Technological Barriers: Moving Toward Fully Accessible Websites, Application Materials, and Information Sharing

CIEE
CIEECIEE
TECHNOLOGICAL BARRIERS: 
Moving Toward Fully Accessible Websites, 
Application Materials, and Information Sharing 
Kate Fox, Whitney Strickler, Christian Vinten- 
Johansen 
Penn State University
WHAT IS “IT” ACCESSIBILITY? 
•Providing access to services and information and 
thereby complying with Title II of the ADA and 
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. 
What is it? 
•Federal law is usually taken seriously 
• …except regarding universal access to digital life 
• …until lately 
Why Should 
You Care? 
•Students and stakeholders with disabilities 
•Focus on technically challenging disabilities 
•Blindness 
•Deafness / hearing impaired 
Who Are We 
Doing This For?
THE LAW AND ACCESSIBILITY 
Why Hasn’t Accessibility Been Addressed? 
•Ambiguous court rulings and legal interpretation 
•Fear of moving first 
•Unknown costs 
•Design precedent 
The Laws 
•Rehabilitation Act of 1973 
•Section 504 
•Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) 
•ADA Amendment Act (2008)
PENN STATE & THE NATIONAL 
FEDERATION OF THE BLIND 
NFB Complaint 
•“Penn State subjects blind students and faculty to 
pervasive and ongoing discrimination in providing access 
to services and information and thereby violates Title II of 
the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.” 
Timeline 
•November 2010 – Press release 
•October 2011 – Settlement signed 
•October 2014 – Deadline to comply
THE SETTLEMENT: PSU AND THE NFB 
Requirements for Compliance 
•Audit 
•Policy update 
•Develop and post plan 
•All “official” web pages 
•Procurement process 
•Library websites and services 
•Learning Management System 
•Classrooms 
•Clickers
IN GOOD COMPANY 
Other Institutions Under Settlements 
•2014 – LSAC 
•2014 – University of Colorado, Boulder 
•2014 – Atlantic Cape Community College 
•2014 – Miami University of Ohio 
•2013 – Louisiana Tech 
•2013 – University of California, Berkeley 
•2013 – South Carolina Technical College System 
•2012 – University of Montana 
•2012 – Florida State University 
•2012 – Maricopa Community College District 
•2011 – Northwestern University 
•2011 – New York University 
•2010 – Penn State University 
•2009 – Law School Admissions Council 
•2009 – Arizona State, Princeton, Reed, Pace, Darden School of Business, Case Western 
•2007 – California State University San Bernardino 
•2005 – University of California
ACCESSIBLE VS. INACCESSIBLE 
CAN YOU HEAR THE DIFFERENCE?
HOW SCREEN READERS READ WEBSITES 
AND DOCUMENTS 
•Text transformed into audio and braille 
•Page is linear – reads top to bottom, but… 
•Can be navigated by lists of: 
•headings 
•links 
•form fields 
Text 
•Images need “alternative” text descriptions 
•Videos may need audio descriptions 
Images 
and Videos 
•Poor or missing text alternatives for images 
•Unlabeled form fields 
•Unstructured data tables 
•Missing page structure 
•Misleading or useless link text 
•Poor page design 
•Missing page title 
•Missing or no video captions 
Blockers
CONSEQUENCES OF INACCESSIBLE WEBSITES
LESSONS LEARNED 
Goal: Change Organizational Culture 
•Policies and strategies 
•Communities of practice 
•Processes and systems 
Top-down and Bottom-up Crucial to Success 
•Top-down = policies, strategies and influence 
•Bottom-up = develop skills in communities of practice 
Processes Ensure Consistency 
•Workflow for captioning videos 
•Q/A testing websites and content 
Common Language Facilitates Change 
Do Not Rely Too Heavily on Results of Automated Tools 
•Hire staff with disabilities to test websites 
Create Common Goals and Language Among Communities of Practice 
Policy Must Align with Federal Law
ADDRESSING ACCESSIBILITY: 
EDUCATION ABROAD OFFICE PERSPECTIVE 
• Can all students access online study abroad information 
and application processes without limitation? Ask 
• A student with visual impairment should not have any 
different of an experience navigating the study abroad 
process than a student with no visual impairment. Consider 
•While we can make accessibility a priority on the front-end, 
it is still important to have realistic conversations 
with a prospective student about the on-site experience 
and if similar accommodations could be made abroad. 
Remember
PUBLIC WEBSITE INFORMATION: HEADERS 
Proper Formatting 
of Headings 
• Screen readers can be told 
to read only the headings of 
a particular page; however 
the headers must be 
