Copy of the presentation given to Public Affairs Ireland on 1st February 2012.
An introduction to social media strategy development and some of the key challenges that social media can/will bring.
6. What does “social media” mean?
Online
technologies and
networks that
people use to
share opinions
insights,
experiences and
perspectives
with each other
4
11. (I’m WAY over stating it, but it can be pretty cool!)
7
12. So, what should you
know before you start?
Image Source: An Untrained Eye on Flickr
8
13. The limitations of social media
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
9
14. The limitations of social media
1. You don’t control your
brand
Users own social media,
not brands
People will give you
exactly what they think
you deserve
If your motivation is to
enforce control, STOP!
You will fail
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
9
15. The limitations of social media
1. You don’t control your 2. It is nothing more than a
brand tool
Users own social media, It is not about ticking off
not brands a list
People will give you Figure out what your
exactly what they think story is
you deserve Make it a story based on
If your motivation is to truth
enforce control, STOP! Tell your story, before
You will fail someone else does
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
9
17. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Over
THREE
years later!
10
18. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Surrender ANY control
Leave your consumer confused
Relinquish your “right to reply”
Set yourself back
Lose money!
10
21. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Hour 6
0 Hour
Twitter
CRISIS HITS Facebook
Blogs
11
22. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Hour 12
Hour 6
0 Hour Sharing
Twitter
CRISIS HITS Facebook
Blogs Mass Media
11
23. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Hour 24
Hour 18
Hour 12
Hour 6
Editorial
0 Hour Sharing
Twitter
CRISIS HITS Facebook Mainstream
Blogs Mass Media
11
24. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Hour 12
Hour 6
0 Hour Sharing
Twitter
CRISIS HITS Facebook
Blogs Mass Media
11
25. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Hour 6
0 Hour
Twitter
CRISIS HITS Facebook
Blogs
11
26. Lesson One: Say nothing at a price
Hour 6
Damage control
0 Hour
Twitter Right to reply
CRISIS HITS Facebook
Less misinformation
Blogs
Potential advocacy
11
27. The limitations of social media
3. Reach does not mean
attention
Fans, followers, likers =
people formerly known
as the audience
Potentially more
valuable
Potentially imaginary!
DO NOT chase numbers
– work to create
advocates
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
12
28. The limitations of social media
3. Reach does not mean
attention 4. Advocates are hard won
Fans, followers, likers =
people formerly known Positive word of mouth
as the audience is your holy grail
Potentially more You need advocates for
valuable this
Potentially imaginary! They’ll talk about you
DO NOT chase numbers when:
– work to create You over deliver
advocates You under deliver
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
12
29. The limitations of social media
5. It requires some maths!
Volume x impact = word
of mouth
Volume is easy
Impact is determined
by:
Where
What
Who
Source
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
13
30. The limitations of social media
6. Word of mouth is not a
5. It requires some maths! cure-all
Volume x impact = word Do NOT chase “buzz” or
of mouth “talkability”
Volume is easy Negative versus positive
Impact is determined word-of-mouth
by: Understand different
Where kinds of word-of-mouth
What Experiential
Who Consequential
Source Intentional
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
13
31. The limitations of social media
7. It WILL cost you!
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
14
32. The limitations of social media
7. It WILL cost you!
Culture
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
14
33. The limitations of social media
7. It WILL cost you!
Culture Good Ideas
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
14
34. The limitations of social media
7. It WILL cost you!
Culture Good Ideas Data
Partial Source: Measuring ROSI by BBDO
14
37. The biggest challenges?
Stakeholder engagement and buy-in
Resource and funding
Image Source:Gizmodo
15
38. The biggest challenges?
Stakeholder engagement and buy-in
Resource and funding
Content planning
Image Source:Gizmodo
15
39. The biggest challenges?
Stakeholder engagement and buy-in
Resource and funding
Content planning
Guidelines
Image Source:Gizmodo
15
40. The biggest challenges?
Stakeholder engagement and buy-in
Resource and funding
Content planning
Guidelines
Creating a social strategy
Image Source:Gizmodo
15
41. The biggest challenges?
Stakeholder engagement and buy-in
Resource and funding
Content planning
Guidelines
Creating a social strategy
Getting started!
Image Source:Gizmodo
15
42. Getting the green light
• Build a business case
• Identify resource and
budget required
• Engage key stakeholders
• Clarify rules of enagement
• Minimise risk
16
Image Source: Nathan W Bingham on Flickr
16
43. A social media strategy
What do you want achieve?
How will you make it work?
How will you know if it has?
How will you evolve?
17
44. What do you want social media to
Engagement?
Attitudinal shift?
Increased footfall?
Increased awareness?
Decrease complaint volume?
Create advocacy?
Are you clear about your goals?
Image Source: Atomic Shed on Flickr
18
45. Where should you do it?
Where is the conversation
happening?
How appropriate is it that
you join in?
What is your presence in
this channel designed to
achieve?
Are you absolutely SURE
you should be there?
19
46. What will you do there?
What are you going to say?
What format will it take?
Will you be proactive or reactive?
How will you keep it fresh?
How will you tell your story?
20
47. Rules of engagement
Tone of voice
What will and won’t
be discussed
What users can expect
from you
How you expect users
to behave
SLAs
Escalation procedure
21
Image source: Alexandra Ferguson on Etsy
21
48. How will you know if it’s worked?
How will you measure this?
What are your KPIs?
What does success look like?
Image source: Richard Moross on Flickr
22
49. Lesson Two: Tell your story in the
right place
Clearly defined
social media role
Clearly defined
channel roles
Story to tell
Two-way
communication
Award winners!
23
51. Lesson 3: Be willing to adapt
Objectives:
Improve community
engagement
Reduce costs
Make communications
more interactive
24 hour Twitter marathon
Hyper-local
No clear role for Facebook
25
25
52. And then...
Manchester Riots
August 2011
26
26
57. Driving community action
Responding to feedback
Implementing change
Admit to mistakes!
After the disturbances
27
Image source: Ben Proctor on Storify and GMP on Flickr
27
62. Ongoing iteration
1. Discovery phase
2. Activity scoping
3. Operational framework
4. Content planning What you say
Where you say it
What format to say it in
When you say it
28
28
63. Ongoing iteration
1. Discovery phase
2. Activity scoping
3. Operational framework
4. Content planning
What you will measure
5. Measurement How you will measure it
How it will be evaluated
What you want to see &
28 when
28
68. Questions?
31
Image source: Eleaf on Flickr
31
69. Twitter: @curlydena
LinkedIn: Dena Walker
Questions?
31
Image source: Eleaf on Flickr
31
Editor's Notes
Hello. It’s really love to be here speaking to you today. I hope that I can keep you awake - I know it’s been a long day for you all.\n\nI was asked to come here today and talk to you about “Challenges, lessons and opportunities of Social Media”. I’ve taken that title quite loosely, so please don’t expect a load of boring lists about “here’s a challenge, here’s how you fix it”. I can promise you that when you go live in Social Media, if you’re not already, you will meet more challenges than I can predict here.\n\nInstead what I have aimed to do is tell you about some very core challenges associated with social media and what they mean for you - so that you’ll hopefully be able to tackle them effectively and go on to great things. \n\nI’ve got a couple of real life examples woven in too, which should hopefully be interesting.\n
So, who am I?\n\nWell, I’m absolutely not a social media expert, guru, seeder, influencer or whatever buzz word you want to apply. Anyone that tells you that they are is a liar and I would advise you to steer clear.\n\nI’m just someone who uses social media, professionally and personally. My day job is looking at user behaviour and the marriage of that with technology, so that my clients can speak to their audience in the most relevant digital channel and format. Or as is often they case, not speak to them at all - just monitor social media, which is just as valuable and sometimes your best course of action.\n
you obviously know that “digital” is important, and here’s a taste of what is happening online in ONE MINUTE.\n\nMad, no?!\n
Social media is a plethora of channels, across a range of platforms. All enabling users to SHARE.\n\nThat’s really what makes social media special - sharing. It’s that simple. \nSharing can be great for your organisation if it’s stuff you want to get shared. And not so great when it’s the stuff you don’t. It’s a double-edged knife that way. \n\nBut understand the users - their channel specific behaviours, general digital behaviours, and their motivations etc is what will get you ahead in social media. \n
Social media is a plethora of channels, across a range of platforms. All enabling users to SHARE.\n\nThat’s really what makes social media special - sharing. It’s that simple. \nSharing can be great for your organisation if it’s stuff you want to get shared. And not so great when it’s the stuff you don’t. It’s a double-edged knife that way. \n\nBut understand the users - their channel specific behaviours, general digital behaviours, and their motivations etc is what will get you ahead in social media. \n
Emerging tech has brought about massive social media adoption- smart phones driving it further.\n\nBut what it’s also done is change our behaviour. After 100 yrs of being told what to think/feel/believe about brands we don’t trust them anymore. We’ve all been let down by a brand or organisation at one time or another, so why should we take it all at face value?\n\nNo. Nowadays we want to question, challenge, discuss what we’re told before we’re willing to believe. \n
