],Even more threatening is anemic job growth. Only 7 million new jobs were created in 2002-2007 (before the crash)—compared to 20 million created in the same 5-year period in the 1990s.,[object Object]
How is the American Middle Class Doing? In one word—”Badly”!,[object Object],Even more threatening is anemic job growth. Only 7 million new jobs were created in 2002-2007 (before the crash)—compared to 20 million created in the same 5-year period in the 1990s.,[object Object],The Bottom Line: Fewer Americans are employed today than a decade ago, despite our population growing by 25 million.,[object Object]
46,[object Object]
How have the very rich been doing?,[object Object]
How have the very rich been doing?,[object Object],In 2007, just before the Great Recession hit us, the top 25 CEOs of investment houses “earned” $22 billion (about the GDP of Costa Rica). The top 5 managers each got over $1 billion. (Page and Jacobs),[object Object]
How have the very rich been doing?,[object Object],In 2007, just before the Great Recession hit us, the top 25 CEOs of investment houses “earned” $22 billion (about the GDP of Costa Rica). The top 5 managers each got over $1 billion! (Page and Jacobs),[object Object],In 2007, America’s top 1% of earners received 23% of the nation’s total income (almost triple the 8% share they got in 1980). (Robert Reich),[object Object]
How have the very rich been doing?,[object Object],In the 1960s, CEOs of major American companies earned 25 times the wages of their typical workers; by 1980 40 times; by 1990 100 times; by 2007 350 times. (Robert Reich). As of 2009, Michael Hiltzik (LA TIMES) reported a Harvard study putting this ratio at 411 to 1.,[object Object]
How have the very rich been doing?,[object Object],In the 1960s, CEOs of major American companies earned 25 times the wages of their typical workers; by 1980 40 times; by 1990 100 times; by 2007 350 times. (Robert Reich). As of 2009, Michael Hiltzik (LA TIMES) reported a Harvard study putting this ratio at 411 to 1.,[object Object],The combined wealth in 2005 of Sam Walton’s family at $90 billion (Walmart ), Bill Gates (Microsoft) at $46 billion, and Warren Buffet at $44 billion is much more than the $95 billion combined wealth of the bottom 40% in the U.S. In short, 3 families own as much as 120 million Americans. (Robert Reich) ,[object Object]
Average Pay of Top 500 Corporate CEOs, 1989 - 2009,[object Object],Source: Forbes.com. Pay is in constant 2008 dollars,[object Object],52,[object Object]
Most Americans are Woefully Ignorant about How Exorbitant CEO Corporate Pay Actually Is,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
In reality, the CEOs of the largest Standard and Poors 500 corporations make $14 million per year. (See Jacobs and Page, CLASS WAR). ,[object Object]
In reality, the CEOs of the largest Standard and Poors 500 corporations make $14 million per year. (See Jacobs and Page, CLASS WAR).
This is 700 times more than the average factory worker and 540 times the salary of the average sales clerk!,[object Object],[object Object]
This top 0.1% increased their share of all income from 2.7% in 1974 to 12.3% in 2007.,[object Object]
This top 0.1% increased their share of all income from 2.7% in 1974 to 12.3% in 2007.
When the capital gains of this richest 1-in-1000 is counted, this equals $1 trillion per year.,[object Object]
60,[object Object]
The 7 Highest Paid CEO Layoff Leaders,[object Object],Source: Institute for Policy Studies,[object Object],61,[object Object]
62,[object Object]
What About “Relative” Income Inequality?,[object Object],63,[object Object]
What About “Relative” Income Inequality?,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.,[object Object]
It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.
On average, then, Americans should be better off—but this is definitely not the case.,[object Object]
It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.
On average, then, Americans should be better off—but this is definitely not the case.
To get a better idea of who benefits vs. those who do not, researchers often divide income recipients into fifths (called Quintiles, or 20% segments).,[object Object]
It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.
On average, then, Americans should be better off—but this is definitely not the case.
To get a better idea of who benefits vs. those who do not, income recipients are often divided into fifths (Quintiles, or 20% segments).
If income were even, each pie slice would be the same size.,[object Object]
70,[object Object]
71,[object Object]
Some Dramatic Shifts,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Real income rose another $12,000 in the 27 years between 1981 and 2008. BUT—the richest 10% got almost all of this increase of income (96%), while the bottom 90% received only 4% of the growth. In short, the very great majority of Americans have simply been totally shut out of any increase in living standards.73,[object Object]
74,[object Object]
(Y-Axis),[object Object],(X-Axis),[object Object],75,[object Object]
76,[object Object]
Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality
Family Income Gini Score by Country: 2009,[object Object],Source: CIA- The World Factbook 2009,[object Object],78,[object Object]
Most Equal Country,[object Object],Most Unequal Country,[object Object],Gini,[object Object],Gini,[object Object],Source: CIA, The World Factbook 2009,[object Object],79,[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],80,[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object],High Teen Birthrates (nations and states),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object],High Teen Birthrates (nations and states),[object Object],High rates of illegal drug use (nations),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object],High Teen Birthrates (nations and states),[object Object],High rates of illegal drug use (nations),[object Object],High infant mortality rates (nations),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object],High Teen Birthrates (nations and states),[object Object],High rates of illegal drug use (nations),[object Object],High infant mortality rates (nations),[object Object],Lower life expectancy (nations),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object],High Teen Birthrates (nations and states),[object Object],High rates of illegal drug use (nations),[object Object],High infant mortality rates (nations),[object Object],Lower life expectancy (nations),[object Object],High rates of Mental Illness (nations),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object],High Teen Birthrates (nations and states),[object Object],High rates of illegal drug use (nations),[object Object],High infant mortality rates (nations),[object Object],Lower life expectancy (nations),[object Object],High rates of Mental Illness (nations),[object Object],Low rates of contraceptive usage (nations),[object Object]
Why worry about relative income inequality?Research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with:,[object Object],High homicide Rates (nations and U.S. states),[object Object],High rates of imprisonment (nations and U.S. States),[object Object],High Teen Birthrates (nations and states),[object Object],High rates of illegal drug use (nations),[object Object],High infant mortality rates (nations),[object Object],Lower life expectancy (nations),[object Object],High rates of Mental Illness (nations),[object Object],Low rates of contraceptive usage (nations),[object Object],Lower access to safe water (nations),[object Object]
For detailed charts and graphs exploring these findings, see: Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, THE SPIRIT LEVEL: WHY GREATER EQUALITY MAKES SOCIETIES STRONGER, 2009. ,[object Object],See especially their free, downloadable Power Point presentation at www.equalitytrust.org.uk,[object Object]
91,[object Object]
Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality
Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality
Source: General Social Survey (GSS) Data,[object Object],94,[object Object]
95,[object Object]
96,[object Object]
97,[object Object]
1 of 117

Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality

••
Download to read offline
EducationTechnologyEconomy & Finance

Growing income inequality in the United States, 2011

D
denny4573

Recommended

Gini coefficient and gdp by
Gini coefficient and gdp Gini coefficient and gdp
Gini coefficient and gdp Tashi Angmo
514 views•6 slides
Incomeinequality by
IncomeinequalityIncomeinequality
Incomeinequalitydevanelle
511 views•16 slides
Income inequality in South Africa report by
Income inequality in South Africa reportIncome inequality in South Africa report
Income inequality in South Africa reportJOSEPH TEBOHO MOKOENA
2.4K views•21 slides
劉遵義 Income inequality under economic globalisation(final) 20150414 by
劉遵義 Income inequality under economic globalisation(final) 20150414劉遵義 Income inequality under economic globalisation(final) 20150414
劉遵義 Income inequality under economic globalisation(final) 20150414Andy Kuo
2K views•86 slides
Income inequality by
Income inequalityIncome inequality
Income inequalitySudiksha Joshi
48.5K views•24 slides
Economic inequality by
Economic inequalityEconomic inequality
Economic inequalityTauhid Alam
1.5K views•15 slides

More Related Content

What's hot

Poverty and income inequalities in asia by
Poverty and income inequalities in asiaPoverty and income inequalities in asia
Poverty and income inequalities in asiawannaphong durongkaveroj
4.3K views•67 slides
Harvard style term paper poverty and inequality by
Harvard style term paper poverty and inequalityHarvard style term paper poverty and inequality
Harvard style term paper poverty and inequalityCustomEssayOrder
6.8K views•7 slides
Income inequality by
Income inequalityIncome inequality
Income inequalityalishaaan
13.6K views•37 slides
Poverty and measure of inequality by
Poverty and measure of inequalityPoverty and measure of inequality
Poverty and measure of inequalityShivani Baghel
6.4K views•12 slides
Truths About Poverty And Inequality In India by
Truths About Poverty And Inequality In IndiaTruths About Poverty And Inequality In India
Truths About Poverty And Inequality In IndiaSHASHIKANT KULKARNI
2.4K views•11 slides
Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development by
Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development
Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development Lilliene Alleje
6.3K views•56 slides

What's hot(20)

Poverty and income inequalities in asia by wannaphong durongkaveroj
Poverty and income inequalities in asiaPoverty and income inequalities in asia
Poverty and income inequalities in asia
wannaphong durongkaveroj•4.3K views
Harvard style term paper poverty and inequality by CustomEssayOrder
Harvard style term paper poverty and inequalityHarvard style term paper poverty and inequality
Harvard style term paper poverty and inequality
CustomEssayOrder•6.8K views
Income inequality by alishaaan
Income inequalityIncome inequality
Income inequality
alishaaan•13.6K views
Poverty and measure of inequality by Shivani Baghel
Poverty and measure of inequalityPoverty and measure of inequality
Poverty and measure of inequality
Shivani Baghel•6.4K views
Truths About Poverty And Inequality In India by SHASHIKANT KULKARNI
Truths About Poverty And Inequality In IndiaTruths About Poverty And Inequality In India
Truths About Poverty And Inequality In India
SHASHIKANT KULKARNI•2.4K views
Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development by Lilliene Alleje
Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development
Economics: Poverty, Inequality & Development
Lilliene Alleje•6.3K views
slide 1: General principles of income distribution by Jeanette Branzuela
slide 1: General principles of income distributionslide 1: General principles of income distribution
slide 1: General principles of income distribution
Jeanette Branzuela•5.9K views
Measuring poverty and inequality by Sakshi Singh
Measuring poverty and inequalityMeasuring poverty and inequality
Measuring poverty and inequality
Sakshi Singh•17.3K views
Poverty and inequality in a changing context by Lindsey Cottle
Poverty and inequality in a changing contextPoverty and inequality in a changing context
Poverty and inequality in a changing context
Lindsey Cottle•2K views
Economic growth and inequality. by Kübra Bayram
Economic growth and inequality.Economic growth and inequality.
Economic growth and inequality.
Kübra Bayram•789 views
Income distribution by Ainezaty Zaki
Income distributionIncome distribution
Income distribution
Ainezaty Zaki•3.7K views
Income Inequality presentation by Indukaka Ipcowala Institute of Management
Income Inequality presentationIncome Inequality presentation
Income Inequality presentation
Indukaka Ipcowala Institute of Management•15.7K views
Inequality, Economic Growth and Development by tutor2u
Inequality, Economic Growth and DevelopmentInequality, Economic Growth and Development
Inequality, Economic Growth and Development
tutor2u•27.6K views
Global Inequality by Aamir Shahzad Ahmad Shah
Global Inequality Global Inequality
Global Inequality
Aamir Shahzad Ahmad Shah•11.7K views
15 May 08 Global Poverty Presentation by guest57a090
15 May 08 Global Poverty Presentation15 May 08 Global Poverty Presentation
15 May 08 Global Poverty Presentation
guest57a090•1.5K views
Mensur Boydaş: Vahdi Boydaş: Inequality 2 by Mensur Boydaş
Mensur Boydaş: Vahdi Boydaş: Inequality 2Mensur Boydaş: Vahdi Boydaş: Inequality 2
Mensur Boydaş: Vahdi Boydaş: Inequality 2
Mensur Boydaş•1.6K views
Wealth inequality by Felisha Coutu
Wealth inequalityWealth inequality
Wealth inequality
Felisha Coutu•2.5K views
Reduced inequalities by Muhammad Adnan Ejaz
Reduced inequalitiesReduced inequalities
Reduced inequalities
Muhammad Adnan Ejaz•10.4K views
Income Distribution by ExternalEvents
Income DistributionIncome Distribution
Income Distribution
ExternalEvents•3.7K views
Poverty pdf by Irfan Sheikh
Poverty pdfPoverty pdf
Poverty pdf
Irfan Sheikh•544 views

