Essay War Against Terrorism

The War On Terror Summary
The beginning of "The War on Terror". "The appeal of justice and liberty in the end, is greater than
the appeal of hatred and tyranny in any form."(Bush).Bush's comment was referring to "The War on
Terror" because he was in presidency during this year so this quote said by him means that he wants
freedom for everyone.The solution to the "U.S.'s War on Terror" is ITA researchers, Antiterrorism
Assistance Program, The Institute for the Study of War and The Critical Threats Project. The
Antiterrorism Assistance Program is helping out by assisting in different assignments such as
protecting us. The ways it's protecting us is by having us alerted to every threat, incident, and action
a terrorist plans, and or has done. It has helped about 84,000
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Terrorism Essay
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a
government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social
objectives". This definition includes three elements: (1) Terrorist activities are illegal and
involve the use of force. (2) The actions are intended to intimidate or coerce. (3) The actions are
committed in support of political or social objectives.
The main topic here is Terrorism and Foreign Policy. The two terms that are going to be discussed
is how the war against terrorism is expanding and how American President George W. Bush
misnamed his National Security Strategy.
In his State of the Union address, President Bush threatened to expand...show more content...
Furthermore, if the president attacks North Korea, Iran, or Iraq, he could exacerbate the proliferation
problem rather than reduce it. Other nations would believe that they could be next and think that
working on missiles and weapons of mass destruction was the only way to keep out a superpower
bent on intervening in civil wars everywhere in the name of fighting terrorism.
And would the United States really intervene unilaterally in friendly nations that it believed were too
timid in fighting terrorism–for example, the Philippines or Yemen? In the Philippines, would the
United States intervene against the wishes of a democracy that it helped institute?
A perpetual state of war–as the president seems to envision when he asserted that the war may run
beyond the duration of his term–could undermine economic recovery, does not comport with the
values of a republic, and will likely lead to the erosion of constitutional liberties and the
accumulation of too much power in the executive branch. And a war in perpetuity is not needed to
minimize the threat from North Korea, Iran and Iraq. If the United States could contain the threat
from a rival superpower during the Cold War, it can certainly contain three small, poor countries. In
addition, a seemingly unprovoked war against another Moslem nation, Iran, Iraq or both could act as
a recruiting poster for

Essay on The war against terrorism
Is war the right way?
Why do people resort to such violent acts as bombing, assassinations, and hi–jacking? How do
individuals and organizations justify these acts of terror? These acts can be described as terrorist
actions. Terrorism is a growing international problem. During the last twenty years, new terrorist
groups have sprung up all over the world. Governments have had little success in their attempts to
resolve issues in which terrorism is used.
A major problem in discussing terrorism is establishing a generally accepted definition. Terrorism
can be described as the unlawful use of fear or force to achieve certain political, economical, or
social aims. Because it is so hard to define, organizations like the United Nations have had...show
more content...
In some cases it may be right but to fight terrorists with war is the wrong way. It is only showing
that our country is worse than they are. By committing war we are only embracing the thought
that fighting and killing is the only way to go. This war that we are creating against these people
and their actions is not justified in any manner. We are only creating more of a war in our own
country than we are in the country of the one we are trying to fight. We have created such a war
that people can even go places they normally go without being check by an officer or being
suspected by someone that u are a terrorist. As we further bomb and shoot at these terrorists we they
will further come back as if they have lost nothing.
We see these terrorists in the news every day and we see that they are not even moved by the
actions we are doing to them. They just brush it off as if it where nothing and had nothing to lose.
In this case they don't lose anything but there husbands or wives or maybe their children, they can't
lose a home because most of them don't have homes and if they do they are very dirty and small.
One's gut reaction to any kind of attack is to get revenge, but much like a tango, it takes two to
wage war. And frankly, we Americans should stand our ground! Show everyone that terrorism will
not be tolerated! ... and show it peacefully. Once someone drops a nuclear bomb in this day and
age, the world, as we know it, will come to an

