Church GeT-RM

313 views

Published on

Slides for the Eurogene 2013 meeting

Published in: Health & Medicine, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
313
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Church GeT-RM

  1. 1. GeT-RM Project and Browser Deanna M. Church @deannachurch
  2. 2. ProjectTeam Lisa Kalman, CDC Birgit Funke, Harvard Partners Madhuri Hegde, Emory Guidance and Direction Implementation Chen Chao, NCBI Douglas Slotta, NCBI Jonathon Trow, NCBI Peter Meric, NCBI Victor Ananiev, NCBI Daniel Frishberg, NCBI Chunlei Liu, NCBI Maryam Halavi, NCBI Wendy Rubinstein, NCBI Deanna Church, NCBI
  3. 3. Submitting Labs ARUP Laboratories Baylor College of Medicine Medical Genetics Laboratory Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Emory Genetics Laboratory GeneDx Genomics and Pathology Services at Washington University in St. Louis Harvard School of Public Health Illumina Laboratory for Molecular Medicine National Institute of Standards and Technology University of California, San Francisco Department of Laboratory Medicine University of Chicago http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/get-rm/details/
  4. 4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/get-rm Calls Tests cSRA Concordant DiscordantNA Target audience: Clinical testing labs Submissions from: Clinical and Research labs
  5. 5. Lab ProvidedValidation Variants validated in this sample using another platform Variants validated in another sample using another platform Variants seen in other samples from submitting lab using this platform Variants seen in public data set Variants that are novel Variants that were not assessed
  6. 6. 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 10 50 100 500 1000 5000 NumberofVariant Read Count Bins Suppor ng Read Counts Based on May 2013 Data release
  7. 7. Based on May 2013 Data release
  8. 8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/get-rm MCL1
  9. 9. Looking forward Analysis Web tools Genotype support analysis based on alignments Development of consensus genotype set Investigation of discordant regions Comparison to paralogous sequence variant (PSV) sites Comparison to GRCh38 Calculation of FP and FN rates Link to browser for review Improved gene navigation Addition of PSV data tracks

×