Similar to Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality

Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality by
Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequalityNarrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality
Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequalitydenny4573
394 views•117 slides
Essay On Poverty In America by
Essay On Poverty In AmericaEssay On Poverty In America
Essay On Poverty In AmericaPaper Writing Service College
4 views•7 slides
PovertyInAmerica.ppt by
PovertyInAmerica.pptPovertyInAmerica.ppt
PovertyInAmerica.pptGurumurthy B R
2 views•16 slides
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docx by
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docxSince the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docx
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docxjennifer822
2 views•386 slides
Chapt07 lecture by
Chapt07 lectureChapt07 lecture
Chapt07 lecturelschmidt1170
1.3K views•54 slides
Research Paper by
Research PaperResearch Paper
Research PaperKathrynEHunter
270 views•7 slides

Similar to Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality(20)

Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality by denny4573
Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequalityNarrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality
Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality
denny4573•394 views
Essay On Poverty In America by Paper Writing Service College
Essay On Poverty In AmericaEssay On Poverty In America
Essay On Poverty In America
Paper Writing Service College •4 views
PovertyInAmerica.ppt by Gurumurthy B R
PovertyInAmerica.pptPovertyInAmerica.ppt
PovertyInAmerica.ppt
Gurumurthy B R•2 views
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docx by jennifer822
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docxSince the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docx
Since the 1960s, the United States Government has de.docx
jennifer822•2 views
Chapt07 lecture by lschmidt1170
Chapt07 lectureChapt07 lecture
Chapt07 lecture
lschmidt1170•1.3K views
Research Paper by KathrynEHunter
Research PaperResearch Paper
Research Paper
KathrynEHunter•270 views
Cause And Effect Of Poverty In The United States by Help Writing Papers Grand Forks
Cause And Effect Of Poverty In The United StatesCause And Effect Of Poverty In The United States
Cause And Effect Of Poverty In The United States
Help Writing Papers Grand Forks•5 views
Redistribution Of Wealth by Ashley Jones
Redistribution Of WealthRedistribution Of Wealth
Redistribution Of Wealth
Ashley Jones•3 views
Life on the Plantation: Thoughts on Income inequality by Sharp Metropolitan Medical Campus
Life on the Plantation: Thoughts on Income inequalityLife on the Plantation: Thoughts on Income inequality
Life on the Plantation: Thoughts on Income inequality
Sharp Metropolitan Medical Campus•922 views
Ch 7 ed by lschmidt1170
Ch 7 edCh 7 ed
Ch 7 ed
lschmidt1170•1.3K views
Sabi's Boomers report and research by Assaf Wand
Sabi's Boomers report and researchSabi's Boomers report and research
Sabi's Boomers report and research
Assaf Wand•424 views
Baby Boomers research report and trends by Assaf Wand
Baby Boomers research report and trendsBaby Boomers research report and trends
Baby Boomers research report and trends
Assaf Wand•2.3K views
The BOOMer Report 2015 By Sabi.com by jah2183
The BOOMer Report 2015 By Sabi.comThe BOOMer Report 2015 By Sabi.com
The BOOMer Report 2015 By Sabi.com
jah2183•2.4K views
E uam male-fin_hr by Havas PR
E uam male-fin_hrE uam male-fin_hr
E uam male-fin_hr
Havas PR•448 views
E uam male-fin_lr by Havas PR
E uam male-fin_lrE uam male-fin_lr
E uam male-fin_lr
Havas PR•783 views
Male in the USA by HavasPR
Male in the USAMale in the USA
Male in the USA
HavasPR•1.4K views
Income Inequality In America by Michele Johnson
Income Inequality In AmericaIncome Inequality In America
Income Inequality In America
Michele Johnson•4 views
Essay On Increasing Population by Paper Writer Service
Essay On Increasing PopulationEssay On Increasing Population
Essay On Increasing Population
Paper Writer Service •12 views
Population Class, Section 1 B by jcarlson1
Population Class, Section 1 BPopulation Class, Section 1 B
Population Class, Section 1 B
jcarlson1•2.1K views
The Problem Of Global Population Aging by Kara Liu
The Problem Of Global Population AgingThe Problem Of Global Population Aging
The Problem Of Global Population Aging
Kara Liu•4 views

Recently uploaded

Six Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptx by
Six Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptxSix Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptx
Six Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptxSahil Srivastava
44 views•11 slides
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau by
The Accursed House by Émile GaboriauThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau
The Accursed House by Émile GaboriauDivyaSheta
251 views•15 slides
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdf by
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdfSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdf
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdfDr Vijay Vishwakarma
130 views•68 slides
Nelson_RecordStore.pdf by
Nelson_RecordStore.pdfNelson_RecordStore.pdf
Nelson_RecordStore.pdfBrynNelson5
46 views•10 slides
Thanksgiving!.pdf by
Thanksgiving!.pdfThanksgiving!.pdf
Thanksgiving!.pdfEnglishCEIPdeSigeiro
500 views•17 slides
INT-244 Topic 6b Confucianism by
INT-244 Topic 6b ConfucianismINT-244 Topic 6b Confucianism
INT-244 Topic 6b ConfucianismS Meyer
45 views•77 slides

Recently uploaded(20)

