Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Factors Of Language Change 1


Published on

Published in: Technology

Factors Of Language Change 1

  1. 1. Factors of Language Change Introduction Generally it is believed that most of the languages of Europe and India are the descendents of an ancient parent language which existed 4000 years ago. The name, traces, or the historical record of that language is no more available now. Modern Researchers identify it with the name of the “Indo-European Language”. Many Questions pop in every mind that is interested in solving this mystery of language change: 1. How does language changes? 2. when this change appears? 3. Is it a constructive or destructive process? 4. Can language change be gauged? The purpose of this work is not to search for the answers to all these Questions. Herein we have tried to collect the examples of how scholars succeeded in studying subtle changes in language. Variables: Independent Variables: i. Sociolinguistic Factors. ii. Psycholinguistic Factors iii. Therapeutic Factors iv. Chain Reaction Factors Dependent Variables i. Syntactic Aspects of Language ii. Morphological Aspects iii. Phonetic Aspects Methodology This work is based on a Secondary or Academic Research . Only Qualitative Data will be collected and arranged. The aim of the work is to prepare a mini catalogue of the achievements attained until now. Hypothesis: Depending on my background knowledge of linguistics and its Method of Research I expect that ‘Even the subtlest change in language can e gauged.’ Delimitations; i. This work is not restricted to the study of changes in a specific language. It is a general overview of the changes taking/en place in different languages of the world. ii. The changes will be described diachronically. Synchronic variations is not the topic of this work.
  2. 2. iii. This work is not restricted the study of only one feature-change. All the components may be discussed if we felt it necessary. iv. Countless causes of language change can be pointed out .here we are concerned with only those which are proven after Research, not those based on speculations. Data Collection And Literature Review: Language change can be studied under Four broad categories: i. Sociolinguistic Factors ii. Psycholinguistic Factors iii. Therapeutic factors iv. Chain Reaction factors Sociolinguistic Changes: Sociolinguistic causes of change can be studied under three heads: i. Fashion And Random Fluctuations ii. Foreign Influence iii. Social Need Random Fluctuations: Every speaker tries to articulate the exact pronunciation of every word and segment. But naturally, no two utterances can be exactly alike. However, minor gaps between different articulations of the same sound remain imperceptible to human ears. The major differences are often successfully gauged. But since the listeners are more attentive to the message only, they hardly give feedback about the deviated pronunciation. Therefore, the speaker remains unaware of his pronunciation difference with the prototype sound. This gradual shift from the prototype pronunciation is not effected by a few persons only. In fact every speaker contributes to this massive change in the pronunciation system. Thus, when the drift becomes marked enough, we realize the change has taken place. Fashion: Out of the variety of deviated pronunciations (of one or more segments) one or the other is preferred to by the majority of the speakers. This preferred pronunciation emerges as a Fashion and qualifies the status of a new prototype sound. Just as there can be no logical and predictable reasons behind the trends in garment fashions, Fashions of pronunciation are also arbitrary and whimsical. But whatever they are, they leave little choice to the people. Foreign Bodies: Random Fluctuations and Fashions are not the sufficiently powerful factors to account for all changes in the language system. A few changes also occur because of the influence of foreign languages. The impact of foreign languages can be studied under the following heads: Substratum Theory: When the immigrants, or the conquered subjects learn a new language, the features of their L 1 are carried over to their L 2. These new learners hand over these imperfections to the next generation. In this way the imperfections become the part of the code and often a new dialect emerges, such as Black’s English. This is one of the major contributing
  3. 3. factors in the change of English language because this language is adopted by a great number of immigrants. Overcorrection: Sometimes the descendents of the above mentioned immigrants pour extra efforts to eradicate their imperfection. But they fall to overcorrection and exaggerate the corrected feature, in this manner they produce another set of new features which add up to the basic stock of the code: e.g.  for   for  National Borders And Multilingualism: When political boundaries also coincide with linguistic boundaries, people living along the border on both sides borrow vocabulary from each other’s language. But a very strange phenomenon was observed in Kupwar village of India, 200 miles south-east of Bombay. In this village of 30000, three languages are spoken : Kannada, Urdu and Marathi. The later two belong to the Indo-European family while the former to the Dravidian family. These three languages have been native to this neighborhood for last six centuries. Because of social pressure, people have not borrowed the vocabulary items form other languages. But strangely enough, their sentence structures have approached very close o each other. As a result the grammar of all the three languages is different from their respective prototype grammars. A sentence ‘I cut some greens and brought them’ is spoken in the abovementioned language in the same number of words arranged in the same order. It would be spoken like this: * ‘Leaves a few having cut taking I came’. A similar syntactic harmony was observed in Tanzania between Ma’a and one of the Bantu languages. Ma’a belongs to Cushitic family which follow SOV structure (Lions meat eat) under the influence of Bantu Language, now Ma’a sentence structure has emerged as SVO (Lions eat meat). Borrowing: In Sociolinguistics ‘Borrowing’ refers to ‘copying’. It has four important characteristics: i. Borrowing of Easily Detachable Elements: Such elements can easily be picked out of their parent language without carrying over any additional properties along with them. For example, the names of the food items like pizza, pudding, burger etc are much used in Urdu language also. ii. Borrowing After Modification: A few items are borrowed after a little modification in them in order to make them adjustable in the new language. For example, English borrowed Urdu Orderly →
  4. 4. Lantern → iii. Borrowing of the compatible Items: Some times a dominant structure of a language is borrowed. The borrowed structure is not new to the borrowing language either, though only in limited use. Since the room for compatibility is already present, the new structure gets easily assimilated in the borrowing language e.g. French language unusually places Adj after the noun like: Un visage blanc The face white. But the people living close to the border of Germany usually place the Adjective in the pre modifying slot. This change occurred because in French language the structure readily existed but in a very few expressions like ‘le petit garcon’ (a small boy) ‘ la jollyie femme (the pretty woman) iv. Minimal Adjustment: Two neighboring languages usually influence each other. But this influence is not established in a day. The mutual borrowing takes place only in small dozes. One doze paves the way for a series of more dozes. But no ‘big leap’ ever occurs in the borrowing process. Need And Function: i. Coinage: To fulfill its needs, a language sometimes coin new words by the processes of blending, compounding, acronym formation, clippings, abbreviations etc. ii. Emphasis: The other example of change in function because of a need is the use of double/repeated negative especially in Black’s English. According to Traditional Grammar, the use of double negative in a sentence is incorrect. But the sentence ‘it ain’t no cat can’t get in no coop.’ is a negative one. Its repeated use of negative is accounted for on the basis of the ‘need for Emphasis’. iii. Politeness: In civilized societies polite and indirect assertions are preferred to rude and straight forward demands. This need of politeness carries out changes in the choice of vocabulary, shape of the sentence structure, and in the type of intonation pattern. For example, compare the two sentences given below: a) Prompt payment would be appreciated. b) We order you to pay immediately. Psycholinguistic Factors: Dropping Off Consonants:
  5. 5. Generally, languages follow C-V-C-V sequence. Mostly the consonants sounds in the end are followed by vowel sounds. In French language an interesting phenomenon took place. If a vowel is followed by a nasalised consonants like  in the final position the property of nasalization is transferred to the preceding vowel. When the vowel becomes nasalised, the following nasal consonants becomes only surplus. That’s how the final position nasal consonants disappeared from French language. Generally, the voiceless stops are pronounced weakly in the final position. In French, Chinese and Maori languages p,t,k sounds are lost from the final position. In Chinese language, first they were replaced by a glottal stop and latter the glottal stop was also lost. In the Cockney and Glaswegian dialects of English kand t, but less after p are replaced by a glottal stop. The possibility is that after some time the glottal stop will also be lost. Linking Sounds Together: Assimilation: During the flow of speech, a few obtrusive sound combinations are simplified and changed into an easier single sound. This process is observed at both the word and the stress level. At word lever ‘hand bag’ is the example which is usually articulated as  . The bilabial effect of bsound creeps back and delete d sound and convert nasal n into a bilabial m. At sentence level, ‘would you’ is pronounced as  . Instead of clicking the tongue at the alveolar ridge, and at the hard palate, once each, only one click is performed that is on the Alveolar ridge and the other one is skipped. As for the stability of such change, Assimilation at word level becomes permanent, but at sentence level it is temporary. Elision: Instead of changing the sound, sometimes it is dropped altogether. The purpose is to maintain the flow of speech. Example of elision within a word is sandwich  , the loss of d sound. Now watch the loss of d at the sentence level: ‘George bang(ed) the drum hard as he march(ed) through the town.’ C-V-C-V Sequence: Consonant-vowel sequence is found in all languages. Though it does not follow with accuracy yet the trends of languages change suggest that the languages are moving towards that end. Other Natural Tendencies: Fambly:
  6. 6. At individual level sometimes,  is heard between  and l  or  combinations. At an earlier stage, this combination was not intervened by  sound in Greek language as amrotia (ambrosia) , and bramael (brambel). The inference may be drawn that  + l  and  +  combinations may be disjoined by an intrusive  sound. Warmpth : The ‘fambly-like phenomenon are observable in other combination too. For example,  + t combinations are intervened by an intrusive p. Therefore, this potential change may appear in future as: dreampt, somepthing, hamster, etc. fantcy: Another phenomenon is the intrusion of  in  combinations. Therefore, the potential possibilities are the following spelling: Printce, tintsel, mintser, etc… Fium and miuk One of the perception difficulties is the hearing of the dark  . Owing to this difficulty, in some varieties of English ‘film’ is pronounced as ‘fium; and ‘milk’ as ‘miuk’. Ingland: In this example,  combination seems to be moving towards the  and  combination. Tone Languages: There is a worldwide tendency that vowels are articulated at a slightly higher pitch before voiceless consonants than before the voiced one. Some languages like Chinese, exaggerated the former style. As a result they are transformed into the tone languages now. They differentiate the words fromone another by the variation of pitch. Bu’er and le’er: In a few environments, the voice quality of  and d sounds become indistinguishable e.g. letter  and d  . As a result the cockney dialect of London replaces these stops with glottal stop. Hence the word letter is pronounced le’er and butter as bu’er. Reverse Change: In fourteenth century, a change began to appear in Swedish language. It was the omission of /d/ in the final position e.g. in the words like ved, hund, blad, etc. the final /d/ sound was dropped. But in the twentieth century this sound was restored probably because of the increased literacy:
  7. 7. Similarly, in America, there was a tendency to skip one consonant if the final cluster contained two e.g. kept, crept, swept, began to be pronounced as kep, crep, swep tec. But if the presence of the final consonant marks tense, then normally the final consonant is not dropped e.g. stepped, heaped, are pronounced as /stept/ -/heapt/. Natural Development in Syntax: There is an evidence that the universal mental tendencies go side by side the physical ones. An example, is a very similar syntactic change in a few languages: the ancient Greek, and a few Niger-Congo languages. There was a tendency in both of the languages that the object used to be placed next to verb as: Henry proposed Petronella ou Sunday.. not Henry proposed on Sunday Petronella. In English language, a tendency is found when the object goes far away from its verb, the subject repeats e.g. ‘Petronella is the kind of girl whom when he had arrived in the woods with the primrose blooming and the girds singing Henry felt impelled to propose her.’ Originally both Greek and Kru languages followed the structure similar to the above mentioned one: The scepter which was studded with golden nails he threw down. (Greek) The rice which the child bought he did not eat (Kru) These structures changed in to: i. The scepter he threw down which was srudded wih golden nails. t ii. The rice he did not eat, which the child bought. This change effected a shift from SOV chain to SVO chain. Therapeutic Changes: This section will discuss the preservation tendencies of language. How it trims outgrowths and shaves off irregularities. The underlying principle is that the efficiency of our memory can be enhanced limitlessly if the data is systematically organized. Since human language consists of limited number of patterns whose rearrangements produce a variety of meanings. If these patterns break down, they bring in stress on memory. To counter this difficulty, self-regulating devices of language become active and restore the broken patterns. This Restoration of the broken patterns is termed as therapeutic change. Neatening the Sound Patterns: The phonemes of English are generally paired into two classes: voiced and voiceless. The voiced phonemes are: /b/- /d/-/g/. the voiceless are /p/ /k/ /t/ etc. The place of Articulation of each member of a pair is the same. They differ from each other only in the presence and absence of the vocal vibration.. In the 18th C, English Fricatives existed in this pattern: Voiceless: /f/ /    Voice :   