What Social Media has really done is demonstrate how empowered our audience has become. They have just the same tools at their disposal as we do. And in a lot of cases, they know better than we do, how to use them! \n\nTo get them to spend their time with us (ie give us their attention) we need to have a genuine story to tell - one that’s relevant to them. \n\nBut they don’t want to just listen to our stories, people want to have a conversation with us about them. As with any good conversation we must also listen more than we speak - get to know your audience - what they feel, what their motivations are and what you can do for them.\n\nDon’t say just anything. Maybe even say nothing - don’t ever forget that just as TV or outdoor or Direct Mail might not be the right medium for your messaging, such is the case with social media! Sometimes, listening might be all you do.\n
What Social Media has really done is demonstrate how empowered our audience has become. They have just the same tools at their disposal as we do. And in a lot of cases, they know better than we do, how to use them! \n\nTo get them to spend their time with us (ie give us their attention) we need to have a genuine story to tell - one that’s relevant to them. \n\nBut they don’t want to just listen to our stories, people want to have a conversation with us about them. As with any good conversation we must also listen more than we speak - get to know your audience - what they feel, what their motivations are and what you can do for them.\n\nDon’t say just anything. Maybe even say nothing - don’t ever forget that just as TV or outdoor or Direct Mail might not be the right medium for your messaging, such is the case with social media! Sometimes, listening might be all you do.\n
What Social Media has really done is demonstrate how empowered our audience has become. They have just the same tools at their disposal as we do. And in a lot of cases, they know better than we do, how to use them! \n\nTo get them to spend their time with us (ie give us their attention) we need to have a genuine story to tell - one that’s relevant to them. \n\nBut they don’t want to just listen to our stories, people want to have a conversation with us about them. As with any good conversation we must also listen more than we speak - get to know your audience - what they feel, what their motivations are and what you can do for them.\n\nDon’t say just anything. Maybe even say nothing - don’t ever forget that just as TV or outdoor or Direct Mail might not be the right medium for your messaging, such is the case with social media! Sometimes, listening might be all you do.\n
What Social Media has really done is demonstrate how empowered our audience has become. They have just the same tools at their disposal as we do. And in a lot of cases, they know better than we do, how to use them! \n\nTo get them to spend their time with us (ie give us their attention) we need to have a genuine story to tell - one that’s relevant to them. \n\nBut they don’t want to just listen to our stories, people want to have a conversation with us about them. As with any good conversation we must also listen more than we speak - get to know your audience - what they feel, what their motivations are and what you can do for them.\n\nDon’t say just anything. Maybe even say nothing - don’t ever forget that just as TV or outdoor or Direct Mail might not be the right medium for your messaging, such is the case with social media! Sometimes, listening might be all you do.\n
What Social Media has really done is demonstrate how empowered our audience has become. They have just the same tools at their disposal as we do. And in a lot of cases, they know better than we do, how to use them! \n\nTo get them to spend their time with us (ie give us their attention) we need to have a genuine story to tell - one that’s relevant to them. \n\nBut they don’t want to just listen to our stories, people want to have a conversation with us about them. As with any good conversation we must also listen more than we speak - get to know your audience - what they feel, what their motivations are and what you can do for them.\n\nDon’t say just anything. Maybe even say nothing - don’t ever forget that just as TV or outdoor or Direct Mail might not be the right medium for your messaging, such is the case with social media! Sometimes, listening might be all you do.\n
What Social Media has really done is demonstrate how empowered our audience has become. They have just the same tools at their disposal as we do. And in a lot of cases, they know better than we do, how to use them! \n\nTo get them to spend their time with us (ie give us their attention) we need to have a genuine story to tell - one that’s relevant to them. \n\nBut they don’t want to just listen to our stories, people want to have a conversation with us about them. As with any good conversation we must also listen more than we speak - get to know your audience - what they feel, what their motivations are and what you can do for them.\n\nDon’t say just anything. Maybe even say nothing - don’t ever forget that just as TV or outdoor or Direct Mail might not be the right medium for your messaging, such is the case with social media! Sometimes, listening might be all you do.\n
