Successfully reported this slideshow.

Knowledge or Credit? The (Un)changing Face of Academic Publishing from the Philosophical Transactions to Blogging

1

Share

1 of 17
1 of 17

Knowledge or Credit? The (Un)changing Face of Academic Publishing from the Philosophical Transactions to Blogging

1

Share

Download to read offline

Held on 12 March 2012 at the event "Social Science and Digital Research: Interdisciplinary Insights", convened by the Oxford Internet Institute's Oxford eSocial Science Project (OeSS). Program: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/events/?id=486

Held on 12 March 2012 at the event "Social Science and Digital Research: Interdisciplinary Insights", convened by the Oxford Internet Institute's Oxford eSocial Science Project (OeSS). Program: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/events/?id=486

More Related Content

More from Cornelius Puschmann

Related Books

Free with a 14 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 14 day trial from Scribd

See all

Knowledge or Credit? The (Un)changing Face of Academic Publishing from the Philosophical Transactions to Blogging

  1. 1. Knowledge or Credit? The (Un)Changing Face of Academic Publishing from the Philosophical Transactions to Blogging Cornelius Puschmann School of Library and Information Science Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Social Science and Digital Research: Interdisciplinary Insights March 12th 2012, Oxford Internet Institute
  2. 2. This Talk 1. Context of this talk 2. A glimpse at the past and present of formal scholarly communication 3. The scholarly blog: Jack of all trades, master of none? 4. (Policy) implications
  3. 3. Context In the broader context of the Internet‘s impact on scholarship, a number of initiatives have adressed scholarly blogs and their potential role for academic communication: • Oxford e-Social Science Project (OeSS, 2005-2012) • MeRC project “Use and Relevance of Web 2.0 Resources for Researchers“ (2008-2009) • Research Consortium “Interactive Science“ (2009-2012, Gießen) • Junior Researchers Group “Science and the Internet“ (2010-2012, Düsseldorf) • my postdoc project (DFG grant): “Networking, visibility, information: a study of digital genres of scholarly communication and the motives of their users“ (2012-2015, Berlin)
  4. 4. The Past • Philosophical Transactions established in 1665 by Henry Oldenburg • consisted of a range of subject areas and genres of text • enabled wide(r) dissemination of knowledge based on discovery than had previously existed • allowed inventors to claim the right to an invention • dual function: • spread knowledge • enable attribution
  5. 5. dual aims of scholarly communication l ind ta ivi cie du so al spreading knowledge building a reputation
  6. 6. The Present massive increase in speed and volume of output: • ~50 mio. scholarly publications in existence a heavily concentrated market: • Reed Elsevier, Springer Science+Business Media and John Wiley & Sons account for large portion of articles published globally extreme imbalances: • key inputs (research articles and peer review) are provided free of charge • output it sold to intermediaries (libraries), not to end-consumers • profit margins of up to 40% changing environments: • digital publishing • open access
  7. 7. What happened in between? • institutionalization and professionalization of academia • corporate intermediaries have taken over publishing • career success based on publications (“publish or perish“) • computers and the Internet (duh) • diversification of scholarly genres: • formal (monographs, peer-reviewed articles) • informal (gray literature, interpersonal communication) How do scholarly blogs fit in here?
  8. 8. resea og rch blo bl g en ce s ci scholarly blog carn de r et eche rech different terms & concepts e Wiss ensc haft sblo g blog ic digita ad em l lab n otebo ac ok
  9. 9. Some flavors of scholarly blogs Communicator Target audience Communicative goals PhD student in English peers*, self write, remember literature postdoctoral researcher in keep in touch, peers* information science network, science enthusiast* experts, lay audience express opinions, educate free-lance journalist lay audience, advertisers gain visibility
  10. 10. Type 1: The Logbook
  11. 11. Type 1: The Logbook
  12. 12. Type 2: The Notepad
  13. 13. Type 2: The Notepad
  14. 14. Type 3: The Printing Press
  15. 15. Type 3: The Printing Press
  16. 16. Observations • scholarly blogs represent a return to a more diverse and less utalitarian genre ecology of academic communication • they cover a range of functions, including notekeeping, academic publishing and science education • their flexibility also makes them hard to evaluate from the perspective of established publishing • it appears unlikely that they will supplant formal genres of scholarly communication in the near future, but like the first academic journals, they are a response to widely-felt needs • should funders incentivize scholarly blogging -- and if yes, what kind?
  17. 17. Thank you for your attention!

×