Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Bibliographic Control and Oclc


Published on

A presentation covering the concept of bibliographic control as well as OCLC

Published in: Technology, Education

Bibliographic Control and Oclc

  1. 1. Bibliographic control, library automation, and OCLC IST 603 October 25, 2006 Denise A. Garofalo
  2. 2. Bibliographic control and library automation <ul><li>Using a controlled vocabulary and following established rules for providing access to materials using technology was a natural progression </li></ul><ul><li>The standardized MARC record and the move towards using bibliographic utilities for processing helped the success of technology in libraries </li></ul>
  3. 3. Processing <ul><li>Automation and computerization have changed traditional methods of cataloging processing materials </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Most libraries have centralized technical services or are a part of a cooperative network </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Libraries purchase processing from vendors and suppliers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Processing is centralized, cooperative, and/or commercial (and generally automated) </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Bibliographic data sources <ul><li>The Library of Congress has supplied bibliographic data to the majority of American libraries during this century </li></ul><ul><li>Automation has seen the development of large databases by vendors, networks and libraries (based on LC’s records) </li></ul>
  5. 5. Cataloging operations <ul><li>Libraries do two types of cataloging </li></ul><ul><ul><li>copy cataloging </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>original cataloging </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cataloging and processing are tied together </li></ul><ul><ul><li>both can be purchased from vendors </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>both are no longer isolated procedures </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Centralized processing <ul><li>Centralized processing is any consolidated effort to bring under one control the operations necessary to prepare library materials for access and use at different service locations </li></ul>
  7. 7. Centralized processing <ul><li>A central office is responsible for the acquisition and processing of materials for all branches/members </li></ul><ul><li>Revisions are sent back to the central office for processing </li></ul>
  8. 8. Processing centers <ul><li>Different types include those responsible for task groups such as: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>acquisitions and complete technical processing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ordering, cataloging, classifying but not physical processing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>cataloging and classifying only </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Online db maintenance </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Why a processing center? <ul><li>Centralization and simplification of routines </li></ul><ul><li>Higher quality of cataloging </li></ul><ul><li>Creation of a union catalog </li></ul><ul><li>Opportunity to use more sophisticated tools (bib sources, equipment) </li></ul><ul><li>Greater level of efficiency (lower cost due to higher volume, staff specialization) </li></ul>
  10. 10. Processing center problems <ul><li>Compromises </li></ul><ul><ul><li>traditional local practices may be eliminated for the “good of the whole” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>sacrifice local control and flexibility </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cost analysis is needed to determine if cost savings is being achieved </li></ul>
  11. 11. Cooperative systems <ul><li>Cooperative systems involve independent libraries </li></ul><ul><li>Each library continues to perform some technical services tasks </li></ul><ul><li>Cooperation can involve sharing access to a bibliographic utility, discounts on bulk purchases and processing, some exchange of data, etc. </li></ul>
  12. 12. Union catalogs <ul><li>Generally developed to support resource sharing (ILL) in a specific geographic area </li></ul><ul><li>Union catalogs may be specialized (newspapers, serials) </li></ul><ul><li>Online union catalogs include those of the bibliographic utilities, regional and state networks, and those of individual libraries and their branches </li></ul>
  13. 13. Purchased commercial processing <ul><li>LC sold printed catalog cards in 1901 </li></ul><ul><li>Commercial cataloging is usually described as centralized cataloging which is performed and sold by a non-library for-profit agency </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Baker and Taylor, Brodart (jobbers) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Library Corp (Bibliophile) </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. Library automation <ul><li>With MARC records easily available and library automation more accessible to all types of libraries, the arduous process of converting records and becoming automated is much less a hardship today than it was 10, 20 or 30 years ago </li></ul>
  15. 15. Questions?
  16. 16. Break time
  17. 17. LC’s bibliographic services <ul><li>Cataloging records </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The Card Division sold printed catalog cards for materials, foreign and domestic, for which LC had performed cataloging </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Card Division became the CDS ( C ataloging D istribution S ervice) in 1975 to reflect change in product from mostly printed cards to mostly MARC records </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. LC’s bibliographic services <ul><li>Print services </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Printed cards </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CIP ( C ataloging- i n- P ublication) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Publishing book catalogs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>NUC ( N ational U nion C atalog) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>bibliographies </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>LC Classification Schedules </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>LCSH </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>New Serial Titles, etc. </li></ul></ul></ul>