Don’t get me wrong, social media is awesome. When it’s done right it has the power to be a phenomenally powerful messaging channel for you. But it’s not a panacea. \n\nI can’t stress this enough - Social Media should always be considered when you’re developing your communications strategies, but don’t be afraid to rule it out if it doesn’t feel right.\n\nBecause when you’re in it, you’re committed. It’s like a marriage - you can’t be half married. You’re in or you’re out.\n\nif you’re in, do it well and the rewards can be great.\n
Social media is not without its limitations. These are the biggest challenges you’ll face with it - people think it’s a magic bullet. It isn’t. \n\nWhen you know and understand the challenges, you can address them. \n
1. Control\n\nJust ask BP or Nestle or Eurostar!\n\nYou need to “manage” a situation. You’ll never be able to control it. \n\n2. Tool\n\nTicklist - FB? Tick. Twitter? Tick. YouTube? Tick. Blog? Tick. You will FAIL!\n
1. Control\n\nJust ask BP or Nestle or Eurostar!\n\nYou need to “manage” a situation. You’ll never be able to control it. \n\n2. Tool\n\nTicklist - FB? Tick. Twitter? Tick. YouTube? Tick. Blog? Tick. You will FAIL!\n
1. Control\n\nJust ask BP or Nestle or Eurostar!\n\nYou need to “manage” a situation. You’ll never be able to control it. \n\n2. Tool\n\nTicklist - FB? Tick. Twitter? Tick. YouTube? Tick. Blog? Tick. You will FAIL!\n
1. Control\n\nJust ask BP or Nestle or Eurostar!\n\nYou need to “manage” a situation. You’ll never be able to control it. \n\n2. Tool\n\nTicklist - FB? Tick. Twitter? Tick. YouTube? Tick. Blog? Tick. You will FAIL!\n
1. Control\n\nJust ask BP or Nestle or Eurostar!\n\nYou need to “manage” a situation. You’ll never be able to control it. \n\n2. Tool\n\nTicklist - FB? Tick. Twitter? Tick. YouTube? Tick. Blog? Tick. You will FAIL!\n
1. Control\n\nJust ask BP or Nestle or Eurostar!\n\nYou need to “manage” a situation. You’ll never be able to control it. \n\n2. Tool\n\nTicklist - FB? Tick. Twitter? Tick. YouTube? Tick. Blog? Tick. You will FAIL!\n
1. Control\n\nJust ask BP or Nestle or Eurostar!\n\nYou need to “manage” a situation. You’ll never be able to control it. \n\n2. Tool\n\nTicklist - FB? Tick. Twitter? Tick. YouTube? Tick. Blog? Tick. You will FAIL!\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
The internet has a LONG memory. When you say nothing you’re at the mercy of Google and co. While Social Media is very popular and people spend a lot of time with it - Search is still king!\n\nIn late 2008 there was an Irish Pork scare. THREE YEARS LATER 3 out of the top 5 search results for Irish Pork are about the scare. Given that barely anyone goes “below the fold” when they’re searching for information - this means that people are going to get some pretty conflicting information about Irish pork.\n\nAny organisation that finds themselves in this situation will end up leaving your consumer/customer/audience confused - if what they see in search results conflicts with what you’re telling them, will that make them trust you any better? Maybe not. Probably not. It’ll make them question it at least. \n\nBy not being there to inform and manage the situation there you’re giving yourself a mountain to climb when you do start - it takes time to climb up search rankings!\n\nYou also stand to lose a LOT of money!\n\n
By saying nothing you’re allowing everyone else the freedom to say whatever they like.\n\nIf you get involved you can at least try to nip a problem in the bud. Or turn a bad situation to your advantage. When the ripples are good ones, instead of a crisis, you can even make a good one better!\n\nBut you have a duty to exercise your right to reply. Especially when you’re dealing with public service information - trust in govt and pubic sector has never been lower. It’s imperative that correct information is out there! \n\nIf you don’t have a social media presence in a channel where something is “breaking” - then see if you can get information to the most influential of those involved. Preferably the ones that are defending you (if there are). Or perhaps just agree to meet with the influential detractors offline - work to make them advocates... or at least less vehement detractors. \n\nWhatever you do, don’t ignore social media. \n
By saying nothing you’re allowing everyone else the freedom to say whatever they like.\n\nIf you get involved you can at least try to nip a problem in the bud. Or turn a bad situation to your advantage. When the ripples are good ones, instead of a crisis, you can even make a good one better!\n\nBut you have a duty to exercise your right to reply. Especially when you’re dealing with public service information - trust in govt and pubic sector has never been lower. It’s imperative that correct information is out there! \n\nIf you don’t have a social media presence in a channel where something is “breaking” - then see if you can get information to the most influential of those involved. Preferably the ones that are defending you (if there are). Or perhaps just agree to meet with the influential detractors offline - work to make them advocates... or at least less vehement detractors. \n\nWhatever you do, don’t ignore social media. \n