  8. 8. There was no partner for  and /h/ sounds. At that time, a therapeutic process began  was provided with a voiced partner  . The reasons were two: (i) First /j/ sound was inserted after /z/ sound e.g. pleasure which was first pronounced as /plez / now began to be pronounced as /plezj /. The combination of /z/ and /j/ sounds produced / / sound (ii) the / / sound was also borrowed from the French words like baige, garage etc. As for the /h/ sound, since no partner could be devised for it, it is tending to disappear from English language e.g. in many words of RP it is not pronounced now. For example, ghost,  exhibit /  etc. The treatment of /r/ and /h/ sounds is an example of how language creates regularities and remove irregularities as a result of an innate process. Vowel Pairs: In the above example, consonant patterning was studied in voice quality. Here we shall study the patterning of the vowels of the same height. For example, /  and  . In New York Labov conducted this study in 1972. According to the findings of this study certain diphthongs were changing their sounds.  was expanding into  .A slower change was also noted. It was the movement from /  to  . A change in the back vowel combination /  also brought a similar change in its counterpart front vowel  . It is an example of how language maintains correlation between its different patterns, and how neatness and harmony are effected. Tidying Up The Morphemes: Generally two principles stay behind every pattern change. 1. Principle of Isomorphism: One form should mark one type of change, one type of ending should express one aspect of meaning e.g. tense or plural should be expressed by one type of inflection or derivation. 2. The rules of alteration in the from of words should be systematic and easily detectable. Under the influence of the same rules many of the irregular nouns have become regular plurals e.g. housen houses, suna sons, media medium, syllabi syllabuses etc. Similarly, a few nouns which were singular with ending  lost this sound to bestow prominent singularity on the lexeme e.g. peas pea. Smoothing Out the Syntax: Sometimes people’s subconscious expectations help to smooth the syntactic structure. For example, before 1000 AD impersonal verbs used to be preceded by the objects in the manner: Him chaunst in to meet upon the way faithless Sarazin…. instead of It chaunst him to meet… In around 1000 AD two changes appeared
  9. 9. i) Inflections after N disappeared (which indicated the subject or object case) ii) SVO chain came into use. Actually (i) became the cause of (ii). The last accusative inflection from Nouns might have turned the preceding obj. into a subj as Achilles chansed to sle philes. Here Achilles was meant to be obj, but it passed as subject. In this way a neatening was effected in the syntax of English. French language is known for the use of double negative without making the sentence negative. For example, Je ne sais pas I don’t know. In the above sentence ‘ne’ and ‘pas’ are negative items. ‘Pas’ is the emphatic negative. Now a change has occurred. ‘Pas’ is considered a regular negative and sometime ‘ne’ is dropped as: Je sais pas I do not know. In this way the syntax maintains both the negation and the emphasis. Moreover, the confusing item is also dropped. The neatening process is, thus, performed. Chain Reaction Changes: Sometimes a therapeutic change triggers off a set of wholesale shifts in which the various linguistic items appear to play a game of musical chain. Grim’s Law: This law describes a series of consonant change from Indo-European to English language. Second Vowel Shift: A great shift in the English Vowel in the 15th C. As a result all the long vowels changed places. This process was completed in 200 years.
  10. 10.   /   /  /  Great Vowel Shift: Mid English Early Mod. English Mod English  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------  /  ------------  ------------ / /  ------------  ------------ /   ------------  ------------ /   ------------  ------------  The Question arises why this shift occurred. The answer has been suggested with the help of two theoretical chains: (i) Drag Chain (ii) Push Chain Drag Chain: It is a chain process in which one vowel slips off its place. Some other vowel fill up this gap, and a chain process begins. Examples: In German language a Drag Chain was formed in this manner. Push Chain:
  11. 11. In this process, a vowel begins to slip forward imperceptibly, driving the next one further ahead. This act of pushing on continues in a chain. The example of this chain is present in the late Middle Chinese language which began in 18th C. There is a strong evidence available that the change took place in this sequence.      800 AD   /  1200 AD  In view of the above Data the hypothesis is proved that language changes can be studied however subtle and imperceptible they are. Bibliography:
  12. 12. 1. Aitchison, Jean (1991) Language Change: Progress or Decay. Cambridge University Press. 2. Matthews . P.H. (2005) Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. OUP 3. Yule, George (1977) The Study of Language. 4. Crystal, David (1994) Encyclopaedia of Language. 5. Lyon, Jhon 6. Robins 7. Hudson