WALS and eLanguage (Leipzig)

2,635 views

Published on

The presentation describes the eLanguage Project, an effort by the Linguistic Society of America (LSA) to advance open access publishing electronic of academic papers in linguistics. The presentation was held on 5 November 2007 at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. It compares eLanguage and the World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS), an extremely successful resource in language typology that has been developed at the Institute.

Published in: Technology
1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,635
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
25
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
34
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

WALS and eLanguage (Leipzig)

  1. 1. From Publishing to Communication eLanguage, WALS and digital linguistics Cornelius Puschmann University of Düsseldorf [email_address] Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 5 November 2007
  2. 2. Contents of this presentation <ul><li>eLanguage: concept & organization </li></ul><ul><li>The technology </li></ul><ul><li>Where we are </li></ul><ul><li>eLanguage and WALS: a comparison </li></ul><ul><li>More than “putting things on the Web” </li></ul><ul><li>Open access, open data – what are the implications? </li></ul>
  3. 3. eLanguage: concept and organization
  4. 4. What is eLanguage? <ul><li>an aggregator for peer-reviewed content from open access journals </li></ul><ul><li>a platform for publishing scientific articles on-line </li></ul><ul><li>a source of meta-information on academic linguistics (book reviews, department news etc) </li></ul><ul><li>an academic community on the Web </li></ul>
  5. 5. Project Partners
  6. 6. From Language to eLanguage <ul><li>Language started in 1924 </li></ul><ul><li>roughly 7,000 individual and institutional subscribers </li></ul><ul><li>issues since 2001 available via Project MUSE </li></ul><ul><li>narrow focus due to space limitations </li></ul><ul><li>slow publication cycle </li></ul><ul><li>high production and dissemination costs </li></ul><ul><li>the goal was to widen the focus </li></ul><ul><li>while reducing costs </li></ul><ul><li>and facilitating access ...an open access approach was the ideal solution </li></ul>
  7. 7. eLanguage organizational structure <ul><li>the eLanguage Editorial Board reviews co-journal proposals </li></ul><ul><li>the Editor in Chief is responsible for the management of the platform </li></ul><ul><li>co-journals are independent once they have been approved </li></ul>Editor in Chief Editorial Board
  8. 8. Co-journal accreditation process forms an editorial board and submits a proposal reviews proposal and approves or asks for revisions is admitted as an eLanguage co-journal eLanguage Editorial Board
  9. 9. Expanded organizational structure content IT services
  10. 10. The technology
  11. 11. A mashup of tools OJS 2.1.1 + Wordpress 2.2
  12. 12. Data from OJS and WP aggregated on the main page blog section content (WP) co-journal content (OJS) master feed
  13. 13. Open Source Reliability <ul><li>all first-level products (OJS, WP) are based on second-level FOSS technologies and protocols such as PHP, MySQL, Apache and RSS/Atom </li></ul><ul><li>mature, well-supported and well-documented products </li></ul><ul><li>90% of software development is outsourced - advantage : we can focus on the content and on making it accessible </li></ul>
  14. 14. Using external tools for added services <ul><li>Google Domain Tools (admin) </li></ul><ul><li>Google Custom Search (search) </li></ul><ul><li>Google Mail (email) </li></ul><ul><li>Google Groups (mailing lists) </li></ul><ul><li>Google Analytics (web statistics) </li></ul><ul><li>Technorati (blog management) </li></ul><ul><li>Feedburner (feed diagnostics) </li></ul>
  15. 15. Three goals for maximum accessibility <ul><li>to make all eLanguage content accessible via search </li></ul><ul><li>to make everything published in eLanguage accessible both via library catalogs and commercial search engines </li></ul><ul><li>to make access to our content independent from access to our website by using feeds (everything but the full text of articles is available via feeds) </li></ul>
  16. 16. Benefits of the platform <ul><li>Benefits for... </li></ul><ul><li>readers : content is free and easily accessible </li></ul><ul><li>authors : no costs, greater impact, faster publication, ownership of article, precise metrics </li></ul><ul><li>editors : full control over their publication, less or no headaches about technical issues, no volumes of specialized knowledge necessary </li></ul><ul><li>Linguistic Society of America : &quot;what's good for the discipline is good for the association&quot;, great visibility </li></ul><ul><li>HBZ/DIPP : strategic value / experience </li></ul>