By saying nothing you’re allowing everyone else the freedom to say whatever they like.\n\nIf you get involved you can at least try to nip a problem in the bud. Or turn a bad situation to your advantage. When the ripples are good ones, instead of a crisis, you can even make a good one better!\n\nBut you have a duty to exercise your right to reply. Especially when you’re dealing with public service information - trust in govt and pubic sector has never been lower. It’s imperative that correct information is out there! \n\nIf you don’t have a social media presence in a channel where something is “breaking” - then see if you can get information to the most influential of those involved. Preferably the ones that are defending you (if there are). Or perhaps just agree to meet with the influential detractors offline - work to make them advocates... or at least less vehement detractors. \n\nWhatever you do, don’t ignore social media. \n
By saying nothing you’re allowing everyone else the freedom to say whatever they like.\n\nIf you get involved you can at least try to nip a problem in the bud. Or turn a bad situation to your advantage. When the ripples are good ones, instead of a crisis, you can even make a good one better!\n\nBut you have a duty to exercise your right to reply. Especially when you’re dealing with public service information - trust in govt and pubic sector has never been lower. It’s imperative that correct information is out there! \n\nIf you don’t have a social media presence in a channel where something is “breaking” - then see if you can get information to the most influential of those involved. Preferably the ones that are defending you (if there are). Or perhaps just agree to meet with the influential detractors offline - work to make them advocates... or at least less vehement detractors. \n\nWhatever you do, don’t ignore social media. \n
By saying nothing you’re allowing everyone else the freedom to say whatever they like.\n\nIf you get involved you can at least try to nip a problem in the bud. Or turn a bad situation to your advantage. When the ripples are good ones, instead of a crisis, you can even make a good one better!\n\nBut you have a duty to exercise your right to reply. Especially when you’re dealing with public service information - trust in govt and pubic sector has never been lower. It’s imperative that correct information is out there! \n\nIf you don’t have a social media presence in a channel where something is “breaking” - then see if you can get information to the most influential of those involved. Preferably the ones that are defending you (if there are). Or perhaps just agree to meet with the influential detractors offline - work to make them advocates... or at least less vehement detractors. \n\nWhatever you do, don’t ignore social media. \n
By saying nothing you’re allowing everyone else the freedom to say whatever they like.\n\nIf you get involved you can at least try to nip a problem in the bud. Or turn a bad situation to your advantage. When the ripples are good ones, instead of a crisis, you can even make a good one better!\n\nBut you have a duty to exercise your right to reply. Especially when you’re dealing with public service information - trust in govt and pubic sector has never been lower. It’s imperative that correct information is out there! \n\nIf you don’t have a social media presence in a channel where something is “breaking” - then see if you can get information to the most influential of those involved. Preferably the ones that are defending you (if there are). Or perhaps just agree to meet with the influential detractors offline - work to make them advocates... or at least less vehement detractors. \n\nWhatever you do, don’t ignore social media. \n
By saying nothing you’re allowing everyone else the freedom to say whatever they like.\n\nIf you get involved you can at least try to nip a problem in the bud. Or turn a bad situation to your advantage. When the ripples are good ones, instead of a crisis, you can even make a good one better!\n\nBut you have a duty to exercise your right to reply. Especially when you’re dealing with public service information - trust in govt and pubic sector has never been lower. It’s imperative that correct information is out there! \n\nIf you don’t have a social media presence in a channel where something is “breaking” - then see if you can get information to the most influential of those involved. Preferably the ones that are defending you (if there are). Or perhaps just agree to meet with the influential detractors offline - work to make them advocates... or at least less vehement detractors. \n\nWhatever you do, don’t ignore social media. \n
3. Reach/attention\n\nFans/followers/likes etc are just the social media equivalent of eyeballs pointed at the TV while your ad is on. It can mean more in social media though as the user as self-selected - i.e. given you permission to tell them your message. \n\nBut you don’t know how many of those “eyeballs” are looking at your messaging. It’s easy to like a page on Facebook. It’s easy to hide one from your news feed too.\n\n4. Winning advocates\nThis takes time! Relationships aren’t built overnight. \n\nYou might have some natural advocates - find them! Build relationships with them first. Then work with them to recruit more and build relationships with those too. \n\nKeep your promises and you’ll get more.\n