properly formatted for the 
reader to know it is a 
header. 
• Title of page: Heading 1 
• Next level: Heading 2 
• Next level: Heading 3 
• Headers should not be links.
PUBLIC WEBSITE INFORMATION: CONTENT 
Lists 
•Bulleted items 
•Numbered lists 
Text Formatting 
•Bold words and ALL CAPS cause the screen reader to shout the word at the user 
•Using directional language in text 
•Bad: “See below” 
•Embed Links into text 
•Good: Learn tips that will help keep study abroad affordable while searching for a program. 
•Bad: To learn more, click here 
•Very Bad: http://global.psu.edu/info/going-abroad/students/funding-study-abroad/keeping-it-affordable 
Acronyms 
•Screen readers read acronyms as words, not as separate letters 
•Example: United States written as “US” is pronounced “us”
PUBLIC WEBSITE INFORMATION: PHOTOS 
Photos 
•Alt tag: Description of what is actually shown in the photo 
•Caption: Brief explanation or attention-grabbing phrase 
about content of webpage
INFORMATION SHARING (EMAIL 
CORRESPONDENCE, ONLINE WEBINARS, ETC.) 
Email Correspondence 
•Same formatting guidelines as websites 
•Beware Attachments 
•Attached documents should be accessible too! 
Webinars and Videos 
•Provide written transcript with all audio 
Course Management Systems 
•Caution: Online content should be accessible too 
Social Media 
•Caution: Most social media apps are not accessible
INFORMATION SHARING: DOCUMENTS 
Microsoft Office 
•Word Documents 
•With proper headers and formatting Word documents can be accessible 
•Create a template to work from for all new documents 
•Excel 
•PowerPoint 
•Best to use existing templates 
•Avoid bells and whistles (e.g. spinning text) 
PDFs 
•Possible to make them accessible, however: 
•It’s time consuming 
•It’s very difficult 
•Better to convert into an accessible format 
•OR, offer an accessible alternative next to the PDF
PDF DEMO
UTILIZING STUDIOABROAD/APPLICATION 
DATABASE 
First, Is the Software You Use Accessible? 
•Terra Dotta has available a website with a voluntary report on the 
accessibility of StudioAbroad’s features. 
Applying Through StudioAbroad 
•Questionnaires 
•Instructions 
•Signature Documents 
•Materials (owned by your office) 
•Learning Content 
•Recommendations 
Communicating Through Studio 
•Email messages 
•Reminders
CASE STUDY: PROGRAM BROCHURE PAGES 
•Building a Template 
•Using a Test Page 
•Penn State Program Pages in StudioAbroad 
•Old version: CLOSED Dept HRIM: Maastricht 
•Updated Version: CIEE: Amman, Diplomacy and Policy Studies 
Front-facing: 
Program Pages 
•Materials and instructions provided to students once they have 
started an application should also be accessible. 
•Old Version: HRIM: Maastricht Application 
•Updated Version: CIEE Application Instructions 
Back-end: 
Materials/Documents 
•Try to match your program pages stylistically to the rest of your 
website. 
•Use the same theme throughout the site (i.e. budget sheet notes, 
materials, documents, etc.) 
•Team effort: Checks and Balances 
Tips
ACCESSIBILITY OF INTERNATIONAL 
PARTNER SITES AND DOCUMENTS 
Documents Owned by a Foreign Institution 
• What is the responsibility of your institution? 
Contacting Your Partners 
• Good Faith Effort 
• Create Awareness of Accessibility Issues 
• Example Email to Partners 
Implementing Outcome of Contact with Partner Institution 
• If provided an accessible document, use it! 
• If not provided an accessible document… 
• Arrange suitable alternative if possible and follow up with partner if 
necessary.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GLOBAL 
PROGRAMS 
Making an Office-wide Plan for Your Larger Unit 
•Priority 1: Public Facing Items 
•Website 
•Correspondence (e.g. email, newsletters, etc.) 
•PDF and online documents 
•Priority 2: Back-End Items 
•Application system 
•Internal documents
SCENARIOS/DISCUSSION 
Discussion Topics 
•Identifying problem areas in your universities/offices 
•Pin-point the problem areas 
•Volunteers?
RESOURCES 
Learn More About This Important Issue 
• National Federation of the Blind (NFB) offers an accessibility toolkit. 
• Mobility International USA (MIUSA) 
• Penn State AccessAbility website 
• W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 
• Penn State World Campus training module 
• Addresses accessibility of online course materials.
QUESTIONS 
Kate Fox 
Education 
Abroad Adviser 
Penn State 
kaf29@psu.edu 
Christian Vinten- 
Johansen 
IT Manager 
Penn State 
v23@psu.edu 
Whitney Strickler 
Education 
Abroad Adviser 
Penn State 
wss11@psu.edu
1 of 24

