Most
Outstanding
Cooperatives
Micro
Small
Medium
Large
QUALIFYING CRITERIA
• With complete reportorial requirements submitted
on time;
• With Very Satisfactory Ratings in both S...
QUALIFYING CRITERIA
• Must be operationally gainful:
• For medium/Large Cooperative – three (3) years and –
(MOV: AFS 2011...
QUALIFYING CRITERIA
Net worth shall be determined based on the following computation:
NETWORTH= ASSETS – LIABILITIES
Liabi...
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
1. Cooperative Annual Performance Report(CARP) duly received by the CDA
– 2011- 2013
2. Audited F...
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
7. Certificate of Good Standing for regular purposes (2011-
2013)
8. Certificate of tax exemption...
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
11. Number of members placing savings/time deposits to
cooperatives;
12. increase in the amount o...
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
17. List of Trainings conducted/sponsored by the
cooperative
18. Certificate proof of Accreditati...
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
21. Proof/Evidence of the following:
i. Programs that benefited the members (e.g. provident
servi...
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
22.List of Awards/Recognition received by the
cooperative including the sponsors of the
awards an...
EVALUATION/JUDGING CRITERIA
CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
Organization, Leadership and
management
40
Financial management and Bu...
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40)
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
1. Performa...
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40)
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
Medium Abov...
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40)
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
b. Percenta...
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40)
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
If no. of t...
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40)
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
4. Training...
II. Financial Management and Business Operation
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
1. PISO PAR...
III. SOCIAL RELEVANCE (20)
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
III. Social relevance
1. Social ...
III. SOCIAL RELEVANCE (20)
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
4. Gender
integration
Presence o...
IV. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION
Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max
Rating
Mi S Md L
Recognition/citati
on received
A...
For Information and Dissemination
Josefina B. Bitonio
OIC Director
Encoder
Eric Justine R. Ancheta
OJT – University of Luz...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

2014 Gawad Parangal for Primaries

962 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
962
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
12
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
29
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

2014 Gawad Parangal for Primaries

  1. 1. Most Outstanding Cooperatives Micro Small Medium Large
  2. 2. QUALIFYING CRITERIA • With complete reportorial requirements submitted on time; • With Very Satisfactory Ratings in both Social and Performance Audit Reports; • Must be In Good Standing for the three (3) preceding years; (MOV:CGS 2011, 2012 & 2013)
  3. 3. QUALIFYING CRITERIA • Must be operationally gainful: • For medium/Large Cooperative – three (3) years and – (MOV: AFS 2011, 2012 & 2013) • For micro and small cooperative – two (2) years – (MOV: AFS 2012 & 2013) No major findings during the inspection as reported (MOV: certification from the Regional Office that the cooperative has no major findings base on the result of inspection, i.e no infraction among the BOD, court cases involving the cooperative such as tax court, labor court & trial court filed in CY2013 or earlier. Note: cooperative as respondent
  4. 4. QUALIFYING CRITERIA Net worth shall be determined based on the following computation: NETWORTH= ASSETS – LIABILITIES Liabilities, under this criteria, shall mean the sum total of all the liabilities of the cooperative including deposit liabilities. Must have a NETWORTH of: Micro Scale Category Up to Php1,500,000 Small Scale Category 1,500,001 to 7,500,000 Medium Scale Category 7,500,001 Million to 50,000,000 Large Scale Category Above 50,000,000
  5. 5. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS 1. Cooperative Annual Performance Report(CARP) duly received by the CDA – 2011- 2013 2. Audited Financial Statements (AFS) (2011, 2012 & 2013) including (Notes to FS and SS) • Summary of Aging of Accounts Receivable • Summary of Loan Releases • Non-Earning Assets • Investments • Liquid Assets 3. Social Audit Report 4. Performance Audit Report 5. List of Training attended by Cooperative Officers (2011- 2013) 6. Amended Articles of Cooperation and By-Laws; (including the Certificate of Amendment)
  6. 6. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS 7. Certificate of Good Standing for regular purposes (2011- 2013) 8. Certificate of tax exemption/ application duly received by the BIR 9. Cooperative Development plan 10. Certification signed by the Cooperative Chairman and/or General manager indicating the following: • Total number of Members • Dates of meeting of the BOD • Dates of meeting of the different committees, committee members and management staff;
  7. 7. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS 11. Number of members placing savings/time deposits to cooperatives; 12. increase in the amount of deposits 13. Number of members contributing to share capital for two consecutive years; 14. Annual increase in the amount of share capital from 2011- 2013(base year is 2011) 15. Names of volunteers, if any, including the specific work assignment 16. Names of BODs, Committees, and Core management team indicating their respective sex
  8. 8. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS 17. List of Trainings conducted/sponsored by the cooperative 18. Certificate proof of Accreditation of LGU and other governing bodies in Local Development Council/ committees 19. Certification of the computation as to the rate of interest on share capital and patronage refund 20. Certification that the cooperative has exciting policies and procedures
  9. 9. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS 21. Proof/Evidence of the following: i. Programs that benefited the members (e.g. provident services)- 2013 ii. Support services extended to other cooperatives- 2013 iii. Social activities initiated and/or participated by the cooperatives such as but not limited to the following health, medical mission, campaign against drug and environmental concerns iv. Participation in Coop Month Celebration , Coop Summit, Local Governance program/ activities,etc v. Activities participated/initiated by the coop for the following sectoral groups: youth, women, PWD and others -2013
  10. 10. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS 22.List of Awards/Recognition received by the cooperative including the sponsors of the awards and the year received 23.Current Business Permit/License
  11. 11. EVALUATION/JUDGING CRITERIA CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS Organization, Leadership and management 40 Financial management and Business Operation 35 Social Relevance 20 Awards and Recognition 5 TOTAL 100
  12. 12. I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40) Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L 1. Performance Audit Report See PAR PART I total score/100 x 24% x 100 24 24 24 24 24 24 2.Years of Existence 5 yrs. & Below Above 5 yrs. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3. Membership a. Total # of members 5 + Large Above 60,000 45,001-60,000 30,001-45,000 15,001-30,000 5,001-15,000 5,000 below 5 4 3 3 1 0 5 4 3 2 1 0
  13. 13. I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40) Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L Medium Above 6000 4501-6000 3001- 4500 1501-3000 501- 1500 500 and below 5 4 3 2 1 0 5 3 1 0 Small Above 600 301-600 102-300 100 and below 5 3 1 0 5 3 1 0 Micro Above 200 101-200 100 and below 5 3 1 5 3 1
  14. 14. I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40) Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L b. Percentage of associate members Total associate members---- x 100% Tot. no. of members Below 20% Above 20% 1 0 1 c. Growth in membership Actual increase in the no. of members per dev’t plan 3 30% above 5%- 30% Below 5% No increase 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0
  15. 15. I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40) Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L If no. of target in development plan: Total number of members, end- tot. no.of members, beg. ------------ x 100% Total no. of members, beg. 30% and above 5%-30% Below 5% No increase 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0
  16. 16. I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (40) Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L 4. Training a. attendance to trainings Attendance to the mandatory cooperative training For officers 3 BOD & Manager mandatory committees Treasurer and secretary 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b. Trainings conducted/ facilitated by the cooperatives except PMEs within the period under review 5 and above training 3-4 training 2 training 1 training No training 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 SUB-TOTAL 40
  17. 17. II. Financial Management and Business Operation Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L 1. PISO PAR PART II Total score/100 x 30% x 100 30 30 30 30 30 30 2. Delinquency rate Past due loans/accounts rec. + non performing restructured loans + Loans/ accts. Under litigation ----------------------------- Total loans & accts. outstanding 5 5 5%-10% 11%-30% Above 30% 5 3 0 5 3 0 5 3 0 5 3 0 5 3 0 SUB-TOTAL 35
  18. 18. III. SOCIAL RELEVANCE (20) Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L III. Social relevance 1. Social audit report See part IV, V & VI Total score/40 x 15% x 100 15 15 15 15 15 15 2. Programs/ activities that benefited its members 4 or more programs/act. 3 programs 2 programs 1 program 2 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 3. Direct employment generation 10 and above employees 7-9 employees 4-6 employees 3 employees 2 employees 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2
  19. 19. III. SOCIAL RELEVANCE (20) Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L 4. Gender integration Presence of male and female in the BOD, committees and management staff 1 1 Sub total 20
  20. 20. IV. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION Criteria Formula Points Equivalent Rating Max Rating Mi S Md L Recognition/citati on received Awards and recognition received for the past three years 5 5 International awards received Local awards received -national award - regional award 3 2 3 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 SUB-TOTAL 5 Grand total 100
  21. 21. For Information and Dissemination Josefina B. Bitonio OIC Director Encoder Eric Justine R. Ancheta OJT – University of Luzon Summer 2014

×