1.
WIFI SSID:Spark+AISummit | Password: UnifiedDataAnalytics

2.
Powering Custom Apps at Facebook
using Spark Script Transformation
Abdulrahman Alfozan
Spark Summit Europe

3.
Agenda
1. Intro to Spark Script Transforms
2. Spark Transforms at Facebook
3. Core Engine Improvements
4. Efficiency Analysis and Results
5. Transforms Execution Model
6. Future Plans

4.
2015
Small Scale
Experiments
2016
Few Pipelines in
Production
2017
Running 60TB+
shuffle pipelines
2018
Full-production
deployment
Successor to Apache
Hive at Facebook
2019
Scaling Spark
Largest Compute
Engine at Facebook
by CPU
Spark at Facebook
Reliability and efficiency are our top priority

5.
Agenda
1. Intro to Spark Script Transforms
2. Spark Transforms at Facebook
3. Core Engine Improvements
4. Efficiency Analysis and Results
5. Transforms Execution Model
6. Future Plans

6.
Script Transforms
SQL query
SELECT
TRANSFORM (inputs)
USING “script”
AS (outputs)
FROM src_tbl;

7.
Script Transforms
SQL query
ScriptTransformation (inputs,
script, outputs)
TableScan (src_tbl)
SELECT
TRANSFORM (inputs)
USING “script”
AS (outputs)
FROM src_tbl;
Query plan

8.
Script Transforms
ScriptTransformation (inputs,
script, outputs)
TableScan (src_tbl)
SQL query Query plan
Spark External
Process
Input Table
Output Table
inputs
outputs
Execution
SELECT
TRANSFORM (inputs)
USING “script”
AS (outputs)
FROM src_tbl;

9.
1. Flexibility:
Unlike UDFs, transforms allow unlimited use-cases
2. Efficiency:
Most transformers are written in C++
Why Script Transforms?

10.
1. Flexibility:
Unlike UDFs, transforms allow unlimited use-cases
2. Efficiency:
Most transformers are written in C++
Why Script Transforms?
Transforms provide custom data processing while relying on Spark for
ETL, data partitioning, distributed execution, and fault-tolerance.

11.
1. Flexibility:
Unlike UDFs, transforms allow unlimited use-cases
2. Efficiency:
Most transformers are written in C++
Why Script Transforms?
Transforms provide custom data processing while relying on Spark for
ETL, data partitioning, distributed execution, and fault-tolerance.
e.g. Spark is optimized for ETL. PyTorch is optimized for model serving.

12.
Agenda
1. Intro to Spark Script Transforms
2. Spark Transforms at Facebook
3. Core Engine Improvements
4. Efficiency Analysis and Results
5. Transforms Execution Model
6. Future plans

13.
Transform Pipelines Usage
% of overall CPU
15%
12%
9%
6%
3%
0%

14.
Pure SQL (54%)
Pure SQL (72%)
Transforms & UDFs
(45%)
Transforms & UDFs
(20%)
DataFrames (1%)
DataFrames (8%)
Count CPU
Transform Pipelines Usage
Query Count CPU
Comparison

15.
Use-case 1: Batch Inference
SQL Query
Transform resourcesADD FILES inference_engine, model.md;
SELECT
TRANSFORM (id INT, metadata STRING, image STRING)
ROW FORMAT SERDE 'JSONSimpleSerDe'
USING ‘inference_engine --model=model.md’
AS labels MAP<STRING, DOUBLE>
ROW FORMAT SERDE 'JSONSimpleSerDe'
FROM tlb_images;
Output: category>confidence
Input columns
Input format
Output format

16.
Use-case 1: Batch Inference
Transform main.cpp
#include ”spark/Transformer.h”
...
while (transformer.readRow(input)) {
// data processing
auto prediction = predict(input)
// write output map
transformer.writeRow(prediction)
}
Transform lib
Row iterator

17.
Use-case 1: Batch Inference
PyTorch runtime container
Self-contained Executable
Spark Executor
Transform Process
stdin
stdout
Spark Task
InternalRow
Serialization into JSON
JSON deserialization
into InternalRow
JSON deserialization into
C++ objects
C++ objects
serialization into JSON
{id:1, metadata:, image:…}
{label_1: score, label_2: score}
Model