More Related Content

Similar to Technological Barriers: Moving Toward Fully Accessible Websites, Application Materials, and Information Sharing

Similar to Technological Barriers: Moving Toward Fully Accessible Websites, Application Materials, and Information Sharing(20)

Final presentation SACES 2014Final presentation SACES 2014
Final presentation SACES 2014
cmholmes1535 views
saces-online tools for the classroomsaces-online tools for the classroom
saces-online tools for the classroom
Jessica Haas229 views
Writing for the College Web Site Writing for the College Web Site
Writing for the College Web Site
Rosemary Jean-Louis412 views
Ud in-curriculum-4 ahead-2018-soloUd in-curriculum-4 ahead-2018-solo
Ud in-curriculum-4 ahead-2018-solo
Howard Kramer91 views
Accessibility and Inclusion in OERAccessibility and Inclusion in OER
Accessibility and Inclusion in OER
Jacqueline L. Frank98 views

More from CIEE(20)

Breakfast PresentationBreakfast Presentation
Breakfast Presentation
CIEE1.3K views
Washington UpdateWashington Update
Washington Update
CIEE276 views

Recently uploaded(20)

Lecture: Open InnovationLecture: Open Innovation
Lecture: Open Innovation
Michal Hron94 views
Plastic waste.pdfPlastic waste.pdf
Plastic waste.pdf
alqaseedae94 views
Classification of crude drugs.pptxClassification of crude drugs.pptx
Classification of crude drugs.pptx
GayatriPatra1460 views
Dance KS5 BreakdownDance KS5 Breakdown
Dance KS5 Breakdown
WestHatch53 views
STERILITY TEST.pptxSTERILITY TEST.pptx
STERILITY TEST.pptx
Anupkumar Sharma107 views
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptxChemistry of sex hormones.pptx
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptx
RAJ K. MAURYA107 views
Universe revised.pdfUniverse revised.pdf
Universe revised.pdf
DrHafizKosar88 views
GSoC 2024GSoC 2024
GSoC 2024
DeveloperStudentClub1056 views
Streaming Quiz 2023.pdfStreaming Quiz 2023.pdf
Streaming Quiz 2023.pdf
Quiz Club NITW97 views
Gopal Chakraborty Memorial Quiz 2.0 Prelims.pptxGopal Chakraborty Memorial Quiz 2.0 Prelims.pptx
Gopal Chakraborty Memorial Quiz 2.0 Prelims.pptx
Debapriya Chakraborty479 views
Psychology KS4Psychology KS4
Psychology KS4
WestHatch54 views
Drama KS5 BreakdownDrama KS5 Breakdown
Drama KS5 Breakdown
WestHatch54 views
AI Tools for Business and StartupsAI Tools for Business and Startups
AI Tools for Business and Startups
Svetlin Nakov74 views
CWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdfCWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdf
CWP_23995_2013_17_11_2023_FINAL_ORDER.pdf
SukhwinderSingh895865480 views
231112 (WR) v1  ChatGPT OEB 2023.pdf231112 (WR) v1  ChatGPT OEB 2023.pdf
231112 (WR) v1 ChatGPT OEB 2023.pdf
WilfredRubens.com118 views

