Q3L07 - Explanations of prejudice

2,370 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Spiritual
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,370
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
13
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
19
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Q3L07 - Explanations of prejudice

  1. 1. Explanations of Prejudice and Discrimination<br />
  2. 2. Repeated exposure to an object results in greater attraction to that object.<br />Mere exposure effect<br />
  3. 3. Frustration-aggression hypothesis<br />Theory that all frustration leads to aggression, and all aggression comes from frustration.<br />Psychodynamic theory – assumption of a fixed amount of psychic energy for humans to perform psychological activities. Completed activity = catharsis. <br />Dollard et. al (1939) argued if goal achievement is prevented, energy remains = disequilibrium.<br />Can only be corrected by aggression.<br />Target of aggression is usually the perceived agent of frustration, but sometimes the agent is amorphous (e.g. bureaucracy), indeterminate (the economy), too powerful, unavailable or someone you love.<br />Therefore, it is displaced on to an alternative target scapegoat<br />
  4. 4. Scapegoat theory<br />If a group is frustrated in its goals by another group that is too powerful, the aggression is displaced on to a weaker group = scapegoat.<br />E.g. The frustration-aggression hypothesis on the rise of anti-Semitism in Germany during 20s and 30s<br />
  5. 5. Adorno’s Authoritarian Personality<br />Theory proposed that autocratic and punitive child-rearing practices were responsible for the emergence of clusters of prejudices from childhood to adulthood.<br />Limitations: situational and sociocultural factors are underemphasised.<br />E.g. Sth Africa and southern US > racist than Nth US – but had no differences in authoritarian personality<br />Constructed California F-scale to assess tendencies towards fascism.<br />9 variables in the F Scale: <br />
  6. 6. 1) Conventionalism: strict following of conventional, middle-class values <br />2) Authoritarian submission: submissive, uncritical attitudes towards idealised authorities of the ingroup; <br />3) Authoritarian aggression: condemnation and rejection of those who violate conventional values, and request for their severe punishment;<br />4) Anti-intraception: opposing to everything subjective, imaginative, not dealing with own inner psychic life and experience; <br />5) Rigid thinking, Superstition and stereotypy: tendency to think in rigid categories and belief in mystical causes of the individual's fate; <br />6) Power and "toughness”: identification with those who own power, exaggerate importance of strength, toughness, discipline; <br />7) Destructiveness and cynism - rejection of compassion and empathy, generalised hostility;<br /> 8) Projectivity - projection of inner unconscious impulses onto the outer world, belief that world is dominated by secret and dangerous forces<br />9) Sex: overemphasised interest in sexual deviations, false morality<br />
  7. 7. Problems with the theory:<br />Prejudice within a society can change very quickly – e.g. Germany in 1930s, US following Pearl Harbor – not consistent with Adorno’s idea that prejudice always goes back to childhood.<br />Cannot easily account for prejudice affecting large groups/whole societies e.g. South Africa under apartheid <br />CRITICISM<br />
  8. 8. Theory that attributes prejudice to an individual’s acceptance of an ideology that legitimisesingroup-serving hierarchy and domination, and rejects egalitarian ideologies.<br />Originally about desire for ingroup domination over outgroups. <br />People who desire their ingroup to be dominant and superior to outgroups = high social dominance orientation and are more inclined to be prejudiced than those with low social dominance orientation.<br />Social dominance theory<br />
  9. 9. The theory that similar beliefs promote liking and social harmony among people while dissimilar beliefs produce dislike and prejudice.<br />Belief congruence<br />

×