War On Terror Policy Analysis
In order to understand the policies adopted in the War on Terror, we must first look to the origins of
the conflict as well as the practices involved. Whilst the term itself was initially introduced during
the Reagan administration, it was given renewed vigour under George Bush following the attacks on
the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon on 9/11. The consequences of these attacks
saw the Bush administration undertake a new policy against terrorism which included: defeating
terrorists and abolishing their organisations, denying sponsorship and support to terrorists and
defending US citizen's interests at home and abroad (Whitehouse Archives, 2003). In this way, the
War on Terror can be considered more than just an armed conflict

The Threat Of The War Against Terrorism
As the world evolves new threats appear and some stand by what they believe in. These beliefs
cause harm to other people. An example this would be, big military forces trying to prove a point
by killing innocent civilian lives. This is where the Counter Terrorism forces comes into play. Such
as the United States Seal team six, United kingdom S.A.S and Kopassus – Gultor 81. They seek out
those who do wrong and bring them to justice. The only problem is that they need to have a
stronger force to be able to do their job more effectively and perform well in urban areas. By
having a larger force, Many countries can work together in helping the innocent lives of people by
getting information of these terror acts. Most recently in Brussel...show more content...
This would help to find terrorists and prevent any atrocities from happening and it'll most definitely
lead to the people who planned any attacks. This is why countries should put aside their problems
and work together to fight terrorism to many innocent lives are being lost. The biggest problem
America faces is terrorism. Polls from December 2–6 2015 show that terrorism was 16% of
Americans biggest concerns (Cook). This goes to show that terrorism is a problem not only for the
American people but the entire world. Countries can start by improving their homeland security.
After the United states was attacked on September 11, they did major adjustments to Homeland
Security, such as improving screening for passenger bags at airports. Advanced passenger
information and name record data to be able to find high value targets if they ever try board on any
plane. Many things the United States have improved on the European countries should improve on
too, especially with many terrorists making fake passports and using those to pass any airport. Also
with German Chancellor Angela Merkel allowing refugees to come to Europe, it should be a
necessity to have strict policies on passports. With Germany being the dominant country bringing
refugees, mostly from Syria. That is why most countries who accept refugees should enforce their
passports policy and give the refugees special identification, this should increase the security and
address any issues countries

Exploratory Essay: The War On Terrorism
Carlos M. Fernandez
2/27/2015
P#3
Exploratory Essay
The War on Terror is one of the most discussed topics in politics today, however not enough
citizens seem to realize how closely it is affecting their daily lives. As witnessed by many living in
the developed world, including me, airplane travel can be very drawn out and stressful. This can be
seen as a direct effect of the War on Terror, which began in September of 2001 with the U.S invasion
of Afghanistan. Since then the U.S. has gotten involved in more than ten nations in the Middle East
resulting in two million deaths, and an estimated $1.2 to $2.7 trillion dollars spent. Even spying on
citizens has become acceptable by the government's standards. But despite all the measures that are
being taken to protect America...show more content...
There have been numerous questionings and tortured suspects, and even more detained in GTMO,
yet not many convicts. For this research project, I asked myself the question, Is the War on Terror
working? I believe this question should concern Americans because terrorism is a looming threat that
is being face by millions around the world, and, thus, we need to find an effective solution to fight
against it while minimizing the costs.
To begin my research, I decided to first learn who were the real victims of the War on Terror, and
what the U.S. could do to help them. I started by reading an online news article, "We Are Losing
the War on Terror," written by CEO and editor of Foreign Policy, David Rothkopf. He argues that,
while fewer Americans are being killed by terrorists, this war is only creating incentives for, and
fueling the spread of terrorism in the Middle East. I learned that in 2007 there were 28 al–Qaeda
–like, jihadist groups; as of 2013 that number has increased to 49, and the