Technological Barriers: Moving Toward Fully Accessible Websites, Application Materials, and Information Sharing

  • 1. TECHNOLOGICAL BARRIERS: Moving Toward Fully Accessible Websites, Application Materials, and Information Sharing Kate Fox, Whitney Strickler, Christian Vinten- Johansen Penn State University
  • 2. WHAT IS “IT” ACCESSIBILITY? •Providing access to services and information and thereby complying with Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. What is it? •Federal law is usually taken seriously • …except regarding universal access to digital life • …until lately Why Should You Care? •Students and stakeholders with disabilities •Focus on technically challenging disabilities •Blindness •Deafness / hearing impaired Who Are We Doing This For?
  • 3. THE LAW AND ACCESSIBILITY Why Hasn’t Accessibility Been Addressed? •Ambiguous court rulings and legal interpretation •Fear of moving first •Unknown costs •Design precedent The Laws •Rehabilitation Act of 1973 •Section 504 •Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) •ADA Amendment Act (2008)
  • 4. PENN STATE & THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND NFB Complaint •“Penn State subjects blind students and faculty to pervasive and ongoing discrimination in providing access to services and information and thereby violates Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.” Timeline •November 2010 – Press release •October 2011 – Settlement signed •October 2014 – Deadline to comply
  • 5. THE SETTLEMENT: PSU AND THE NFB Requirements for Compliance •Audit •Policy update •Develop and post plan •All “official” web pages •Procurement process •Library websites and services •Learning Management System •Classrooms •Clickers
  • 6. IN GOOD COMPANY Other Institutions Under Settlements •2014 – LSAC •2014 – University of Colorado, Boulder •2014 – Atlantic Cape Community College •2014 – Miami University of Ohio •2013 – Louisiana Tech •2013 – University of California, Berkeley •2013 – South Carolina Technical College System •2012 – University of Montana •2012 – Florida State University •2012 – Maricopa Community College District •2011 – Northwestern University •2011 – New York University •2010 – Penn State University •2009 – Law School Admissions Council •2009 – Arizona State, Princeton, Reed, Pace, Darden School of Business, Case Western •2007 – California State University San Bernardino •2005 – University of California
  • 7. ACCESSIBLE VS. INACCESSIBLE CAN YOU HEAR THE DIFFERENCE?
  • 8. HOW SCREEN READERS READ WEBSITES AND DOCUMENTS •Text transformed into audio and braille •Page is linear – reads top to bottom, but… •Can be navigated by lists of: •headings •links •form fields Text •Images need “alternative” text descriptions •Videos may need audio descriptions Images and Videos •Poor or missing text alternatives for images •Unlabeled form fields •Unstructured data tables •Missing page structure •Misleading or useless link text •Poor page design •Missing page title •Missing or no video captions Blockers
  • 10. LESSONS LEARNED Goal: Change Organizational Culture •Policies and strategies •Communities of practice •Processes and systems Top-down and Bottom-up Crucial to Success •Top-down = policies, strategies and influence •Bottom-up = develop skills in communities of practice Processes Ensure Consistency •Workflow for captioning videos •Q/A testing websites and content Common Language Facilitates Change Do Not Rely Too Heavily on Results of Automated Tools •Hire staff with disabilities to test websites Create Common Goals and Language Among Communities of Practice Policy Must Align with Federal Law
  • 11. ADDRESSING ACCESSIBILITY: EDUCATION ABROAD OFFICE PERSPECTIVE • Can all students access online study abroad information and application processes without limitation? Ask • A student with visual impairment should not have any different of an experience navigating the study abroad process than a student with no visual impairment. Consider •While we can make accessibility a priority on the front-end, it is still important to have realistic conversations with a prospective student about the on-site experience and if similar accommodations could be made abroad. Remember
  • 12. PUBLIC WEBSITE INFORMATION: HEADERS Proper Formatting of Headings • Screen readers can be told to read only the headings of a particular page; however the headers must be properly formatted for the reader to know it is a header. • Title of page: Heading 1 • Next level: Heading 2 • Next level: Heading 3 • Headers should not be links.
