Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

0138020272 ppt09

1,439 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

0138020272 ppt09

  1. 1. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Ninth Edition By Frank SchmallegerPearson Education, Inc.
  2. 2. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Ninth Edition By Frank Schmalleger Chapter 9 SentencingPearson Education, Inc.
  3. 3. The Philosophy and Goals of Criminal Sentencing • Traditional sentencing options have included imprisonment, fines, probation, and death • Five goals – Retribution – Incapacitation – Deterrence • General deterrence • Specific deterrence – Rehabilitation – RestorationCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 3 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  4. 4. Retribution • Retribution – The act of taking revenge on a criminal perpetrator – The earliest-known rationale for punishment – Corresponds to the model of sentencing called just deserts – Just Deserts • A model of criminal sentencing that holds that criminal offenders deserve the punishment they receive • Primary sentencing tool of the just deserts model is imprisonmentCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 4 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  5. 5. Incapacitation • Incapacitation – The use of imprisonment or other means to reduce the likelihood that an offender will commit future offenses – Seeks to protect innocent members of society – Separate offenders from the community to reduce opportunities for further criminality – Incapacitation requires only restraint, not punishmentCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 5 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  6. 6. Deterrence • Deterrence – A goal of criminal sentencing that seeks to inhibit criminal behavior through the fear of punishment – Overall goal is crime prevention • Specific deterrence – A goal of criminal sentencing that seeks to prevent a particular offender from engaging in repeat criminality – Reduce the likelihood of recidivismCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 6 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  7. 7. Deterrence • General Deterrence – A goal of criminal sentencing that seeks to prevent others from committing crimes similar to the one for which a particular offender is being sentenced by making an example of the person sentenced • Deterrence is compatible with the goal of incapacitation • Retribution is oriented toward the past • Deterrence is a strategy for the future and aims to prevent new crimesCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 7 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  8. 8. Rehabilitation • Rehabilitation – The attempt to reform a criminal offender – Seeks to bring about fundamental changes in offenders and their behavior – Fell victim in the 1970s to the nothing-works doctrine • With as many as 90% of former convicted offenders returning to crime following release from a prison-based treatment program, incapacitation grew more appealingCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 8 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  9. 9. Restoration • Restoration – A goal of criminal sentencing that attempts to make the victim “whole again” • Restorative Justice (RJ) – A sentencing model that builds on restitution and community participation in an attempt to make the victim “whole again” – Community-focused – Primary goal of improving the quality of life for all members of the communityCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 9 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  10. 10. Indeterminate Sentencing • Explanation of Indeterminate Sentencing – A model of criminal punishment that encourages rehabilitation through the use of general and relatively unspecific sentences – Relies heavily on judges’ discretion to choose among types of sanctions and to set upper and lower limits on the length of prison stays • Consecutive Sentence – Served one after the otherCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 10 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  11. 11. Indeterminate Sentencing • Concurrent Sentence – Two or more sentences served at the same time • Indeterminate model created to take into consideration differences in the degree of guilt • Inmate’s behavior while incarcerated is the primary determinant of the amount of time servedCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 11 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  12. 12. Critiques of Indeterminate Sentencing • Since the 1970s, the model has been criticized for contributing to inequality in sentencing • Also criticized for perpetuating a system under which offenders might be sentenced more on the basis of personal and social characteristics than on culpability • Tends to produce dishonesty in sentencingCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 12 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  13. 13. Critiques of Indeterminate Sentencing • Gain Time – The amount of time deducted from time to be served in prison on a given sentence as a consequence of participation in special projects or programs • Good Time – The amount of time deducted from time to be served in prison on a given sentence as a consequence of good behaviorCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 13 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  14. 14. Structured Sentencing • Critics of indeterminate model called for the recognition of three fundamental sentencing principles – Proportionality – Equity – Social debt • Proportionality – Severity of sanctions should bear a direct relationship to the seriousness of the crime committedCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 14 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  15. 15. Structured Sentencing • Equity – Similar crimes should be punished with the same degree of severity, regardless of the social or personal characteristics of the offenders • Social Debt – An offender’s criminal history should be objectively be taken into account in sentencing decisionsCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 15 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  16. 16. Structured Sentencing • Structured Sentencing – A model of criminal punishment that includes determinate and commission-created presumptive sentencing schemes • Determinate Sentencing – A model of criminal punishment in which an offender is given a fixed term of imprisonment that may be reduced by good time or gain time – Also specify an anticipated release dateCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 16 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  17. 17. Structured Sentencing • Voluntary/Advisory Sentencing Guidelines – Recommended sentencing policies that are not required by law – Usually based on past sentencing practices – Serve as guides to judges – A form of structured sentencing • Presumptive Sentencing – Developed by a sentencing commission rather than state legislature – Explicit and highly structuredCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 17 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  18. 