Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Critical Reviews of TV Science
Documentaries
Jon Scott

School of
Biological Sciences
Aims
To encourage students to:
• think critically about and analyse documentary
material presented in the media
• research...
Exercise Brief
• Working in Groups (4 or 5 students)
• Provided with a DVD of a recent TV programme
on a Neuroscience topi...
Marking
• Content
– Overview of the programme content (10 %)

– Evaluation of the scientific accuracy and currency of the ...
Student Feedback
• Students’ Comments:
• ‘..was good to do a critical review on something
other than just a research paper...
Student views on the review exercise
100

% Respondents

90
80
70
60
50
40

30
20
10
0
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Critical reviews of TV science documentaries

1,832 views

Published on

Prof Jon Scott (Academic Registrar, University of Leicester) gave a short presentation at the Making the Most of Broadcast Media in Your Teaching day conference. Jon outlined an assessed activity conducted with final year bioscientists, in which they prepare a critical review of a designated TV science documentary.
The day conference was sponsored by the Higher Education Academy and took place at the University of Leicester on January 14th 2014.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Critical reviews of TV science documentaries

  1. 1. Critical Reviews of TV Science Documentaries Jon Scott School of Biological Sciences
  2. 2. Aims To encourage students to: • think critically about and analyse documentary material presented in the media • research the background to the documentary • as a group discuss their views about the programme • work as a group to prepare and deliver an oral presentation • critically evaluate the presentations of the other groups
  3. 3. Exercise Brief • Working in Groups (4 or 5 students) • Provided with a DVD of a recent TV programme on a Neuroscience topic – sourced via TRILT • Provided with the Marking Scheme • 3 weeks preparation time • Required to present a 15 minute critical review of the programme
  4. 4. Marking • Content – Overview of the programme content (10 %) – Evaluation of the scientific accuracy and currency of the programme (20 %) – Evaluation of the objectivity of the programme (20 %) – Evaluation of the quality of the presentation (10 %) – Effectiveness in targeting the audience (10 %) • Presentation – Clarity of the presentation (10 %) – Quality of the delivery (10 %) – Quality of the visual aids and their usage (10 %)
  5. 5. Student Feedback • Students’ Comments: • ‘..was good to do a critical review on something other than just a research paper, making the exercise more interesting.’ • ‘..improved the way I observe tv documentaries. I think I will be more critical in future and not just sit back and watch.’ • ‘It was interesting to see the differences in styles of thinking and evaluation between students in the group’. • ‘…gave us an understanding of exploring the information and criticising the information given’
  6. 6. Student views on the review exercise 100 % Respondents 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

×