Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Phosphorus scenario analyses in the EU-27 food system - Kimo van Dijk


Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Phosphorus scenario analyses in the EU-27 food system - Kimo van Dijk

  1. 1. Phosphorus scenario analyses in the EU-27 food system Present and future P flows and dynamics Kimo van Dijk MSc, Wageningen University 2nd Scientific European Phosphorus Workshop, Wageningen, 6 February 2013
  2. 2. Introduction  Phosphorus (P) is essential and non-renewable at human time scale  EU has almost no mineral P sources and dependents on import  Transition towards sustainable use of P is necessary: ● Higher P use efficiency & more/better recycling ● 4R principle is usefull: • Reduce the inputs • Reuse organic P rich materials • Recycle wastes • Redefine and redesign
  3. 3. Objectives & research questions  To develop a dynamic model for the analysis of the effects of changes in drivers and nutrient management strategies on P dynamics in the food chain.  What would be the P dynamics & food production in EU- 27 in case of a stop of P import via ● Q1: mineral fertilizers? ● Q2: mineral fertilizers and animal feed?  Q3: What are effects of best management practices (BMPs) on food production and P use efficiency?
  4. 4. Dynamic Food System model  Mass balance principle  Miterra-Europe model  EU-27 at country level, timesteps of a year  Entire food system  P imports, exports, losses and internal flows  Flows described dynamically as function of sector input  Crop P uptake as function of soil P stock and P application
  5. 5. Dynamic crop P uptake
  6. 6. Dynamic crop P uptake Mitscherlich yield response curve: Puptake= [a – b * exp (-c* Papplication)] * d Crop P Yield Response Types (1=high, 5=low response) CPYRT Crop types CPYRT 1 Vegetables, cut flowers, tree nurseries CPYRT 2 Potatoes, maize CPYRT 3 Sugar beet CPYRT 4 Oil crops, other root crops, legumes, summer cereals, bulb flowers CPYRT 5 Cereals, grassland, fruit tree, citrus trees, olive trees
  7. 7. EU-27 P flow analyses & data  Different sources: Miterra-Europe, CAPRI, FAOSTAT, Eurostat, reports, articles and experts  P flow = physical flow x P content  ‘Top down’ data integration VS ‘bottom up’  Assumptions were necessary P flows in the EU-27 food system for 2005 in Gg P/year, showing the imports (I) , exports (E), losses of and internal upward/downward flows between sectors (indicated with square blocks), the width of the arrows representing the magnitude of the flow.
  8. 8. Scenarios & BMPs  The scenarios are: ● BAU: present (~2005), Business as Usual ● S1: future, no P import via fertilizer, BAU ● S2: future, no P import via fertilizer & feed, BAU ● S3: future, no P import via fertilizer, BMPs ● S4: future, no P import via fertilizer & feed, BMPs  The Best Management Practices (BMPs) are: ● BMP-1: 25 % lower P losses in each sector ● BMP-2: 75 % higher crop P use efficiency  No changes in other drivers and factors, such as population, agricultural area, crop types etc.
  9. 9. Per ha EU-27 crop P uptake per scenario for 2005-2300
  10. 10. Changes in soil P stock per scenario for 2005-2300
  11. 11. Total P import, export, losses and balance per scenario in 2050
  12. 12. Per capita food production & processing P flows per scenario in 2050
  13. 13. Total P in food available per capita per Member State per scenario in 2050
  14. 14. Changes in total P in food per capita in EU- 27 per scenario for 2005-2300
  15. 15. Changes in dry matter crop yield in EU-27 per scenario for 2005-2300
  16. 16. Conclusions  The EU-27 is heavily dependent on the import of P via mineral fertilizer (70%), animal feed (20%) and food products.  Soil P is an important stock to take into account in P dynamics, because of its buffering capacity and large size (~150.000 Gg P)  A stop on P fertilizer import has a large effect on food production, mainly on the longer term  A stop on P import via fertilizer and animal feed makes the effect even more pronounced, causing a larger and earlier drop in food production  The effects can be mitigated by the implementation of best management practices in nutrient management  Additional data is necessary, especially for downscaling to the regional level
  17. 17. Thank you for your attention Do you have questions, comments or data? Email: