Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Kirkpatrick model

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
Training evaluation ppt
Training evaluation ppt
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 1 Ad

More Related Content

Similar to Kirkpatrick model (20)

Advertisement

More from CONUL Teaching & Learning (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Kirkpatrick model

  1. 1. Kirkpatrick model Four Levels of Learning Evaluation The Kirkpatrick learning evaluation model was developed by Donald Kirkpatrick and presented in four journal articles in 1959-60. This is a four level model focusing successively on: 1. Reaction - what participants think and feel about the training, focused on participant satisfaction with the training provided, including the trainers and the environment in which it was provided. The pre- and (immediately) post-event/module questionnaires used at this level are sometimes referred to as reactionnaires. 2. Learning - any increase in knowledge and/or skills, or attitude change. This level of evaluation usually happens during the training and may take the form of a test, assignment or other means of demonstrating knowledge. [Comment by David Streatfield - However, such measures do not capture slow knowledge gain, which may only be apparent to the participant some time after the event or module completion.] 3. Behavior - transfer of knowledge, skills, or attitudes from the training setting to the job (change in work behavior which may be attributable to the training program). This level of evaluation is usually conducted at a minimum 3–6 months after the training, through observation of the participant at work or through interviews with the participants and their line-managers and peers. 4. Results - the final outcomes that occur following attendance and participation in a training program. This change can be financial, performance-based, or manifest itself at organisational level. (Some critics of this model have suggested that a further level of evaluation is needed, looking outside the immediate organisational context of the participant.)

×