Six Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptx by Sahil Srivastava
Six Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptxSix Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptx
Six Sigma Concept by Sahil Srivastava.pptx
Sahil Srivastava•44 views
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau by DivyaSheta
The Accursed House by Émile GaboriauThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau
DivyaSheta•251 views
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdf by Dr Vijay Vishwakarma
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdfSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdf
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODULE 1_UNIT1 _UNIT2.pdf
Dr Vijay Vishwakarma•130 views
Nelson_RecordStore.pdf by BrynNelson5
Nelson_RecordStore.pdfNelson_RecordStore.pdf
Nelson_RecordStore.pdf
BrynNelson5•46 views
Thanksgiving!.pdf by EnglishCEIPdeSigeiro
Thanksgiving!.pdfThanksgiving!.pdf
Thanksgiving!.pdf
EnglishCEIPdeSigeiro•500 views
INT-244 Topic 6b Confucianism by S Meyer
INT-244 Topic 6b ConfucianismINT-244 Topic 6b Confucianism
INT-244 Topic 6b Confucianism
S Meyer•45 views
Papal.pdf by MariaKenney3
Papal.pdfPapal.pdf
Papal.pdf
MariaKenney3•68 views
Creative Restart 2023: Atila Martins - Craft: A Necessity, Not a Choice by Taste
Creative Restart 2023: Atila Martins - Craft: A Necessity, Not a ChoiceCreative Restart 2023: Atila Martins - Craft: A Necessity, Not a Choice
Creative Restart 2023: Atila Martins - Craft: A Necessity, Not a Choice
Taste•45 views
MercerJesse2.1Doc.pdf by jessemercerail
MercerJesse2.1Doc.pdfMercerJesse2.1Doc.pdf
MercerJesse2.1Doc.pdf
jessemercerail•314 views
UNIDAD 3 6º C.MEDIO.pptx by MarcosRodriguezUcedo
UNIDAD 3 6º C.MEDIO.pptxUNIDAD 3 6º C.MEDIO.pptx
UNIDAD 3 6º C.MEDIO.pptx
MarcosRodriguezUcedo•146 views
MUET Newsletter Vol-IX, Issue-III, 2023 by Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro
MUET Newsletter Vol-IX, Issue-III, 2023MUET Newsletter Vol-IX, Issue-III, 2023
MUET Newsletter Vol-IX, Issue-III, 2023
Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro•139 views
NodeJS and ExpressJS.pdf by ArthyR3
NodeJS and ExpressJS.pdfNodeJS and ExpressJS.pdf
NodeJS and ExpressJS.pdf
ArthyR3•48 views
EILO EXCURSION PROGRAMME 2023 by info33492
EILO EXCURSION PROGRAMME 2023EILO EXCURSION PROGRAMME 2023
EILO EXCURSION PROGRAMME 2023
info33492•202 views
Retail Store Scavenger Hunt.pptx by jmurphy154
Retail Store Scavenger Hunt.pptxRetail Store Scavenger Hunt.pptx
Retail Store Scavenger Hunt.pptx
jmurphy154•52 views
Pharmaceutical Analysis PPT (BP 102T) by yakshpharmacy009
Pharmaceutical Analysis PPT (BP 102T) Pharmaceutical Analysis PPT (BP 102T)
Pharmaceutical Analysis PPT (BP 102T)
yakshpharmacy009•108 views
Gross Anatomy of the Liver by obaje godwin sunday
Gross Anatomy of the LiverGross Anatomy of the Liver
Gross Anatomy of the Liver
obaje godwin sunday•77 views
Mineral nutrition and Fertilizer use of Cashew by Aruna Srikantha Jayawardana
Mineral nutrition and Fertilizer use of Cashew Mineral nutrition and Fertilizer use of Cashew
Mineral nutrition and Fertilizer use of Cashew
Aruna Srikantha Jayawardana•56 views
Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November) by Esquimalt MFRC
Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November)Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November)
Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November)
Esquimalt MFRC•107 views
The Future of Micro-credentials: Is Small Really Beautiful? by Mark Brown
The Future of Micro-credentials: Is Small Really Beautiful?The Future of Micro-credentials: Is Small Really Beautiful?
The Future of Micro-credentials: Is Small Really Beautiful?
Mark Brown•75 views
unidad 3.pdf by MarcosRodriguezUcedo
unidad 3.pdfunidad 3.pdf
unidad 3.pdf
MarcosRodriguezUcedo•134 views

