Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Fort Meade Regional Growth Management Committee Regional Transportation Briefing West Anne Arundel County Chamber of Comme...
Top Regional Employment Centers Nearly 50% of job base concentrated in fewer than 20 employment centers Sources:  BMC Roun...
Regional Growth Centers We need a unifying set of themes and templates to address our regional transportation challenges S...
Fort Meade Job Growth Fort Meade and related growth could eventually require a highway investment of up to $4.7 billion So...
NSA Growth Plan Could add as much as 5.8 million square feet by 2030 Source:  NSA EIS; RGMC Staff Analysis
FGGM Workforce Distribution Map   Distribution of Fort Meade workforce typical for top employment centers Source: NSA; RGM...
FGGM Workforce Distribution Two-thirds reside within 20 miles (81% in 5 jurisdictions); FGGM commuting generates nearly 30...
Meade Coordination Zone All inbound traffic affects last 5 miles Source: FGGM Agencies; Google Maps; RGMC Staff Analysis 7...
Shortfall in Road Capacity Meade Coordination Zone highways currently at capacity in peak periods; planned increases in hi...
Two-Part Transportation Strategy Limit growth in traffic volume while expanding capacity at a few key highway segments and...
Key Fort Meade Transportation Resources Served by a combination of roadways and rail stations MD-175 / Rockenbach / Disney...
FGGM Gate Delay Scenarios Only Rockenbach Gate can be expanded in near term (2011);  requires improvements at Rockenbach /...
Timing / Impact of Gate Overload By 2Q-2011, peak delays at gates could reach 20 minutes Source: Gannett Fleming; RGMC Sta...
Impact of Growth on Local Intersections System is at capacity and will cause delays until planned upgrades are in place; t...
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Proposed Objective and Principles for Fort Meade program Using a combination of str...
Proposed Initial TDM Goals Near term goal of 27% varies by Agency based on variations in geographic distribution of workfo...
Fort Meade Compared to Pentagon Restraining the growth of vehicle volume at Fort Meade addresses both short-term and long-...
Subscription Bus Concept Make equipment, service, features and incentives competitive with SOV <ul><li>Requires no taxpaye...
Meade Attractive Zips by Quintile Ten zips significant for Howard, Carroll and Frederick Counties Source:  Fort Meade Agen...
Top Regional Zip Codes Source:  Fort Meade Agency; RGMC Staff Analysis
Carroll / Howard Collection Points Potential collection points for Fort Meade subscription buses and vanpools A1 A2 C B D E
Next Steps Overall <ul><li>Work with Fort Meade Garrison Command and SHA to monitor local conditions </li></ul>Roadway Imp...
<ul><li>END </li></ul>
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Rgmc west county cc transportation briefing 110322 rl

279 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Rgmc west county cc transportation briefing 110322 rl