  17. 17. Where we are
  18. 18. eLanguage Beta
  19. 19. Semantics & Pragmatics
  20. 20. Recent developments <ul><li>as of November 2007, four journals have been accredited: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Constructions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Anette Rosenbach (University of Paderborn, Germany), </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Alexander Bergs (University of Osnabruck, Gemany) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Journal of Mesoamerican Languages and Linguistics (JMLL) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>David Mora-Marín (University of North Carolina, USA) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Annie Zaenen (PARC Inc / Stanford University, USA), </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Bonnie Webber (University of Edinburgh, UK), </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Martha Palmer (University of Colorado, USA) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Semantics & Pragmatics (S&P) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Kai von Fintel (Massachusetts of Technology, USA) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>David Beaver (University of Texas, USA) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>a blog has been launched to keep people informed </li></ul><ul><li>launch in Spring 2008, possibly BNs will be launched earlier </li></ul>
  21. 21. Issues <ul><li>producing content takes time </li></ul><ul><li>many researchers have a “wait and see” approach to digital publishing </li></ul><ul><li>communication must be managed well when working in a geographically dispersed team </li></ul><ul><li>for our needs, OJS could be simpler in terms of its UI, even if that meant less functions </li></ul>
  22. 22. What could we do better? <ul><li>Once the platform has successfully launched we will look into... </li></ul><ul><li>unified citation database </li></ul><ul><li>preprint repository </li></ul><ul><li>more &quot;reader&quot; involvement (blog comments? link external sources?) </li></ul>
  23. 23. eLanguage and WALS: a comparison
  24. 24. From print to digital <ul><li>eLanguage </li></ul><ul><li>paper journal - platform for scholarly communication </li></ul><ul><li>narrow focus - diversity </li></ul><ul><li>slow publication cycle - faster and more flexible publication </li></ul><ul><li>limited access - open access </li></ul><ul><li>WALS Online </li></ul><ul><li>atlas - interactive research tool </li></ul><ul><li>“completed” - continually updated </li></ul><ul><li>read-only access – read-write access </li></ul><ul><li>limited access - open access </li></ul>
  25. 25. More than “putting things on the Web”
  26. 26. Useful but problematic metaphors <ul><li>an “electronic journal” can be designed to look like a print product </li></ul><ul><li>but the digital form makes entirely new uses possible </li></ul><ul><li>storage “just happens” </li></ul><ul><li>publishing = conserving knowledge for posterity </li></ul><ul><li>communication = exchanging information more rapidly </li></ul>
  27. 27. Practical implications <ul><li>we will increasingly not just publish “completed” papers on the Web, but conduct ongoing discussions and debates there </li></ul><ul><li>collaborative research on the Web (with something like WALS Online) is the next logical step </li></ul><ul><li>tools for data visualization, modeling etc are likely to become ubiquitous </li></ul><ul><li>Research will increasingly “happen” on the Web </li></ul>
  28. 28. Open access, open data – what are the implications?
  29. 29. Implications <ul><li>natural language data is available on an unprecedented scale </li></ul><ul><li>tools for processing and analysis of this data are increasingly available </li></ul><ul><li>a virtual space for discussing and interpreting the results of such analyses is also available (your research blog or wiki, eLanguage, WALS...) </li></ul><ul><li>Most importantly, all of these levels are open and accessible to everyone! </li></ul>
  30. 30. How we can benefit <ul><li>collaborative language documentation (endangered languages, typology) </li></ul><ul><li>more salient corpus-based investigations (syntax, semantics, pragmatics, ...) </li></ul><ul><li>better intradisciplinary connectivity (what are my colleagues doing?) </li></ul><ul><li>better interdisciplinary communication (too many related fields to name!) </li></ul>
  31. 31. Thanks for listening!

×