Narrated public lecture of growing u.s. income inequality

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5. The middle class is shrinking
  • 6.
  • 7. The middle class is shrinking
  • 8. Poverty has been increasing
  • 9.
  • 10. The middle class is shrinking
  • 11. Poverty has been increasing
  • 12. U.S. Multinational Corporations cause more inequality both in the U.S. and in the World
  • 13.
  • 14. The middle class is shrinking
  • 15. Poverty has been increasing
  • 16. U.S. Multinational Corporations cause more inequality both in the U.S. and in the World
  • 17. Huge inequalities exist between U.S. locales
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 27. Have their numbers increased over time?
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34. Within the past decade, the poverty rate has increased 27% for all persons, and 30% for all families.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38. These two innocent, vulnerable groups comprise 44% of poor people, approaching the 20 million mark.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41. After taxes and transfers, however, our poverty rate only declines to 17.1%. Of the 20 advanced countries, we are last in reduction.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49. These households were stalked by hunger and at times did not have enough money to buy enough food at various times during the year.
  • 50.
  • 51.
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58.
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61.
  • 62.
  • 63.
  • 64.
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68.
  • 69.
  • 70. In reality, the CEOs of the largest Standard and Poors 500 corporations make $14 million per year. (See Jacobs and Page, CLASS WAR).
  • 71.
  • 72.
  • 73. This top 0.1% increased their share of all income from 2.7% in 1974 to 12.3% in 2007.
  • 74.
  • 75.
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 78.
  • 79.
  • 80.
  • 81. It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.
  • 82.
  • 83. It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.
  • 84. On average, then, Americans should be better off—but this is definitely not the case.
  • 85.
  • 86. It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.
  • 87. On average, then, Americans should be better off—but this is definitely not the case.
  • 88. To get a better idea of who benefits vs. those who do not, income recipients are often divided into fifths (Quintiles, or 20% segments).
  • 89.
  • 90.
  • 91.
  • 92.
  • 93.
  • 94.
  • 95.
  • 96.
  • 98.
  • 99.
  • 100.
  • 101.
  • 102.
  • 103.
  • 104.
  • 105.
  • 106.
  • 107.
  • 108.
  • 109.
  • 110.
  • 111.
  • 114.
  • 115.
  • 116.
  • 117.
  • 119.
  • 120.
  • 121.
  • 122. Since 1995, the richest 400 households have had their taxes cut 45%, or $46 million per household per year.
  • 123. Even for those earning $1 million per year, their tax cut equals $128,000 annually.
  • 124. For those with middle class incomes, our yearly tax cut savings comes to $300.
  • 125.
  • 126.
  • 127.
  • 128. Cut defense spending/stop fighting needless wars (Stiglitz estimates the Iraq War has cost $3 trillion)
  • 129.
  • 130. Cut defense spending/stop fighting needless wars (Stiglitz estimates the Iraq War has cost $3 trillion)
  • 131. Invest in R & D (cutting-edge Green Technology)
  • 132.
  • 133. Cut defense spending/stop fighting needless wars (Stiglitz estimates the Iraq War has cost $3 trillion)
  • 134. Invest in R & D (cutting-edge Green Technology)
  • 135. Re-industrialize our country, especially hi-tech areas!
  • 136.
  • 137. Cut defense spending/stop fighting needless wars (Stiglitz estimates the Iraq War has cost $3 trillion)
  • 138. Invest in R & D (cutting-edge Green Technology)
  • 139. Re-industrialize our country, especially hi-tech areas!
  • 140. Continue to fully fund our public university system—the envy of the world and the font of our national productivity.
  • 141.
  • 142. Cut defense spending/stop fighting needless wars (Stiglitz estimates the Iraq War has cost $3 trillion)
  • 143. Invest in R & D (cutting-edge Green Technology)
  • 144. Re-industrialize our country, especially hi-tech areas!
  • 145. Continue to fully fund our public university system—the envy of the world and the font of our national productivity.
  • 146. Reduce our national debt.
  • 147.
  • 148.
  • 149.
  • 150. Consume less, and when you do—buy carefully, e.g., coops. (Sounds Un-American—right?) Read Annie Leonard, THE STORY OF STUFF.
  • 151.
  • 152. Consume less, and when you do—buy carefully, e.g., coops. (Sounds Un-American—right?) Read Annie Leonard, THE STORY OF STUFF.
  • 153. Read widely (NEVER STOP LEARNING), use unbiased news sources/avoid hate-mongering broadcast media pundits, e.g., beware of the FOX in the hen-house.
  • 154.
  • 155.
  • 156. Avoid simplistic, extremist politicians hawking know-nothing solutions (cutting taxes will not solve all of our problems, but only reward the rich).
  • 157.
  • 158. Avoid simplistic, extremist politicians hawking know-nothing solutions (cutting taxes will not solve all of our problems, but only reward the rich).
  • 159. Network, Network, Network—especially through the internet. Power accrues to individuals when they act as groups!
  • 160.