3. Reach/attention\n\nFans/followers/likes etc are just the social media equivalent of eyeballs pointed at the TV while your ad is on. It can mean more in social media though as the user as self-selected - i.e. given you permission to tell them your message. \n\nBut you don’t know how many of those “eyeballs” are looking at your messaging. It’s easy to like a page on Facebook. It’s easy to hide one from your news feed too.\n\n4. Winning advocates\nThis takes time! Relationships aren’t built overnight. \n\nYou might have some natural advocates - find them! Build relationships with them first. Then work with them to recruit more and build relationships with those too. \n\nKeep your promises and you’ll get more.\n
3. Reach/attention\n\nFans/followers/likes etc are just the social media equivalent of eyeballs pointed at the TV while your ad is on. It can mean more in social media though as the user as self-selected - i.e. given you permission to tell them your message. \n\nBut you don’t know how many of those “eyeballs” are looking at your messaging. It’s easy to like a page on Facebook. It’s easy to hide one from your news feed too.\n\n4. Winning advocates\nThis takes time! Relationships aren’t built overnight. \n\nYou might have some natural advocates - find them! Build relationships with them first. Then work with them to recruit more and build relationships with those too. \n\nKeep your promises and you’ll get more.\n
3. Reach/attention\n\nFans/followers/likes etc are just the social media equivalent of eyeballs pointed at the TV while your ad is on. It can mean more in social media though as the user as self-selected - i.e. given you permission to tell them your message. \n\nBut you don’t know how many of those “eyeballs” are looking at your messaging. It’s easy to like a page on Facebook. It’s easy to hide one from your news feed too.\n\n4. Winning advocates\nThis takes time! Relationships aren’t built overnight. \n\nYou might have some natural advocates - find them! Build relationships with them first. Then work with them to recruit more and build relationships with those too. \n\nKeep your promises and you’ll get more.\n
3. Reach/attention\n\nFans/followers/likes etc are just the social media equivalent of eyeballs pointed at the TV while your ad is on. It can mean more in social media though as the user as self-selected - i.e. given you permission to tell them your message. \n\nBut you don’t know how many of those “eyeballs” are looking at your messaging. It’s easy to like a page on Facebook. It’s easy to hide one from your news feed too.\n\n4. Winning advocates\nThis takes time! Relationships aren’t built overnight. \n\nYou might have some natural advocates - find them! Build relationships with them first. Then work with them to recruit more and build relationships with those too. \n\nKeep your promises and you’ll get more.\n
3. Reach/attention\n\nFans/followers/likes etc are just the social media equivalent of eyeballs pointed at the TV while your ad is on. It can mean more in social media though as the user as self-selected - i.e. given you permission to tell them your message. \n\nBut you don’t know how many of those “eyeballs” are looking at your messaging. It’s easy to like a page on Facebook. It’s easy to hide one from your news feed too.\n\n4. Winning advocates\nThis takes time! Relationships aren’t built overnight. \n\nYou might have some natural advocates - find them! Build relationships with them first. Then work with them to recruit more and build relationships with those too. \n\nKeep your promises and you’ll get more.\n
5. Maths\nVolume = frequency of exposure to your social media activities\nImpact = action taken as a result of exposure to your social media activities\n\n6. WOM\nTalkability is NOT a real thing. It’s not even a real word.\nDon’t go after “loads of mentions” for your initiative/organisation - work to get the RIGHT kind of mentions. \n\n
5. Maths\nVolume = frequency of exposure to your social media activities\nImpact = action taken as a result of exposure to your social media activities\n\n6. WOM\nTalkability is NOT a real thing. It’s not even a real word.\nDon’t go after “loads of mentions” for your initiative/organisation - work to get the RIGHT kind of mentions. \n\n
5. Maths\nVolume = frequency of exposure to your social media activities\nImpact = action taken as a result of exposure to your social media activities\n\n6. WOM\nTalkability is NOT a real thing. It’s not even a real word.\nDon’t go after “loads of mentions” for your initiative/organisation - work to get the RIGHT kind of mentions. \n\n
5. Maths\nVolume = frequency of exposure to your social media activities\nImpact = action taken as a result of exposure to your social media activities\n\n6. WOM\nTalkability is NOT a real thing. It’s not even a real word.\nDon’t go after “loads of mentions” for your initiative/organisation - work to get the RIGHT kind of mentions. \n\n
