CHA2DS2-VASc, Score CHADS2 score, and Hasbled score

3,529 views

Published on

CHA2DS2-VASc Score
CHADS2 score
Hasbled score

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,529
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
136
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

CHA2DS2-VASc, Score CHADS2 score, and Hasbled score

  1. 1. CHADS2 Scoring System http://crisbertcualteros.page.tl
  2. 2. CHADS2 score: • clinical prediction rule for assessing the risk of stroke in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation • used to determine if treatment is required with anticoagulation therapy or antiplatelet therapy or not • High CHADS2 score: greater risk of stroke • Low CHADS2 score: lower risk of stroke
  3. 3. Condition Points C Congestive Heart Failure 1 H Hypertension 1 A AGE >75yo 1 D Diabetes Mellitus 1 S2 Prior Stroke or TIA 2
  4. 4. CHADS2 Score Stroke Risk % 95% confidence interval 0 1.9 1.2-3.0 1 2.8 2.0-3.8 2 4.0 3.1-5.1 3 5.9 4.6-7.3 4 8.5 6.3-11.1 5 12.5 8.2-17.5 6 18.2 10.5-27.4 Annual Stroke Risk with Respect to CHADS 2 Score
  5. 5. Anticoagulation based on the CHADS2 score Score Risk Anticoagulation Therapy Considerations 0 Low Aspirin Aspirin daily 1 Moderate Aspirin or Warfarin Aspirin daily or raise INR to 2.0- 3.0, depending on factors such as patient preference 2 or greater Moderate or High Warfarin Raise INR to 2.0-3.0, unless contraindicated (e.g. clinically significant GI bleeding, inability to obtain regular INR screening)
  6. 6. http://crisbertcualteros.page.tl
  7. 7. CHA2DS2-VASc score http://crisbertcualteros.page.tl
  8. 8. Feature Score Congestive Heart Failure 1 Hypertension 1 Age >75 years 2 Age between 65 and 74 years 1 Stroke/TIA/TE 2 Vascular disease (previous MI, PAD or aortic plaque) 1 Diabetes mellitus 1 Female 1
  9. 9. HAS-BLED score http://crisbertcualteros.page.tl
  10. 10. • is a therapeutic bleeding risk stratification score for those on oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation
  11. 11. Letter Clinical Characteristic Points Awarded H Hypertension 1 A Abnormal renal and liver function (1 point each) 1 or 2 S Stroke 1 B Bleeding 1 L Labile INRs 1 E Elderly 1 D Drugs or alcohol (1 point each) 1 or 2 Maximum possible score is 9
  12. 12. H Hypertension -( systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg) (Points: 1 ) A Abnormal renal function ( defined as the presence of chronic dialysis or renal transplantation or serum creatinine 200µmol/L (>~2.3 mg/dL)) (Points: 1 ) Abnormal liver function ( defined as chronic hepatic disease (eg. cirrhosis) or biochemical evidence of significant hepatic derangement (eg. bilirubin >2x upper limit of normal, in association with AST/ALT/ALP >3x upper limit normal) (Points: 1 ) S Stroke (Previous history of stroke) (Points: 1 ) B Bleeding (Major bleeding history (anemia or predisposition to bleeding)) (Points: 1 ) L Labile INRs (refers to unstable/high INRs or poor time in therapeutic range(eg<60%))(Points: 1) E Elderly (age >/= 65) (Points: 1 ) D Drug Therapy (concomitant therapy such as antiplatelet agents, NSAID's) (Points: 1 ) Alcohol intake (consuming 8 or more alcoholic drinks per week) (Points: 1)
  13. 13. Feature Score Hypertension (Systolic >= 160mmHg) 1 Abnormal renal function 1 Abnormal liver function 1 Age >= 65 years 1 Stroke in past 1 Bleeding 1 Labile INRs 1 Taking other drugs as well 1 Alcohol intake at same time 1 HAS-BLED score
  14. 14. The risk of major bleeding within one year in atrial fibrillation patients enrolled in the Euro Heart Survey. HAS-BLED, acronym: Hypertension [uncontrolled, >160 mmHg systolic), Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition [anemia], Labile INR [i.e. therapeutic time in range <60%], Elderly (>65) and Drugs/alcohol concomitantly [antiplatelet agents, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs] [Maximum score 9]. HAS-BLED score n Bleeds, n Bleeds/100 patients* 0 798 9 1.13 1 1286 13 1.02 2 744 14 1.88 3 187 7 3.74 4 46 4 8.70 5 8 1 12.50 Any score 3071 48 1.56
  15. 15. • score of 3 or more indicates increased one year bleed risk on anticoagulation sufficient to justify caution or more regular review > risk is for intracranial bleed, bleed requiring hospitalization or a hemoglobin drop > 2g/L or that needs transfusion.

×