Editor's Notes

  1. This Power Point presentation is a lecture delivered at San Diego State University on April 18th, 2011 to participants in the Osher Program. I am its author, Denny Braun, Professor Emeritus of Sociology, Minnesota State University (Mankato). I began my professional career as a demographer/statistician at the U.S. Census Bureau in Washington, DC. After joining the faculty at MSU in 1968 I remained teaching and doing research at this university until my retirement 33 years later.
  2. Right from the start of my career, I had an interest concerning Income Inequality. Inequality had become virulent by the early 1980s, when I began research for a book on this problem. My 1st Ed. Of THE RICH GET RICHER came out in 1991, and the 2nd Ed. was published in 1997.
  3. Absolute income inequality (in actual dollars) is increasing (the rich are “getting richer”!).
  4. The middle class is shrinking.
  5. Poverty has been increasing
  6. U.S. Multinational Corporations have caused much of this growing income inequality--both in the United States and in the World. Unfortunately, I cannot address this topic today because of time restraints, but it is thoroughly discussed in my book.
  7. Huge disparities exist between U.S. locales on income inequality
  8. The growth of relative income inequality is not only continuous but has become explosive
  9. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita is the value of all final goods and services produced within a nation in a given year divided by its mid-year population, converted at market exchange rates to U.S. dollars. PPP means “Purchasing Power Parity” which adjusts for differences of inflation, cost-of-living, taxes, etc. These and other concepts are more fully explained in the accompanying Word document entitled “Suggested Further Sources on Growing Income Inequality”. To begin with, The U.S. is NOT the richest country in the world, ranking 9th behind such European countries as Luxembourg (#1), Norway (#2), Switzerland,Denmark, etc. Two anomalies, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, are oil rich sheikdoms illustrating the great wealth characteristic of oil exporting nations. The PPP column in the far right of this table illustrates that the U.S., with its comparatively “light” tax burden among nations, improves its world position to 6th richest. But even here, note that we are still 69% below second place Luxembourg
  10. When median household income is compared among U.S. states, one can easily see the richest states (dark green) are on the Eastern seaboard and in New England, together with Alaska and Hawaii. A second tier of well-off states (medium green) form the Upper Midwest and a few western states extending to the Pacific coast. Poor states (light yellow) are mostly in the South. Median household income for the entire U.S. was $50,303 in 2008.
  11. Specifically, here are the top and bottom 6 states by median household income. While Maryland is a “Southern” state, it contains wealthy suburbs next to Washington, DC.
  12. By looking at household income in our 3140 U.S. counties, these regional patterns still prevail. Note that even wealthy states have some counties that are not affluent. One can also see richer, metropolitan counties that have household income well above average: Dallas, Houston, Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Chicago, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles/Orange County, and San Diego.
  13. When median household income is adjusted for inflation, it is called “REAL MEDIAN INCOME”. This allows us to compare trends over a period of 42 years translated to today’s dollars (2009 in our table). It is easy to see a flattening of income from the year 2000 to the present for all racial groups. This occurred well before the Great Recession which began in January of 2008. In constant 2009 dollars, median House Hold income peaked in 1999 at $52,301 for all households and has DECLINED ever since—reaching a low of $49,777 in 2009 (-5% over all)!
  14. This bar chart indicates that the loss of income was not shared equally. Looking at the red bars on the left, which describe the past decade, one can see African American households lost 11% of their income, compared to minus 8% of Latinos and -5% for whites. The major point here, however, is that all groups have been losing income within the past decade. Looking at the pink bars on the right, which describe the 1991-2000 decade, it is obvious that all racial groups made huge gains in real income prior to the start of this century. 
  15. Who are the poor? What are their characteristics?Where do they live? Have their numbers increased over time? How about the rate of poverty? Is that unchanged?
  16. We can see that poverty contains a strong racial component: Blacks and Hispanics are two and one-half times as likely to be poor than whites (comprising one fourth of their entire populations). ). It is important to remember, however, that Non-Hispanic Whites are the largest component of poor people at 43% in 2010.
  17. The good news is that since the mid-1960s, when Social Security payments were indexed to inflation, the elderly are less likely to be poor. The bad news is that one of every five American children lives under poverty.
  18. Many of those poor children live in female headed families, where nearly one-third of families of this type are under poverty. Intact, married couple families are quite low on poverty (about 1 in 16).
  19. This chart recounts the number and percent of those living under poverty over the past 40 years. On the right side of the graph, one can see a rise in the rate of poverty since the year 2000 AND a very steep increase in the number of poor persons since that date as well.
  20. To begin with, how “poor” is poor? It depends on your family size and your age. In 2009, if you were a single mom with 2 kids under 18, you were “poor” if your annual income was $17,285 or less. For a single person over 65 years old, the cut off was $ 10,289.
  21. Within the past decade, the poverty rate has increased 27% for all persons, and 30% for all families.
  22. Thus, the poor grew by 12 million in the past decade, totally obliterating the 4 million reduction in poor persons that occurred in the 1990s.
  23. The number of Americans who are poor today, over 43 million, is at an all time high and surpasses the population of most nations. One of every 7 persons in our country is poor!
  24. Many, many Americans have such low incomes that they are on the brink of poverty at all times. In the four year period (2004-2007), just before the onset of The Great Recession, nearly one in three Americans fell into poverty for 2 or more months. The 2008-2011 figures will surely be even grimmer!
  25. Lastly, one of 11 elderly (65 and over) and 1 of every 5 children are living under poverty today.
  26. These two innocent, vulnerable groups comprise 44% of poor people, approaching the 20 million mark.
  27. Unfortunately, the United States does not do a very good job protecting our poor through social services and other governmental programs.
  28. The U.S. has an initial poverty rate lower than many of our industrial peers (26.3%, compared to Sweden’s 26.7%, Germany’s 33.6%, U.K.’s 26.3%, Japan’s 26.9%).
  29. After taxes and transfers, however, our poverty rate only declines to 17.1%. Of the 20 advanced countries, we are last in reduction.
  30. For example, Sweden goes down to 5.3%, Germany to 11%, U.K. to 8.3%, and Japan to 14.9%.
  31. Comparing poverty rates among U.S. states, it is easy to see that the South leads the nation in the percentage of poor persons (dark blue states). Poverty is least likely to exist along the northeastern coast (including New England) and in Alaska and Hawaii (white states).
  32. Among the 6 best and 6 worst states on poverty rates, Wyoming is the only state that stands out for its lack of poverty—and I am not sure why.
  33. Looking at poverty among all 3,140 counties, the poorest in 2010 are in dark purple. Counties with the lowest poverty are white. Both poor whites and blacks drive up poverty in the South, especially in rural counties. Lastly, even “rich” states have pockets of poverty!
  34. About 15% of U.S. Households experienced “food insecurity” in 2009—which translates to over 17 million American families
  35. These households were stalked by hunger and at times did not have enough money to buy enough food at various times during the year. . In California, 1 in 5 persons during 2010 did not have enough money at times to buy food that they needed! (http://www.frac.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/FoodHardship_State2010.pdf)
  36. Nearly 7 million households (with one million children) had such severe financial problems that they were forced to miss meals on a regular basis.
  37. Today, the number of households with hunger is at an all-time high since data began to be gathered in 1995.
