Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Wk09 Interfacet 29 09

500 views

Published on

Published in: News & Politics, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Wk09 Interfacet 29 09

  1. 1. Interfacet WK’09 29-09-2009 tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  2. 2. Litteratur Bertelsen, O. W. & Pold, S. (2004). Criticism as an Approach to Interface Aesthetics. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2004. http://portal.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=1028018 William W. Gaver: “Oh What a Tangled Web We Weave: Metaphor and Mapping in Graphical Interfaces”. http://delivery.acm.org/ 10.1145/230000/223669/p270-gaver.pdf? key1=223669&key2=7385434401&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=7441094&CFT OKEN=4ber P Barr, R Biddle, J Noble. A taxonomy of user interface metaphors. Proceedings of SIGCHI-NZ Symposium On Computer-Human Interaction, 2002 - http://www.pippinbarr.com/academic/publications/ Barr2002_A_Taxonomy_Of_User_Interface_Metaphors.pdf Ekstensivt: Manovich, Lev: “The Language of Cultural Interfaces” in The Language of New Media, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 69-93. tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  3. 3. Betydningsproduktion i interfacet Stilistisk Retorisk Semiotisk Narrativ Interaktiondesign/usability - optimeret/informationelt kommunikationsdesign Oplevelsesdesign - non-optimeret kommunikationsdesign tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  4. 4. Semiotisk - Peirce http://www.pippinbarr.com/academic/publications/ Barr2003_A_Semiotic_Model_Of_User_Interface_Metaphor.pdf tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  5. 5. Metafor - mapping tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  6. 6. Barr via Lakoff & Johnson tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  7. 7. Hvad er en metonymi Lighed, berøring, nærhedsrelation Metonymi http://www.pianovaerkstedet.dk/ Synekdoke - pars pro toto http://www.tour-eiffel.fr/teiffel/fr/documentation/structure/index.html Interfaceniveau: Repræsentation (det vi ser) ~ repræsenteret (det, der ligger bagved) 1 6 tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  8. 8. Eksempel på metonymisk betydningsproduktion 1 7 tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  9. 9. tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  10. 10. Gaver: “Du er en skovl” tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  11. 11. Interfacekritik • Bertelsen og Pold: “Criticism as an Approach to Interface Aesthetics” • Humanistisk OG datalogisk (den skandinaviske skole) perspektiv tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  12. 12. Stylistic references • Analyze stylistic references in the interface (e.g. Mac OS vs. X11, renaissance vs. baroque). tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  13. 13. Renaissance • http://www.tickitaly.com/ images/tickets/last-supper/ vinci-supper.jpg tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  14. 14. Det barokke • http://witcombe.sbc.edu/ baroquetheory/images/ bronzinolawrence.jpg tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  15. 15. • http://www.arngren.net/ • http://www.seemydress.com/Popup.aspx tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  16. 16. Standards • Identify the use of standards and the conformance to tradition • simplesoft.dk tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  17. 17. tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  18. 18. Materiality and remediation • Consider the materiality of the interface (e.g. code, algorithms, pixels) and discuss how it is used. • Consider how the interface draws on the materiality of other media (e.g. text pages, photography, cinematic language, control panels). • Discuss immediacy and hypermediacy in the interface. tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  19. 19. tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  20. 20. tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  21. 21. Remediering Immediacy Hypermediacy • ”Kigge på” • ”Kigge gennem” • Tydeliggør • Transparens medieringen 21 tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  22. 22. Genre • Identify and consider various genres in the interface. • [genre vs. stil] tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  23. 23. Hybridity • Discuss the interface as a hybrid between the functional (control interface) and the cultural interface. tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  24. 24. Representations • Identify representational techniques and analyze how they work (e.g. realistic and naturalistic representations vs.symbolic and allegorical representations). tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  25. 25. Challenges to expectations & developmental potentials • Identify challenges to users expectations. • Consider the developmental potentials. How is development in use supported? How may the interface support the development of unanticipated use? tirsdag den 29. september 2009
  26. 26. Øvelse • Analyser casen ud fra Barrs taxonomi og Porl og Bertelsen interfacekritik • Cases: n, • http://viralmarkedsfoering.dk/increase/dns2.html • Usability- og storytellinggrupperne • BooneOakley.com - Home Page: http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=Elo7WeIydh8&annotation_id=annotation_202654&feature=iv • branding- og markedsføringsgrupperne tirsdag den 29. september 2009

×