Essay On War On Terror
Introduction. The United States' War on Terror is a mistake because it is bringing more burdens
and terrorism to the United States at home and abroad. While the October 11, 2001, U.S. invasion
of Afghanistan is considered to be rightfully justified by 9/11, there is evidence to show that the
January 17, 1991 Operation Desert Storm, which started the issues in the Middle East, was merely
justified by the fear of a monopoly on the world's oil by the ruthless dictator Saddam Hussein. This
event is essential to understanding the current War on Terror, given that it is the beginning of the US
involvement in the Middle East. Therefore, understanding what occurred in 1990, is necessary to
understanding the reasons behind the current War on Terror. On August 1, 1990, the Iraqi dictator,
Saddam Hussein, ordered an attack on Iraq's neighbor Kuwait, who had been a part of Iraq until
1961. Hussein stated that he was simply reuniting what should have never been divided. April
Glaspie, U.S....show more content...
This was another violation of the laws of war. This report shows how the CIA and theUnited States
clearly failed to uphold the laws of war that are supposed to be upheld with the signing of the Geneva
Convention. Because the United States signed the Geneva Convention, the ones responsible for the
war crimes should have been tried at the International Criminal Court ("Punishment). But rather than
those in the CIA that were responsible for these heinous acts being tried and convicted, no one was
ever punished for these horrible acts. One could argue that they were just using these methods to get
an upper hand on the terrorists that they were fighting that would have done the same thing to U.S.
soldiers in a heartbeat, but by the United States doing these things to the terrorists that they capture,
makes them just as bad as the terrorists that they are

Essay on The Global Fight Against Terrorism
Despite spending billions of dollars to fight endless wars, global terrorism rose 43% in 2013. As a
result, terrorism has been brought to the fore of not only the American mentality, but the
international mentality as well. Consequently, we must do a few things in order to maintain our
sanity, dignity, power, and security.
We must retaliate forcefully and successfully. We mustgarner support for our cause and give other
countries a reason to want to stand behind America. We must reassure the world of our confidence as
a great power, and our ability to retain that status. Lastly, and most practically, we must explore the
possibilities of terrorism that exist and attempt to grasp the actual threat that these...show more
content...
These include:
Telecommunications, electrical power systems, gas and oil, banking and finance, transportation,
water supply systems, and government and emergency services(Critical Infrastructure Assurance
Office). These systems and their role in our every day lives cannot be taken for granted. What would
we do if they were to break down?
I'm walking a fine line here with regards to the definition of terrorism. It is not often implied that
the goal of the terrorist is to cause irreparable damage to a particular state system. Instead, the goal
of a terrorist is to communicate a message, attract attention, or to advance a political ideology
through violent ( and not necessarily ubiquitous) acts. Wiping out a country's economic foundation
may be an action that would be expected as an act of war; a state–sponsored project in response to
another states adversary nature, as we have demonstrated by employing economic sanctions in
response to Saddam Hussein's disregard for morality.
But then I consider the causes and motives of terrorism I am aware of. Religious fanaticism and
Post War conditions are obvious, but I worry most about terrorists that are both embittered and
driven by a deep hatred for democracy, the institutions it fosters, and feelings of economic distress.
One who is raised in an environment that fuels these

George Bush and His War Against Terrorism Essay
George Bush and His War Against Terrorism
When George W Bush came to the presidential office of America at the beginning of the year
2000, there was already a lot of controversy that surrounded him. He was appointed Governor of
Texas in 1995 and as of 7:30pm, December 7, 2000, 152 people have been executed during Bush's
office as governor. This makes Texas Governor George W Bush the most
–killing Governor, in the
history of the United States of America. This list can be found on the website http:/
/www.bushkills.com/murders.html. Even his run for presidency was controversial: it is still not
certain if Bush actually won; many believe that it was his opponent Al Gore. Following the tragic
events...show more content...
So we now have an accusation that cannot be backed up, yet Bush still decides to launch an attack
on Afghanistan. The attack is widely regarded as a failure though Bush will not admit it. In
Afghanistan the US army used a policy of 'blanket bombing', which was basically: bomb everything
in sight, and you're bound to hit something. This 'something' was 1 nursing home, 2 Red Cross
hospitals, 1 school and hundreds of homes. They did manage, with the help of the anti–Taliban group
in Afghanistan, the Northern Alliance, to find some arms caches and 'eliminate' some Taliban
members. Once people realized that the operation in Afghanistan was a failure, Bush tried to regain
his popularity by announcing yet another controversial move; plans to attack Iraq. During the 1990's
Saddam Hussein, the leader of Iraq invaded Kuwait, the worlds biggest oil producer, and the US
and UN stepped in to defend it. This was known as the gulf war and was a big success for the US,
although they did not manage to get rid of Hussein. Many people now believe that Bush is now
trying to pick up where his predecessor, Bill Clinton, left off and rid the world of Saddam Hussein
and his oppression forever. This is all fine and well, but they are completely unprovoked and have
absolutely no reason to attack: Iraq has kept themselves to themselves since the end of the gulf war.
An assault on Iraq would, as the assault on

War on Terrorism Essay
The War On Terrorism
Every morning, millions of people around the world begin their day by reading the newspaper.
News topics are constantly discussed in everyday life and remain the dominant topic of
conversation between friends, family, and even strangers. It is our responsibility as a modern
society to recognize all events that impact our lives and make others aware of them, and newspapers
as well as the general media allow us this opportunity. The New York Times, a worldwide newspaper
, offers us a chance to become informed of worldwide current events while also offering insight
into the development of society as seen through the eyes of the media. Through developing an
archive of New York Times articles over a period of several
...show more content...
Considering this, I have chosen articles for this chapter that seem most pertinent in the general
overview of the response to these attacks, and through reviewing them one can clearly see the
escalation of the American public's grief and desire for revenge and closure.
The development of man's intellectual ability and understanding of the world around him can be
most readily seen in the continued development of science and technology. Whether it be new
advancements in medicine and healthcare or improvements on missiles for the anti–terrorism war,
science and technology breakthroughs reassure us that our culture is thriving and continuing to
expand our horizons.
As an economic giant in the worldwide scheme of business, the United States has a great focus on
economical development and relations with foreign countries. The stock market has drastically
changed in response to the terrorist attacks, and this in turn has led to a great impact on the lives
of billions. The World Trade Towers, a symbol of our economic prowess, have fallen, but the
American desire to move forward in the field of world business has compelled me to include this
aspect of life in my archive.
Although economics fuels our society from a business standpoint, the development of the mind is a
practice that can never be rivaled. Through arts and entertainment, man is able to find what he is most

Argumentative Essay On War On Terrorism
AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY
HOW EFFECTIVE IS U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY IN COUNTERING TERRORISM
VICTOR RAY HOLLIFIELD
TERRORISM AND COUNTERTERRORISM INTL450
10 DECEMBER 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States of America has for centuries been confronted with
many situations of terror. However, these situations had never before the 2001 September attack
made Americans feel anxious about their safety. Most times that American security was threatened,
the war was conventional, and the country's military was always prepared for the attacks. However,
the 2001 September terrorist attack awakened America to an age of unconventional terror and
heightened anxiety. The aftermath of the attack forced the USA to change its view and tactics of
dealing with terrorism drastically. Having identified the need to deal with terrorism from its roots,
president's Bush administration declared war on terror with the aim of bringing Al–Qaeda and
Osama bin Laden to justice and to stop further attacks and existence of other terrorist groups.
According to Urgoji (2017), the first tactic that the government used was to place economic and
military sanctions on states that were perceived to harbor or fund terrorism.[footnoteRef:1] The
other tactic the USA employed was increasing global surveillance and intelligence sharing among its
allied states. The third policy initiated involved the USA invasion of Iraq targeting Al–Qaeda and
Taliban camps. Some of the domestic policies