  38. The number of households experiencing hunger has tripled in the 3 years between 2006 and 2009.
  39. So, what is the message we may hear from Wall Street Tycoons and the very rich? Now that the stock market is making a rebound, and economists have declared the Great Recession officially over, working Americans should “Get over it!”
  40. What about the “average” American? How is the proverbial American middle class doing? In a word—“badly”!
  41. As a reminder, in all income comparisons from year-to-year and decade-to-decade, the effect of inflation has been factored out (called “constant dollars” or “real dollars”). Since peaking in 1999 (at $38,720), median earnings for male workers had sank 6% lower eleven years later ($36,331 in 2009).
  42. Female workers have done slightly better, going from $23,738 to $26,030 in the same period—a 9.7% increase
  43. Thus, in a two-earner, husband/wife family, this means that earnings have been stagnant for 10 years.
  44. Even more threatening is anemic job growth. Only 7 million new jobs were created in 2002-2007 (before the crash)—compared to 20 million created in the same 5-year period in the 1990s.
  45. The Bottom Line: Fewer Americans are employed today than a decade ago, despite our population growing by 25 million.
  46. With an unemployment rate that recently peaked at 10%, the collapse of the housing market, upside down mortgages where millions now owe more than their homes are worth, and a foreclosure epidemic—we have witnessed a new wave of homelessness hitting the middle class.
  47. Now that we’ve briefly looked at the poor and middle class in America, we can ask how the very rich have been doing?
  48. In 2007, just before the Great Recession hit us, the top 25 CEOs of investment houses “earned” $22 billion (about the GDP of Costa Rica). The top 5 managers each got over $1 billion in that year! (Page and Jacobs)
  49. In 2007, America’s top 1% of earners received 23% of the nation’s total income (almost triple the 8% share they got in 1980). (Robert Reich).
  50. In the 1960s, CEOs of major American companies earned 25 times the wages of their typical workers; by 1980 40 times; by 1990 100 times; by 2007 350 times. (Robert Reich). As of 2009, Michael Hiltzik (LA TIMES) reported a Harvard study putting this ratio at 411 to 1.
  51. Now that we’ve briefly looked at the poor and middle class in America, we can ask how the very rich have been doing?
  52. This bar chart documents the pay (in constant 2009 dollars) of the CEOs in charge of our largest 500 corporations. Ignore the colors (separate salary sources) and focus on the height of the bars. Even with a recession dip, they are making 5 times their 1990 salaries.
  53. Most Americans are woefully Ignorant about how exorbitant CEO corporate pay actually is. When asked how much they believe typical corporate CEOs “earn” in a year, Americans estimate their pay at $500,000 (20 times that of unskilled workers or sales clerks
  54. In reality, the CEOs of the largest Standard and Poors 500 corporations make $14 million per year. (See Jacobs and Page, CLASS WAR).
  55. This is 700 times more than the average factory worker and 540 times the salary of the average sales clerk! . This nearly tripled CEO pay (in “real” or “constant” dollars) compared to 1989!
  56. Hacker and Pierson (in their book WINNER TAKE ALL POLITICS) assert that these CEOs form the bulk of the top 0.1% of income recipients in the United States.
  57. This top 0.1% (1 in every 1,000) increased their share of all income in the U.S. from 2.7% in 1974 to 12.3% in 2007. This percentage is the highest ever since the creation of the income tax in 1913.
  58. When the capital gains of this richest 1-in-1000 is counted, this equals $1 trillion per year.
  59. Looking at the data over the past 60 years, it is obvious that the stupendous growth of income for the top 1% took off in 1980 (red line), after the election of RonaldReagan and the introduction of “trickle down” economics, tax cuts for the very rich, and de-regulation of businesses, banks, and Wall Street firms. Again, while increases for persons in the 95th to 99th percentile were gradual (gray line), they were not that substantial in comparison to the top 1%.
  60. This cartoon portrays the relentless march of CEO pay into the stratosphere. Nearly all studies indicate that CEO pay in the U.S. is quite unrelated to how well their companies perform—there is a severe disconnect—CEOs are paid exorbitant salaries even when their companies do poorly. See especially graefcrystal.com. The cartoon also illustrates how ineffective efforts have been by various groups to reign in these excessive salaries.
  61. Most of these corporations that lavish pay on their CEOs are household names. Take note of Mark Hurd, at California firm Hewlett Packard. He resigned in August over a personal relationship with a marketing contractor, but was awarded $53 million in severance pay by the HP Board of Directors just to get him out the door. Shareholders are now suing in the San Jose Federal Court in an attempt to get the money back.
  62. While CEO pay remained in the tens of millions, many Americans have experienced a nosedive in their retirement portfolios, mortgages that have turned upside down so that they owe much more than their home is worth , outright foreclosures or short sales, and an unemployment rate near 10%--the highest rate in nearly a third of a century.
  63. For the remainder of my talk we will shift gears. Rather than speaking of absolute dollar differences, we will now look at how income is “shared” in the United States. We will examine “relative” income inequality, in the sense that we can say the poor have only a third of the income of the middle class—and so on. Why this is very important will be discussed as we go along.
  64. It was John Kennedy who termed the phrase—”A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats”—meaning the poor also benefit from economic growth.
  65. It is true that our Real GDP doubled between 1983-2007 while our population increased only by one-third, i.e., per capita real GDP actually did grow over this past quarter century.
  66. On average, then, Americans should be better off—but this is definitely not the case.
  67. To get a better idea of who benefits vs. those who do not, researchers often divide income recipients into fifths (called Quintiles, or 20% segments).
  68. If income were even, each pie slice would be the same size. There would be 5 equal slices.
  69. This is far from the case! For the last year of available data, in 2009, we can see that the top 5th gets half the pie! In fact, the richest 5% of American households received nearly one-fourth of ALL U.S. income. The bottom 3 slices—60% of all Americans—can be described as “not getting their fair share”. The poorest 5th only received less than 4% of all income!
  70. Since 1947, at the end of WW II, every segment of American society benefitted from economic growth until 1973. (top 3rd of graph). The bottom third of this histogram shows that such sharing of income among all segments of our society ended by the year 2000. The middle segment of bar charts shows a sharp developing of income inequality starting in 1973 up to the year 2000. While all segments are still gaining income, note that the top 5th has increased its income at six times the rate as the poorest 5th. Since the richest 20% of families have much more income than the poorest 20%, this means the absolute dollar increase would be very high for the wealthiest families. Lastly, the bottom level of bar charts traces what has happened since the start of this century. The great majority of American families (the bottom 60%) are now losing money, while there is only slight growth in the richest two quintiles. To reiterate: about two-thirds of American families have seen their incomes slide down over the past decade. Moreover, since the impact of the Great Recession is not accounted for in this data, this loss will be even more severe in the future when data become available. (Source: Economic Policy Institute using Census data)
  71. This bar chart captures what has happened in the past few years. The Great Recession has made everyone less well-off, but there has been much less income decline at the top than at the bottom. And, as a reminder, the top 1% has likely become ever richer despite the Great Recession.
  72. Between 1945 and 1980, incomes increased on average by $19,000. While the richest 10% of our population captured over 1/3 of this growth in real dollars, the bottom 90% still received the other 2/3rds of the income increase.
  73. It is not mere coincidence that starting in 1981--with the birth of Reaganomics--trickle-down economic theories, de-regulation of Wall Street and the banking industry, huge tax cuts for the very rich, etc.–began and still continues to this day.
  74. How much are these differences between groups in real dollars? In 2009, the mean income of top 5% of households was over $295,000. For the bottom 5th, mean income stood at $11,552. This graph shows that this disparity has been growing relentlessly over the past 40 years. 