  1. 1. Fort Meade Regional Growth Management Committee Regional Transportation Briefing West Anne Arundel County Chamber of Commerce March 22, 2011
  2. 2. Top Regional Employment Centers Nearly 50% of job base concentrated in fewer than 20 employment centers Sources: BMC Round 7; CBRE Sub-Markets; RGMC Staff Analysis
  3. 3. Regional Growth Centers We need a unifying set of themes and templates to address our regional transportation challenges Sources: FGGM Agencies; RGMC Staff Analysis
  4. 4. Fort Meade Job Growth Fort Meade and related growth could eventually require a highway investment of up to $4.7 billion Source: FGGM Garrison Command; RGMC Staff Analysis
  5. 5. NSA Growth Plan Could add as much as 5.8 million square feet by 2030 Source: NSA EIS; RGMC Staff Analysis
  6. 6. FGGM Workforce Distribution Map Distribution of Fort Meade workforce typical for top employment centers Source: NSA; RGMC Staff Analysis
  7. 7. FGGM Workforce Distribution Two-thirds reside within 20 miles (81% in 5 jurisdictions); FGGM commuting generates nearly 300 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per year Source: FGGM Agency; Google Maps; RGMC Staff Analysis
  8. 8. Meade Coordination Zone All inbound traffic affects last 5 miles Source: FGGM Agencies; Google Maps; RGMC Staff Analysis 7.5% 35% 20% 30%
  9. 9. Shortfall in Road Capacity Meade Coordination Zone highways currently at capacity in peak periods; planned increases in highway capacity will not close gap Source: RGMC Staff Analysis
  10. 10. Two-Part Transportation Strategy Limit growth in traffic volume while expanding capacity at a few key highway segments and intersections; received regional endorsement Reduce peak load by 27%; to date 1200 of 4300 have signed up, but the jury is still out Focus limited funding – $50M of $1.1B – on a few key projects Roadway Capacity Demand Management
  11. 11. Key Fort Meade Transportation Resources Served by a combination of roadways and rail stations MD-175 / Rockenbach / Disney MD-175 / Reece MD-175 / Mapes MD-295 / MD-32 MD-175 / Llewellyn MD-295 / MD-198 MD-32 / MD-198 / Mapes MD-295 MD-32 I-95 MARC - Camden MARC - Penn MD-100 Controlled Intersection Interchange MD-175 / MD-32 BWI MD-175 MD-295 / MD-175 MARC Station NSA DISA DMA EUL ADJ Access Control Point Site M
  12. 12. FGGM Gate Delay Scenarios Only Rockenbach Gate can be expanded in near term (2011); requires improvements at Rockenbach / Cooper Source: Gannett Fleming; RGMC Staff Analysis
  13. 13. Timing / Impact of Gate Overload By 2Q-2011, peak delays at gates could reach 20 minutes Source: Gannett Fleming; RGMC Staff Analysis
  14. 14. Impact of Growth on Local Intersections System is at capacity and will cause delays until planned upgrades are in place; timely completion of Rockenbach / Cooper essential Source: Gannett Fleming; MDOT / SHA; RGMC Staff Analysis
  15. 15. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Proposed Objective and Principles for Fort Meade program Using a combination of structures and methods, restrain future FGGM SOV volume to sustainable level OBJECTIVE PRINCIPLES <ul><li>Employer-Sponsored . Fort Meade agencies develop, implement and monitor own TDM programs – individually or collaboratively – consistent with overall FGGM goal. </li></ul><ul><li>Demand Driven . Design program to provide end user value equivalent to SOV, including guaranteed ride home. </li></ul><ul><li>Communications Program . Use leadership, internal marketing programs, and end user input to generate participation. </li></ul><ul><li>Public-Private Partnership . Maximize use of TIP to fund program. Leverage private sector resources to reduce risk and access additional capital. </li></ul><ul><li>Savings . Structure program to pay for itself through reductions in new highway construction; use a portion of savings to ensure program success. </li></ul><ul><li>Environmental Component . Appeal to public’s desire to reduce environmental impact as a program benefit. </li></ul><ul><li>Regional Template . Document approach and lessons learned; develop and apply template to support economic development across the region. </li></ul>
  16. 16. Proposed Initial TDM Goals Near term goal of 27% varies by Agency based on variations in geographic distribution of workforce Source: RGMC Staff Analysis
  17. 17. Fort Meade Compared to Pentagon Restraining the growth of vehicle volume at Fort Meade addresses both short-term and long-term capacity issues Source: Pentagon Website; Ft. Belvoir EIS; RGMC Staff Analysis
  18. 18. Subscription Bus Concept Make equipment, service, features and incentives competitive with SOV <ul><li>Requires no taxpayer subsidy </li></ul><ul><li>Point to point service; demand driven schedule and features </li></ul><ul><li>Build working relationships with colleagues </li></ul><ul><li>Make travel time productive time </li></ul><ul><li>Arrive at destination fresh and alert </li></ul><ul><li>Experience improvement in quality of life </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce commuting costs / fuel consumption / carbon footprint </li></ul><ul><li>Avoid investment in peak roadway capacity </li></ul>
  19. 19. Meade Attractive Zips by Quintile Ten zips significant for Howard, Carroll and Frederick Counties Source: Fort Meade Agency; RGMC Staff Analysis
  20. 20. Top Regional Zip Codes Source: Fort Meade Agency; RGMC Staff Analysis
  21. 21. Carroll / Howard Collection Points Potential collection points for Fort Meade subscription buses and vanpools A1 A2 C B D E
  22. 22. Next Steps Overall <ul><li>Work with Fort Meade Garrison Command and SHA to monitor local conditions </li></ul>Roadway Improvements <ul><li>Track construction progress </li></ul><ul><li>Support backup / mitigation efforts </li></ul><ul><li>Scan for new funding opportunities </li></ul><ul><li>Press for rapid implementation </li></ul><ul><li>Support identification of bus collection points and establishment of bus traffic priority </li></ul>Demand Management
  23. 23. <ul><li>END </li></ul>

×