Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

TechTeam Presnetation

494 views

Published on

This presentation is designed for TechTeam project participants.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

TechTeam Presnetation

  1. 1. Mary Churchill Technology Integrationalist Duluth Public Schools Chery Takkunen, Ph.D Chair, Assoc. Professor Graduate Education Programs The School of Education The College of St. Scholastica Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  2. 2.  Framework(s): Technology for Learning and 21st Century skills  Empower students for optimal learning  Higher level thining Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  3. 3. Facebook and Twitter Digital Immigrant Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  4. 4. What is the best example of technology integration you have witnessed in your school in the last year? Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  5. 5. 21 st Century Skills LoTI ISTE Standards Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  6. 6. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  7. 7. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  8. 8. We are currently preparing students for jobs that don’t yet exist . . . using technologies that haven’t yet been invented . . .in order to solve problems we don’t even know are problems yet. — Richard Riley, Secretary of Education under Clinton Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  9. 9.  Core Subjects  Global  Critical Thinking Awareness  Collaboration  Information  Creativity Literacy  Communication  Technology Literacy  Innovation  Life/career skills Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  10. 10.  Return to basic skills- safer?  Concerns: NCLB state tests?  Deep learning vs. shallow learning  Have faith 21st Century skills teaching and learning works.  Not either/Or  A Vision of K-12 Students  Article in folder cites research to support 21st century skills Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  11. 11. http://www.techlearning.com/printablearticle/8670 Bloom, Lorin Anderson, revised Bloom's Taxonomy and published this- Bloom's Revised Taxonomy in 2001.Key to this is the use of verbs Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  12. 12.  Quantity  Quality of use  Number of computers  How students are  Internet use using technology  Quality of product  “How much?” Old Way New Way Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  13. 13.  Six Levels  Level Four- Target Level  Adopted by many states  At Level Four best chance for student learning potential  Dr. Christopher Moersch (1995)  LOTI- Connection Formerly named Levels of Technology ImplementationTakkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  14. 14. Level 0 Non-use 1 Awareness Teacher use only- Grades, email, etc. (Productivity) 2 Exploration Student us (Lower level thinking) Teacher directed Technology is an extension or enrichment 3 Infusion Higher level thinking and engaged learning used to care out teacher-directed tasks 4 Integration A and B (Mechanical vs. Routine) Learner Centered- Student inquiry driven process 5 Expansion Goes beyond the classroom 6 Technology infusion Technology goes beyond the ctakkune@css.edu walls classroom Takkunen:
  15. 15. http://www.techlearning.com/printablearticle/8670 Bloom, Lorin Anderson, revised Bloom's Taxonomy and published this- Bloom's Revised Taxonomy in 2001.Key to this is the use of verbs Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  16. 16. Students use of digital tools and resources is inherent and motivated by the drive to answer student-generated questions that dictate the content, process, and products embedded in the learning experience. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  17. 17. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  18. 18. 1. Standard texting rates only (worst cast US $0.20) TIPS 2. We have no access to your phone number 3. Capitalization doesn’t matter, butctakkune@css.eduspelling do Takkunen: spaces and
  19. 19.  Promethean Lesson  Maui Movie  Tessellations  Promethean HS Math  Edutopia Lesson: Geometry Let’s give this the “sniff” test…. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  20. 20.  Administrators  Teachers  Students  Student Profiles  44 states have adopted these or other tech standards  Minnesota still does not have a set of grade level measureable technology standards….. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  21. 21.  Visionary Leadership NETS-A  Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning NETS T  Creativity and Innovation NETS S  Communicate and Collaborate NETS S Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  22. 22.  What did you identify as the best technology project you saw in your school last year?  What LoTI level do you believe it is?  Did this project encourage 21st century skills?  Did it meet any of the ISTE standards? Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  23. 23. Marzono’s Work Classroom Instruction that Works Promethean: 17% Achievement Gain "You don't get gains from technology... you get gains from changing the learning environment with technology" Twitter quote from #ties09 “quoting Marzono” Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  24. 24. Higher Empower Level and Thinking Engage 21st Century Skills LoTI ISTE NETS Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  25. 25. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  26. 26. The illiterate of the future will not be the person who cannot read. It will be the person who does not know how to learn. Alvin Toffler Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  27. 27. Where to start? Awash in too many ideas… Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  28. 28. It’s a little like herding cats..…. Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  29. 29.  I like the Smartboard, but I think that all kids should have their own small smartboards so that we could do more stuff….  1st grader from Northern MN  When I go to school I have to “power down”…  5the grader from Illinois Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  30. 30.  Digital- Age Literacy ◦ Kids need help with this  Remember that schools may be the only place for some children to access technology  Research: $70,000 for full technology access with high speed internet at home  TALK to students- they know!  Let Children Create Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  31. 31.  Tech Team Project  0 credit course available for student teachers  1 credit course ($125.00) available for cooperating teachers ◦ Mentor student teachers/training etc. ◦ Read several articles ◦ Reflection paper  Student teacher creates a technology- integrated project Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  32. 32.  Student project (Student teacher in charge) ◦ Can this project fit in with work that is already being done? ◦ ISTE standard ◦ MN academic standard ◦ Higher level thinking ◦ LoTi level 3 or higher ◦ CSS lesson plan Celebration: A day to share projects! Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  33. 33.  What other support do you need?  Will the tentative dates work?  Would you prefer to have support/training in your classrooms? Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu
  34. 34. Thank you! ctakkune@css.edu Twitter@ctak10 Facebook.com.css.education Takkunen: ctakkune@css.edu

×