  75. The degree of relative income inequality can be graphed in what is called a “Lorenz Curve”. The green line in this graph indicates perfect equality, where everyone receives exactly the same income. The red line indicates reality, because no society is perfectly equal. We can see that 40% of all the income (the Y or vertical axis) goes to the bottom 60% of all households (the X or horizontal axis). Exploring further, we can see that 60% of all income goes to the bottom 80% of households. The Gini ratio is the area between the red and green lines divided by the area in the the triangle—between the green and blue lines. If all households had exactly the same income, Gini would equal zero (0). If one household had all the income, and the rest of the households had no income, Gini would equal 1.0. Obviously, for all societies reality lies in between.
  76. Some less technical reports now multiply the Gini score by 100%, implying that the U.S. household income Gini score of .468 in 2009 is what we might call 47% unequal. However you interpret it, the march toward inequality has been relentless! The household Gini score in 1968 was .386, compared to .468 in 2009—a 21% increase in relative inequality occurring over 41 years!
  77. A quick glance of this U.S. map shows the most highly unequal states (in red) are in the South and in the Northeast (NY, Conn., Mass.). Calif. Is the lone western state among the most unequal. Green states are especially equal, comprising the Midwest and New England.
  78. How to do we compare to the rest of the world in terms of our relative income inequality measure, the Gini Ratio? This map courtesy of the CIA World Fact book begins to indicate how UNEQUAL the U.S. is when compared to other nations. While green and blue countries are more equal, purple and red nations are quite unequal.
  79. The U.S. has a family income Gini score (not house hold Gini) of .450, which makes us the 42ndmost UNEQUAL of 134 countries ranked by the CIA. This means our percentile rank of 31% on the World Equality Index puts us in the bottom third of all nations when it comes to economic equality among all families throughout the world! One can easily see that the most equal countries are European. Sweden, at the top of the list with a Gini of .23, has a score that would literally have to double to become as unequal as the United States in its pattern of family income dispersion.
  80. It can be asked Why we should worry about relative income inequality anyway? In terms of wealth, our country is still quite rich. Even if our bottom two quintiles (40%) of households are much less well off than the top quintile, are not they still better off in real dollars than in less developed countries? There is room for grave concern, because research shows that high relative income inequality is associated with a number of negative trends.
  81. High homicide Rates (among nations and among U.S. states)
  82. High rates of imprisonment (among nations and among U.S. States)
  83. High Teen Birthrates (among nations and among states)  
  84. High rates of illegal drug use (nations)
  85. High infant mortality rates (nations
  86. Lower life expectancy (nations)
  87. High rates of Mental Illness (nations
  88. Low rates of contraceptive usage (nations)
  89. Lower access to safe water (nations)
  90. For detailed charts and graphs exploring these findings, see: Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, THE SPIRIT LEVEL: WHY GREATER EQUALITY MAKES SOCIETIES STRONGER, 2009. See especially their free, downloadable Power Point presentation at www.equalitytrust.org.uk
  91. For comparison between nations, Wilkinson & Pickett use the ratio of income received by the top 20% of households divided by the bottom 20%. In comparing U.S. States, they use household Gini ratios. Both are comparable inequality measures. You can easily see in this scatter plot that U.S. states with high income inequality also have much higher high school dropout rates. You will note that California, our home state, is high on both measures. The area I am from, comprising the upper-Midwest states of Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin (together with Alaska, Utah, and New Hampshire), are very low on both measurements.
  92. Nations with greater income inequality tend to have high school students with much lower math and reading test scores. Note that the U.S. is at the far right in the graph, reflecting high inequality and low educational scores.
  93. Murder rates are higher in more unequal U.S. States. 
  94. Basic trust in our fellow human beings has been diminishing over time in the U.S. as relative income inequality has risen. Distrust of others was at an all-time high in 2006, the last year that data was available for this measure. This is quite serious, since it equates with a breakdown of community—the sense that we all have a shared destiny and that we’re all “in this together”.
  95. High relative income inequality among U.S. states is associated with low levels of voter turnout. The latest data (2009) from the Center for Responsive Politics reports that nearly half (261 of the 535 members) of Congress are millionaires, while their yearly median income is $911,000. For Senators, median income is even higher at $2.38 million per year. My question would be: how can these elected officials really relate to the average American household, which now has less than $50,000 in yearly household income? It may be that many poor and average income Americans have become so dispirited with uncaring, nonresponsive politicians that they no longer bother to vote.
  96. This cartoon illustrates the reality that political power is increasingly being wrested away from us by corporations, banks, and the very rich. For a cogent, detailed, well-researched book on the damaging effect of corporations financing politicians and political campaigns, see: Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson, WINNER-TAKE-ALL POLITICS: HOW WASHINGTON MADE THE RICH RICHER—AND TURNED ITS BACK ON THE MIDDLE CLASS. 2010(on handout).
  97. Our propensity to become fat, and therefore less healthy, is also related to high relative income inequality. States with high levels of obesity also tend to have high relative income inequality.
  98. Lastly, unemployment tends to rise in U.S. states that are also high on relative income inequality.
  99. It must be noted that American are aware of these incredible levels of income inequality in our country. A majority of all Americans (black bars) want to see income inequality reduced. This is true even among those who are Republican (gray bars) and those with high incomes (white bars).
  100. Crankshaft has a compassionate view of income inequality despite his being a curmudgeon! Here he is out having lunch with his buddies, explaining that it will not matter if the economy improves unless everyone becomes better off.
  101. Finally, be sure to read Robert Reich, a former Secretary of Labor and renowned economist, who has DETAILED suggestions in his must-read book, AFTERSHOCK. His data show no trickle-down or economic boost given to Americans by these cuts. Rather, investment by the very rich typically goes to building new factories in China—further depriving our country of needed jobs.
  102. Cut defense spending/stop fighting needless wars (Stiglitz estimates the Iraq War has cost $3 trillion)
  103. Invest in R & D (cutting-edge Green Technology)
  104. Re-industrialize our country, especially hi-tech areas!
  105. Continue to fully fund our public university system—the envy of the world and the font of our national productivity.
  106. Reduce our national debt.
  107. Reinstate more progressive tax rates to protect the middle class (see Robert Reich, AFTERSHOCK, NY: Knopf, 2010).
  108. What is to be Done?Personal Actions You Can Take
  109. “Thing Globally—Act Locally”. Join local action groups that address social ills (hunger, homelessness, political advocacy, etc.)
  110. Consume less, and when you do—buy carefully, e.g., coops. (Sounds Un-American—right?) Read Annie Leonard, THE STORY OF STUFF.
  111. Read widely (NEVER STOP LEARNING), use unbiased news sources/avoid hate-mongering broadcast media pundits, e.g., beware of the FOX in the hen-house.
  112. Use “social cause” VISA cards like WORKING ASSETS.
  113. Invest your retirement, IRAs, 401K money in Social Responsible Investment (SRI) funding companies that “Do No Evil”, e.g., Calvert Fund.
  114. Avoid simplistic, extremist politicians hawking no-nothing solutions (cutting taxes will not solve all of our problems, but only reward the rich).
  115. Network, Network, Network—especially through the internet. Power accrues to individuals when they act as groups!
  116. Fatal acceptance leads to defeat. Never lose hope! To preserve equality and democracy, we must not fail to act.
  117. Thank you so much!