Fighting the War on Terrorism Essay
It has been said that the easiest way to discredit someone in the political field is to accuse them of
possessing "Machiavellian morals." Until recently, today's political arena has been consumed by
such illusive and controversial topics as human rights and the environment. Thus, it is easy to see
why being referred to as a disciple of the austere Machiavellian principle could result in the
untimely death of a political career. However, as of September 11th, the times have changed and so
should the mindset with which politicians approach such elusive topics.
This tragedy was not, however, suffered in vain. Underneath this enveloping shroud of sadness, there
were a few blessings in disguise. Outwardly, the nation acquired a...show more content...
The logical, scientific, methodology behind his theories allows for concise, clear–cut approaches in
management of state affairs. His infamous book on statecraft entitled, "The Prince", is the
embodiment of Machiavellianism. This philosophy is centered on two main tenets. Primarily, that
political order is equivocal but entirely separate from any other known 'good' including morality.
"Politics has and should have it own rules and should not accept of any kind from any source
where the object is not to win or to prevail" (Machiavelli,vii). In other words, "It must find its inner
laws, and free itself from methodological dependence on theology, metaphysics, and moral
philosophy" (Parel, 5). All extemporaneous theories and ideals not associated specifically with the
perfection of political application must be removed from the equation. The state must play 'God' in
order to secure the desired outcome.
Secondly, Machiavelli asserts that "One successfully governs by force and not by law" (Machiavelli).
This is not to say that prudency should not also be simultaneously practiced. However, given the
anarchical nature of the international system, conventions and resolutions do not carry much, if any,
weight. Without an authority to enforce such legislation, it is ultimately up to individual states to
redress the injustices committed against them. Thus, it is ultimately the responsibility of United
States to avenge the inconceivable attacks of

Wars and terrorist attacks are both catastrophic events that occur all around the world. War and
terrorism both have some aspects that make them unique. They also share some similarities such as
destruction and fear. Chris Hedges War is a Force That Gives us Meaning, the movie Why we Fight,
and the RAND Corporation's Terrorism Past and Present show some of these similarities and
differences.
One of the biggest differences between war and terrorism is the way the government and society
wants Americans to feel about each. Why we Fight makes the point that the government wants
Americans to support war. By supporting war, citizens are allowing for more jobs and government
profit. In general, the United States considers war to be good, even if the reasoning behind the war
is unknown. Hedges mentions how war gives Americans a sense of empowerment and hope. War
can be one's key to success in life. He also discusses how these concepts exist due to the way the
media sugar coats the realities of war. The Government and the society want citizens to have the
opposite feelings about terrorism. Americans are told to believe war is good and terrorism is evil.
In Terrorism Past and Present, Bruce Hoffman, a knowledgeable person on the subject of...show more
content...
Soldiers go to war knowing that they may never return home, but also know they are giving the
ultimate sacrifice to their country. Some wars such as World War II have also used suicide
bombing. There is also a kind of terrorism called suicide terrorism. In both suicide bombing and
suicide terrorism, the victim is willing to voluntarily kill himself for what he believes is the
ultimate good. Suicide bombing is however planned out by many war officials prior to the attack.
Suicide terrorism is usually carried out by a single person, also known as a "lone wolf"

What Is ISIS War On Terror?
War on terror is essential for safety of individuals around the world. War on terror's definition is a
country's actions against terrorist groups who cause damage or deaths to a country's property
/civilians. Today a terrorist group by the name ISIS is causing havoc around the world. Three
countries in specific are taking initiative to the ISIS war on terror, they are US, Egypt, and Turkey.
Each country takes their own unique actions against ISIS, however they all have the common goal,
destroy ISIS and make sure they do not come back. Here is the US' intentions in one sentence by
President Obama, "we must define our effort ... as a series of persistent, targeted efforts to dismantle
specific networks of violent extremists that threaten America."1