  19. 19. LC’s bibliographic services <ul><li>Non-print formats </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Many of LC’s bibliographic tools are no longer available in print format </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The NUC is only on microfiche (1983) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Name authority records and subject authority records are now available for free online </li></ul></ul>
  20. 20. LC’s bibliographic services <ul><li>Print order process </li></ul><ul><ul><li>CDS has The Complete Catalog, which provides information on establishing an account, pricing and completing an order form </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ordering is best accomplished through the use of the LCCN ( L ibrary of C ongress c ard n umber) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The LCCN is found in CBI ( C umulative B ook I ndex), WR ( W eekly R ecord), the BPR (American B ook P ublishing R ecord), LJ ( L ibrary J ournal), and in CIP </li></ul></ul>
  21. 21. LC’s bibliographic services <ul><li>CDS Alert Service </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Issues subject selections of bib records produced at LC </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sent weekly </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Subscribers complete profile and receive full LC cataloging for those subject areas selected </li></ul></ul>
  22. 22. LC’s bibliographic services <ul><li>CIP </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Started in 1971 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Based on preliminary data provided by publishers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CIP is replaced by a full record when made available (i.e. when fully cataloged by LC) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li> </li></ul></ul>
  23. 23. LC’s bibliographic services <ul><li>MARC </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The MARC Distribution Service began in 1964 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Started with English-language monographs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Formats for other materials developed over time </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Format integration (one format for all) was implemented in 1993 </li></ul></ul>
  24. 24. Other bibliographic services <ul><li>The CONSER ( Con version of Ser ials) database </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Sponsored by the Council on Library Resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Used OCLC’s online facilities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Distributed through LC’s MARC Distribution Service--Serials </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Began in 1976 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>After two-year pilot became a part of OCLC </li></ul></ul>
  25. 25. Other bibliographic services <ul><li>REMARC </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A retrospective conversion project to add MARC records for those materials previously cataloged on cards </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Begun in 1980 by Carrollton Press </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Goal was to convert the over 5 million titles cataloged by LC between 1897 and 1968 </li></ul></ul>
  26. 26. Other bibliographic projects <ul><li>NCCP ( N ational C ooperative C ataloging P roject) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Began in the early 1980s to create cataloging records in MARC format </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Involved LC, Harvard and the University of Chicago </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Data was input by Harvard and U of Chicago directly into LC’s database </li></ul></ul>
  27. 27. Other bibliographic projects <ul><li>LSP ( L inked S ystem P roject) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Initiated by LC to link together the major bibliographic utilities in the US and LC </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Involves the creation and maintenance of authority records </li></ul></ul>
  28. 28. Other bibliographic projects <ul><li>NACO ( N ame A uthority Co operative Project) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>All new names, series, uniform titles and subjects are entered into the LC database in MARC authorities format (established in the late 1970s) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Under the project cooperating libraries provide additional authority records through LSP </li></ul></ul>
  29. 29. MARC record types <ul><li>LC creates USMARC records </li></ul><ul><li>Canada uses CANMARC </li></ul><ul><li>The United Kingdom uses UKMARC </li></ul><ul><li>Many countries use UNIMARC (established through the IFLA--the I nternational F ederation of L ibrary A ssociations and Institutions) </li></ul><ul><ul><li> </li></ul></ul>
  30. 30. Online bibliographic records <ul><li>To share such requires a network--those multilibrary entities established to facilitate resource sharing, reference, processing, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>These entities are also called bibliographic utilities </li></ul><ul><ul><li>providers of computerized cataloging records </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>seek to make cataloging data widely and conveniently available, foster speed and efficiency, and facilitate resource sharing </li></ul></ul>
