Be the first to like this
Prosecutor Ben Smith Transitions to Pursuit and Deterrence of Journalist Darren M Meade
After the conviction of Ms. Richter and particularly after Mr. Smith survived the
first appeal in January 2013, as expected he gained confidence in his decisions and felt justified in feeling that he was unfairly accused by the Richter family, the Ripoff Report and Darren M Meade.
Smith began to use his prosecutorial power to see if he could cause those criticizing
him to back off.
To accomplish his desire to chill the criticism or punish his critics, Smith used a number of tools that are only available to a prosecutor:
a. Issuing subpoenas that can be done confidentially.
b. Issuing sealed search warrants.
c. Collecting and examining private documents of his critics that would not normally
be available to a private citizen including, but not limited to: bank records, emails,
attorney client communications, and phone conversations.
d. Distributing or releasing confidential documents publicly and privately gathered by
e. Filing motions to put pressure on those who were critical of him.
f. Making public allegations about the behavior (criminal) of his critics that, when
made by a prosecutor, is presumed to be true or valid.
g. Indicting at least one of his critics, Darren Meade.
None of the above actions are available to a private citizen or have the power to
chill or punish to the same level as when made by a prosecutor.
Smith chose to use prosecutorial power despite knowing it was improper. He did
so not only toward Meade but others as well, including but not limited to:
a. Threatened criminal prosecution against various persons, including Ed Magedson and
Xcentric Ventures to retaliate against the political and professional criticism that
has been reported on Ripoff Report;
b. Unlawfully searched emails, including those containing privileged attorney-client
c. Disclosed attorney-client privileged communications to the public;
d. Disclosed private and personal communications to the public;
e. Disclosed bank account numbers and private financial records to the public in
violation of law;
f. Wrongfully instituted civil proceedings for the purpose of placing private records
in the public records;
g. Issued over 100 criminal subpoenas as part of his campaign of harassment;
h. Improperly obtained and executed search warrants; and
i. Falsely accused others, including Meade, of criminal conduct.
Assuming Smith’s affidavit claims are true, after the conviction, he spent more than
1,600 hours investigating Meade,and others for posting criticisms about the Richter investigation and trial.
If true, that amount of time would have precluded the filing of the charges in the
first place because any in-depth review would have exposed that the claims were false or certainly did not support probable cause to indict anyone.