  • 13. PUBLIC WEBSITE INFORMATION: CONTENT Lists •Bulleted items •Numbered lists Text Formatting •Bold words and ALL CAPS cause the screen reader to shout the word at the user •Using directional language in text •Bad: “See below” •Embed Links into text •Good: Learn tips that will help keep study abroad affordable while searching for a program. •Bad: To learn more, click here •Very Bad: http://global.psu.edu/info/going-abroad/students/funding-study-abroad/keeping-it-affordable Acronyms •Screen readers read acronyms as words, not as separate letters •Example: United States written as “US” is pronounced “us”
  • 14. PUBLIC WEBSITE INFORMATION: PHOTOS Photos •Alt tag: Description of what is actually shown in the photo •Caption: Brief explanation or attention-grabbing phrase about content of webpage
  • 15. INFORMATION SHARING (EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE, ONLINE WEBINARS, ETC.) Email Correspondence •Same formatting guidelines as websites •Beware Attachments •Attached documents should be accessible too! Webinars and Videos •Provide written transcript with all audio Course Management Systems •Caution: Online content should be accessible too Social Media •Caution: Most social media apps are not accessible
  • 16. INFORMATION SHARING: DOCUMENTS Microsoft Office •Word Documents •With proper headers and formatting Word documents can be accessible •Create a template to work from for all new documents •Excel •PowerPoint •Best to use existing templates •Avoid bells and whistles (e.g. spinning text) PDFs •Possible to make them accessible, however: •It’s time consuming •It’s very difficult •Better to convert into an accessible format •OR, offer an accessible alternative next to the PDF
  • 18. UTILIZING STUDIOABROAD/APPLICATION DATABASE First, Is the Software You Use Accessible? •Terra Dotta has available a website with a voluntary report on the accessibility of StudioAbroad’s features. Applying Through StudioAbroad •Questionnaires •Instructions •Signature Documents •Materials (owned by your office) •Learning Content •Recommendations Communicating Through Studio •Email messages •Reminders
  • 19. CASE STUDY: PROGRAM BROCHURE PAGES •Building a Template •Using a Test Page •Penn State Program Pages in StudioAbroad •Old version: CLOSED Dept HRIM: Maastricht •Updated Version: CIEE: Amman, Diplomacy and Policy Studies Front-facing: Program Pages •Materials and instructions provided to students once they have started an application should also be accessible. •Old Version: HRIM: Maastricht Application •Updated Version: CIEE Application Instructions Back-end: Materials/Documents •Try to match your program pages stylistically to the rest of your website. •Use the same theme throughout the site (i.e. budget sheet notes, materials, documents, etc.) •Team effort: Checks and Balances Tips
  • 20. ACCESSIBILITY OF INTERNATIONAL PARTNER SITES AND DOCUMENTS Documents Owned by a Foreign Institution • What is the responsibility of your institution? Contacting Your Partners • Good Faith Effort • Create Awareness of Accessibility Issues • Example Email to Partners Implementing Outcome of Contact with Partner Institution • If provided an accessible document, use it! • If not provided an accessible document… • Arrange suitable alternative if possible and follow up with partner if necessary.
  • 21. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GLOBAL PROGRAMS Making an Office-wide Plan for Your Larger Unit •Priority 1: Public Facing Items •Website •Correspondence (e.g. email, newsletters, etc.) •PDF and online documents •Priority 2: Back-End Items •Application system •Internal documents
  • 22. SCENARIOS/DISCUSSION Discussion Topics •Identifying problem areas in your universities/offices •Pin-point the problem areas •Volunteers?
  • 23. RESOURCES Learn More About This Important Issue • National Federation of the Blind (NFB) offers an accessibility toolkit. • Mobility International USA (MIUSA) • Penn State AccessAbility website • W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 • Penn State World Campus training module • Addresses accessibility of online course materials.
  • 24. QUESTIONS Kate Fox Education Abroad Adviser Penn State kaf29@psu.edu Christian Vinten- Johansen IT Manager Penn State v23@psu.edu Whitney Strickler Education Abroad Adviser Penn State wss11@psu.edu