18.
Use-case 2: Batch Indexing
SQL Query
Transform resourcesADD FILES indexer;
SELECT
TRANSFORM (shard_id INT, data STRING)
ROW FORMAT SERDE ‘RowFormatDelimited‘
USING ‘indexer --schema=data<STRING>’
FROM src_tbl
CLUSTER BY shard_id;
Input columns
Input format
Partition operator

19.
Spark Task
Spark Task
Use-case 2: Batch Indexing
shard_id data
1 {…}
1 {…}
2 {…}
shard_id data
1 {…}
2 {…}
2 {…}
shard_id data
1 {…}
1 {…}
1 {…}
shard_id data
2 {…}
2 {…}
2 {…}
Mappers
Reducer Transforms
Shuffle Reducer 1
Mapper 1
Mapper 2
Transform Process
stdin
indexer
…
Reducer 2
Execution

20.
Agenda
1. Intro to Spark Script Transforms
2. Spark Transforms at Facebook
3. Core Engine Improvements
4. Efficiency Analysis and Results
5. Transforms Execution Model
6. Future Plans

21.
ScriptTransformationExec.scala
• Direct process invocation
• Class IOSchema to handle SerDe schema and config
• MonitorThread to track transform process progress
• Transform process error handling and surfacing
Core Engine Improvements
Operator

22.
• DelimitedJSONSerDe.scala
JSON format standard RFC 8259
Core Engine Improvements
SerDe support

23.
• SimpleSerDe.scala
ROW FORMAT DELIMITED
Core Engine Improvements
SerDe support
FIELDS TERMINATED BY ','
COLLECTION ITEMS TERMINATED BY '|'
MAP KEYS TERMINATED BY ':'
LINES TERMINATED BY 'n'
Configurable properties

24.
Core Engine Improvements
SerDe support
Development
• Text-based
DelimitedJSONSerDe.scala
SimpleSerDe.scala
• Binary
?
Production

25.
• Binary format
Text-based encoding is slow and less-compact
Core Engine Improvements
Production SerDe Requirements

26.
• Binary format
Text-based encoding is slow and less-compact
• Zero-copy
Access to serialized data without parsing or unpacking
Improving Facebook’s performance on Android with FlatBuffers
Core Engine Improvements
Production SerDe Requirements

27.
• Binary format
Text-based encoding is slow and less-compact
• Zero-copy
Access to serialized data without parsing or unpacking
Improving Facebook’s performance on Android with FlatBuffers
• Word-aligned data
Allow for SIMD optimizations
Core Engine Improvements
Production SerDe Requirements

28.
• LazyBinarySerDe (Apache Hive)
Not zero-copy nor word-aligned, require converters in Spark
• Protocol Buffers / Thrift
Not zero-copy, more suited for RPC
• Flatbuffers / Cap’n Proto
require converters (to/from InternalRow) in Spark Core
• Apache Arrow
great future option
Binary SerDe Considerations

29.
UnsafeRow
• Binary & Word-aligned
• Zero-copy
• Already part of Spark core
• Available converters to/from InternalRow
Binary SerDe Considerations
Chosen format

30.
UnsafeRow SerDe
SPARK-7076: Introduced UnsafeRow format to Spark
apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java

31.
UnsafeRow SerDe
SPARK-15962: Introduced UnsafeArrayData and UnsafeMapData
apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeMapData.java

32.
UnsafeRow SerDe
UnsafeRow SerDe C++ library
INT
BIGINT
BOOLEAN
FLOAT
DOUBLE
STRING
ARRAY<INT>
MAP<INT,STRING>
int32_t
int64_t
bool
float
double
unsaferow::String
unsaferow::List<int32_t>
unsaferow::Map<int32_t, unsaferow::String>
SQL datatypes C++ datatypes