5. Maths\nVolume = frequency of exposure to your social media activities\nImpact = action taken as a result of exposure to your social media activities\n\n6. WOM\nTalkability is NOT a real thing. It’s not even a real word.\nDon’t go after “loads of mentions” for your initiative/organisation - work to get the RIGHT kind of mentions. \n\n
5. Maths\nVolume = frequency of exposure to your social media activities\nImpact = action taken as a result of exposure to your social media activities\n\n6. WOM\nTalkability is NOT a real thing. It’s not even a real word.\nDon’t go after “loads of mentions” for your initiative/organisation - work to get the RIGHT kind of mentions. \n\n
5. Maths\nVolume = frequency of exposure to your social media activities\nImpact = action taken as a result of exposure to your social media activities\n\n6. WOM\nTalkability is NOT a real thing. It’s not even a real word.\nDon’t go after “loads of mentions” for your initiative/organisation - work to get the RIGHT kind of mentions. \n\n
Culture = Trust and engagement is what social media is about. You won’t get this by paying lip service. People can smell disingenuousness a mile away. Your online, and social media, behaviour needs to be true to your culture. This might mean a cultural change - not an easy task!\n\nGood Ideas = they can come from anywhere. Not just your agency (I’m doing myself out of a job here!). GMP did a 24 hour tweetathon (as we’ll see later) to show people what they deal with in a single day. Great insight into an often maligned service that created community pride and engagement.\n\nData = Get to know your audience. I’ll keep saying it. If you don’t know them what you say will be off target. It’ll have less impact and less effect. \n
Culture = Trust and engagement is what social media is about. You won’t get this by paying lip service. People can smell disingenuousness a mile away. Your online, and social media, behaviour needs to be true to your culture. This might mean a cultural change - not an easy task!\n\nGood Ideas = they can come from anywhere. Not just your agency (I’m doing myself out of a job here!). GMP did a 24 hour tweetathon (as we’ll see later) to show people what they deal with in a single day. Great insight into an often maligned service that created community pride and engagement.\n\nData = Get to know your audience. I’ll keep saying it. If you don’t know them what you say will be off target. It’ll have less impact and less effect. \n
Culture = Trust and engagement is what social media is about. You won’t get this by paying lip service. People can smell disingenuousness a mile away. Your online, and social media, behaviour needs to be true to your culture. This might mean a cultural change - not an easy task!\n\nGood Ideas = they can come from anywhere. Not just your agency (I’m doing myself out of a job here!). GMP did a 24 hour tweetathon (as we’ll see later) to show people what they deal with in a single day. Great insight into an often maligned service that created community pride and engagement.\n\nData = Get to know your audience. I’ll keep saying it. If you don’t know them what you say will be off target. It’ll have less impact and less effect. \n
One of your biggest challenges will be to get stakeholder engagement. \n\nYou might experience technophobes and social media skeptics. You have to kill this with information.\n\nInformation and experience - get them onto social media so they can see it for themselves. \n
One of your biggest challenges will be to get stakeholder engagement. \n\nYou might experience technophobes and social media skeptics. You have to kill this with information.\n\nInformation and experience - get them onto social media so they can see it for themselves. \n
One of your biggest challenges will be to get stakeholder engagement. \n\nYou might experience technophobes and social media skeptics. You have to kill this with information.\n\nInformation and experience - get them onto social media so they can see it for themselves. \n
One of your biggest challenges will be to get stakeholder engagement. \n\nYou might experience technophobes and social media skeptics. You have to kill this with information.\n\nInformation and experience - get them onto social media so they can see it for themselves. \n
One of your biggest challenges will be to get stakeholder engagement. \n\nYou might experience technophobes and social media skeptics. You have to kill this with information.\n\nInformation and experience - get them onto social media so they can see it for themselves. \n
One of your biggest challenges will be to get stakeholder engagement. \n\nYou might experience technophobes and social media skeptics. You have to kill this with information.\n\nInformation and experience - get them onto social media so they can see it for themselves. \n
Build a business case! Why is this right for you? What will it cost to do it? What could it cost you if you don’t? \n\nMinimise the risk for them to say yes!\n\nTo do this you need a cohesive strategy - a plan of action!\n
\n