Cold War Vs Terrorism
The Cold War and the War on Terrorism both have similar and different events that make each
war important to think about. The U.S. has dealt with the Cold War for decades and today the
War on Terrorism continues since 2001. However, the viewpoints of culture, society and other
variables change how each war was or is viewed. Tactics used by the U.S. varied for each war and
we will look closer at those tactics. We also need to consider if the approach for the War on
Terrorism is even the right one? First let's learn a little more on each war and then we will compare
and contrast them. In the years after the Second World War the threat of Communism began to
spread over Europe and Asia. Communism is an ideology which people's businesses and resources
...show more content...
tactics for each war? Well let's start by seeing the similarities and differences between both wars.
Both wars involved the U.S. fighting a nation from the east and standing up against their ideology.
However, they were for two different reasons. The war against the USSR was to prevent the spread
of Communism while the fight against Terrorism started with the attack of 9/11. Both wars affect
the U.S. in similar ways. People began to develop hatred toward these countries involved in
terrorism. During the Cold War people feared and hated the Communist nations. So how is the
U.S. handling the War on Terror? As we talked about earlier the U.S. was not afraid to get
involved in a real fight when it came to terrorist. The wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq while
accomplished most of the American's goals, it left those countries in a state of unrest and made it
worse. Both governments fell and a new power took over causing civil unrest and fighting. More
fighting obviously means more attacks of terrorism. The war on terrorism has not been handled
very effectively or correctly. The U.S. has not starved terrorism but has fed it with more rage and
power as its involvement stirs countries like Iraq into the

The War Against Terrorism Essay
The War Against Terrorism
On August 2nd 1990, Iraq invaded the small oil rich country of Kuwait on its southeastern border.
Iraq claimed that Kuwait was a long time province from the 1800's and early 1900s', whose lands
belonged under control of Iraq, a so–called province. Saddam Hussein also argued that Kuwait was
pumping oil from an oil field that was on the border of the two countries and belonged to Iraq.
Upon gaining control of Kuwait, Hussein was able to eliminate his previous debt to Kuwait and gain
it's substantial oil wealth, roughly 10% of the worlds oil supply. Regardless of the motives behind
Iraq's invasion, under international law, none of Iraq's claims against Kuwait justified its invasion of
that country.
The...show more content...
In the aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11th, the world has had a
sobering look at world terrorism. Led mainly by the United States, and supported by the United
Nations, a new war on terrorism has begun. Overwhelming support worldwide has surfaced as
President Bush has vowed to punish those who decide to commit terrorist acts, as well as those who
harbor or condone these activities. So far Bush has followed through on his promise with the war in
Afghanistan against the Taliban regime. Others are also displaying their understanding of the
situation and are treading a great deal lighter in search of their causes to avoid being labeled as
terrorists, as shown by the latest disarmament and return to the negotiating table by the Irish
Republican Army. As the world watches, President Bush is now faced with enormous pressure to
gain control of the Arab–Israeli conflict.
However, this situation is a difficult one. With Israeli's continual attempt to occupy more land in the
disputed settlements, Palestinian anger only grows. With Yasir Arafat's inability to control, or
unwillingness to control, such militant groups as Hamas and Islamic Jihad, chances of the two sides
reaching a piece agreement dwindle.

War On Terrorism Pros And Cons
"Our war on terror begins with Al– Qaida, but it does not end there, It will not end end until every
terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated." – President George W. Bush
after 9/11. After the attack on the twin towers the Bush Administration and some of the United
States' allies formed an organization that fought against terrorism, known as the war on terror. The
idea of the war on terror, that one day terrorism would be eliminated entirely, is a great idea but
we, as a nation, should have went about it differently. The war on terror has a negative influence on
the world as demonstrated by the increase in racial profiling, unethical use of torture, and the
decrease of privacy. Racial profiling has made the war

Essay on The War on Terror
War on terror refers to the ongoing military campaign led by U.S and U.K against organizations
identified as terrorists. Terrorism can be defined as an unlawful violence or war deliberately
targeted to civilians. It can also be defined as a systematic use of terror to coerce or violent acts
intended to create fear. This threat is normally perpetrated for religious, political or ideological
goals. The conflict as also called by other names. They include World War III, The Long War,War on
Terrorism, Bush's War on Terror, The Global War of Terror and War on
Al–Qaeda, (Coaty, 2010).
Terrorism became popular in 1996 when Al– Qaeda network was formed by the late Osama Bin
Laden. The network was formed by the World Islamic Front for Jihad...show more content...
Underlying conditions that terrorists seek to exploit were reduced. This was a measure that was used
to reduce the chances of unlawful attacks on the globe. U.S partnered with the international
community to empower weak states and prevent emergence of terrorism. To date, this can be seen in
Libya, Cote Devore and Somalia where the states have no proper governments. The international
troops have been deployed in the above states to ensure that terrorists do not utilize such loopholes to
attack the citizens.
Fighting the War on Terror
War on terror is a global challenge. A number of ways have been put across to fight the problem led
by the United States of America. Defeating terrorist has been found to be a very effective way of
fighting this threat. It is achieved by identity, location and destruction of the terrorists along with
their organizations. Once the unlawful activities are spotted, they are confirmed and relevant actions
taken against them instantly. Evidence is the U.S bombing of Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan in
pursuit of Al– Qaeda network which was successful because Osama was later found and killed.
Strategy of targeted killings is also a major way to fight terror. This is a method that focuses on the
individuals who bear the greatest responsibility. The aim is to catch them alive or dead. It has
indeed borne fruit over the years. Evidence is the demise of Sadaam, Fazul and the recent killing of
Osama