33.
UnsafeRow SerDe
UnsafeRow SerDe C++ library
SELECT
TRANSFORM (id INT)
ROW FORMAT SERDE 'UnsafeRowSerDe'
USING ‘script’
AS (value BIGINT)
ROW FORMAT SERDE UnsafeRowSerDe'
FROM src_tbl;
#include ”spark/Transformer.h”
while (transformer.readRow(input)) {
// data processing
int32_t id = input->getID();
output->setValue(id*id);
// write output
transformer.writeRow(output)
}
SQL Query C++ Transformer

34.
Core Engine Improvements
SerDe support summary
Development
Production
• Text-based
DelimitedJSONSerDe.scala
SimpleSerDe.scala
• Binary
UnsafeRowSerDe.scala

35.
Core Engine Improvements
SELECT
TRANSFORM (id, AVG(value) AS value_avg)
USING ‘script’
AS (output)
FROM src_tbl;
GROUP BY id;
Aggregation and projection support (SQL)

36.
Agenda
1. Intro to Spark Script Transforms
2. Spark Transforms at Facebook
3. Core Engine Improvements
4. Efficiency Analysis and Results
5. Transforms Execution Model
6. Future Plans

37.
• Text-based (UTF-8)
- JSON
- Row Format Delimited
• Binary:
- UnsafeRow
Efficiency Analysis
SerDe overhead
JSON lib

38.
Efficiency Analysis
Text-SerDe CPU overhead: Spark

39.
Efficiency Analysis
Text-SerDe CPU overhead: Transform process

40.
• Text-based SerDe overhead is non-negligible
especially for Complex types
• SerDe cost could be up to 70% of pipeline’s CPU resources
Efficiency Analysis
SerDe overhead

41.
• Text-based SerDe overhead is non-negligible
especially for Complex types
• SerDe cost could be up to 70% of pipeline’s CPU resources
Solution: use an efficient binary SerDe
Efficiency Analysis
SerDe overhead

42.
Efficiency Analysis: UnsafeRow
Efficient Binary SerDe
UnsafeRow
C++ lib

43.
Efficiency Analysis: UnsafeRow
Spark

44.
Efficiency Analysis: UnsafeRow
Transform process

45.
UnsafeRow SerDe Benchmark
Text-Based SerDe vs Binary
SerDe (UnsafeRow)
Transform pipelines end-
to-end CPU savings:
up to 4x
Complex types SerDe
impacted the most

46.
Agenda
1. Intro to Spark Script Transforms
2. Spark Transforms at Facebook
3. Core Engine Improvements
4. Efficiency Analysis and Results
5. Transforms Execution Model
6. Future Plans

47.
CPU cores per container: spark.executor.cores = 4
Memory per container: spark.executor.memory=4GB + spark.transform.memory=4GB
Transforms Execution Model
Resource Request
Spark
Driver
Cluster
Manager
Node Manager
Node Manager
Executor
Task 1 Task 2
Resource Request
CPU cores = 4,
Memory = 8GB
Launch Spark
Executor
Process 1 Process 2
Executor

48.
• JVM’s memory limits: Xms, Xmx and Xss.
• CPU threads:
spark.executor.core,spark.task.cpus
Transforms Execution Model
Resource Control

49.
• JVM’s memory limits: Xms, Xmx and Xss.
• CPU threads:
spark.executor.core,spark.task.cpus
These limits are irrelevant when running an
external process!
Transforms Execution Model
Resource Control

50.
• JVM’s memory limits: Xms, Xmx and Xss.
• CPU threads:
spark.executor.core,spark.task.cpus
These limits are irrelevant when running an
external process!
Solution: cgroup v2 containers
Transforms Execution Model
Resource Control

51.
cgroup v2 controllers:
• cpu.weight
Allows Multi-threaded transforms
• memory.max
OOM offending processes
• io.latency
IO QoS
Transforms Execution Model
Resource Control & Isolation

52.
Transforms Execution Model
Resource Control & Isolation
/cgroup2/task_container/exec1

53.
Agenda
1. Intro to Spark Script Transforms
2. Spark Transforms at Facebook
3. Core Engine Improvements
4. Efficiency Analysis and Results
5. Transforms Execution Model
6. Future Plans

54.
• Binary SerDe based on Apache arrow
• Vectorization
Future Plans

55.
Questions

56.
INFRASTRUCTURE