If you don’t have a clear reason to be, then you probably shouldn’t be doing anything.\nSometimes, it’s OK just to listen and monitor what’s going on. You might not be ready to establish social media presence - that’s OK. It might not be right for your organisation - but ALWAYS listen. Then you’ll be ready if/when things change and your do need to start building a presence.\n\nListening will uncover the “why” of social media for your organisation. And will continue to tell you why... or why not.\n
Monitoring should also tell you the “where” too\n\nOnly pick the channels that are relevant. If it’s not appropriate for you to establish an active presence in a channel - look for other ways to get your message there. Look to your advocates - are they there? Can they help you? \n\nRemember the point about the ticklist? Use your insights to help you establish why you should be in a channel.\n\nIf relevant, just pick one channel and operate within that singular channel with EXCELLENCE. \n\nWhen you’re ready, and ONLY IF it’s right, then you can scale up to other channels.\n
You know why and you know where, but how about the “what”?\n\nThink about what you’ll say and how you’ll say it. \n\nWhat does your audience want/need to hear from you? What are the key commentary themes about your organisation/area of interest? \n\nSocial media is absolutely not about finding new, “free” channels to push out advertising messages through. Do that and I guarantee nothing will come of it. People will ignore you. \n\nMake sure you’re sending out the right information in the right format. At the right time - a quick note on automated messaging, beyond automatic sharing your blog posts, avoid it if you can - people find it disingenuous and you’ll get bitten on the arse sooner or later with a mis-timed message that is at odds with tone of the channel at that time.\n\n\n
\nIt’s OK to establish your own rules of engagement. \n\nYou have to take into account the user behaviour of a particular channel and make sure it’s not at odds with that - but if there are things you can’t discuss online that’s OK. Tell people why and they’ll accept that. If there are times that you will and won’t be available to respond - tell them, they’ll be OK with with too.\n\nIf there will be instances when you have to remove user content, say from your Facebook page, make sure they know why. And don’t just remove it without comment - tell your community why it’s removed. So they don’t get annoyed and hopefully fewer people will make the same mistake again.\n\n
MEASURE what you do. Gina’s going to talk through this more in detail tomorrow. But I can’t emphasise it enough!\n\nBut you don’t have to measure EVERYTHING!\n\nJust because you can, doesn’t always mean that you should!\n\nIf you’ve figured out the “why” that I mentioned earlier, then your KPIs should be linked to that.\n\n
Suffolk County Council Trading Standards: http://suffolktradingstandards.wordpress.com/\n
Don’t just work it up, put it in a lever arch file that gets shoved into a cupboard. Or print out an impressively complex info-graphic that just gets posted on a wall. \n\nTreat your strategy as a living thing - it will grow and change over time. \n
GMP at set-up.\n\nBasically, it was cheaper community outreach!\n\nThey had nice ideas to get awareness and ignite sharing. They could even be hyper-local with station specific twitter accounts. Nothing’s more relevant than a break in two streets away!\n\nBut they didn’t know what to do with Facebook - it had no clear role (their ticklist wasn’t working!)\n
Then England went a bit mad for a few days, last August.\n\nSuddenly they had an opportunity to turn their social media assets into a genuinely useful, real-time service to their community.\n\nLess cuddly community outreach. More “this is what’s going on now” so that people felt lest afraid and panic was minimised.\n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
During the riots - there were real-time updates, so people felt reassured. Compare this to other cities, especially around Tottenham, where there was a lot of vocal critisism of police and fire services for lack of information.\n\nAfter the riots, they kept the community involved. They “named and shamed” those convicted (just as they would traditionally do in the press) and even explained why. \n\nThey listened to feedback about this from the community and adapted their activity after it - when they made mistakes they held their hands up (no pun intended) and learned from it.\n\nThey also used YouTube to keep people informed, on a more detailed level, from senior members of the police force - the community could see that GMP were taking social media seriously and it was paying dividends.\n\nCommunity engagement was high enough for GMP to launch “shop a looter” via Twitter and (now with a reason to exist) their Facebook page - integrating Flickr and Youtube content. \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
All the theory in the world will only do so much. With social media there comes a point when you just need to get stuck in.\n\nYou’ll never really understand it until you are in it.\n
Don’t feel like you have to do it all in one go. Start small, make some mistakes (and you will!), admit them, learn from them, then grow when you’re ready!\n
Any questions?\n\nIf you have any afterwards, drop me a line any time...\n\n\n