18. Structured Sentencing – Typically relying on a quantitative scoring instrument – Not voluntary/advisory in that judges had to adhere to the sentencing system or provide a written rationale for departing from itCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 18 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  19. 19. Structured Sentencing • Aggravating Circumstances – Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that make it more grave than the average instance of that crime • Mitigating Circumstances – Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that may be considered to reduce the blameworthiness of the offenderCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 19 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  20. 20. Federal Sentencing Guidelines • Comprehensive Crime Control Act (1984) – Addressed the issue of Truth In Sentencing • A close correspondence between the sentence imposed on an offender and the time actually served in prison – Nearly eliminated good-time credits and began the process of both phasing out federal parole and eliminating the U. S. Parole Commission – Funds available for states that adopt truth-in- sentencing laws and are able to guarantee that certain violent offenders will serve 85% of their sentences • Mistretta v. U. S. (1989)Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 20 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  21. 21. Federal Guideline Provisions • Specified a sentencing range from which judges had to choose • Departures were generally expected only in the presence of aggravating or mitigating circumstances • Federal sentencing guidelines are built around a table containing 43 rows, each corresponding to one offense level – Defendants may move into the highest criminal history category by virtue of being designated a career offenderCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 21 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  22. 22. Plea Bargaining under the Guidelines • It required that the agreement – Be fully disclosed in the record of the court – Detail the actual conduct of the offense • Melendez v. U. S. (1996)Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 22 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  23. 23. The Legal Environment of Structured Sentencing • Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) • U. S. v. O’Brien (2010) • Blakely v. Washington (2004) • Cunningham v. California (2007) • U. S. v. Booker (2005) • U. S. v. Fanfan (2005) • Rita v. U. S. (2007) • Oregon v. Ice (2009) • Gall v. U. S. (2007)Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 23 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  24. 24. Three Strikes Laws • About half of the states have passed three-strike legislation • Questions remain about the effectiveness of three-strikes legislationCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 24 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  25. 25. Mandatory Sentencing • Mandatory Sentencing – A structured sentencing scheme that allows no leeway in the nature of the sentence imposed • Diversion – The official suspension of criminal or juvenile proceedings against an alleged offender at any point after a recorded justice system intake, but before the entering of a judgmentCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 25 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  26. 26. The Presentence Investigation • Presentence Investigation (PSI) – The examination of a convicted offender’s background prior to sentencing • One of three forms – A detailed written report on the defendant’s personal and criminal history – An abbreviated written report summarizing the information – Verbal report to the courtCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 26 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  27. 27. The Victim – Forgotten No Longer • Sentencing process now frequently includes consideration of the needs of victims and survivors • No victims’ rights amendment to the federal Constitution – More than 30 states have passed their own victims’ rights amendments • Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 27 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  28. 28. The Victim – Forgotten No Longer • Much of the philosophical basis of today’s victims’ movement can be found in the restorative justice model • In 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act amended the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 – Made victims of terrorism and their families eligible for victims’ compensation paymentsCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 28 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  29. 29. Victim-Impact Statements • Victim-Impact Statements • An in-court statement made by the victim or survivors, to sentencing authorities seeking to make an informed sentencing decision • One study of the efficacy of victim-impact statements found that sentencing decisions are rarely affected by them – Little effect because judges and other officials “have established ways of making decisions which do not call for explicit information about the impact”Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 29 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  30. 30. Sentencing Practices • State courts convicted 1,132,000 felons in 2006 – About 41% were sentenced to active prison terms – 28% received jail sentences involving less than one year’s confinement – 27% were sentenced to probation with no jail or prison time to serve – The largest offense category for which state felons were sent to prison was drug offensesCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 30 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  31. 31. Fines • One of the oldest forms of punishment • Often imposed for relatively minor law violations • Most likely to be imposed where the offender has both a clean record and the ability to pay • Day-fine systemCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 31 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  32. 32. Habeas Corpus Review • Writ of Habeas Corpus – A writ that directs the person detaining a prisoner to bring him or her before a judicial officer to determine the lawfulness of the imprisonment • McCleskey v. Zant (1991) • Schlup v. Delo (1995) • Felker v. Turpin (1996) • Elledge v. Florida (1998)Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 32 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved
  33. 33. The Courts and the Death Penalty • Wilkerson v. Utah (1878) • In re Kemmler (1890) • Furman v. Georgia (1972) • Gregg v. Georgia (1976) • Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) • Ring v. Arizona (2002) • Poyner v. Murray (1993) • Campbell v. Wood (1994) • Baze v. Rees (2008)Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e 33 Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.Frank Schmalleger Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All rights reserved

×