  31. 31. Online bibliographic records <ul><li>Only one major online bibliographic network/utility today in the US </li></ul><ul><ul><li>OCLC Online Computer Library Center </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>RLIN ( R esearch L ibraries I nformation N etwork) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>WLN ( W ashington L ibrary N etwork) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Both now a part of OCLC </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>UTLAS used to be around </li></ul><ul><ul><li>served some American libraries </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>was mainly used by Canadian libraries </li></ul></ul>
  32. 32. OCLC <ul><li>Established in 1967 </li></ul><ul><li>Is the oldest and the largest bib utility </li></ul><ul><li>Online operations began in 1971 </li></ul><ul><li>Serves libraries through broker networks--NELINET, SYNY OCLC, SOLINET </li></ul>
  33. 33. OCLC <ul><li>Primary service is the OLUC ( O n l ine U nion C atalog), called WorldCat </li></ul><ul><li>WorldCat has over 68 million MARC records with close to 1 billion individual locations/holdings </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul>
  34. 34. OCLC <ul><li>You can search by: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>browse search </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>names (personal, corporate, conference) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>name and title </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>title </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>control numbers (LCCN, ISBN, ISSN, CODEN or OCLC control number) </li></ul></ul>
  35. 35. OCLC <ul><li>Has authority files </li></ul><ul><li>The CJK system provides for cataloging Chinese, Japanese and Korean materials through this system and special terminals </li></ul>
  36. 36. OCLC contributed cataloging <ul><li>OCLC members can contribute cataloging to WorldCat (“bibliographic responsibility”) </li></ul><ul><li>New cataloging is entered in MARC format following OCLC rules </li></ul><ul><li>Members are obligated to follow AACR2, 2005 revised and check all name, uniform title and series headings in the NAF ( N ame A uthority F ile) </li></ul>
  37. 37. OCLC’s other services <ul><li>FirstSearch provides access to online informational databases </li></ul><ul><li>Serials control is available </li></ul><ul><li>The ILL subsystem is used by libraries worldwide to locate and request materials </li></ul>
  38. 38. RLIN <ul><li>RLG ( R esearch L ibraries G roup) was formed in 1974 with Columbia, Harvard, Yale and NYPL </li></ul><ul><li>RLG adopted BALLOTS ( B ibliographic A utomation of L arge L ibrary O pera t ion s , from Stanford University) and RLIN resulted </li></ul><ul><li>Harvard withdrew and Stanford replaced it </li></ul>
  39. 39. RLIN <ul><li>RLIN membership (at its largest members exceeded 100) was supposed to foster support of inter-institutional communication and instruction </li></ul><ul><li>Primary services were bib control and access, shared resources, collection management and cooperative development, and preservation of research materials </li></ul>
  40. 40. RLIN <ul><li>Main difference from OCLC— </li></ul><ul><ul><li>OCLC attaches many holdings records to one bib record </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RLIN preserves a separate bib record for every record cataloged and held by a library </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Much smaller database than OCLC </li></ul><ul><li>All records were in MARC format </li></ul>
  41. 41. WLN <ul><li>Started in 1977 by the State of Washington </li></ul><ul><li>Involved 10 pilot libraries </li></ul><ul><li>Designed to give public and private libraries a comprehensive bib control system </li></ul><ul><li>WLN became a private, not-for-profit institution in 1988 </li></ul>
  42. 42. WLN <ul><li>Bib records ere in MARC format </li></ul><ul><li>Authority database was much more sophisticated than RLIN or OCLC </li></ul><ul><li>Provided a high level of quality control </li></ul>
  43. 43. Utlas <ul><li>Began in 1983 as the University of Toronto Library Automation Systems </li></ul><ul><li>In 1983 became Utlas </li></ul><ul><li>Like RLIN there were separate records for each library’s holdings </li></ul>
  44. 44. Bibliographic cooperation <ul><li>OCLC began offering partial memberships in 1982 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>allowed for participation of all size libraries due to lower costs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>also allowed members of other networks, such as RLIN, to access OCLC </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>tapeload members contribute holdings to OCLC and meet their “bibliographic responsibility” to share materials </li></ul></ul>
  45. 45. Online bib services <ul><li>Use of an online bib utility does not necessarily result in change in the organization </li></ul><ul><li>Such participation should cause a reevaluation of policies and procedures </li></ul><ul><li>Generally the professional contribution to online cataloging is managerial--to organize policies and procedures for efficient use of the service </li></ul>
  46. 46. Considerations <ul><li>Utilization of all aspects of utility </li></ul><ul><ul><li>pre-order verification </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ILL </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>citation verification for reference </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>bib problem solving/cataloging </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Placement of equipment </li></ul><ul><li>Scheduling of staff on equipment </li></ul><ul><li>Policy--review, update, modify </li></ul>
  47. 47. Questions?
  48. 48. Assignment <ul><li>Wynar, Chapters 19, 20 and appendix </li></ul><ul><li>Cataloging homework assignments </li></ul><ul><li>Work on short paper </li></ul>