War On Terror Essay
The goal of the War on Terror defined by President Bush is "Our war on terror begins with Al
Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been
found, stopped and defeated". The problem with this goal is that it is unrealistic and that the
definition of a terrorist varies with in countries. For example those who are labeled freedom fighters
in one nation can be considered terrorists in another. People argue that there is no real enemy and
that those who do a terrorist act should be handled through the Judicial System and not by the
military. An example of this is the Boston bombings. Another problem with the War on Terror is that
it has added about $1.7 trillion to $18 trillion onto the United States debt. It has also taken jobs
away from the American people due to the fact that for every $1 billion given as a tax cut
supplies a demand to create 10,779 jobs when $1 billion spent on defense creates 8,555 jobs.
Meaning that for every billion we spend of defense takes away 2,224 jobs. Another thing is that due
to the war in Iraq and Afghanistan people argue that President's Bush's true goal was to "strengthen
the U.S. grip on the Middle East, turn Iraq into a military and political platform for further
aggression, gain tighter control of international energy supplies, control and reshape the entire arc
from North Africa to Central Asia, and strengthen the U.S. hand against rivals–current and...show
more content...
It protects the United States citizens because after 9/11 the United States has gotten more serious
with defense. For example restrictions on what you can bring on a plane and then going through a
metal detector before entering boarding area. Another pro is that by interfering in Afghanistan and
Iraq on can argue that the United States did bring some balance into the lives of the people living

Us War Against Terrorism Essay
Stephen Blank another American writer has a perspective that that US should be consistent in its
process of combating against terrorism and other ills in the region with other regional
organizations as he says "U.S. policy in Central Asia is embattled and under siege. Moscow and
Beijing, as well as to a lesser degree Tehran, view America's political and strategic presence in
Central Asia with unfeigned alarm. Indeed, Russia and China suspect America's desire for bases
there. Despite Russo–Chinese protestations of support for the U.S. war on terrorism, in fact they wish
to exclude America from the area and fear that it means to stay there militarily, and in other ways,
indefinitely. In this campaign, Moscow has taken the lead, with Chinese...show more content...
On the other hand China is seen to propose the development of inter–SCO Development Bank in
2010 as a smaller regional regional version of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund
which means that SCO plans to overcome monetary dependence which is run by the U.S.which will
ultimately lead to developing Russia and Chinese dominance in the region. The proposal is however
pending but there are indications that Russia may be more willing to cooperate with China moving
forward. (Albert. E 2015)
Findings and Dissemination
From recent developments it is becoming increasingly evident that SCO's activities are extended
beyond its original mandate. China recent military exercises with Russia and its support for
Uzbekistan leadership against US military presence ominous signs for western alliances. These
indicate a growth in military cooperation and scope. Given that the Eurasian heartland is incredibly
rich in natural resources competing powers will continue seeking dominance in the region. It appears
that SCO is a vital platform through which Russia and China seek to counterbalance the influence of
US and its politico–economic instruments such as NATO, IMF, World Bank etc in the region.
Pakistan is an important strategic neighbor of China and with the current development of the China
Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and accession of Pakistan into SCO create a serious

Essay War Against Terrorism

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay War Against Terrorism